Anastasi, A. (1982). Psychological testing. 5th edition. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co. Inc.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. A. (1957). Significance of growth and development to the practicing physician. In Harris (1957).

Armstrong, L. (2003). Every second counts: from recovery to victory. London: Yellow Jersey Press.Google Scholar

Axtell, G. (2000). Knowledge, belief, and character: readings in virtue epistemology. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.Google Scholar

Bainton, R. H. (1950). Here I stand: a life of Martin Luther. New York: Signet.Google Scholar

Baldwin, J. (2005). www.inspirationalstories.com/0/91.html

Bickhard, M. (2003). Process and emergence: normative function and representation. In Seibt, J. (ed.), Process theories: crossdisciplinary studies in dynamic categories. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bjorklund, D. & Pellegrini, A. (2002). The origins of human nature. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Blank, G. (2002). www.drblank.com/slaws.htm

Bornstein, M. & Lamb, M. (1992). Developmental psychology: an advanced textbook. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Brandom, R. (1994). Making it explicit: reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Brandom, R. (2000). Articulating reasons: an introduction to inferentialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, T. & Weiss, L. (1987). Structures, procedures, heuristics and affectivity. Archives de Psychologie, 55, 59–94. Reprinted in L. Smith (1992), Jean Piaget: critical assessments, vol. IV. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Changeux, J-P. (2000). Co-author. In Changeux, J-P. & Ricoeur, P., What makes us think?Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Cole, M., Cole, S. & Lightfoot, C. (2005). The development of children. 5th edition. New York: Worth Publishing.Google Scholar

Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (2004). What is evolutionary psychology? Explaining the new science of the mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Cresswell, M. & Hughes, G. (1996). A new introduction to modal logic. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Damasio, A. (2003). Looking for Spinoza. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar

Damon, W. (1998). Handbook of child psychology. 5th edition. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (1999). The extended phenotype: the long reach of the gene. Revised edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Durkheim, E. (1901). The rules of sociological method. In Lukes, S. (1982). London: Macmillan Press Ltd.Google Scholar

Flavell, J., Miller, P. & Miller, S. (1993). Cognitive development. 3rd edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Frege, G. (1964). The basic laws of arithmetic. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (1982). Developmental psychology: an introduction. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. & Selten, R. (2001). Bounded rationality: the adaptive toolbox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Goldman, A. (2001). Pathways of knowledge: public and private. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Goswami, U. (2002). Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, J. (1992). Between facts and norms: contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Harris, D. B. (1957). The concept of development. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Hawking, S. (2001). The universe in a nutshell. London: Bantam Press.Google Scholar

Horty, J. F. (2001). Agency and deontic logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hume, D. (1965). Treatise of human nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Humphrey, G. (1963). Thinking. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Inhelder, B. & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Isaacs, N. (1951). Critical notice. British Journal of Psychology, 42, 185–8.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1780). On universal practical philosophy. In Heath, P. & Schneewind, J. (1997), Lectures on ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. In Paton, H. J. (1948), The moral law. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1800). Introduction to logic. In Abbott, T. K. (1972), Kant's Introduction to logic. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

King, M. L. (1968). The role of the behavioural scientist in the Civil Rights movement. American Psychologist, 23, 180–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitcher, P. (1992). The naturalists return. The Philosophical Review, 101, 53, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korsgaard, C. (1996). The sources of normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. (2000). The road beyond structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Laudan, L. (1996). Beyond positivism and relativism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

LeTour (2005). www.letour.fr/indexus.html

Longuenesse, B. (1998). Kant and the capacity to judge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

MacIntyre, A. (1998). A short history of ethics. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mandler, J. (1998). Babies think before they speak. Human Development, 41, 116–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marcus, R. B. (1993). Modalities: philosophical essays. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mason, H. E. (1996). Moral dilemmas and moral theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: an experimental view. London: Tavistock Publications Ltd.Google Scholar

Milgram, S. (1992). Individual in a social world. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Mooney, C. (2003). www.csicop.org/doubtandabout/polling/

Nadel, I. (2002). Double act: a life of Tom Stoppard. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Neisser, U. (1998). The rising curve. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Nozick, R. (2001). Invariances. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Peng, K. & Nisbett, R. E. (1999). Culture, dialecticism, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 54, 741–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piaget, J. (1918). Recherche. Lausanne: La Concorde.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1953). Origins of intelligence in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1976). The grasp of consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1995). Sociological studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Plotkin, H. (1997). Evolution in mind. London: Allen Lane Press.Google Scholar

Popper, K. R. (1968). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar

Popper, K. (1979). Objective knowledge. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pufendorf, S. (1703). Of the law of nature and nations. Oxford: Lichfield.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. (2002). The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy, and other essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Quine, W. (1972). Methods of logic. 3rd edition. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, P. (2000). Co-author. In Changeux, J-P. & Ricoeur, P., What makes us think?Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Ross, A. (1968). Directives and norms. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Sainsbury, R. M. (1991). Logical forms. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Searle, J. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Shayer, M. (2007). 30 years on – a large anti-‘Flynn effect’? The Piagetian test volume & heaviness norms 1975–2003. Brilish Journal of Educational Psychology.CrossRef

Siegler, R. S. (1991). Children's thinking. 2nd edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1981). Sciences of the artificial. 2nd edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviourism. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar

Slater, A. & Muir, D. (1999). Blackwell reader in developmental psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, L. (1993). Necessary knowledge. Hove, UK: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Smith, L. (2002). Reasoning by mathematical induction in children's arithmetic. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Smith, L. (2003). From epistemology to psychology in the development of knowledge. In Brown, T. & Smith, L. (eds.), Reductionism and the development of knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Spencer, R. (1957). Evolution and development: a view of anthropology. In Harris (1957).

Spinoza, B. (1963). Short treatise. New York: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar

Summers, L. H. (2005). Remarks at NBER conference on diversifying the science & engineering workforce. President, Harvard University homepage.

Wason, P. (1977). Self-contradictions. In Johnson-Laird, P. & Wason, P. (eds.), Thinking: readings in cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Watson, J. B. (1930). Behaviorism. New York: Norton & Company Inc.Google Scholar

Wright, G. H. (1963). Norm and action. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Wright, G. H. (1968). The varieties of goodness. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Wright, G. H. (1983). Practical reason. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

, Aristotle (1928). περι ψυξήγ. In Oeuvres complètes. Paris: Guillaume Budé.Google Scholar

Baldwin, J. M. (1902). Development and evolution. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Baldwin, J. M. (1906, 1908, 1911). Thoughts and things or genetic logic. 3 vols. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bergson, H. (1911). Creative evolution (trans. A. Mitchell). New York: Holt.Google Scholar

Bosanquet, B. (1888). On the morphology of knowledge. 2 vols. London/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cassirer, E. (1903–20). Das Erkenntnisproblem. 3 vols. Berlin: B. Cassirer.Google Scholar

Cassirer, E. (1953, 1955, 1957). Philosophy of symbolic forms. 3 vols. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Damasio, A. (2003). Looking for Spinoza. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: Murray.Google Scholar

Durkheim, E. (1897). Le suicide. Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar

Furth, H. (1986). The social function of Piaget's theory: a response to Apostel. New Ideas, 4 (1), 23–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobhouse, L. T. (1888). Theory of knowledge. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hobhouse, L. T. (1912). Mind in evolution. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Huxley, T. H. (1881). Science and culture. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Henry Holt, vol. II.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1972). Introduction to logic. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Liard, L. (1873). De Democrito philosopho. Paris.Google Scholar

Lovejoy, A. O. (1936). The great chain of being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Maturana, H. R. & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piaget, J. (1936). La naissance de l'intelligence chez l'enfant. Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1953). The origins of intelligence in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Popper, K. (1928). Die Methodenfrage der Denkpsychologie. Vienna: unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vienna University.

Russell, E. (1946). The defectiveness of organic activities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sigwart, C. (1894–5). Logic. 2 vols. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Thompson, D. A. W. (1942). On growth and form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Werner, H. & Kaplan, B. (1963). Symbol formation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Wright, G. H. (1983). Practical reason. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wundt, W. (1880). Logik. Stuttgart: Enke.Google Scholar

Aristotle (1908). De anima (On the soul). In Ross, W. D. (ed.), The works of Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press, §424a, pp. 17–22.Google Scholar

Bickhard, M. H. (1980). A model of developmental and psychological processes. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 102, 61–116.Google Scholar

Bickhard, M. H. (1988). Piaget on variation and selection models: structuralism, logical necessity, and interactivism. Human Development, 31, 274–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bickhard, M. H. (1989). The nature of psychopathology. In Simek-Downing, Lynn (ed.), International psychotherapy: theories, research, and cross-cultural implications. Westport, CT: Praeger Press, pp. 115–40.Google Scholar

Bickhard, M. H. (1992a). How does the environment affect the person? In Winegar, L. T. & Valsiner, J. (eds.), Children's development within social contexts: metatheory and theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 63–92.Google Scholar

Bickhard, M. H. (1992b). Scaffolding and self scaffolding: central aspects of development. In Winegar, L. T. & Valsiner, J. (eds.), Children's development within social contexts: research and methodology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 33–52.Google Scholar

Bickhard, M. H. (1992c). Piaget on variation and selection models: structuralism, logical necessity, and interactivism. In Smith, L. (ed.), Jean Piaget: critical assessments, vol. IV. London: Routledge, ch. 83, pp. 388–434. (Reprint of 1988)Google Scholar

Bickhard, M. H. (1992d). Commentary on the age 4 transition. Human Development, 35 (3), 182–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bickhard, M. H. (1993). Representational content in humans and machines. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 5, 285–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bickhard, M. H. (2000a). Motivation and emotion: an interactive process model. In Ellis, R. D. & Newton, N. (eds.), The caldron of consciousness. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins, pp. 161–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bickhard, M. H. (2000b). Emergence. In Andersen, P. B., Emmeche, C., Finnemann, N. O. & Christiansen, P. V. (eds.), Downward causation. Aarhus, Denmark: University of Aarhus Press, pp. 322–48.Google Scholar

Bickhard, M. H. (2001). Why children don't have to solve the frame problems: cognitive representations are not encodings. Developmental Review, 21, 224–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bickhard, M. H. (2003a). An integration of motivation and cognition. In Smith, L., Rogers, C. & Tomlinson, P. (eds.), Development and motivation: joint perspectives. Leicester: British Psychological Society, Monograph Series II, pp. 41–56.Google Scholar

Bickhard, M. H. (2003b). Process and emergence: normative function and representation. In Seibt, J. (ed.), Process theories: crossdisciplinary studies in dynamic categories. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp. 121–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bickhard, M. H. (2003c). The biological emergence of representation. In Brown, T. & Smith, L. (eds.), Reductionism and the development of knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 105–31.Google Scholar

Bickhard, M. H. (in preparation). The whole person.

Bickhard, M. H. & Campbell, R. L. (1989). Interactivism and genetic epistemology. Archives de Psychologie, 57 (221), 99–121.Google Scholar

Bickhard, M. H. & Campbell, R. L. (1996). Topologies of learning and development. New Ideas in Psychology, 14 (2), 111–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bickhard, M. H. & Richie, D. M. (1983). On the nature of representation: a case study of James Gibson's theory of perception. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar

Brady, G. (2000). From Peirce to Skolem. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Campbell, D. T. (1974). Evolutionary epistemology. In Schilpp, P. A. (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper. LaSalle, IL: Open Court, pp. 413–63.Google Scholar

Campbell, D. T. (1990). Levels of organization, downward causation, and the selection-theory approach to evolutionary epistemology. In G. Greenberg, & Tobach, E. (eds.), Theories of the evolution of knowing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar

Campbell, R. (1992). Truth and historicity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, R. L. & Bickhard, M. H. (1986). Knowing levels and developmental stages. Contributions to Human Development. Basel, Switzerland: Karger.Google Scholar

Campbell, R. L. & Bickhard, M. H. (1992). Types of constraints on development: an interactivist approach. Developmental Review, 12 (3), 311–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caston, V. (1997). Epiphenomenalisms, ancient and modern. Philosophical Review, 106 (3), 309–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christensen, W. D. & Bickhard, M. H. (2002). The process dynamics of normative function. Monist, 85 (1), 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coffa, J. A. (1991). The semantic tradition from Kant to Carnap. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fodor, J. A. (1987). A situated grandmother?Mind and Language, 2, 64–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fodor, J. A. (1990a). Information and representation. In Hanson, P. P. (ed.), Information, language, and cognition. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, pp. 175–90.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. A. (1990b). Fodor's guide to mental representation. In Fodor, J. A. (ed.), A theory of mental content and other essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. A. (2003). Hume variations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gill, M-L. (1989). Aristotle on substance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hume, D. (1978). A treatise of human nature. Index by L. A. Selby-Bigge; Notes by P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hylton, P. (1990). Russell, idealism, and the emergence of analytic philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Juarrero, A. (1999). Dynamics in action: intentional behavior as a complex system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Olson, K. R. (1987). An essay on facts. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piaget, J. (2001). Studies in reflecting abstraction, ed. and trans. Robert L. Campbell. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Plato (1892). Theaetetus. In The dialogues of Plato, vol. IV, ed. and trans. B. Jowett. Oxford: Clarendon Press, p. 191.

Rouse, J. (2002). How scientific practices matter: reclaiming philosophical naturalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Alston, W. (1989). Epistemic justification. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Apostel, L. et al. (1957). Les liaisons analytiques et synthétiques dans les comportements du sujet. In Etudes d'épistémologie génétique, vol. IV. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Aristotle (1984). Nichomachean ethics. In Barnes, J. (ed.), The complete works of Aristotle, vol. II. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 1, 729–867.Google Scholar

Armstrong, D. (1973). Belief, truth and knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Axtell, G. (2000). Knowledge, belief, and character. Lanham, MD: Rowman.Google Scholar

Bicchieri, C. (1993). Rationality and coordination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bonjour, L. (1985). The structure of empirical knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Chisholm, R. (1977). Theory of knowledge. 2nd edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Churchland, P. (1979). Scientific realism and the plasticity of mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clifford, W. (1999). The ethics of belief and other essays. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.Google Scholar

Conee, E. & Feldman, R. (2004). Evidentialism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copp, D. (2001). Morality, normativity, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dancy, J. & Sosa, E. (eds.) (1992). A companion to epistemology. Oxford: Blackwell's.Google Scholar

Danielson, P. (1992). Artificial morality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Descartes, R. (1984). Meditations on first philosophy. In Cottingham, J. et al. (eds., trans.), The philosophical writings of Descartes, vol. II. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–62. (Original work published 1641.)Google Scholar

Fairweather, A. & Zagzebski, L. (eds.) (2001). Virtue epistemology: essays on epistemic virtue and responsibility. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gauthier, D. (1986). Morals by agreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Ginet, C. (1975). Knowledge, perception and memory. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldman, A. I. (l986). Epistemology and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef

Goldman, A. I. (1992). Liaisons: philosophy meets the cognitive and social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Goldman, A. (2001). Social epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology-social

Hamlyn, D. (1971). Epistemology and conceptual development. In Mischel, T. (ed.), Cognitive development and epistemology. New York: Academic Press, pp. 3–24.

Inhelder, B. (1981). Some aspects of Piaget's genetic approach to cognition. In Furth, H. (ed.), Piaget and knowledge: theoretical foundations. 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 22–39.Google Scholar

Kitchener, R. F. (1986). Piaget's theory of knowledge: genetic epistemology and scientific reason. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitchener, R. F. (1999). The conduct of inquiry: an introduction to logic and scientific method. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Kitchener, R. F. (ed.) (ed.) (2000). Special issue: Piaget's Sociological studies. New Ideas In Psychology, 18, 119–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitchener, R. F. (2003). Piaget's social epistemology. In Carpendale, J. & Müller, U. (eds.), Social interaction and the development of knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 45–67.Google Scholar

Kitchener, R. F. (forthcoming). Developmental epistemology: cognitive development and naturalistic epistemology. (Book manuscript.)

Kitcher, P. (1992). The naturalists return. Philosophical Review, 101, 53–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kripke, S. A. (1982). Wittgenstein on rules and private language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Laudan, L. (1987). Progress or rationality? The prospects for normative naturalism. American Philosophical Quarterly, 24, 19–31.Google Scholar

Locke, J. (1975). An essay concerning human understanding (ed. P. H. Niddith, 4th edition). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Maffie, J. (1990). Recent work on naturalized epistemology. American Philosophical Quarterly, 27, 281–93.Google Scholar

Opp, D. (1983). Die Enstehung der sozialer Normen. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1942). Les trois structures fondamentales de la vie psychique: rythme, régulation et groupement. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Psychologie und ihre Anwendungen, 1, 9–21.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1950). Introduction à l'épistémologie génétique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, vol. I.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1955). Les lignes générales de l'épistémologie génétique. In Actes du deuxième Congrès international de l'Union internationale de philosophie des sciences, Zurich, 1954, vol. I. Neuchâtel: de Griffon, pp. 26–45.

Piaget, J. (1957). Programme et méthodes de l'épistémologie génétique. In Etudes d'épistémologie génétique, vol. I. Epistémologie génétique et recherche psychologique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 13–84.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1962). Défense de l'épistémologie génétique. In Etudes d'épistémologie génétique, vol. XVI. Implication, formalization et logique naturelle. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 165–91.

Piaget, J. (1967a). Nature et méthodes de l'épistémologie. In Piaget, J. (ed.), Logique et connaissance scientifique. Paris: Gallimard, pp. 3–61.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1967b). Les méthodes de l'épistémologie. In Piaget, J. (ed.), Logique et connaissance scientifique. Paris: Gallimard, pp. 62–126.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1971a). Psychology and epistemology. New York: Viking.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1971b). Genetic epistemology. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1972a). Insights and illusions of philosophy (trans. W. Mays, 2nd edition). New York: World Publishing Co. (Original work published 1968.)Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1972b). The principles of genetic epistemology (trans. W. Mays). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1970.)Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibration of cognitive structures: the central problem of intellectual development (trans. T. Brown & K. J. Thampy). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1975.)Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1986). Essay on necessity (trans. L. Smith & F. Steel). Human development, 29, 301–14.CrossRef

Piaget, J. (1995). Sociological studies (ed. L. Smith, trans. L. Smith et al.). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Plantinga, A. (1993a). Warrant and proper function. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plantinga, A. (1993b). Warrant: the current debate. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. (1951). Two dogmas of empiricism. Philosophical Review, 60, 20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. (1969). Epistemology naturalized. In his Ontological relativity and other essays. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 69–90.Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Schmitt, F. (1994). Socializing epistemology: an introduction through two sample issues. In Schmitt, F. (ed.), Socializing epistemology: the social dimensions of knowledge. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar

Smith, L. (1993). Necessary knowledge. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Smith, L. (1995). Introduction. In Smith, L. (ed., trans. L. Smith et al.), Jean Piaget: sociological studies. London: Routledge, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar

Sosa, E. (1991). Knowledge in perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sugden, R. (1986). The economics of rights, cooperation and welfare. Oxford: Blackwell's.Google Scholar

Taylor, M. (1984). The possibility of cooperation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ullmann-Margalit, E. (1977). The emergence of norms. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Zagzebski, L. (1996). Virtues of the mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adey, P. & Shayer, M. (2002). Cognitive acceleration comes of age. In Shayer, M. & Adey, P. (eds.), Learning intelligence. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Aristotle (1987). On the soul. In Ackrill, J. (ed.), New Aristotle reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Audi, R. (1999). The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bell, V. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1998). A model theory of modal reasoning. Cognitive Science, 22, 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Bickhard, M. (2003). The biological emergence of representation. In Brown, T. & Smith, L. (eds.), Reductionism and the development of knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Bjorklund, D. & Pellegrini, A. (2002). The origins of human nature.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Braine, M. & O'Brien, D. (1998). Mental logic. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Brandom, R. (1994). Making it explicit: reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Brandom, R. (2000). Articulating reasons: an introduction to inferentialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bryant, P. (2001). Learning in Geneva: the contribution of Bärbel Inhelder and her colleagues. In Typhon, A. & Vonèche, J. (eds.), Working with Piaget: essays in honour of Bärbel Inhelder. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Byrnes, J. & Duff, M. (1989). Young children's comprehension of modal expressions. Cognitive Development, 4, 369–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carl, W. (1994). Frege's theory of sense and reference: its origins and scope. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, L. (1895). What the tortoise said to Achilles. Mind, 4, 278–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chalmers, D. (1996). The conscious mind: in search of a fundamental theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Changeux, J-P. (2000). Co-author. In Changeux, J-P. & Ricoeur, P., What makes us think?Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Cheng, P. & Holyoak, K. (1985). Pragmatic reasoning schemas. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 391–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31, 187–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (2004). What is evolutionary psychology? Explaining the new science of the mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Cresswell, M. & Hughes, G. (1996). A new introduction to modal logic. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Damon, W. (1977). The social world of the child. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (1999). The extended phenotype: the long reach of the gene. Revised edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Descartes, R. (1931). Meditations on first philosophy. In Haldane, E. & Ross, G. (eds.), Philosophical works of Descartes, vol. I. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar

Dummett, M. (1981). Frege: philosophy of language. 2nd edition. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Evans, J. (2002). Logic and human reasoning: an assessment of the deduction paradigm. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 978–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ferrari, M., Pinard, A. & Runions, K. (2001). Piaget's framework for a scientific study of consciousness. Human Development, 44, 195–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiddick, L. (2003). Is there a faculty of deontic reasoning? A critical re-evaluation of abstract deontic versions of the Wason selection task. In Over, D. (ed.). Evolution and the psychology of thinking. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Fiddick, L. (2004). Domains of deontic reasoning: resolving the discrepancy between the cognitive and moral reasoning literatures. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 447–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Flavell, J., Miller, P. & Miller, S. (1993). Cognitive development. 3rd edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Frege, G. (1950). The foundations of arithmetic. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Frege, G. (1964). The basic laws of arithmetic. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Frege, G. (1977). Logical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Frege, G. (1979). Posthumous papers. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Goldman, A. (2001). Pathways of knowledge: public and private. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gruber, H. & Vonèche, J. (1995). The essential Piaget. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson Inc.Google Scholar

Harris, P. L. & Núñez, M. (1996). Understanding of permission rules by preschool children. Child Development, 67, 1572–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hawking, S. (2001). The universe in a nutshell. London: Bantam Press.Google Scholar

Holbo, J. (2002). Moral dilemma and the logic of obligation. American Philosophical Quarterly, 39, 259–74.Google Scholar

Horty, J. F. (2001). Agency and deontic logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Humphrey, G. (1951). Thinking. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Huxley, T. H. (1868). A liberal education. In Bibby, C. (1971), Huxley on education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Isaacs, N. (1951). Critical notice. British Journal of Psychology, 42, 185–8.Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird, P. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird, P. (1999). Deductive reasoning. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 109–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kant, I. (1993). Critique of practical reason. 3rd edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1997). Lectures on ethics. In Collected works. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenny, A. (1995). Frege. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Kitcher, P. (1992). The naturalists return. The Philosophical Review, 101, 53–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klahr, D. (1999). The conceptual habitat: in what kind of system can concepts develop? In Scholnick, E., Nelson, K., Gelman, S. & Miller, P. (eds.), Conceptual development: Piaget's legacy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Korsgaard, C. (1996). The sources of normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kripke, S. (1982). Wittgenstein on rules and private language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. (1977). The essential tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kusch, M. (1995). Psychologism: a case study in the sociology of philosophical knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lakatos, I. (1974). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In Lakatos, I. & Musgrave, A. (eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Macnamara, J. (1994). The logical foundations of cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mason, H. E. (1996). Moral dilemmas and moral theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Morf, A. (1957). Les relations entre la logique et la langage lors du passage du raisonnement concrèt au raisonnement formel. In Apostel, L., Mandelbrot, B. & Morf, A., Logique, langage, et théorie de l'information. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Morgan, P. (2005). The insider. London: Ebury Press.Google Scholar

Moser, P. (1999). Epistemology. In Audi, R. (ed.), The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nagel, T. (1995). Other minds: critical essays 1969–94. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Peng, K. & Nisbett, R. (1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 54, 741–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piaget, J. (1918). Recherche. Lausanne: La Concorde.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1950). Introduction à l'épistémologie génétique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, vol. I.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1952). The child's conception of number. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1953). Logic and psychology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1965). Discussion: genèse et structure en psychologie. In Gandillac, M. & Goldman, L. (eds.), Entretiens sur les notions de genèse et de structure. Paris: Mouton & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piaget, J. (1966). Part II. In Beth, E. & Piaget, J., Mathematical epistemology and psychology. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1970a). Genetic epistemology. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1970b). A conversation with Jean Piaget. Psychology Today, 3, 25–32.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1971). Biology and knowledge. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1973). Main trends in psychology. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1974). The child and reality. London: Frederick Muller Ltd.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1985). Equilibration of cognitive structures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1986). Essay on necessity. Human Development, 29, 301–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piaget, J. (1995). Sociological studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (2001). Studies in reflecting abstraction. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (2006). Reason. New Ideas in Psychology.CrossRef

Piaget, J. & Garcia, J. (1991). Toward a logic of meanings. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Popper, K. (1979). Objective knowledge. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Priest, G. (1998). What is so bad about contradictions?The Journal of Philosophy, 95, 410–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, H. (2002). The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy, and other essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Quine, W. (1972). Methods of logic. 3rd edition. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, P. (2000). Co-author. In Changeux, J-P. & Ricoeur, P., What makes us think?Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Ross, A. (1968). Directives and norms. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Sainsbury, R. M. (1991). Logical forms. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Scholnick, E. & Wing, C. (1995). Logic in conversation: comparative studies of deduction in children and adults. Cognitive Development, 10, 319–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Searle, J. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Searle, J. (1999). Mind, language and society. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar

Searle, J. (2001). Rationality in action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Shayer, M. (1997). Piaget and Vygotsky: a necessary marriage for effective intervention. In Smith, L., Dockrell, J. & Tomlinson, P. (eds.), Piaget, Vygotsky and beyond. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Shayer, M. & Adey, P. (1981). Towards a science of science teaching. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Shayer, M. & Adey, P. (2002). Learning intelligence. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Shayer, M. & Adhami, M. (2003). Realising the cognitive potential of children 5–7 with a mathematics focus. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 743–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sluga, H. (1980). Gottlob Frege. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Smith, L. (1993). Necessary knowledge. Hove, UK: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Smith, L. (1998). On the development of mental representation. Developmental Review, 18, 202–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, L. (1999a). What Piaget learned from Frege. Developmental Review, 19, 133–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, L. (1999b). Epistemological principles for developmental psychology in Frege and Piaget. New Ideas in Psychology, 17, 83–117, 137–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, L. (1999c). Representation and knowledge are not the same thing. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 22, 784–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, L. (2002a). Reasoning by mathematical induction in children's arithmetic. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Smith, L. (2002b). Piaget's model. In Goswami, U. (ed.), Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, L. (2003). From epistemology to psychology in the development of knowledge. In Brown, T. & Smith, L. (eds.), Reductionism and the development of knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Smith, L. (2004). Developmental epistemology and education. In Carpendale, J. & Müller, U. (eds.), Social interaction and the development of knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wason, P. (1966). Reasoning. In Foss, B. (ed.), New horizons in psychology. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar

Wason, P. (1977). The theory of formal operations: a critique. In Gerber, B. (ed.), Piaget and knowing. LondonRoutledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1978). Remarks on the foundations of mathematics. 3rd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wright, G. H. (1963). Norm and action. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Wright, G. H. (1983a). Practical reason. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wright, G. H. (1983b). Truth, knowledge, and modality. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wright, G. H. (1985). The tree of knowledge. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar

Boesch, E. E. (1991). Symbolic action theory and cultural psychology. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breit, H. & Eckensberger, L. H. (2004). Die Faktizität des Normenbewusstseins: eine entwicklungs psychologische Perspektive. In Lütge, C. & Vollmer, G. (eds.), Fakten statt Normen? Zur Rolle einzelwissenschaftlicher Argumente in einer naturalistischen Ethik. Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verlag, pp. 207–24.Google Scholar

Cole, M. (1998). Cultural psychology: a once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Dasen, P. R. & Heron, A. (1981). Cross-cultural tests of Piaget's theory. In Triandis, H. C. & Heron, A. (eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, vol. IV: Developmental psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, pp. 295–342.Google Scholar

Day, J. & Tappan, M. (1996). The narrative approach to moral development: from the epistemic subject to dialogical selves. Human Development, 32, 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckensberger, L. H. (1986). Handlung, Konflikt und Reflexion: zur Dialektik von Struktur und Inhalt im moralischen Urteil. In Edelstein, W. & Nunner-Winkler, G. (eds.), Zur Bestimmung der Moral: philosophische und sozialwissenschaftliche Beiträge zur Moralforschung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 409–42.Google Scholar

Eckensberger, L. H. (1990). From cross-cultural psychology to cultural psychology. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 12 (1), 37–52.Google Scholar

Eckensberger, L. H. (1993). Normative und deskriptive, strukturelle und empirische Anteile in moralischen Urteilen: ein Ökonomie-Ökologie Konflikt aus psychologischer Sicht. In Eckensberger, L. H. & Gähde, U. (eds.), Ethische Norm und empirische Hypothese. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag, pp. 328–79.Google Scholar

Eckensberger, L. H. (1995). Activity or action: two different roads towards an integration of culture into psychology?Culture & Psychology, 1, 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckensberger, L. H. (1996). Agency, action and culture: three basic concepts for cross-cultural psychology. In Pandey, J., Sinha, D. & Bhawuk, D. P. S. (eds.), Asian contributions to cross-cultural psychology. New Delhi: Sage Publications, pp. 72–102.Google Scholar

Eckensberger, L. H. (2003). Wanted: a contextualized psychology: a plea for cultural psychology based on actual psychology. In Saraswathi, T. S. (ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives in human development: theory, research, and application. New Delhi: Sage Publications, pp. 70–101.Google Scholar

Eckensberger, L. H. & Emminghaus, W. B. (1982). Moralisches Urteil und Aggression: zur Systematisierung und Präzisierung des Aggressionskonzeptes sowie einiger empirischer Befunde. In Hilke, R. & Kempf, W. (eds.), Aggression: naturwissenschaftliche und kulturwissenschaftliche Perspektiven der Aggressionsforschung. Bern: Huber, pp. 208–80.Google Scholar

Eckensberger, L. H. & Meacham, J. (1984). The essentials of action theory: a framework for discussion. Human Development, 27, 166–72.Google ScholarPubMed

Eckensberger, L. H. & Plath, I. (in press). Soziale Kognitionen. In Schneider, W. & Sodian, B. (eds.), Enzyklopädie für Psychologie, Kognitive Entwicklung, C Theorie und Forschung, Serie V Entwicklung, vol. II. Göttingen: Hogrefe, pp. 407–91.

Eckensberger, L. H. & Reinshagen, H. (1980). Kohlbergs Stufentheorie der Entwicklung des moralischen Urteils: ein Versuch ihrer Reinterpretation im Bezugsrahmen handlungstheoretischer Konzepte. In Eckensberger, L. H. & Silbereisen, R. K. (eds.), Entwicklung sozialer Kognitionen: Modelle, Theorien, Methoden, Anwendung. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, pp. 65–131.Google Scholar

Eckensberger, L. H. & Zimba, R. F. (1997). The development of moral judgment. In Dasen, P. & Saraswathi, T. S. (eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology. 2nd edition, vol. II. Developmental psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, pp. 299–338.Google Scholar

Eckensberger, L. H., Breit, H. & Döring, T. (1996). Moral judgments in the context of ecological and economical value orientations: the case of a coal-fuelled power station. Paper read at the 22nd Annual Conference of the Association for Moral Education (AME) Ottawa, November, 1996.

Eckensberger, L. H., Breit, H. & Döring, T. (1997). Moral judgments and knowledge in the context of ecological and economical value orientations: the case of a coal-fuelled power plant. Paper read at the 23rd Annual Conference of the Association for Moral Education (AME) Atlanta, November, 1997.

Eckensberger, L. H., Breit, H. & Döring, T. (1999a). Ethik und Barrieren in umweltbezogenen Entscheidungen: eine entwicklungspsychologische Perspektive. In Linneweber, V. & Kals, E. (eds.), Umweltgerechtes Handeln. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 165–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckensberger, L. H., Breit, H.& Döring, T. (1999b). The role of affects in contextualized moral judgments. Paper read at the 25th Annual Conference of the Association for Moral Education (AME) Minneapolis, November, 1999.

Eckensberger, L. H., Döring, T. & Breit, H. (2001). Moral dimensions in risk evaluation. Research in Social Problems and Public Policy, 9, 137–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engelhardt, H. D. (1975). Umweltstrategie: Materialien und Analysen zu einer Umweltethik in der Industriegesellschaft. Gütersloh: Mohn.Google Scholar

Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life-cycle. New York: International University Press.Google Scholar

Fowler, J. W. (1981). Stages of faith. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. (1998). Surrogates for theories. Theory & Psychology, 8 (2), 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haan, N. (1977). Coping and defending: processes of self-environment organization. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, vol. I: Handlungsrationalität und geschlechtliche Rationalisierung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1966). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. In Paton, H. (ed.), The moral law. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar

Kasper, E., Sieloff, U., Nieder, A. & Eckensberger, L. H. (1987). Entwicklung eines Tests zur Erfassung des Wissens über die Kraftwerksproblematik. Arbeiten der Fachrichtung Psychologie, Universität des Saarlandes, 114.

Kegan, R. (1982). The emerging self. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kesselring, T. (1981). Entwicklung und Widerspruch: ein Vergleich zwischen Piagets genetischer Erkenntnistheorie und Hegels Dialektik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Kohlberg, L. (1973). The claim to moral adequacy of a highest stage of moral judgment. Journal of Philosophy, 70, 630–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lazarus, R. S. & Launier, R. (1978). Stress-related transactions between person and environment. In Pervin, L. A. & Lewis, M. (eds.), Perspective in interactional psychology. New York: Plenum, pp. 287–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leontiev, A. N. (1977). Tätigkeit, Bewusstsein, Persönlichkeit (Activity, consciousness, personality). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar

Lourenço, O. (1996). Reflections on narrative approaches to moral development. Human Development, 39, 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meggle, G. (1993). Semantische, empirische und normative Aspekte eines Begriffs des kommunikativen Handelns. In Eckensberger, L. H. & Gähde, U. (eds.), Ethische Norm und empirische Hypothese. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 197–221.

Oser, F. & Gmünder, P. (1984). Der Mensch: Stufen seiner religiösen Entwicklung. Zürich: Benziger.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1918). Recherche. Lausanne: La Concorde.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget's theory. In Mussen, P. H. (ed.), Carmichael's handbook of child psychology, vol. I. New York: Wiley, pp. 703–32.

Piaget, J. (1977). The grasp of consciousness. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul ((1974). La prise de conscience. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France).

Piaget, J. (1981). Intelligence and affectivity: their relationship during child development, trans. and ed. Brown, T. A. & Kaegi, C. E.. Palo Alto, California: Annual Reviews Inc.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1995). Sociological studies. London: Routledge ((1965). Etudes sociologiques. Geneva: Droz).

Piaget, J. (2001). Studies in reflecting abstraction. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Rosnow, R. L. & Georgoudi, M. (1986). The spirit of contextualism. In Rosnow, R. L. & Georgoudi, M. (eds.), Contextualism and understanding in behavioral science. New York: Praeger, pp. 3–22.Google Scholar

Schwartz, L. (1951). Die Neurosen und die dynamische Psychologie von Pierre Janet. Basel, Switzerland: Schwabe.Google Scholar

Shweder, R. A. (1990). Cultural psychology – what is it? In Stigler, J. W., Shweder, R. A. & Herdt, G. (eds.), Cultural psychology: essays on comparative human development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sieloff, U., Schirk, S., Kasper, E., Nieder, A. & Eckensberger, L. H. (1988). Eine textanalytische Auswertungstechnik zur Erfassung von Abwehr und Bewältigung beim moralischen Argumentieren. Arbeiten der Fachrichtung Psychologie, 118, Saarbrücken: Universität des Saarlandes.

Valsiner, J. (1987). Culture and the development of children's action. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1972). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. 2nd edition. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Wright, G. H. (1971). Explanation and understanding. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Arsenio, W. F. & Lover, A. (1995). Children's conceptions of sociomoral affect: happy victimizers, mixed emotions, and other expectancies. In Killen, M. & Hart, D. (eds.), Morality in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 87–128.Google Scholar

Barrett, C. D., Keller, M., Takezawa, M. & Wichary, S. (submitted). Children's understanding of social emotions: a study in ecological rationality.

Berndt, T. J. (1993). The morality of friendship versus the morality of individual autonomy. Paper presented at the symposium ‘Spheres of Morality’ at the 60th anniversary meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, March, 1993.

Bersoff, D. M. & Miller, J. G. (1993). Culture, context and the development of moral accountability judgments. Developmental Psychology, 29, 664–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blasi, A. (1980). Bridging moral cognition and moral action: a critical review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blasi, A. (2004). Moral functioning: moral understanding and personality. In Lapsley & Narváez (eds.), pp. 335–48.

Blum, L. A. (1980). Friendship, altruism and morality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Bond, M. H. (ed.) (1996). The handbook of Chinese psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Boyes, M. & Walker, L. J. (1988). Implications of cultural diversity for the universality claims of Kohlberg's theory of moral reasoning. Human Development, 31, 44–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bukowski, W. M. & Sippola, L. K. (1996). Friendship and morality: how are they related? In Bukowski, W. M., Newcomb, A. F. & Hartup, W. W. (eds.), The company they keep. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 238–61.Google Scholar

Colby, A. & Kohlberg, L. (1987). The measurement of moral judgment, vol. I. Theoretical foundations and research validation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In Barkow, J., Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (eds.), The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 163–228.Google Scholar

Damon, W. (1977). The social world of the child. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Döbert, R. (1989). Moralische Erziehung in der Volksrepublik China (Moral education in the People's Republic of China). Vergleichende Pädagogik, 25, 246–59.Google Scholar

Eckensberger, L. H. & Zimba, R. F. (1997). The development of moral judgment. In Dasen, P. R. & Saraswathi, T. S. (eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, vol. III. Developmental psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, pp. 299–338.Google Scholar

Edelstein, W. & Noam, G. G. (1982). Regulatory structures of the self and ‘postformal’ stages in adulthood. Human Development, 25, 407–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisenberg, N. (1982). The development of reasoning regarding prosocial behavior. In Eisenberg, N. (ed.), The development of prosocial behavior. New York: Academic Press, pp. 219–49.Google Scholar

Fiddick, L. (2004). Domains of deontic reasoning: resolving the discrepancy between the cognitive and moral reasoning literatures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 447–74.CrossRef

Frankena, W. K. (1973). Ethics. 2nd edition. London: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Gerson, R. R. & Damon, W. (1978). Moral understanding and children's conduct. In Damon, W. (ed.), Moral development. New directions for child development, No. 2. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 41–61.Google Scholar

Gibbard, A. (1992). Wise choices, apt feelings: a theory of normative judgement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gibbs, J. C. & Widaman, K. F. (1982). Social intelligence: measuring the development of sociomoral reflection. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Goodwin, R. & So-Kum Tang, C. (1996). Chinese personal relationships. In Bond (ed.), pp. 294–308.

Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: implications for caring and justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keller, M. (1984). Resolving conflicts in friendship: the development of moral understanding in everyday life. In Kurtines, W. M. & Gewirtz, J. L. (eds.), Morality, moral behaviour and moral development. New York: Wiley, pp. 140–58.Google Scholar

Keller, M. (1996). Moralische Sensibilität: Entwicklung in Freundschaft und Familie (Moral sensibility: development in friendship and family). Weinheim: Psychologie-Verlags Union.Google Scholar

Keller, M., in cooperation with Cecora, L., Eckert, U., Fang, Fu-xi & Fang, Ge (2004a). Self in relationship. In Lapsley & Narváez (eds.), pp. 267–98.

Keller, M. & Edelstein, W. (1990). The emergence of morality in personal relationships. In Wren, T. E. (ed.), The moral domain: essays in the ongoing discussion between philosophy and the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 255–82.Google Scholar

Keller, M. & Edelstein, W. (1991). The development of socio-moral meaning making: domains, categories and perspective-taking. In Kurtines, W. M. & Gewirtz, J. L. (eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development, vol. II. Research. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, pp. 89–114.Google Scholar

Keller, M. & Edelstein, W. (1993). The development of the moral self from childhood to adolescence. In Noam & Wren (eds.), pp. 310–36.

Keller, M. & Reuss, S. (1984). An action-theoretical reconstruction of the development of social-cognitive competence. Human Development, 27, 211–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Keller, M., Eckensberger, L. H. & Rosen, K. (1989). A critical note on the conception of preconventional morality: the case of stage 2 in Kohlberg's theory. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 12, 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keller, M., Gummerum, M., Wang, X. T. & Lindsey, S. (2004b). Understanding perspectives and emotions in contract violation: development of deontic and moral reasoning. Child Development, 75, 614–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Keller, M., Lourenço, O., Malti, T. & Saalbach, H. (2003). The multifaceted phenomenon of ‘happy victimizers’: a cross-cultural comparison. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keller, M., Edelstein, W., Fang, Fu-xi, Hong, Tang & Schuster, P. (1996). The role of culture in the attribution of moral feelings. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Conference of the Association for Moral Education, Ottawa, November, 1996.

Keller, M., Edelstein, W., Krettenauer, T., Fang, F. & Fang, G. (2005). Reasoning about moral obligations and interpersonal responsibilities in different cultural contexts. In W. Edelstein & G. Nunner-Winkler (eds.), Morality in context. Advances in Psychology 137. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 317–40.CrossRef

Keller, M., Edelstein, W., Schmid, C., Fang, F. & Fang, G. (1998). Reasoning about responsibilities and obligations in close relationships: a comparison across two cultures. Developmental Psychology, 34, 731–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: the cognitive developmental approach. In Lickona, T. (ed.), Moral development and behavior: theory, research and social issues. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 31–53.Google Scholar

Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on moral development, vol. II. The psychology of moral development: the nature and validity of moral stages. San Francisco: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Krappmann, L. (1996). Amicitia, drujba, shin-yu, philia, Freundschaft, friendship: on the cultural diversity of a human relationship. In Bukowski, W. M., Newcomb, A. F. & Hartup, W. W. (eds.), The company they keep: friendship in childhood and adolescence. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–40.Google Scholar

Krettenauer, T. (2004). Metaethical cognition and epistemic reasoning development in adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 68, 461–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krettenauer, T. & Eichler, D. (2005). Adolescents' self-attributed emotions following a moral transgression: relations with delinquency, confidence in moral judgment, and age. British Journal of Developmental Psychology.

Lapsley, D. K. & Narváez, D. (eds.) (2004). Moral development, self and identity. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Ma, H. K. (1988). The Chinese perspectives on moral judgment development. International Journal of Psychology, 23, 201–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markus, H. R. & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nisan, M. (2004). Judgement and choice in moral functioning. In Lapsley & Narváez (eds.), pp. 133–60.

Noam, G. G. & Wren, T. E. (1993) in cooperation with Nunner-Winkler, G. & Edelstein, W. (eds.), The moral self. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Nucci, L. P. & Lee, J. (1993). Morality and personal autonomy. In Noam & Wren (eds.), pp. 123–48.

Nunner-Winkler, G. (1993). The growth of moral motivation. In Noam & Wren (eds.), pp. 269–91.

Nunner-Winkler, G. & Sodian, B. (1988). Children's understanding of moral emotions. Child Development, 59, 323–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Oser, F. & Reichenbach, R. (2005). Moral resilience – the unhappy moralist. In W. Edelstein & G. Nunner-Winkler (eds.), Morality in context. Advances in Psychology 137. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 203–24.CrossRef

Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgment of the child. New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1932.)Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Richards, D. A. J. (1971). A theory of reasons for action. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Selman, R. L. (1980). The growth of interpersonal understanding: developmental and clinical analyses. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Shweder, R. A., Mahapatra, M. & Miller, J. G. (1987). Culture and moral development. In Kagan, J. and Lamb, S. (eds.), The emergence of morality in young children. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–83.Google Scholar

Smetana, J. G. (1982). Concepts of self and morality. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Triandis, H. C. (1990). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. In Berman, J. J. (ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation 1989, vol. XXXVII. Cross-cultural perspectives. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 41–133.Google Scholar

Turiel, E. (1983). Domains and categories in social cognitive development. In Overton, W. F. (ed.), The relationship between social and cognitive development. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, pp. 53–90.Google Scholar

Turiel, E. (1998). The development of morality. In Damon, W. (series ed.) & Eisenberg, N. (vol. ed.), Handbook of child psychology, vol. III. Social, emotional and personality development. 5th edition. New York: Wiley, pp. 863–932.Google Scholar

Youniss, J. (1980). Parents and peers in social development. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Abu-Lughod, L. (1993). Writing women's worlds: Bedouin stories. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Antipoff, H. (1928). Observations sur la compassion et le sens de la justice chez l'enfant. Archives de Psychologie, 21.Google Scholar

Asch, S. E. (1952). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benedict, R. (1934). Patterns of culture. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Bok, S. (1978/1999). Lying: moral choice in public and private life. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Clémence, A., Doise, W., Rosa, A. S. & Gonzalez, L. (1995). La représentation sociale des droits de l'homme: une recherche internationale sur l'étendue et les limites de l'universalité. Journal Internationale de Psychologie, 30, 181–212.Google Scholar

Davidson, P., Turiel, E. & Black, A. (1983). The effect of stimulus familiarity on the use of criteria and justifications in children's social reasoning. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1, 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doise, W., Clémence, A. & Spini, D. (1996). Human rights and social psychology. The British Psychological Society Social Psychology Section Newsletter, 35, 3–21.Google Scholar

Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking rights seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Fiddick, L. (2004). Domains of deontic reasoning: resolving the discrepancy between the cognitive and moral reasoning literatures. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 447–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiddick, L. (2005). Domains of deontic reasoning: a postscript. Paper presented at the 35th Annual Meeting of the Jean Piaget Society. Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 2005.

Freeman, V. G., Rathore, S. S., Weinfurt, K. P., Schulman, K. A. & Sulmasy, D. P. (1999). Lying for patients: physician deception of third-party payers. Archives of Internal Medicine, 159, 2,263–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gewirth, A. (1982). Human rights: essays on justification and applications. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hatch, E. (1983). Culture and morality: the relativity of values in anthropology. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Helwig, C. C. (1995). Adolescents' and young adults' conceptions of civil liberties: freedom of speech and religion. Child Development, 66, 152–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helwig, C. C. (1997). The role of agent and social context in judgments of freedom of speech and religion. Child Development, 68, 484–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hyman, H. H. & Sheatsley, P. B. (1953). Trends in public opinion on civil liberties. Journal of Social Issues, 9, 6–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, M. L. Jr. (1968). The role of the behavioral scientist in the civil rights movement. American Psychologist, 23, 180–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: the cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In Goslin, D. (ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNally, pp. 347–480.Google Scholar

Kohlberg, L. (1971). From is to ought: how to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development. In Mischel, T. (ed.), Psychology and genetic epistemology. New York: Academic Press, pp. 151–235.Google Scholar

McClosky, M. & Brill, A. (1983). Dimensions of tolerance: what Americans believe about civil liberties. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar

Nucci, L. P. (2001). Education in the moral domain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nucci, L. P. & Nucci, M. S. (1982a). Children's responses to moral and social conventional transgressions in free-play settings. Child Development, 53, 1,337–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nucci, L. P. & Nucci, M. S. (1982b). Children's social interactions in the context of moral and conventional transgressions. Child Development, 53, 403–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perkins, S. A. (2003). Adolescent reasoning about lying in close relationships. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.

Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1951/1995). Egocentric thought and sociocentric thought. In Piaget, J., Sociological studies. London: Routledge, pp. 270–86.Google Scholar

Pizarro, D. A. & Bloom, P. (2003). The intelligence of the moral intuitions: comment on Haidt (2001). Psychological Review, 110, 193–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Protho, J. W. & Grigg, C. M. (1960). Fundamental principles of democracy: bases of agreement and disagreement. Journal of Politics, 22, 276–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sarat, A. (1975). Reasoning in politics: the social, political, and psychological bases of principled thought. American Journal of Political Science, 19, 247–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smetana, J. G. (1995). Morality in context: abstractions, ambiguities, and applications. In Vasta, R. (ed.), Annals of child development, vol. X. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, pp. 83–130.Google Scholar

Smetana, J. G. (2002). Culture, autonomy, and personal jurisdiction in adolescent–parent relationships. In Reese, H. W. & Kail, R. (eds.), Advances in child development and behavior, vol. XXIX. New York: Academic Press, pp. 51–87.Google Scholar

Smith, L. (2003). From epistemology to psychology in the development of knowledge. In Brown, T. & Smith, L. (eds.), Reductionism and the development of knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 201–28.Google Scholar

Stouffer, S. (1955). Communism, conformity and civil liberties. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Tisak, M. S. & Turiel, E. (1984). Children's conceptions of moral and prudential rules. Child Development, 55, 1,030–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: morality and convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Turiel, E. (1998). The development of morality. In W. Damon (ed.), Handbook of child psychology. 5th edition, vol. III: N. Eisenberg (ed.), Social, emotional, and personality development. New York: Wiley, pp. 863–932.

Turiel, E. (2002). The culture of morality: social development, context, and conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turiel, E. (2003). Resistance and subversion in everyday life. Journal of Moral Education, 32, 115–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turiel, E. (2005). Thought about actions in social domains: morality, social conventions, and social interactions. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.

Turiel, E. (2006). Thought, emotions, and social interactional processes in moral development. In Killen, M. & Smetana, J. G. (eds.), Handbook of moral development. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 7–35.Google Scholar

Turiel, E. & Perkins, S. A. (2004). Flexibilities of mind: conflict and culture. Human Development, 47, 158–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turiel, E. & Wainryb, C. (1998). Concepts of freedoms and rights in a traditional hierarchically organized society. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 375–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turiel, E., Perkins, S. A. & Mensing, J. F. (in preparation). Judgments about deception in marital relationships. University of California, Berkeley.

Wason, P. (1968). Reasoning about a rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 273–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wertheimer, M. (1935). Some problems in the theory of ethics. Social Research, 2, 353–67.Google Scholar

Wikan, U. (1996). Tomorrow, God willing: self-made destinies in Cairo. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Wynia, M. K., Cummins, D. S., VanGeest, J. B. & Wilson, I. B. (2000). Physician manipulation of reimbursement rules for patients: between a rock and a hard place. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283, 1,858–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borsboom, D. (2005). Measuring the mind: conceptual issues in contemporary psychometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erneling, C. E. & Johnson, D. M. (eds.) (2005). The mind as a scientific object: between brain and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1987). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, vol. I. Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung, vol. II. Zur Kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft. 4th edition. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Heidelberger, M. (2004). Nature from within: Gustav T. Fechner and his psychophysical worldview. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

Kusch, M. (1995). Psychologism: a case study in the sociology of philosophical knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

McCarthy, G. E. (2001). Objectivity and the silence of reason: Weber, Habermas, and the methodological disputes in German sociology. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Molenaar, P. C. M. (2003). State space techniques in structural equation modeling: transformation of latent variables in and out of latent variable models. http://www.hhdev.psu.edu/hdfs/faculty/molenaar.html

Molenaar, P. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2, 201–18.Google Scholar

Nesselroade, J. R. & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2003). Quantitative models for developmental processes. In Valsiner, J. & Connolly, K. (eds.), Handbook of developmental psychology. London: Sage, pp. 622–39.Google Scholar

Oddie, G. (2005). Value, reality, and desire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, H. (2004). The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. 3rd edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Acredolo, C., O'Connor, J., Banks, L. & Horobin, K. (1989). Children's ability to make probability estimates: skills revealed through application of Anderson's functional measurement methodology. Child Development, 60, 933–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bozzi, P. (1990). Fisica ingenua (Naive physics). Milan: Garzanti.Google Scholar

Brainerd, C. J. (1981). Working memory and the developmental analysis of probability judgment. Psychological Review, 88, 463–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (1996). Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty. Cognition, 58, 1–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

da Buti, F. (1852–62). Commento di Francesco da Buti sopra La Divina Commedia di Dante Allighieri (Francesco da Buti's commentary on Dante's Divine Comedy). Pisa: Nistri. (Originally written circa 1385.) Available at http://dciswww.dartmouth.eduGoogle Scholar

David, F. N. (1962). Games, gods and gambling: a history of probability and statistical ideas. London: Griffin.Google Scholar

Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense: how the mind creates mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

della Lana, J. (1866–7). Comedia di Dante degli Allaghieri col commento di Jacopo della Lana bolognese (Dante's Comedy, commentary by Jacopo della Lana from Bologna). Bologna: Tipografia Regia. (Originally written circa 1324.) Available at http://dciswww.dartmouth.eduGoogle Scholar

Fischbein, E. (1975). The intuitive sources of probabilistic thinking in children. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franklin, J. (2001). The science of conjecture: evidence and probability before Pascal. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. (1993). The bounded rationality of probabilistic mental models. In Manktelow, K. & Over, D. (eds.), Rationality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. & Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to improve bayesian reasoning without instruction: frequency format. Psychological Review, 102, 684–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilovich, T., Griffin, D. & Kahneman, D. (eds.) (2002). Heuristics and biases: the psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Girotto, V. (2004). Task understanding. In Leighton, J. & Sternberg, R. (eds.), The nature of reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Girotto, V. & Gonzalez, M. (2001). Solving probabilistic and statistical problems: a matter of information structure and question form. Cognition, 78, 247–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Girotto, V. & Gonzalez, M. (2002). Chances and frequencies in probabilistic reasoning: rejoinder to Hoffrage, Gigerenzer, Krauss, and Martignon. Cognition, 84, 353–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Girotto, V. & Gonzalez, M. (2003). Early reasoning about chances and possibilities: historical and developmental evidence. Paper presented at the 16th Jean Piaget Archives Conference, University of Geneva, September.

Girotto, V. & Gonzalez, M. (2005). Probabilistic reasoning and combinatorial analysis. In Girotto, V. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (eds.), The shape of reason. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Girotto, V. & Gonzalez, M. (in press). Extensional reasoning about chances. In Schaeken, W., Vooght, G., Vandierendonck, A. & d'Ydewalle, G. (eds.), Mental model theory: extensions and refinements. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Hacking, I. (1975). The emergence of probability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hilton, D. (1995). The social context of reasoning: conversational inference and rational judgement. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 248–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howson, C. & Urbach, P. (1993). Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar

Inhelder, B. & Piaget, J. (1964). The early growth of logic. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1955.)Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird, P. N., Legrenzi, P., Girotto, V., Sonino-Legrenzi, M. & Caverni, J. P. (1999). Naive probability: a model theory of extensional reasoning. Psychological Review, 106, 62–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (eds.) (2000). Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kendall, M. G. (1956). The beginnings of a probability calculus. Biometrika, 43, 1–14.Google Scholar

Locke, J. (1975). An essay concerning human understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Original work published 1690.)Google Scholar

Neyman, J. & Pearson, E. S. (1967). Joint statistical papers of J. Neyman and E. S. Pearson. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Nisbett, R. E., Krantz, D. H., Jepson, C. & Kunda, D. (1983). The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 90, 339–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ore, O. (1965). Cardano, the gambling scholar. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Ottimo, A. L. (1827–9). L'Ottimo commento della Divina Commedia (Ottimo's commentary on the Divine Comedy). Pisa: Capurro. (Originally written circa 1331.) Available at http://dciswww.dartmouth.eduGoogle Scholar

Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1975). The origin of the idea of chance in children. New York: Norton. (Original work published 1951.)Google Scholar

Piaget, J. & Szeminska, B. (1952). The child's conception of number. New York: Humanities Press. (Original work published 1941.)Google Scholar

Politzer, G. & Noveck, I. A. (1991). Are conjunction rule violations the results of conversational rule violations?Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Sloman, S. A., Over, D., Slovak, L. & Stibel, J. M. (2003). Frequency illusions and other fallacies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 296–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tentori, K., Bonini, N. & Osherson, D. (2004). The conjunction fallacy: a misunderstanding about conjunction?Cognitive Science, 26, 467–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90, 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yost, P. A., Siegel, A. E. & Andrews, J. M. (1962). Nonverbal probability judgments by young children. Child Development, 33, 769–80.Google ScholarPubMed

Zhu, L. & Gigerenzer, G. (2006). Children can solve Bayesian problems: the role of representation in mental computation. Cognition, 98, 287–308.CrossRef