Abdelal, Rawi and Meunier, Sophie, ‘Managed Globalization: Doctrine, Practice and Promise’ (2010) 17(3) Journal of European Public Policy, pp. 350–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahmad, Zaker, WTO Law and Trade Policy Reform for Low-Carbon Technology Diffusion: Common Concern of Humankind, Carbon Pricing, and Export Credit Support (Leiden: Brill, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akande, Dapo, Akhavan, Payam, and Bjorge, Eirik, ‘Economic Sanctions, International Law, and Crimes against Humanity: Venezuela’s Referral to the International Criminal Court’ (2021) 115(3) American Journal of International Law, pp. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alden, Chris and Large, Daniel, ‘On Becoming a Norms Maker: Chinese Foreign Policy, Norms Evolution and the Challenges of Security in Africa’ (2015) 221 The China Quarterly, pp. 123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allee, Todd, Elsig, Manfred, and Lugg, Andrew, ‘The Ties between WTO and Preferential Trade Agreements’ (2017) 20(2) Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 333–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aloupi, Niki, ‘The Right to Non-intervention and Non-interference’ (2015) 4(3) Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law, pp. 566–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Al-Sulaiti, Ahmed Essa, ‘WTO Members Can Save Their ‘Crown Jewel’: A View from the Arab World’ (2022) 56(1) Journal of World Trade, pp. 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersen, Scott, Friedbacher, Todd, Lau, Christian et al., ‘Using Arbitration under Article 25 of the DSU to Ensure the Availability of Appeals’ (2017) 17 Centre for Trade and Economic Integration Working Papers, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar

Anghel, Suzana, Immenkamp, Beatrix, Lazarou, Elena et al., ‘On the Path to “Strategic Autonomy”: The EU in an Evolving Geopolitical Environment’ (2020) 652(96) European Parliamentary Research Service Study, pp. 1–53.Google Scholar

Ankersmit, Laurens, ‘Opinion 2/15: Adding Some Spice to the Trade & Environment Debate’, European Law Blog, 15 June 2017, https://europeanlawblog.eu/2017/06/15/opinion-215-adding-some-spice-to-the-trade-environment-debate/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Apaza Lanyi, Pamela and Steinbach, Armin, ‘Limiting Jurisdictional Fragmentation in International Trade Disputes’ (2014) 5(2) Journal of International Dispute Settlement, pp. 372–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arko, Annie, ‘A Canadian Border Carbon Adjustment? GATT Compliance and Underexplored Exceptions’ (2021) 16(9) Global Trade and Customs Journal, pp. 446–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arrowsmith, Sue, Government Procurement in the WTO (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2003).Google Scholar

Arrowsmith, Sue, ‘Reviewing the GPA: The Role and Development of the Plurilateral Agreement after Doha’ (2002) Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 761–790.Google Scholar

Asteriti, Alessandra, ‘Article 21 TEU and the EU’s Common Commercial Policy: A Test of Coherence’, in Bungenberg, Marc, Krajewski, Markus, Tams, Christian et al. (eds.), European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2017 (Cham: Springer, 2017), pp. 111–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Azaria, Danae, ‘Trade Countermeasures for Breaches of International Law Outside the WTO’ (2022) International & Comparative Law Quarterly, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar

Azoulai, Loïc, ‘Structural Principles: Internal and External’, in Cremona, Marise (ed.), Structural Principles in EU External Relations Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2018), pp. 35–66.Google Scholar

Åhman, Joachim, ‘Exploring Border Areas between the Law of State Responsibility and WTO Law’ (2020) 54(2) Journal of World Trade, pp. 219–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Babić, Milan, Dixon, Adam, and Liu, Imogen, ‘Geoeconomics in a Changing Global Order’, in Babić, Milan, Dixon, Adam, and Liu, Imogen (eds.), The Political Economy of Geoeconomics (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022), pp. 1–27.Google Scholar

Bacchus, James, ‘Legal Issues with the European Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism’ (2021) CATO Briefing Paper No. 125, www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/2021-08/briefing-paper-125.pdf, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar

Bacchus, James and Lester, Simon, ‘The Rule of Precedent and the Role of the Appellate Body’ (2020) 54(2) Journal of World Trade, pp. 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baetens, Freya, ‘Abuse of Process and Abuse of Rights before the ICJ: Ever More Popular, Ever Less Successful?’, EJIL:Talk!, 15 October 2019, www.ejiltalk.org/abuse-of-process-and-abuse-of-rights-before-the-icj-ever-more-popular-ever-less-successful/.Google Scholar

Baetens, Freya and Bronckers, Marco, ‘The EU’s Anti-Coercion Instrument: A Big Stick for Big Targets’, EJIL: Talk!, 19 January 2022, www.ejiltalk.org/the-eus-anti-coercion-instrument-a-big-stick-for-big-targets/.Google Scholar

Bakardjieva Engelbrekt, Antonina, Bremberg, Niklas, Michalski, Anna, and Oxelheim, Lars, The European Union in a Changing World Order (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, Richard, ‘Global Supply Chains: Why They Emerged, Why They Matter, and Where They Are Going’ (2012) No. 9103 CEPR Discussion Paper, pp. 13–59.Google Scholar

Baldwin, Robert E., ‘The Case for a Multilateral Trade Organization’ in Narlikar, Amrita, Daunton, Martin, and Stern, Robert M. (eds.), Oxford Handbook on the World Trade Organization (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 29–39.Google Scholar

Barfield, Claude, Free Trade, Sovereignty, Democracy. The Future of the World Trade Organization (Washington, DC: AEI Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Baroncini, Elisa, ‘Preserving the Appellate Stage in the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism: The EU and the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement’ (2019) 29 The Italian Yearbook of International Law, pp. 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baroncini, Elisa, ‘The EU Approach to Overcome the WTO Dispute Settlement Vacuum: Article 25 DSU Interim Appeal Arbitration as a Bridge between Renovation and Innovation’, in Lewis, Meredith Kolsky, Nakagawa, Junji, Neuwirth, Rostam J et al. (eds.), A Post-WTO International Legal Order. Utopian, Dystopian and Other Scenarios (Cham: Springer, 2020), pp. 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartels, Lorand, ‘Applicable Law in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings’ (2001) 35 Journal of World Trade, pp. 499–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartels, Lorand, ‘The Trade and Development Policy of the European Union’ (2007) 18(4) European Journal of International Law, pp. 715–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartels, Lorand, ‘The WTO Legality of the EU’s GSP+ Arrangement’ (2007) 10(4) Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 869–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartels, Lorand, ‘Human Rights and Sustainable Development Obligations in EU Free Trade Agreements’ (2013) 40(4) Legal Issues of Economic Integration, pp. 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartels, Lorand, ‘Human Rights, Labour Standards, and Environmental Standards in CETA’, in Griller, Stefan, Obwexer, Walter, and Vranes, Erich (eds.), Mega-Regional Trade Agreements: CETA, TTIP, and TiSA: New Orientations for EU External Economic Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 202–215.Google Scholar

Bartels, Lorand, ‘Jurisdiction and Applicable Law in the WTO’ (2016) Society of International Economic Law Working Paper No. 2016/18, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar

Bartels, Lorand, ‘Does WTO Law Really Not Regulate ‘Foreign Subsidies’?’, Linklaters, 22 June 2020, www.linklaters.com/en/insights/blogs/tradelinks/2020/june/does-wto-law-really-not-regulate-foreign-subsidies.Google Scholar

Bauermeister, Tabea, ‘A Tool to Investigate M&A Transactions with Regard to Foreign Financial Contributions’ (2022) 3 Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, pp. 477–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benitah, Marc, WTO Law of Subsidies: A Comprehensive Approach (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2019).Google Scholar

Bhagwati, Jagdish and Patrick, Hugh (eds.), Aggressive Unilateralism. America’s 301 Trade Policy and the World Trading System (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Bhala, Raj, Modern GATT Law: A Treatise on the Law and Political Economy of the GATT & Other W.T.O Agreements, 2nd ed. (London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters, 2013).Google Scholar

Bianchi, Andrea, Peat, Daniel, and Windsor, Matthew (eds.), Interpretation in International Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bilal, San and Hoekman, Bernard, ‘Introduction: EU Trade and External Policy in Troubled Waters’, in Bilal, San and Hoekman, Bernard (eds.), Perspectives on the Soft Power of EU Trade Policy (London: CEPR Press, 2019), pp. 9–14.Google Scholar

Bluth, Christian Johannes, Europe’s Trade Strategy for the Age of Geoeconomic Globalization (London: CEPR Press, 2021).Google Scholar

Bogdanova, Iryna, Unilateral Sanctions in International Law and the Enforcement of Human Rights (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohanes, Jan and Salcedo, Karolyn, Overview of WTO Jurisprudence in 2013’, in Herrmann, Christoph, Krajewski, Markus, and Terhechte, Jörg Philipp (eds.), European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2015 (Cham: Springer, 2015), pp. 337–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence, ‘Remarks: The State of State Responsibility’, (2002) American Society of International Law Proceedings of the 96th Annual Meeting, pp. 169–172.Google Scholar

Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence, and Lee, Jaemin, ‘The European Union–Korea Free Trade Agreement Sustainable Development Proceeding: Reflections on a Ground-Breaking Dispute’ (2022) 23 The Journal of World Investment & Trade, pp. 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bollen, Yelter, De Ville, Ferdi, and Orbie, Jan, ‘EU Trade Policy: Persistent Liberalisation, Contentious Protectionism’ (2016) 38(3) Journal of European Integration, pp. 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borchert, Ingo, Conconi, Paola, Di Ubaldo, Mattia, and Herghelegiu, Cristina, ‘The Pursuit of Non-Trade Policy Objectives in EU Trade Policy’ (2020) European University Institute Working Papers, RSCAS 2020/26, pp. 1–37.Google Scholar

Bordin, Fernando Lusa, ‘Reflections of Customary International Law: The Authority of Codification Conventions and ILC Draft Articles in International Law’ (2014) 63(3) International & Comparative Law Quarterly, pp. 535–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bovis, Christopher, ‘The Principles of Public Procurement Regulation’, in Bovis, Christopher (ed.), Research Handbook on EU Public Procurement Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2016), pp. 35–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bown, Chad P. and Kolb, Melina, ‘Trump’s Trade War Timeline: An Up-to-Date Guide’, 24 March 2023, www.piie.com/blogs/trade-investment-policy-watch/trump-trade-war-china-date-guide.Google Scholar

Bradford, Anu, ‘The Brussels Effect’ (2012) 107(1) Northwestern University Review, pp. 1–67.Google Scholar

Bradford, Anu, The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World (New York: Oxford University Press, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brattberg, Erik and Le Corre, Philippe, ‘The EU and China in 2020: More Competition Ahead’ (2020) Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, https://carnegieendowment.org/files/1-31-20_Brattberg_Le_Corre_EU_China.pdf.Google Scholar

Breton, Thierry, ‘A European Sovereignty Fund for an industry “Made in Europe”’, Blog of Commissioner Thierry Breton, 15 September 2022, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/statement_22_5543.Google Scholar

Brewster, Rachel, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement: Can we Go Back Again?’ (2019) 113 AJIL Unbound, pp. 61–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brittain, Stephen, ‘Justifying the Teleological Methodology of the European Court of Justice: A Rebuttal’ (2016) 55 Irish Jurist, pp. 134–165.Google Scholar

Brolin, Matilda J., ‘Procedural Agreements in WTO Disputes: Addressing the Sequencing Problem’ (2016) 85 Nordic Journal of International Law, pp. 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bronckers, Marco, ‘Trade Conflicts: Whither the WTO?’ (2020) Legal Issues of Economic Integration, pp. 221–244.Google Scholar

Bronckers, Marco and Gruni, Giovanni ‘Taking the Enforcement of Labour Standards in the EU’s Free Trade Agreements Seriously’ (2019) 56 Common Market Law Review, pp. 1591–1622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bronckers, Marco and Gruni, Giovanni ‘Retooling the Sustainability Standards in EU Free Trade Agreements’ (2021) 24 Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buffard, Isabelle and Zemanek, Karl, ‘The Object and Purpose of a Treaty: An Enigma?’ (1998) 3 Austrian Review of International and European Law, pp. 311–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

BusinessEurope, ‘BusinessEurope’s Views on an International Procurement Instrument’, Position Paper, 20 May 2020, www.businesseurope.eu/sites/buseur/files/media/position_papers/rex/2020-05-20_views_on_an_international_procurement_instrument.pdf.Google Scholar

Callahan, William A., ‘Sino-Speak: Chinese Exceptionalism and the Politics of History’ (2012) 71(1) The Journal of Asian Studies, pp. 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cannizarro, Enzo, ‘The Value of the EU International Values’, in Douma, Wybe, Eckes, Christina, Van Elsuwege, Peter et al. (eds.), The Evolving Nature of EU External Relations Law (Berlin: T.M.C. Asser Press, Springer, 2021), pp. 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caranta, Roberto, ‘Article 1. Subject-Matter and Scope’, in Caranta, Roberto and Sanchez-Graells, Albert (eds.), European Public Procurement. Commentary on Directive 2014/24/EU (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2021), pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carter, Barry E., ‘Economic Sanctions’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1521?prd=OPIL.Google Scholar

Caspary, Daniel, ‘Opinion: International Procurement Instrument – the end of the waiting game’, Borderlex, 31 March 2022, https://borderlex.net/2022/03/31/opinion-international-procurement-instrument-the-end-of-the-waiting-game/.Google Scholar

Cass, Deborah, Williams, Brett, and Barker, George (eds.), China and the World Trading System: Entering the New Millennium (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ceretelli, Carlotta, ‘EU – New Zealand FTA: Towards a New approach in the Enforcement of Trade and Sustainable Development Obligations’, EJIL:Talk!, 28 September 2022, www.ejiltalk.org/eu-new-zealand-fta-towards-a-new-approach-in-the-enforcement-of-trade-and-sustainable-development-obligations/.Google Scholar

Chaisse, Julien and Matsushita, Mitsuo, ‘China’s ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative: Mapping the World Trade Normative and Strategic Implications’ (2018) 52(1) Journal of World Trade, pp. 163–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chandra Prasad, Gireesh and Dutta Mishra, Ravi, ‘India Brews Its Own Carbon Levy to Hit Back at EU Imports’, Mint, 19 June 2023, www.livemint.com/economy/india-brews-its-own-carbon-levy-to-hit-back-at-eu-imports-11687113102140.html.Google Scholar

Chandy, Sandeep Thomas and Dasgupta, Anupal, ‘Government Procurement Outside the GPA: A Developing Country View’ (2019) 14(7 & 8) Global Trade and Customs Journal, pp. 383–390.Google Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve, ‘Grading Trump’s China Trade Strategy’, in Bungenberg, Marc, Krajewski, Markus, Tams, Christian et al. (eds.), European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2019 (Cham: Springer, 2020), pp. 217–256.Google Scholar

Cheng, Bin, General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (London: Grotius Publications Limited, 1987).Google Scholar

Choer Moraes, Henrique, ‘The Turn to Managed Interdependence: A Glimpse into the Future of International Economic Law?’ EJIL:Talk!, 14 August 2018, www.ejiltalk.org/the-turn-to-managed-interdependence-a-glimpse-into-the-future-of-international-economic-law.Google Scholar

Choer Moraes, Henrique and Wigell, Mikael, ‘Balancing Dependence: The Quest for Autonomy and the Rise of Corporate Geoeconomics’, in Babić, Milan, Dixon, Adam, and Liu, Imogen (eds.), The Political Economy of Geoeconomics (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022), pp. 29–55.Google Scholar

Choi, Won-Mog, ‘Like Products’ in International Trade Law. Towards a Consistent GATT/WTO Jurisprudence (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Claussen, Kathleen, ‘Reimagining Trade-Plus Compliance: The Labor Story’ (2020) 23 Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colli Vignarelli, Mattia, ‘The European Commission Trade Policy Review: The Effectiveness of Sustainable Development Chapters in EU FTAs’ (2021) 6(1) European Papers, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar

Collins, David, ‘Government Procurement with Strings Attached: The Uneven Control of Offsets by the World Trade Organization and Regional Trade Agreements’ (2018) 8 Asian Journal of International Law, pp. 301–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conconi, Paola and Voon, Tania, ‘EC – Seal Products: The Tension between Public Morals and International Trade Agreements’ (2015) EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2015/70, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar

Conley, Heather, ‘The Birth of a Global Strategy amid Deep Crisis’ (2016) 51(3) The International Spectator, pp. 12–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cosbey, Aaron and Mavroidis, Petros C., ‘A Turquoise Mess: Green Subsidies, Blue Industrial Policy and Renewable Energy: The Case for Redrafting the Subsidies Agreement of the WTO’ (2014) EUI Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Working Paper 2014/17, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar

Couvreur, Sjorre, De Ville, Ferdi, Jacobs, Thomas, and Orbie, Jan, ‘The Good Geopolitical Trade Actor? The European Union’s Discursive Justification of the Anti-Coercion Instrument’ (2022) Special Issue Perspectivas Journal of Political Science, pp. 133–147.Google Scholar

Crawford, James, ‘State Responsibility’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1093?prd=EPIL.Google Scholar

Cremona, Marise, ‘The European Union and Regional Trade Agreements’, in Herrmann, Christoph and Terhechte, Jörg Philipp (eds.), European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2010 (Cham: Springer, 2010), pp. 245–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cremona, Marise, ‘Values in Foreign Policy’, in Evans, Malcolm and Koutrakos, Panos (eds.), Beyond the Established Legal Orders (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011), pp. 275–317.Google Scholar

Cremona, Marise, State Responsibility. The General Part (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Cremona, Marise, ‘A Quiet Revolution: The Changing Nature of the EU’s Common Commercial Policy’, in Bungenberg, Marc, Krajewski, Markus, Tams, Christian et al. (eds.), European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2017 (Cham: Springer, 2017), pp. 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cremona, Marise, ‘A Quiet Revolution: The Common Commercial Policy Six Years after the Treaty of Lisbon’ (2017) Report No. 2, Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies, pp. 1–61.Google Scholar

Criddle, Evan J., ‘Humanitarian Financial Intervention’ (2013) 24 European Journal of International Law, pp. 583–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crochet, Victor, ‘The EU Anti-Coercion Mechanism: Legitimate Trade Instrument or Hidden “Economic” Sanction’, EU Law Live Weekend Edition No. 96, 2 April 2022, pp. 2–13.Google Scholar

Crochet, Victor and Gustafsson, Marcus, ‘Lawful Remedy or Illegal Response? Resolving the Issue of Foreign Subsidization under WTO Law’ (2021) 20(3) World Trade Review, pp. 343–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crochet, Victor and Hedge, Vineet, ‘China’s “Going Global” Policy: Transnational Production Subsidies under the WTO SCM’ (2020) 23(4) Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 841–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curran, Louise, Eckhardt, Jappe, and Lee, Jaemin ‘The Trade Policy Response to COVID-19 and Its Implications for International Business’ (2021) 17(2) Critical Perspectives on International Business, pp. 252–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalpé, Vincent, ‘Canada – Feed-In Tariff: Are FITs Desirable, or Even Legal? A Case Comment’ (2014) 27(1) Quebec Journal of International Law, pp. 87–112.Google Scholar

Daunton, Martin, ‘The Inconsistent Quarte: Free Trade Versus Competing Goals’, in Narlikar, Amrita, Daunton, Martin, and Stern, Robert M. (eds.), Oxford Handbook on the World Trade Organization (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 40–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson Ladly, Sarah, ‘Border Carbon Adjustments, WTO-Law and the Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities’ (2012) 12(1) International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, pp. 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, Arwel, ‘The GATT Article III:8(a) Procurement Derogation and Canada – Renewable Energy’ (2015) 18(3) Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 543–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawar, Kamala, ‘Government Procurement in the WTO: A Case for Greater Integration’ (2016a) 15(4) World Trade Review, pp. 645–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawar, Kamala, ‘The 2016 European Union International Procurement Instrument’s Amendments to the 2012 Buy European Proposal: A Retrospective Assessment of Its Prospects’ (2016b) 50(5) Journal of World Trade, pp. 845–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Andrade, Mariana, ‘Procedural Innovations in the MPIA: A Way to Strengthen the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism?’ (2020) Questions of International Law, www.qil-qdi.org/procedural-innovations-in-the-mpia-a-way-to-strengthen-the-wto-dispute-settlement-mechanism/.Google Scholar

De Andrade, Mariana, ‘The EU’s Anti-Coercion Instrument: Balancing Ambiguity’, International Economic Law and Policy Blog, 13 November 2022, https://ielp.worldtradelaw.net/2022/11/guest-post-the-eus-anti-coercion-instrument-balancing-ambiguity.html.Google Scholar

De Bièvre, Dirk, ‘EU Regulatory Trade Agenda and the Quest for WTO Trade Enforcement’ (2006) 13(6) Journal of European Public Policy, pp. 851–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Konink, Constant, Ronse, Thierry, and Timmermans, William, European Public Procurement Law: The Public Sector Procurement Directive Explained through 30 Years of Case Law by the Court of Justice of the European Union, 2nd ed. (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2015).Google Scholar

De Witte, Bruno, ‘The EU and the International Legal Order: The Case of Human Rights’, in Evans, Malcolm, Koutrakos, Panos (eds.), Beyond the Established Legal Orders: Policy Interconnections Between the EU and the Rest of the World (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011), pp. 127–148.Google Scholar

De Witte, Bruno, ‘A Selfish Court? The Court of Justice and the Design of International Dispute Settlement Beyond the EU’, in Cremona, Marise and Thies, Anne (eds.), The European Court of Justice and External Relations Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014), pp. 33–46.Google Scholar

Dias, Anna, Seeuws, Stéphanie, and Nosowicz, Agnieszka, ‘EU Border Carbon Adjustment and the WTO: Hand in Hand Towards Tackling Climate Change’ (2020) 15(1) Global Trade and Customs Journal, pp. 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dimopoulos, Angelos, ‘The Effects of the Lisbon Treaty on the Principles and Objectives of the Common Commercial Policy’ (2010) 15(2) European Foreign Affairs Review, pp. 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dobson, Natalie L. and Ryngaert, Cedric, ‘Provocative Climate Protection: EU ‘Extraterritorial’ Regulation of Maritime Emissions’ (2017) 66 International & Comparative Law Quarterly, pp. 295–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dörr, Oliver and Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. A Commentary, 2nd ed. (Heidelberg: Springer, 2018).Google Scholar

Dreyer, Iana, ‘Ostrich Policy: The EU’s Anti-Coercion Instrument Risks Becoming a Damp Squib’ (2022) Borderlex, 1 February 2022, https://borderlex.net/2022/02/01/comment-ostrich-policy-the-eus-anti-coercion-instrument-risks-becoming-a-damp-squib/.Google Scholar

Drezner, Daniel, Farrell, Henry, and Newman, Abraham (eds.), The Uses and Abuses of Weaponized Interdependence (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2021).Google Scholar

Duchâtel, Mathieu, ‘Effective Deterrence? The Coming European Anti-Coercion Instrument’, Institut Montaigne, 2 December 2022, www.institutmontaigne.org/en/expressions/effective-deterrence-coming-european-anti-coercion-instrument.Google Scholar

Dunbar, Rupert, ‘Article 3 (5) TEU a Decade On: Revisiting ‘Strict Observance of International Law’ in the Text and Context of Other EU Values’ (2021) 28(4) Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, pp. 479–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dutta Mishra, Ravi, ‘India Seeks Taiwan, South Africa Backing on Carbon Tax’, Mint, 16 June 2023, www.livemint.com/economy/india-seeks-taiwan-s-africa-backing-on-carbon-border-tax-11686936697768.html.Google Scholar

Dür, Andreas, Eckhardt, Jappe, and Poletti, Arlo, ‘Global Value Chains, the Anti-Globalization Backlash, and EU Trade Policy: A Research Agenda’ (2020) 27 Journal of European Public Policy, pp. 944–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Early, Bryan R. and Cilizoglu, Menevis, ‘Economic Sanctions in Flux: Enduring Challenges, New Policies, and Defining the Future Research Agenda’ (2020) 21(4) International Studies Perspectives, pp. 438–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ebrecht, Caspar, ‘Foreign Subsidies Regulation and EU International Procurement’ (2022) 3 Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, pp. 487–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eeckhout, Piet, The European Internal Market and International Trade: A Legal Analysis (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eeckhout, Piet, ‘The Integration of Public International Law in EU Law: Analytical and Normative Questions’, in Eeckhout, Piet and López-Escudero, Manuel (eds.), The EU’s External Action in Times of Crisis (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2016), pp. 189–204.Google Scholar

Eeckhout, Piet, ‘Brexit After the Negotiation of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement: Who Takes Back Control of What?’ (2021) 68 Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo, pp. 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eliasson, Johan and Garcia-Duran, Patricia, ‘New Is Old? The EU’s Open, Sustainable and Assertive Trade Policy’ (2023) 14(Suppl 3) Global Policy, pp. 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Englisch, Joachim and Falcão, Tatiana, ‘EU Carbon Border Adjustments and WTO Law, Part One’ (2021a) 51(10) Environmental Law Reporter, pp. 10857–10882.Google Scholar

Englisch, Joachim and Falcão, Tatiana, ‘EU Carbon Border Adjustments and WTO Law, Part Two’ (2021b) 51(11) Environmental Law Reporter, pp. 10935–10946.Google Scholar

Erixon, Frederik, Guinea, Oscar, Lamprecht, Philipp et al., ‘The New Wave of Defensive Trade Policy Measures in the European Union’, European Centre for International Political Economy Occasional Paper No 04/2022.Google Scholar

Espa, Ilaria, ‘Reconciling the Climate/Industrial Interplay of CBAMs: What Role for the WTO?’ (2022) 116 American Journal of International Law Unbound, Symposium on Carbon Border Adjustments, pp. 208–212.Google Scholar

Espa, Ilaria, Francois, Joseph, and van Asselt, Harro, ‘The EU Proposal for a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM): An Analysis under WTO and Climate Change Law’ (2022) World Trade Institute Working Paper No. 06/2022, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar

Evenett, Simon J., ‘Paper Tiger? EU Trade Enforcement as if Binding Pacts Mattered’ (2016) New Direction, The Foundation for European Reform, pp. 8–41.Google Scholar

Evenett, Simon J., Sud, Juhi Dion, and Vermulst, Edwin, ‘The European Union’s New Move Against China: Countervailing Chinese Outward Foreign Direct Investment’ (2020) 15(9) Global Trade and Customs Journal, pp. 413–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fang, Meng Mandy, ‘Shades of Green: Mapping the Parameters of the GATT Article III:8(a) Government Procurement Derogation in the Renewable Energy Transition’ (2019) 20 The Journal of World Investment & Trade, pp. 553–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fanou, Maria, ‘The CETA ICS and the Autonomy of the EU Legal Order in Opinion 1/17’ (2020) 22 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, pp. 106–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farrell, Henry and Newman, Abraham, ‘Weaponized Interdependence’ (2019) 44(1) International Security, pp. 42–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Felbermayr, Gabriel, ‘A Trumpian Turn in EU Trade Politics and the Silence of Germany’, 2018 EconPol Opinion 6, www.econpol.eu/opinion_6.Google Scholar

Felbermayr, Gabriel and Peterson, Sonja, ‘Economic Assessment of Carbon Leakage and Carbon Border Adjustment’ (2020) EP Briefing Requested by the INTA Committee, www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/603501/EXPO_BRI(2020)603501_EN.pdf, pp. 5–21.Google Scholar

Felbermayr, Gabriel and Steininger, Marina, ‘Trump’s Trade Attack on China – Who Will Have the Last Laugh?’ (2019) 20(1) CesIfo Forum 1/2019, pp. 27–32.Google Scholar

Fernández Pons, Javier, ‘Self-Help and the World Trade Organization’, in Mengozzi, Paolo (ed.), International Trade Law on the 50th Anniversary of the Multilateral Trade System (Milano: Giuffrè, 1999), pp. 55-112.Google Scholar

Fernández Pons, Javier, ‘The European Commission’s Proposed Anti-Coercion Instrument from an International Law Perspective’ (2023) CIDOB, www.cidob.org/en/articulos/monografias/la_estrategia_geoeconomica_de_china/the_european_commission_s_proposed_anti_coercion_instrument_from_an_international_law_perspective, pp. 57–63.Google Scholar

Fiorini, Matteo, Hoekman, Bernard M., Mavroidis, Petros C. et al., ‘WTO Dispute Settlement and the Appellate Body Crisis: Insider Perceptions and Members’ Revealed Preferences’ (2020) 54(5) Journal of World Trade, pp. 667–698.Google Scholar

Fisler Damrosch, Lori, ‘The Legitimacy of Economic Sanctions as Countermeasures for Wrongful Acts’ (2019) 37 Berkeley Journal of International Law, pp. 250–264.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, ‘Material Breach of Treaty: Some Legal Issues’ (2001) 6 Austrian Review of International and European Law, pp. 3–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flett, James, ‘Referring PTA Disputes to the WTO Dispute Settlement System’, in Dür, Andreas and Elsig, Manfred (eds.), Trade Cooperation: The Purpose, Design and Effects of Preferential Trade Agreements (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 555–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flett, James, ‘The European Union Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism and Its Consistency with World Trade Organization Law’, in European Commission, 70 Years of EU Law: A Union for its Citizens (Brussels: Bietlot, 2022), pp. 268–290.Google Scholar

Frankopan, Peter, The New Silk Roads. The Present and Future of the World (London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2018).Google Scholar

Furculita, Cornelia, ‘The Time of PTA Dispute Settlement Mechanisms Might Have Come’, in Elsig, Manfred, Polanco, Rodrigo, and Van den Bossche, Peter (eds.), International Economic Dispute Settlement: Demise or Transformation? (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2021a), pp. 442–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furculita, Cornelia, The WTO and the New Generation EU FTA Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: Interacting in a Fragmented and Changing International Trade Law Regime (Cham: Springer, 2021b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gabriel, Marc, Schulz, Andreas, and Manzini, Alice, ‘Proposal for an International Procurement Instrument: The Undiscovered (Third) Country’ (2020) Public Procurement Law Review, pp. 335–342.Google Scholar

Galiffa, Chiara and Garcia Bercero, Ignacio, ‘How WTO-Consistent Tools Can Ensure the Decarbonization of Emission-Intensive Industrial Sectors’ (2022) 116 American Journal of International Law Unbound, Symposium on Carbon Border Adjustments, pp. 196–201.Google Scholar

Gao, Henry, ‘Finding a Rule-Based Solution to the Appellate Body Crisis: Looking Beyond the Multiparty Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement’ (2021) 24 Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 534–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gao, Henry, ‘Will the European Union’s New Anti-Coercion Instrument Work with China?’ (2022) Research Collection Yong Pung How School of Law, https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6036&context=sol_research, pp. 1–3.Google Scholar

García, María J., ‘Sanctioning Capacity in Trade and Sustainability Chapters in EU Trade Agreements: The EU–Korea Case’ (2022) 10(1) Politics and Governance, pp. 58–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garcia-Duran Huet, Patricia and Eliasson, Leif Johan, ‘Was the EU’s 2021 Trade Strategy a Critical Juncture?’ (2022) European Foreign Affairs Review, pp. 563–584.Google Scholar

Garcia-Rubio, Mariano, ‘Unilateral Measures as a Means of Forcible Execution of WTO Recommendations and Decisions’, in Forlati, Laura and Sicilianos, Linos-Alexandre (eds.), Economic Sanctions in International Law (Leiden, Boston: Brill Nijhoff, 2004), pp. 445–475.Google Scholar

Gargne, Léo, ‘Sustainable Development in Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs)’, in Faure, Michael (ed.), Elgar Encyclopedia of Environmental Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021), vol. 11, pp. 468–479.Google Scholar

Gavin, Brigid, The European Union and Globalization: Towards Global Democratic Governance (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gehrke, Tobias, ‘EU Open Strategic Autonomy and the Trappings of Geoeconomics’ (2022) European Foreign Affairs Review Special Issue, pp. 61–78.Google Scholar

Gertz, Geoffrey and Evers, Miles, ‘Geoeconomic Competition: Will State Capitalism Win?’ (2020) 43(2) The Washington Quarterly, pp. 117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giegerich, Thomas, ‘Article 60. Termination or Suspension of the Operation of a Treaty as a Consequence of Its Breach’, in Dörr, Oliver and Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. A Commentary, 2nd ed. (Heidelberg: Springer, 2018), pp. 1095–1125.Google Scholar

Gisselman, Fredrik et al., ‘Border Carbon Adjustments. An analysis of Trade Related Aspects and the Way Forward’ (2020) National Board of Trade Sweden, www.kommerskollegium.se/contentassets/7a09d4cdb83a46feaf0c6ae6e5b02fff/border-carbon-adjustments_final_.pdf, pp. 1–105.Google Scholar

Glöckle, Caroline, ‘Bridging the Gap: The MPIA as a Valuable Short-Term Solution to the Impasse of the WTO’s Appellate Body?’, Völkerrechtsblog, 12 October 2020, https://voelkerrechtsblog.org/bridging-the-gap-the-mpia-as-a-valuable-short-term-solution-to-the-impasse-of-the-wtos-appellate-body/.Google Scholar

Glöckle, Caroline, ‘Die Ungewisse Zukunft des WTO Appellate Body’ (2020) 9 Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, pp. 356–364.Google Scholar

Glöckle, Caroline and Würdemann, Aike, ‘Die Appellate Body-Krise der WTO – eine Analyse der US-Kritikpunkte’ (2018) 23 Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, pp. 976–982.Google Scholar

Glöckle, Caroline and Würdemann, Aike, ‘The Atypical Fashion of the US-China ‘Phase 1’-Deal: Context, Content and Perspectives’ (2020) 23(2) Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, pp. 347–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gomula, Joanna, ‘Responsibility and the World Trade Organization’, in Crawford, James, Alain Pellet, and Simon Olleson (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 791–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Govaere, Inge, ‘Interconnecting Legal Systems and the Autonomous EU Legal Order’, in Govaere, Inge and Garben, Sacha (eds.), The Interface between EU and International Law. Contemporary Reflections (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2019), pp. 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graafsma, Folkert, ‘The Revised Enforcement Regulation (No 2021/167) and Some Possible Effects on EU Trade Disputes’ (2022) 17(7 & 8) Global Trade and Customs Journal, pp. 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graham, Thomas R., ‘The Rise (and Demise?) of the WTO Appellate Body’, 5 March 2020, https://worldtradelaw.typepad.com/files/t.graham.greenwaldlecture.final_.pdf.Google Scholar

Grey, Felicia A., ‘Arbitration as an Alternative Dispute Settlement Mechanism at the WTO’ (2021) 12 Journal of International Dispute Settlement, pp. 477–504.Google Scholar

Grieger, Gisela, ‘Review of EU Enforcement Regulation for Trade Disputes’ (2021) European Parliamentary Research Service Briefing, www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/652021/EPRS_BRI(2020)652021_EN.pdf.Google Scholar

Gruszczynski, Lukasz, ‘The WTO and FCTC Dispute Settlement Systems: Friends or Foes’ (2017) 12 Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy, pp. 105–134.Google Scholar

Guilliard, Simon, Beihilfenkontrolle zwischen Supranationalität und Intergouvernementalität. Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Brexit (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hackenbroich, Jonathan, ‘Protecting Europe from Economic Coercion: A European Toolbox for Countering Economic Coercion’, European Council on Foreign Relations, Policy Brief, 20 October 2020, https://ecfr.eu/publication/defending_europe_economic_sovereignty_new_ways_to_resist_economic_coercion/?amp%3Bqid=9084882#protecting.Google Scholar

Hackenbroich, Jonathan, ‘Europe’s New Economic Statecraft: A Strong Anti-Coercion Instrument’, European Council on Foreign Relations, 1 April 2022, https://ecfr.eu/article/europes-new-economic-statecraft-a-strong-anti-coercion-instrument/.Google Scholar

Hackenbroich, Jonathan and Zerka, Pawel, ‘Measured Response: How to Design a European Instrument against Economic Coercion’ (2021) European Council on Foreign Relations, Policy Brief, 23 June 2021, https://ecfr.eu/publication/measured-response-how-to-design-a-european-instrument-against-economic-coercion/.Google Scholar

Hagemeyer-Witzleb, Teoman M., The International Law of Economic Warfare (Heidelberg: Springer, 2020).Google Scholar

Hahn, Michael, ‘We’ll Always Have Geneva: The Existential Crisis of the US-led Multilateral Trading System and the EU Reactions’, in Govaere, Inge and Garben, Sascha (eds.), The Interface Between EU and International Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2019), pp. 269–292.Google Scholar

Hamann, Andrea, ‘Living without the WTO Appellate Body: Procedural Developments in International Trade Dispute Settlement’ (2021) 20 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, pp. 166–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanson, Brian, ‘What Happened to Fortress Europe? External Trade Policy Liberalization in the EU’ (1998) 52(1) International Organization, pp. 55–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harding, Rebecca, and Harding, Jack, The Weaponization of Trade: The Great Unbalancing of Politics and Economics (London: London Publishing Partnership, 2017).Google Scholar

Harrison, James et al., ‘Labour Standards Provisions in EU Free Trade Agreements: Reflections on the European Commission’s Reform Agenda’ (2019) 18(4) World Trade Review, pp. 635–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harte, Roderick Edward Noël, ‘International Procurement Instrument’ (2017) EPRS Briefing, www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2017/614610/EPRS_BRI(2017)614610_EN.pdf.Google Scholar

Hazarika, Angshuman and Van Vaerenbergh, Pieter, ‘‘One Rule to Rule Them All’: Rules for Article 25 DSU Arbitration’ (2019) 36(5) Journal of International Arbitration, pp. 595–628.Google Scholar

Heath, J. Benton, ‘The New National Security Challenge to the Economic Order’ (2020) 129(4) Yale Law Journal, pp. 1020–1098.Google Scholar

Hegde, Vineet, Wouters, Jan, and Raina, Akhil, ‘The Demise of the Rules-Based International Economic Order?’ (2020) Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies, Working Paper 224, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar

Helal, Mohamed S., ‘On Coercion in International Law’ (2019) 52(1) International Law and Politics, pp. 1–122.Google Scholar

Hinojosa-Martínez, Luis M. and Pérez-Bernárdez, Carmela (eds.) Enhancing the Rule of Law in the EU’s External Action (Cheltenham: Elgar Publishing, 2023).Google Scholar

Hiro, Dilip, After Empire: The Birth of a Multipolar World (New York: National Books, 2010).Google Scholar

Hoekman, Bernard M. and Mavroidis, Petros C., ‘To AB or Not to AB: Dispute Settlement in WTO Reform’ (2020) 23 Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 703–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoekman, Bernard and Puccio, Laura, ‘EU Trade Policy: Challenges and Opportunities’ (2019) 2019/06 Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Policy, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar

Hoffmeister, Frank, ‘The EU Public Procurement Regime on Third-Country Bidders – Setting the Cursor between Openness and Reciprocity’, in Kalimo, Harri and Jansson, Max S. (eds.), EU Economic Law in a Time of Crisis (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016), pp. 76–88.Google Scholar

Hoffmeister, Frank, ‘The Devil Is in the Detail: A First Guide on the EU’s New Trade Defence Rules’, in Weiß, Wolfgang and Furculita, Cornelia (eds.), Global Politics and EU Trade Policy: Facing the Challenges to a Multilateral Approach (Cham: Springer, 2020), pp. 211–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffmeister, Frank, ‘Do Ut Des oder Tit for Tat? – Die Europäische Handelspolitik Angesichts Neuer Herausforderungen aus den USA und China’, in Herrmann, Christoph (ed.), Die Gemeinsame Handelspolitik im Europäischen Verfassungsverbund (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2020), pp. 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffmeister, Frank, ‘Securing a Level Playing Field through EU Free Trade Agreements – from Traditional Competition Chapters to a Dedicated Title in the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement’, in Heger, Alexander and Gourdet, Sascha (eds.), Fairen Wettbewerb in der Europäischen Union sichern (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2022), pp. 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holden, Patrick, ‘Regional Integration and Trade in the Era of COVID-19: A First Look’, UNU-CRIS Working Paper Series, September 2020, p. 11, https://cris.unu.edu/sites/cris.unu.edu/files/WP20.3%20-%20Holden.pdf.Google Scholar

Hooijmaaijers, Bas, ‘China, the BRICS and the Limitations of Reshaping Global Economic Governance’ (2021) 34 The Pacific Review, pp. 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopeland, Kristen, Clash of Powers: US–China Rivalry in Global Trade Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020).Google Scholar

Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C., ‘To B(TA) or Not to B(TA)? On the Legality and Desirability of Border Tax Adjustments from a Trade Perspective’ (2011) The World Economy, pp. 1911–1937.Google Scholar

Horn, Henrik, Mavroidis, Petros C., and Sapir, André, ‘Beyond the WTO? An Anatomy of EU and US Preferential Trade Agreements’ (2010) 33(11) The World Economy, pp. 1565–1588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howse, Robert, ‘Distinguished Essay: Non-tariff Barriers and Climate Policy: Border-Adjusted Taxes and Regulatory Measures as WTO-Compliant Climate Mitigation Strategies’, in Herrmann, Christoph, Krajewski, Markus, and Terhechte, Jörg Philipp (eds.), European Yearbook of International Economic Law (Berlin: Springer, 2015), pp. 3–18.Google Scholar

Hradilová, Kateřina and Svoboda, Ondřej, ‘Sustainable Development Chapters in the EU Free Trade Agreements: Searching for Effectiveness’ (2018) 52(6) Journal of World Trade, pp. 1019–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hufbauer, Gary C., ‘China as an Economic Actor on the World Stage: An Overview’, in Abbott, Frederick M. (ed.), China in the World Trading System. Defining the Principles of Engagement (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1998), pp. 47–52.Google Scholar

Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, Kim, Jisun, and Schott, Jeffrey J., ‘Can EU Carbon Border Adjustment Measures Propel WTO Climate Talks?’ (2021) Peterson Institute for International Economics Policy Brief, www.piie.com/sites/default/files/documents/pb21-23.pdf, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar

Hufbauer, Gary, Moll, Thomas, and Rubbini, Luca, ‘Investment Subsidies for Cross-Border M&A’, United States Council Foundation Occasional Paper No. 2, April 2008, www.uscib.org/docs/usc_foundation_investment_subsidies.pdf, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar

Ikenberry, G. John, ‘The End of Liberal International Order?’ (2018) 94(1) International Affairs, pp. 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobs, Thomas, Gheyle, Niels, De Ville, Ferdi, and Orbie, Jan, ‘The Hegemonic Politics of “Strategic Autonomy” and “Resilience”: COVID-19 and the Dislocation of EU Trade Policy’ (2023) 61(1) Journal of Common Market Studies, pp. 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jamnejad, Maziar and Wood, Michael, ‘The Principle of Non-Intervention’ (2009) 22(2) Leiden Journal of International Law, pp. 345–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Juncos, Ana, ‘Resilience as the New EU Foreign Policy Paradigm: A Pragmatist Turn’ (2017) 26(1) European Security, pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kang, Jing, ‘The Presumption of Good Faith in the WTO “As Such” Cases: A Reformulation of the Mandatory/Discretionary Distinction as an Analytical Tool’ (2012) 46(4) Journal of World Trade, pp. 879–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kassoti, Eva, ‘Between Sollen and Sein: The CJEU’s Reliance on International Law in the Interpretation of Economic Agreements Covering Occupied Territories’ (2020) 33(2) Leiden Journal of International Law, pp. 371–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kassoti, Eva and Odermatt, Jed, ‘The Principle of Autonomy and International Investment Arbitration: Reflections on Opinion 1/17’ (2020) 73 Questions of International Law, pp. 5–20.Google Scholar

Kassoti, Eva and Wessel, Ramses A., ‘The Conclusion of Trade Agreements and the EU’s Duty to Respect Human Rights Abroad’, in Rodrigues, Nuno Cunha (ed.), Exterritoriality of EU Economic Law: The Application of EU Economic Law Outside the Territory of the EU (Cham: Springer, 2021), pp. 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kassoti, Eva and Wessel, Ramses A., ‘The Normative Effect of Article 3 (5) TEU. Observance and Development of International Law by the European Union’, in Andrade, Paula García (ed.) Interacciones entre el Derecho de la Union Europea y el Derecho Internacional Público (Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch, 2023), pp. 19–46.Google Scholar

Keck, Alexander and Low, Patrick, ‘Special and Differential Treatment in the WTO: Why, When, and How?’, in Hoekman, Bernard M. and Evenett, Simon J. (eds.), Economic Development and Multilateral Trade Cooperation (Washnigton, DC and New York: Palgrave Macmillan and The World Bank, 2006), pp. 147–188.Google Scholar

Khorana, Sangeeta and Garcia, Maria, ‘Introduction’, in Khorana, Sangheta and Garcia, Maria (eds.), Handbook on the EU and International Trade (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018), pp. 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, Song and Osgood, Iain, ‘Firms in Trade and Trade Politics’ (2019) Annual Review of Political Science, pp. 399–417.Google Scholar

Kirchner, Stefan, ‘More Fairness in Global Procurement: The European Union’s Future International Procurement Instrument Moves Closer to Reality’ (2021), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3913595.Google Scholar

Kirgis, Frederic, ‘Some Lingering Questions About Article 60 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties’ (1989) 22(3) Cornell International Law Journal, pp. 549–573.Google Scholar

Klimas, Tadas and Vaičiukaitė, Jūratė, ‘The Law of Recitals in European Community Legislation’ (2008) 15(1) ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar

Koch, Rika, Green Public Procurement under WTO Law. Experience of the EU and Prospects for Switzerland (Cham: Springer, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koen, Louis and Rammila, Davy, ‘The EU-Korea Panel Report: A Watershed Moment for the Trade-Labor Nexus or Mere Symbolic Victory?’ (2021) 7(2) Journal of International Trade, Logistics and Law, pp. 53–58.Google Scholar

Koenig, Christian and von Wendland, Bernhard, The Art of Regulation. Competition in Europe: Wealth and Wariness (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolb, Robert, ‘Principles as Sources of International Law (with Special Reference to Good Faith)’ (2006) 53(1) Netherlands International Law Review, pp. 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Konstadinides, Theodore, ‘Customary International Law as a Source of EU Law: A Two-Way Fertilization Route?’ (2016) 35(1) Yearbook of European Law, pp. 513–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koutrakos, Panos, ‘More on Autonomy: Opinion 1/17 (CETA)’ (2019) 3 European Law Review, pp. 293–294.Google Scholar

Krajewski, Markus, ‘The Reform of the Common Commercial Policy’, in Biondi, Andrea and Eeckhout, Piet (eds.), EU Law After Lisbon (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 292–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kratz, Agatha and Oertel, Janka, ‘Home Advantage: How China’s Protected Market Threatens Europe’s Economic Power’, European Council on Foreign Relations, Policy Brief, 15 April 2021, https://ecfr.eu/publication/home-advantage-how-chinas-protected-market-threatens-europes-economic-power/.Google Scholar

Krieger, Heike, Nolte, Georg, and Zimmermann, Andreas (eds.), The International Rule of Law: Rise or Decline? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kriener, Florian, ‘Intervention, Prohibition of’, in Anne Peters and Wolfrum, Rüdiger (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024), https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1434.Google Scholar

Kübek, Gesa, ‘Sustainable Development Chapters in EU FTAs and Dispute Settlement: Lessons Learned from Ukraine – Wood Products and Korea – Labour Rights’, in Fahey, Elaine and Mancini, Isabella (eds.), Understanding the EU as a Good Global Actor. Ambitions, Values and Metrics (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2022), pp. 277–293.Google Scholar

Kugler, Kholofelo, ‘Operationalizing MPIA Appeal Arbitrations: Opportunities and Challenges’, in Elsig, Manfred, Polanco, Rodrigo, and van den Bossche, Peter (eds.), International Economic Dispute Settlement: Demise or Transformation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021), pp. 68–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuijper, Pieter Jan, ‘From Dyestuffs to Kosovo Wine: From Avoidance to Acceptance by the European Community Courts of Customary International Law as Limit to Community Action’, in Dekker, Ige and Post, Harry (eds.), On the Foundations and Sources of International Law (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press Institute, 2003), pp. 151–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuijper, Pieter Jan, ‘“It Shall Contribute to […] the Strict Observance and Development of International Law …”’, in Rosas, Allan, Levits, Egils, and Bot, Yves (eds.), The Court of Justice of the EU and the Construction of Europe: Analyses and Perspectives on Sixty Years of Case-law (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2013), pp. 589–612.Google Scholar

Kumar, Manoj and Arora, Neha, ‘India Plans to Challenge EU Carbon Tax at WTO’, Reuters, 17 May 2023, www.reuters.com/world/india/india-plans-challenge-eu-carbon-tax-wto-sources-2023-05-16/.Google Scholar

Kunig, Philip, ‘Prohibition of Intervention’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), vol. 6, pp. 289–299.Google Scholar

Kurmayer, Nikolaus J., ‘Green industry: G7 Sets Out Terms for Global “Climate Club”’, 13 December 2022, www.euractiv.com/section/energy-environment/news/green-industry-g7-sets-out-terms-for-global-climate-club/.Google Scholar

Lacerda Prazeres, Tatiana, ‘Trade and National Security: Rising Risks for the WTO’ (2020) 19 World Trade Review, pp. 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lamp, Nicolas, ‘Making WTO Dispute Settlement Work without the Appellate Body: How the Threat of Unilateral Retaliation Could Be Used to Incentivize the Adoption of Panel Reports’, International Economic Law and Policy Blog, 3 December 2019, https://ielp.worldtradelaw.net/2019/12/making-wto-dispute-settlement-work-without-the-appellate-body-how-the-threat-of-unilateral-retaliati.html.Google Scholar

Lange, Bernd, ‘Comment: How to Make the EU’s Anti-coercion Instrument Work’, Borderlex, 7 December 2021, https://borderlex.net/2021/12/07/comment-how-to-make-the-eus-anti-coercion-instrument-work/.Google Scholar

Lanz, Rainer and Maurer, Andreas, ‘Services and Global Value Chains: Some Evidence on Servicification of Manufacturing and Services Networks’ (2015) No. ERSD-2015-03 WTO Staff Working Paper, www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd201503_e.pdf, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar

Laprévote, Francois-Charles and Lin, Wanjie, ‘Between State Aid, Trade and Antitrust: The Mixed Procedural Heritage of the Foreign Subsidies Regulation and the Overarching Principle of Non-Discrimination’ (2022) 3 Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, pp. 443–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larik, Joris, ‘The Kadi Saga as a Tale of “Strict Observance” of International Law’ (2014) 61(1) Netherlands International Law Review, pp. 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch, The Development of International Law by the International Court (London: Stevens & Sons Limited, 1958).Google Scholar

Lavery, Scott, McDaniel, Sean, and Schmid, Davide, ‘European Strategic Autonomy’, in Babić, Milan, Dixon, Adam, and Liu, Imogen (eds.), The Political Economy of Geoeconomics (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022), pp. 57–80.Google Scholar

Leal-Arcas, Rafael, EU Trade Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leal-Arcas, Rafael, Faktaufon, Manuliza, and Kyprianou, Anna, ‘A Legal Exploration of the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism’ (2022) European Energy and Environmental Law Review, pp. 223–240.Google Scholar

LeClercq, Desiree, ‘The Panel Report under the EU-Korea Trade Agreement Concerning Labor Practices: What Are the Purposes of Trade Agreements as They Relate to the ILO’s Fundamental Labor Rights?’, International Economic Law and Policy Blog, 8 February 2021, https://ielp.worldtradelaw.net/2021/02/guest-post-the-panel-report-under-the-eu-korea-trade-agreement-concerning-labor-practices-what-are-t.html.Google Scholar

Lenaerts, Koen, ‘Direct Applicability and Direct Effect of International Law in the EU Legal Order’, in Govaere, Inge, Lannon, Erwan, van Elsuwege, Peter, and Adam, Stanislas (eds.), The EU in the World: Essays in Honour of Marc Maresceau (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2014), pp. 45-64.Google Scholar

Lenaerts, Koen and Gutiérrez-Fons, José A., ‘To Say What the Law of the EU Is: Methods of Interpretation and the European Court of Justice’ (2013) European Union Institute Working Papers AEL 2013/9, pp. 1–48.Google Scholar

Leonelli, Giulia Claudia, ‘Carbon Border Measures, Environmental Effectiveness and WTO Law Compatibility: Is There a Way Forward for the Steel and Aluminium Climate Club?’ (2022) World Trade Review, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar

Lester, Simon, ‘A Framework for Thinking about the Discretion in the Mandatory/Discretionary Distinction’ (2011) 14(2) Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 369–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lester, Simon, ‘Can Interim Appeal Arbitration Preserve the WTO Dispute System?’ (2020) 77 CATO Institute Free Trade Bulletin, Hubert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies, www.cato.org/free-trade-bulletin/can-interim-appeal-arbitration-preserve-wto-dispute-system.Google Scholar

Lester, Simon, ‘Questions About the MPIA and Article 25 Appeal Arbitration’, International Economic Law and Policy Blog, 1 September 2020, https://ielp.worldtradelaw.net/2020/09/questions-about-the-mpia.html.Google Scholar

Lester, Simon, ‘Who’s Going to Pay for Supporting the MPIA?’, International Economic Law and Policy Blog, 15 June 2020, https://ielp.worldtradelaw.net/2020/06/whos-going-to-pay-for-the-mpia.html.Google Scholar

Lester, Simon, Mercurio, Bryan, and Davies, Arwel, World Trade Law: Text, Materials and Commentary, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2018).Google Scholar

Li, Xiaoling, ‘DSU Article 25 Appeal Arbitration: A Viable Interim Alternative to the WTO Appellate Body?’ (2020) 15(10) Global Trade and Customs Journal, pp. 461–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lim, Darren and Ferguson, Victor, ‘Informal Economic Sanctions: The Political Economy of Chinese Coercion During the THAAD Dispute’ (2022) 29(5) Review of International Political Economy, pp. 1525–1548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lockhart, Nicolas and Sheargold, Elisabeth, ‘In Search of Relevant Discretion: The Role of the Mandatory/Discretionary Distinction in WTO Law’ (2010) 13(2) Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 379–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Low, Patrick, Marceau, Gabrielle, and Reinaud, Julia, ‘The Interface between the Trade and Climate Change Regimes: Scoping the Issues’ (2011) WTO Staff Working Paper ERSD-2011-1, www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd201101_e.pdf, pp. 1–41.Google Scholar

Lowe, Sam, ‘The EU Should Reconsider Its Approach to Trade and Sustainable Development’ (2019a) Centre for European Reform, www.cer.eu/sites/default/files/insight_SL_31.10.19.pdf, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar

Lowe, Sam, ‘Should the EU Tax Imported CO₂?’ (2019b) Insight Centre for European Reform, www.cer.eu/sites/default/files/insight_SL_24.9_19.pdf, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar

Lowe, Sam, ‘The EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. How to Make it Work for Developing Countries’ (2021) Open Society European Policy Institute Policy Brief, www.cer.eu/publications/archive/policy-brief/2021/eus-carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism-how-make-it-work, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar

Lowe, Vaughan and Tzanakopoulos, Antonios, ‘Economic Warfare’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e292.Google Scholar

Lowenfeld, Andreas F., International Economic Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luja, Raymond, ‘The Foreign Subsidies Regulation: Countering State Aid Beyond the European Union’ (2021) 20 European State Aid Law Quarterly, pp. 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lyu Shuping, Buts Caroline and Jegers, Marc, ‘Comparing China’s Fair Competition Review System to EU State Aid Control’ (2019) 18(1) European State Aid Law Quarterly, pp. 37–60.Google Scholar

Malkin, Anton, ‘The Made in China Challenge to US Structural power: Industrial Policy, Intellectual Property and Multinational Corporations’ (2018) No. 183 Centre for International Governance Innovation Papers, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar

Manners, Ian, ‘Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?’ (2002) Journal of Common Market Studies, pp. 235–258.Google Scholar

Marceau, Gabrielle, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement and Human Rights’ (2002) 13(4) Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 753–814.Google Scholar

Marceau, Gabrielle and Wyatt, Julian, ‘Dispute Settlement Regimes Intermingled: Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO’ (2010) 1(1) Journal of International Dispute Settlement, pp. 67–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marín Durán, Gracia, ‘Sustainable Development Chapters in EU Free Trade Agreements: Emerging Compliance Issues’ (2020) 57 Common Market Law Review, pp. 1031–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marín Durán, Gracia, ‘EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Key Issues Going Forward’ (2021) 26(4) European Foreign Affairs Review, pp. 499–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marín Durán, Gracia, ‘Carbon Border Adjustments: Ensuring Compatibility with the International Climate and Trade Regimes’ (2022) 16 University College London Research Paper Series, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar

Martinico, Giuseppe, ‘The Autonomy of EU Law. A Joint Celebration of Kadi II and Van Gend en Loos’, in Avbelj, Matej, Fontanelli, Filippo, and Martinico, Giuseppe (eds.), Kadi on Trial: A Multifaceted Analysis of the Kadi Trial (London: Routledge, 2014), pp. 157–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marx, Axel, Ebert, Franz, Hachez, Nicolas, and Wouters, Jan, ‘Dispute Settlement in the Trade and Sustainable Development Chapters of EU Trade Agreements’ (2017) Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies, https://ghum.kuleuven.be/ggs/publications/books/final-report-9-february-def.pdf, pp. 13-22.Google Scholar

Marx, Axel, Ebert, Franz, and Hachez, Nicolas, ‘Dispute Settlement for Labour Provisions in EU Free Trade Agreements: Rethinking Current Approaches’ (2017) 5(4) Politics and Governance, pp. 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matsushita, Mitsuo, Schoenbaum, Thomas, Mavroidis, Petros C., and Hahn, Michael, The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice, and Policy, 3rd ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C., ‘Remedies in the WTO Legal System: Between a Rock and a Hard Place’ (2000) 11(4) European Journal of International Law, pp. 763–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C., The Sources of WTO Law and Their Interpretation (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mazzotti, Paolo, ‘Stepping Up the Enforcement of Trade and Sustainable Development Chapters in the European Union’s Free Trade Agreements: Reconsidering the Debate on Sanctions’ (2021) European Law Institute, www.europeanlawinstitute.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/p_eli/YLA_Award/Submission_ELI_Young_Lawyers_Award_Paolo_Mazzotti_2021.pdf.Google Scholar

Mbengue, Makane Moïse, ‘Preamble’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1456.Google Scholar

Mbengue, Makane Moïse, ‘The Settlement of Trade Disputes: Is There a Monopoly for the WTO?’ (2016) 15 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, pp. 207–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDonald, Brad, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement and Rule-Making: One Crisis or Two?’ (2021) 55(3) Journal of World Trade, pp. 383–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mearsheimer, John J., ‘Bound to Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order’ (2019) 43(4) International Security, pp. 7–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mehling, Michael A. and Ritz, Robert A., ‘Going Beyond Default Intensities in an EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism’ (2020) Energy Policy Research Group Paper, www.jstor.org/stable/resrep30315#metadata_info_tab_contents, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar

Mehling, Michael A., van Asselt, Harro, Das, Kasturi et al., ‘Designing Border Carbon Adjustments for Enhanced Climate Action’ (2019) 113(3) American Journal of International Law, pp. 433–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mehling, Michael,van Asselt, Harro, Droege, Susanne, and Das, Kasturi, ‘The Form and Substance of International Cooperation on Border Carbon Adjustments’ (2022) 116 American Journal of International Law Unbound, Symposium on Carbon Border Adjustments, pp. 213–218.Google Scholar

Melo Araujo, Billy, The EU Deep Trade Agenda: Law and Policy (New York: Oxford University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mendez, Mario, The Legal Effects of EU Agreements. Maximalist Treaty Enforcement and Judicial Avoidance Techniques (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mendez, Mario, ‘The Application of International Law by the CJEU’, in Bradly, Curtis (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Foreign Relations Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2019), pp. 601–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Messad, Paul, ‘Steel Industry United in Opposing Bloc’s Carbon Border Levy’, Euractiv, 23 December 2022, www.euractiv.com/section/emissions-trading-scheme/news/steel-industry-united-in-opposing-blocs-carbon-border-levy/.Google Scholar

Messerlin, Patrick, ‘The Beauty of Public Procurement in TTIP’ (2016) European Centre for International Political Economy Bulletin No. 1/2016, pp. 1–3.Google Scholar

Meunier, Sophie, ‘Managing Globalization? The EU in International Trade Negotiations’ (2007) 45(4) Journal of Common Market Studies, pp. 905–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meunier, Sophie, ‘The End of Naivety: Assertiveness and New Instruments in EU Trade and Investment Policy’ (2022) European Union Institute Global Governance Programme, Policy Brief Issue 2022/55, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar

Meunier, Sophie and Nicolaidis, Kalypso, ‘The Geopoliticization of European Trade and Investment Policy’ (2019) Journal of Common Market Studies, pp. 103–113.Google Scholar

Meyer, Timothy, ‘Taxing, Regulating, and Trading Carbon: An Introduction to the Symposium’ (2022) 116 American Journal of International Law Unbound, Symposium on Carbon Border Adjustments, pp. 191–195.Google Scholar

Meyer, Timothy and Tucker, Todd N., ‘A Pragmatic Approach to Carbon Border Measures’ (2022a) 21 World Trade Review, pp. 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer, Timothy and Tucker, Todd N., ‘Trade and Climate, Law and Politics: A Response’ (2022b) 21 World Trade Review, pp. 127–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Micheau, Claire, ‘Control of State Aid’, in Hofmann, Herwig, Rowe, Gerhard, and Türk, Alexander (eds.), Specialized Administrative Law of the EU (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 451–475.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Andrew D., ‘Good Faith in WTO Dispute Settlement’ (2006) 7 Melbourne Journal of International Law, pp. 339–371.Google Scholar

Moens, Barbara and van der Burchard, Hans, ‘Europe First: Brussels Gets Ready to Dump Its Free Trade Ideals’, www.politico.eu/article/ursula-von-der-leyen-joe-biden-trade-europe-first-brussels-gets-ready-to-dump-its-free-trade-ideals/.Google Scholar

Moore, Stephen and Laffer, Arthur B., Trumponomics: Inside the America First Plan to Revive Our Economy (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Moreno-Lax, Violeta and Gragl, Paul, ‘Beyond Monism, Dualism, Pluralism: The Quest for a (Fully-Fledged) Theoretical Framework’ (2016) 35(1) Yearbook of European Law, pp. 455–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morin, Jean-Frédéric and Rochette, Myriam ‘Transatlantic Convergence of PTAs’ Environmental Clauses’ (2017) Business and Politics, www.chaire-epi.ulaval.ca/sites/chaire-epi.ulaval.ca/files/publications/morin_and_rochette.pdf, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar

Moritani, Yuki, ‘The Partnership Agreements with Japan as a Part of Structural Foreign Policy’ (2020) 2(1) The Greater European Journal, pp. 72–78.Google Scholar

Moulin, Thibault, ‘Reviving the Principle of Non-Intervention in Cyberspace: The Path Forward’ (2020) 25(3) Journal of Conflict and Security Law, pp. 423–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maruyama, Warren and Wolff, Alan Wm., ‘Saving the WTO from the National Security Exception’ (2023) Peterson Institute for International Economics Working Papers 23-3, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar

Müller, Andreas, ‘The Direct Effect of Customary International Law’, in Bordin, Fernando Lusa, Müller, Andreas Th., and Pascual-Vives, Francisco (eds.), The EU and Customary International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022), pp. 210–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller-Ibold, Till, ‘The Draft Foreign Subsidies Regulation’ (2022) 3 Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, pp. 431–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagy, Csongor István, ‘Foreign Subsidies, Distortions and Acquisitions. Can the Playing Field Be Levelled?’ (2021) 2(1) Central European Journal of Comparative Law, pp. 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nakanishi, Yumiko, ‘Significance of the Strategic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Japan in International Order’, in Nakanishi, Yumiko and Tambou, Olivia (eds.), The EU-Japan Relationship, Collection Open Access Book (Blogdroiteuropeen, 2020), https://blogdroiteuropeen.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/eu-japan-relationship-v3–4.pdf, pp. 20–26.Google Scholar

National Board of Trade Sweden, ‘Comments on the Commission’s Roadmap for a Mechanism to Deter and Counteract Coercive Action by Non-EU Countries’, 17 March 2021, https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12803-Trade-mechanism-to-deter-counteract-coercive-action-by-non-EU-countries/F2000578_en.Google Scholar

National Board of Trade Sweden, ‘The EU Proposal for an Anti-Coercion Instrument’ (2022), www.kommerskollegium.se/en/publications/reports/2022/the-eu-proposal-for-an-anti-coercion-instrument.Google Scholar

Neframi, Eleftheria, ‘Customary International Law and the EU from the Perspective of Article 3 (5) TEU’, in Eeckhout, Piet and López-Escudero, Manuel (eds.), The EU’s External Action in Times of Crisis (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2016), pp. 205–222.Google Scholar

Neumann, Felix, Export des Europäischen Beihilfenrechts. Eine Analyse der Europäisierung des internationalen Subventionsrechts durch bilaterale Handelsabkommen (Cham: Springer, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nguyen, Trung, ‘The Procedural Inconsistency of the Envisaged EU Enforcement Regulation with the EU’s WTO Obligations’, OpinioJuris, 30 October 2020, http://opiniojuris.org/2020/10/30/the-procedural-inconsistency-of-the-envisaged-eu-enforcement-regulation-with-the-eus-wto-obligations/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nissen, Aleydis, ‘And So It Begins: Trade and Sustainable Development Recommendations by a Panel of Experts under a European Union Free Trade Agreement’ (2021) 7 International Labor Rights Case Law, pp. 257–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nissen, Aleydis, ‘Not That Assertive: The EU’s Take on Enforcement of Labour Obligations in Its Free Trade Agreement with South Korea’ (2022) 33 European Journal of International Law, pp. 607–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Novitz, Tonia, ‘Enforceable Social Clauses in Trade Agreements with ‘Bite’? Implications of the EU–South Korea Panel of Experts Report of 20 January 2021’ (2021) 6 European Trade Union Institute Policy Brief, www.etui.org/publications/enforceable-social-clauses-trade-agreements-bite.Google Scholar

Novitz, Tonia, ‘The Role of the EU in Making ‘Sustainable’ Labour Linkages in Contemporary Trade: Is Being ‘Assertive’ also ‘Good’?’, in Fahey, Elaine and Mancini, Isabella (eds.), Understanding the EU as a Good Global Actor (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2022), pp. 124–141.Google Scholar

Odermatt, Jed, ‘Council of the European Union v. Front Populaire Pour la Libération de la Saguia-El-Hamra et du Rio de Oro (Front Polisario). Case C-104/16P’ (2017) 111(3) American Journal of International Law, pp. 731–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Odermatt, Jed, International Law and the European Union (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oh, Seung-Youn, ‘China’s Race to the Top: Regional and Global Implications of China’s Industrial Policy’ (2021) 20(2) World Trade Review, pp. 169–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orbie, Jan, ‘EU Trade Policy Meets Geopolitics’ (2021) 26(2) European Foreign Affairs Review, pp. 197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Sullivan, David, ‘The European Union and the Multilateral System: Lessons from Past Experience and Future Challenges’, European Parliamentary Research Service Briefing PE 689.365, 5 March 2021, www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/689365/EPRS_BRI(2021)689365_EN.pdf.Google Scholar

Pacheco Restrepo, Yilly Vanessa, ‘Enforcement Practice under Preferential Trade Agreements: Environmental Consultations and Submissions on Environmental Enforcement Matters in the US-Peru TPA’ (2019) 46(3) Legal Issues of Economic Integration, pp. 247–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pander Maat, Eva, ‘The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism and the Challenge of Being a “Good” Climate and Trade Actor’, in Fahey, Elaine and Mancini, Isabella (eds.), Understanding the EU as a Good Global Actor: Ambitions, Values and Metrics (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022), pp. 141–157.Google Scholar

Papaconstantinou, George A. and Pedreschi, Luigi F., ‘Alternative Dispute Settlement and the Jurisprudential Legacy of the World Trade Organization’s Appellate Body’ (2022) 56(2) Journal of World Trade, pp. 261–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘How to Win a World Trade Organization Dispute Based on Non-World Trade Organization Law? Questions of Jurisdiction and Merits’ (2003) 37(6) Journal of World Trade, pp. 997–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘Carbon Leakage Measures and Border Tax Adjustments under WTO Law’, in Van Calster, Geert and Prévost, Denise (eds.), Research Handbook on Environment, Health and the WTO (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013), pp. 448–506.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘Interplay between the WTO Treaty and Other International Legal Instruments and Tribunals: Evolution After 20 Years of WTO Jurisprudence’ (2017), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2731144.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement Post 2019: What to Expect?’ (2019) Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 297–321.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘The MPIA: What’s New (Part III)’, International Economic Law and Policy Blog, 6 March 2023, https://ielp.worldtradelaw.net/2023/03/the-mpia-whats-new-part-iii.html.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost and Kleimann, David, ‘Trade Related Aspects of a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: A Legal Assessment’ (2020) European Parliament Briefing Requested by the Committee on International Trade (INTA), www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/210514/EXPO_BRI(2020)603502_EN.pdf, pp. 5–17.Google Scholar

Pechstein, Matthias and Drechsler, Carola, ‘Die Auslegung und Fortbildung des Primärrechts’, in Riesenhuber, Karl (ed.), Europäische Methodenlehre: Handbuch für Ausbildung und Praxis, 4 ed. (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2015), pp. 181–208.Google Scholar

Peers, Steve, ‘The EU’s Accession to the ECHR: The Dream Becomes a Nightmare’ (2015) 16(1) German Law Journal, pp. 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peksen, Dursun and Jeong, Jin, ‘Coercive Diplomacy and Economic Sanctions Reciprocity: Explaining Targets’ Counter-Sanctions’ (2021) Defence and Peace Economics, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar

Perdikis, Nicholas and Perdikis, Laurie, ‘The Establishment and Development of the European Union and Its Trade Policy’, in Khorana, Sangeeta and Garcia, Maria (eds.), Handbook on the EU and International Trade (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018), pp. 17–35.Google Scholar

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, ‘Participation of the EC in the GATT: International Law and Community Law Aspects’, in O’Keeffe, David and Schermers, Henry G. (eds.), Mixed Agreements (Boston: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, 1983), pp. 167–198.Google Scholar

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, ‘How Should WTO Members React to Their WTO Crises?’ (2019) 18(3) World Trade Review, pp. 503–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, ‘Multilevel Judicial Protection of “Access to Justice” and the EU’s Duty to Contribute to the “Strict Observance and Development of International Law”’, in Avbelj, Matej, Fontanelli, Filippo, and Martinico, Giuseppe (eds.), Kadi on Trial: A Multifaceted Analysis of the Kadi Trial (London: Routledge, 2014), pp. 187–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pickard, Duncan, ‘Judicial Interpretation at the European Court of Justice as a Feature of Supranational Law’ (2017) 20 European Union Law Working Papers, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar

Poiares Maduro, Miguel, ‘Interpreting European Law: Judicial Adjudication in the Context of Constitutional Pluralism’ (2007) 1(2) European Journal of Legal Studies, pp. 137–152.Google Scholar

Poretti, Pietro, ‘Waiting for Godot: Subsidy Disciplines in Services Trade’, in Panizzon, Marion, Pohl, Nicole, and Sauvé, Pierre (eds.), GATS and the Regulation of International Trade in Services (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 466–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porges, Amy, ‘Alternative Dispute Settlement in the GATT and the WTO’, in Bethlehem, Daniel (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Trade Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022), pp. 1042–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Portela, Clara, ‘Enforcing Respect for Labour Standards with Targeted Sanctions’ (2018) Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/singapur/14689.pdf.Google Scholar

Prévost, Denise and Alexovičová, Iveta, ‘Mind the Compliance Gap: Managing Trustworthy Partnerships for Sustainable Development in the European Union’s Free Trade Agreements’ (2019) 6(3) International Journal of Public Law and Policy, pp. 236–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Qin, Julia, ‘Turkey–Pharmaceuticals: The First WTO Arbitration for Appellate Review’ (2022) 49(4) Legal Issues of Economic Integration, pp. 415-430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quick, Reinhard, ‘Carbon Border Adjustment: A Dissenting View on Its Alleged GATT-Compatibility’ (2020) 4 Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, pp. 549–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quick, Reinhard and Das, Isha, ‘Can Paris Strike Back? On the Paris Agreement’s Inability to Cope with Unilateral Trade-Related Carbon Measures Such as the European Commission’s CBAM-Proposal’, in Baetens, Freya and van den Bogaert, Stefaan (eds.), The EU and the WTO: Ever the Twain Shall Meet: Liber Amicorum Marco Bronckers (Aalphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2023), pp. 75–102.Google Scholar

Quick, Reinhard and Das, Isha, ‘The EU’s CBAM-Regulation stands in contrast to fundamental EU-obligations under the Paris Agreement’, International Economic Law and Policy Blog, 19 July 2023, https://ielp.worldtradelaw.net/2023/07/guest-post-the-eus-cbam-regulation-stands-in-contrast-to-fundamental-eu-obligations-under-the-paris-.html.Google Scholar

Rajamani, Lavanya, ‘Ambition and Differentiation in the 2015 Paris Agreement: Interpretative Possibilities and Underlying Politics’ (2016a) 65 International & Comparative Law Quarterly, pp. 493–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rajamani, Lavanya, ‘Common but Differentiated Responsibilities’, in Faure, Michael (ed.), Elgar Encyclopedia of Environmental Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016b), pp. 291–302.Google Scholar

Rajput, Aniruddha, ‘The BRICS as ‘Rising Powers’ and the Development of International Law’, in Krieger, Heike, Nolte, Georg, and Zimmermann, Andreas (eds.), International Rule of Law: Rise or Decline? (New York: Oxford University Press, 2019), pp. 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raju, Deepak, ‘Proposed EU Regulation to Address Third Country Coercion – What Is Coercion?’, EJIL:Talk!, 6 January 2022, www.ejiltalk.org/proposed-eu-regulation-to-address-third-country-coercion-what-is-coercion/.Google Scholar

Ranjan, Prabhash, ‘Russia-Ukraine War and WTO’s National Security Exception’ (2023) 58(2) Foreign Trade Review, pp. 246–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reinhold, Steven, ‘Good Faith in International Law’ (2013) Bonn Research Papers on Public International Law Paper No. 2/2013, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar

Remy, Jan Yves, ‘Dispute Settlement at the WTO: How Did We Get Here and What’s Next for Commonwealth States?’ (2020) 166 The Commonwealth Trade Hot Topics, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar

Riesenhuber, Karl (ed.), Europäische Methodenlehre, 4th ed. (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rigod, Boris, ‘Global Europe: The EU’s New Trade Policy in Its Legal Context’ (2012) 18 Columbia Journal of European Law, pp. 277–306.Google Scholar

Ritzek-Seidl, Simone, ‘The Regulation on Foreign Subsidies Distorting the Internal Market: Outline of the Provisional Agreement’ (2022) 3 Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, pp. 423–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, Anthea, Choer Moraes, Henrique, and Ferguson, Victor, ‘Toward a Geoeconomic Order in International Trade and Investment’ (2019) 22(4) Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 655–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ronzitti, Natalino, ‘Sanctions as Instruments of Coercive Diplomacy: An International Law Perspective’, in Ronzitti, Natalino (ed.), Coercive Diplomacy, Sanctions and International Law (Leiden: Brill Neijhoff, 2016), pp. 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubini, Luca, ‘“A Delphic Oracle?” What Does the Recent EU Commission’s Trade Policy Review Mean?’, EU Law Live, 24 June 2020, https://eulawlive.com/op-ed-a-delphic-oracle-what-does-the-recent-eu-commissions-trade-policy-review-mean-by-luca-rubini.Google Scholar

Ruggie, John, ‘International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order’ (1982) 36(2) International Organization, pp. 379–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruiz Fabri, Hélène, ‘Is There a Case – Legally and Politically – for Direct Effect of WTO Obligations?’ (2014) 25(1) European Journal of International Law, pp. 151–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruys, Tom, ‘Sanctions, Retorsions and Countermeasures: Concepts and International Legal Framework’, in van den Herik, Larissa (ed.), Research Handbook on UN Sanctions and International Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017), pp. 19–51.Google Scholar

Sánchez, Alejandro, ‘What Trade Lawyers Should Know About the ILC Articles on State Responsibility’ (2012) 7(6) Global Trade and Customs Journal, pp. 292–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanchez-Graells, Albert, ‘Article 2: Definitions’, in Caranta, Roberto and Sanchez-Graells, Albert (eds.), European Public Procurement. Commentary on Directive 2014/24/EU (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2021).Google Scholar

Sands, Philippe, and Peel, Jacqueline, Principles of International Environmental Law, 3rd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sapir, André and Horn, Henrik, ‘Political Assessment of Possible Reactions of EU Main Trading Partners to EU Border Carbon Measures’ (2020) European Parliament Briefing Requested by the Committee on International Trade (INTA), www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/210515/EXPO_BRI(2020)603503_EN.pdf, pp. 5–14.Google Scholar

Sato, Sakuya (Yoshida), ‘EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Will It Achieve Its Objective(s)?’ (2021) 56(3) Journal of World Trade, pp. 383–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schaus, Malorie, ‘EU Trade Policy in Light of the New Industrial Strategy’ (2021) 56 Intereconomics, pp. 144–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmitz, Luuk and Seidl, Timo, ‘As Open as Possible, as Autonomous as Necessary’ (2023) 61(3) Journal of Common Market Studies, pp. 834–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schonberg, Morris, ‘The EU Foreign Subsidies Regulation: Substantive Assessment Issues and Open Questions’ (2022) 21(2) European State Aid Law Quarterly, pp. 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sender, , Omri, ‘Coercion’, in Anne Peters and Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law, Online ed. (Oxford University Press, 2024), https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1749.Google Scholar

Shaffer, Gregory, Emerging Powers and the World Tading System: The Past and Future of International Economic Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shaffer, Gregory and Gao, Henry, ‘A New Chinese Economic Order?’ (2020) 23(3) Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 607–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Siles-Brügge, Gabriel, Constructing European Union Trade Policy: A Global Idea of Europe (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simma, Bruno and Pulkowski, Dirk, ‘Of Planets and the Universe: Self-Contained Regimes in International Law’ (2006) 17(3) European Journal of International Law, pp. 483–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simma, Bruno and Tams, Christian, ‘Reacting Against Treaty Breaches’, in Hollis, Duncan (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Treaties, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020), pp. 568–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Starshinova, Olga, ‘Is the MPIA a Solution to the WTO Appellate Body Crisis?’ (2021) 55(5) Journal of World Trade, pp. 787–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stewart, Terence P., ‘European Union Moves to Authorize Retaliation Where There Is No Alternative to the Appellate Body Pursued’, Current Thoughts on Trade, 19 December 2019, https://currentthoughtsontrade.com/2019/12/19/european-union-moves-to-authorize-retaliation-in-disputes-where-there-is-no-alternative-to-the-appellate-body-pursued/.Google Scholar

Stiglitz, Joseph E., Making Globalization Work (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2006).Google Scholar

Stoll, Peter-Tobias, Gött, Henner, and Abel, Patrick, ‘Model Labour Chapter for European Union Trade Agreements’ (2020) Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/singapur/16089.pdf.Google Scholar

Sun Han, Ji, ‘The EU-Korea Labour Dispute: A Critical Analysis of the EU’s Approach’ (2021) 26(4) European Foreign Affairs Review, pp. 531–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Szczepański, Marcin, ‘EU International Procurement Instrument’ (2022) European Parliamentary Research Service, www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2022/729459/EPRS_ATA(2022)729459_EN.pdf.Google Scholar

Tamiotti, Ludivine, The, Robert, Kulaçoglu, Vasile et al., ‘Trade and Climate Change’ (2009) WTO-UNEP Report, www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/trade_climate_change_e.pdf, pp. 1–166.Google Scholar

Telles, Pedro, ‘SME Related Impacts, Thresholds and National Legislation’, in Detailed Appraisal of the European Commission’s Impact Assessment: Third Countries’ Reciprocal Access to EU Public Procurement (2013) European Parliamentary Research Service, www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2014/508963/EPRS_BRI(2014)508963_REV1_EN.pdf, pp. 100–121.Google Scholar

Titievskaia, Jana, Morgado Simões, Henrique, and Dobreva, Alina, ‘EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism Implications for Climate and Competitiveness’ (2022) European Parliament Research Service, www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2022/698889/EPRS_BRI(2022)698889_EN.pdf, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar

Tladi, Dire, ‘The Duty Not to Intervene in Matters Within Domestic Jurisdiction’, in Viñuales, Jorge E. (ed.), The UN Friendly Relations Declaration at 50: An Assessment of the Fundamental Principles of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020), pp. 87–104.Google Scholar

Tocci, Nathalie, ‘The Making of the EU Global Strategy’ (2016) 37 Contemporary Security Policy, pp. 461–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tokas, Marios, ‘Playing the Game: The EU’s Proposed Regulation on Foreign Subsidies’ (2022) 56(5) Journal of World Trade, pp. 779–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trachtman, Joel P., ‘WTO Law Constraints on Border Tax Adjustment and Tax Credit Mechanisms to Reduce the Competitive Effects of Carbon Taxes’ (2016) Resources for the Future Discussion Paper, https://media.rff.org/documents/RFF-DP-16-03.pdf, pp. 1–42.Google Scholar

Trapp, Patricia, ‘Das Weißbuch der Kommission zur Gewährleistung fairer Wettbewerbsbedingungen bei Subventionen aus Drittstaaten’ (2020) 22 Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschafsrecht, pp. 964–970.Google Scholar

Trepte, Peter, ‘The Agreement on Government Procurement’, in Macrory, Patrick F. J., Appleton, Arthur E, and Plummer, Michael G (eds.), The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis (New York: Springer, 2005), pp. 1123–1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tzanakopoulos, Antonios, ‘The Right to be Free from Economic Coercion’ (2015) 4(3) Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law, pp. 616–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van den Bossche, Peter, ‘Is There a Future for the WTO Appellate Body and WTO Dispute Settlement?’ (2022) World Trade Institute Working Paper No. 01/2022, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar

Van den Bossche, Peter and Akpofure, Sarah, ‘The Use and Abuse of the National Security Exception under Article XXI(b)(iii) of the GATT 1994’ (2020) WTI Working Paper No. 03/2020, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar

Van den Bossche, Peter and Zdouc, Werner, The Law and Policy of the WTO, 5th ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022).Google Scholar

Van der Loo, Guillaume, ‘Law and Practice of the EU’s Trade Agreements with “Disputed” Territories: A Consistent Approach?’, in Govaere, Inge and Garben, Sacha (eds.), The Interface Between EU and International Law. Contemporary Reflections (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2019), pp. 243–268.Google Scholar

Van der Schueren, Paulette, Mizulin, Nikolay, Gergondet, Edourd, and Geraets, Dylan, ‘European Commission Unveils its Anti-Coercion Instrument Proposal’, Meyer Brown Legal Update, 9 December 2021, www.mayerbrown.com/-/media/files/perspectives-events/publications/2021/12/european-commission-unveils-its-anticoercion-instrument-proposal.pdf, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar

van Elsuwege, Pieter, ‘The Nexus Between Common Commercial Policy and Human Rights’, in van der Loo, Guillaume and Hahn, Michael (eds.) The Law and Practice of Common Commercial Policy: The First Ten Years after the Treaty of Lisbon (Leiden, Boston: Brill Nijhoff, 2021), pp. 416–433.Google Scholar

van Gaal, Wester, ‘EU Negotiators Agree on Historic Carbon Tariff’, EUobserver, 13 December 2022, https://euobserver.com/green-economy/156534.Google Scholar

VanGrasstek, Craig, Trade and American Leadership: The Paradoxes of Power and Wealth from Alexander Hamilton to Donald Trump (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

VanGrasstek, Craig, ‘The Trade Policy of the United States under the Trump Administration’ (2019b) EUI Working Papers, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies 2019/11, pp. 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van ‘t Wout, Demy, ‘The Enforceability of the Trade and Sustainable Development Chapters of the European Union’s Free Trade Agreements’ (2022) 20 Asia Europe Journal, pp. 81–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Velut, Jean Baptiste, Baeza Breinbauer, Daniela, de Bruijne, Marit et al., ‘Comparative Analysis of Trade and Sustainable Development Provisions in Free Trade Agreements’ (2022) Trade Policy Hub, London School of Economics and Political Science Consulting, www.lse.ac.uk/business/consulting/assets/documents/TSD-Final-Report-Feb-2022.pdf.Google Scholar

Ventouratou, Anna, ‘The Law on State Responsibility and the World Trade Organization’ (2021) 22 Journal of World Investment & Trade, pp. 759–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Venzke, Ingo and Vidigal, Geraldo, ‘Are Unilateral Trade Measures in the Climate Crisis the End of Differentiated Responsibilities? The Case of the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)’, in den Heijer, Maarten and van der Wilt, Harmen (eds.), Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 2020: Global Solidarity and Common but Differentiated Responsibilities, vol. 51 (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2022), pp. 187–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verlin Laatikainen, Katie and Smith, Karen E. (eds.), The European Union at the United Nations: Intersecting Multilateralisms (Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vermulst, Edwin and Dion Sud, Juhi, ‘Are the EU’s Trade Defence Instruments WTO Compliant?’, in Weiß, Wolfgang and Furculita, Cornelia (eds.), Global Politics and EU Trade Policy: Facing the Challenges to a Multilateral Approach (Cham: Springer, 2020), pp. 231–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vidigal, Geraldo, ‘Why Is There So Little Litigation under Free Trade Agreements? Retaliation and Adjudication in International Dispute Settlement’ (2017) 20 Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 927–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vidigal, Geraldo, ‘Westphalia Strikes Back: The 2008 Trade Wars and Threat to the WTO Regime’ (2018) 2018/31 Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper, pp. 1–57.Google Scholar

Vidigal, Geraldo, ‘Living without the Appellate Body: Multilateral, Bilateral and Plurilateral Solutions to the WTO Dispute Settlement Crisis’ (2019) 20(6) Journal of World Investment & Trade, pp. 862–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vidigal, Geraldo, ‘WTO Adjudication and the Security Exception: Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed – Something Blue?’ (2019) 46(3) Legal Issues of Economic Integration, pp. 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Villiger, Mark E., Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vogenauer, Stefan, Die Auslegung von Gesetzen in England und auf dem Kontinent (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001).Google Scholar

Voigt, Christina, ‘Up in the Air: Aviation, the EU Emissions Trading Scheme and the Question of Jurisdiction’ (2012) 14 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, pp. 475–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Voigt, Christina and Ferreira, Felipe, ‘Dynamic Differentiation: The Principles of CBDR-RC, Progression and Highest Possible Ambition in the Paris Agreement’ (2016) 5(2) Transantional Environmental Law, pp. 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vranes, Erich, ‘Jurisdiction and Applicable Law in WTO Dispute Settlement’ (2005) 48 German Yearbook of International Law, pp. 265–290.Google Scholar

Vranes, Erich, ‘The Definition of ‘Norm Conflict’ in International Law and Legal Theory’ (2006) 17(2) European Journal of International Law, pp. 395–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walker, Rebecca, ‘The “Trade-Related” Conundrum of the EU–Korea FTA Expert Panel: Are FTAs a Novel Forum to Enforce Sustainable Development Goals?’ (2021) International Institute for Sustainable Development, www.iisd.org/itn/en/2021/10/07/the-trade-related-conundrum-of-the-eu-korea-fta-expert-panel-are-ftas-a-novel-forum-to-enforce-sustainable-development-goals/.Google Scholar

Wang, Heng, ‘Selective Reshaping: China’s Paradigm Shift in International Economic Governance’ (2020) 23(3) Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 583–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weil, Prosper, ‘Towards Relative Normativity in International Law’ (1983) 77 American Journal of International Law, pp. 413–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weinhardt, Clara, Mau, Karsten, and Hillebrand Pohl, Jens, ‘The EU as a Geoeconomic Actor? A Review of Recent European Trade and Investment Policies’, in Babić, Milan, Dixon, Adam D, and Liu, Imogen T (eds.), The Political Economy of Geoeconomics (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022), pp. 107–136.Google Scholar

Weiß, Wolfgang, ‘WTO Procurement Rules: In Particular the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA) and Services of General Interest’, in Krajewski, Markus (ed.), Services of General Interest Beyond the Single Market. External and International Law Dimensions (The Hague: T.M.C Asser Press, 2015), pp. 49–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiß, Wolfgang, ‘EU Multilateral Trade Policy in a Changing, Multipolar World: The Way Forward’, in Weiß, Wolfgang and Furculita, Cornelia (eds.), Global Politics and EU Trade Policy: Facing the Challenges to a Multilateral Approach (Cham: Springer, 2020), pp. 17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiß, Wolfgang, ‘Interpreting Essential Security Exceptions in WTO Law in View of Economic Security Interests’, in Weiß, Wolfgang and Furculita, Cornelia (eds.), Global Politics and EU Trade Policy: Facing the Challenges to a Multilateral Approach (Cham: Springer, 2020), pp. 255–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiß, Wolfgang, ‘The CETA Investment Court and EU External Autonomy’ (2020) 8(1) Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, pp. 15–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiß, Wolfgang, WTO Law and Domestic Regulation (München, Oxford, Baden-Baden: Hart, Beck, Nomos, 2020).Google Scholar

Weiß, Wolfgang, ‘Enhancement of the European Parliament’s Monitoring for Better Coherence Between Trade Policy and Non-Trade Policy Objectives (NTPOs)’ (2021) 2021/68 Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Working Paper, https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/72240/RSC%202021_68.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y, pp. 1-19.Google Scholar

Weiß, Wolfgang, ‘Ex Officio Third Country Subsidies’ Review’ (2022) 21(2) European State Aid Law Quarterly, pp. 132–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiß, Wolfgang, ‘Handelsvergeltungs-VO’, in Krenzler, Horst Günter, Herrmann, Christoph, and Niestedt, Marian (eds.), EU-Außenwirtschafts-und Zollrecht (München: C.H. Beck, 2022), p. 112.Google Scholar

Weiß, Wolfgang, ‘The EU’s Strategic Autonomy in Times of Politicization of International Trade: The Future of Commission Accountability’ (2023) 14(Suppl 3) Global Policy, pp. 54–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiß, Wolfgang, ‘The EU’s Strategic Autonomy and Rule of Law in External Affairs: What Future for Respect for International Law and Multilateralism in Trade Policy?’, in Hinojosa-Martínez, Luis M. and Bernárdez, Carmela Pérez (eds.), Enhancing the Rule of Law in the EU’s External Action (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2023), pp. 186–215.Google Scholar

Weiß, Wolfgang and Furculita, Cornelia, ‘The EU in Search for Stronger Enforcement Rules. Assessing the Proposed Amendments to Trade Enforcement Regulation 654/2014’ (2020) 23(4) Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 865–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wessel, Ramses, ‘The EU and International Law’, in Wessel, Ramses and Larik, Joris (eds.), EU External Relations Law: Text, Cases and Materials, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2020), pp. 139–173.Google Scholar

Wessel, Ramses and Kaspiarovich, Yuliya, ‘The Role of Values in EU External Relations, in Fahey, Elaine and Mancini, Isabella (eds.), Understanding the EU as a Good Global Actor: Ambitions, Values, and Metrics (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022), pp. 92–106.Google Scholar

Whitsitt, Elizabeth, ‘A Modest Victory at the WTO for Ontario’s FIT Program’ (2013) 20(1) University of California, Davis Journal of International Law and Policy, pp. 75–103.Google Scholar

Will, Ulrike, Climate Border Adjustments and WTO Law: Extending the EU Emissions Trading System to Imported Goods and Services (Leiden: Brill Neijhoff, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, Nancy, ‘The Resilience of Protectionism in U.S. Trade Policy’ (2019) Boston University Law Review, pp. 683–719.Google Scholar

Williams, Rhodri, ‘A New EU International Procurement Instrument (IPI)’, Henderson Chambers, 13 April 2022, www.hendersonchambers.co.uk/2022/04/13/alerter-by-rhodri-williams-qc-a-new-eu-international-procurement-instrument-ipi/.Google Scholar

Wolff, Alan Wm., ‘WTO 2025: Restoring Binding Dispute Settlement’, Peterson Institute for International Economics Working Papers 22-5, www.piie.com/publications/working-papers/wto-2025-restoring-binding-dispute-settlement, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar

Woo Kim, Jin and Luyten, Ann-Evelyn, ‘Op-Ed: Could the EU’s Chief Trade Enforcement Officer Enforce Sustainable Development Commitments under EU Trade Agreements Against Non-Compliant Third Countries?’, EU Law Live, 13 May 2020, https://eulawlive.com/op-ed-could-the-eus-chief-trade-enforcement-officer-enforce-sustainable-development-commitments-under-eu-trade-agreements-against-non-compliant-third-countries-by-ann-evel/#.Google Scholar

Woolcock, Stephen, ‘EU Policy on Preferential Trade Agreements in the 2000s: A Reorientation Towards Commercial Aims’ (2014) 20(6) European Law Journal, pp. 718–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woolcock, Stephen, ‘Trade Policy: Policy-Making After the Treaty of Lisbon’, in Wallace, Helen, Pollack, Mark A., and Young, Alasdair R. (eds.), Policy-Making in the European Union, 7th ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 388–406.Google Scholar

World Trade Organization, ‘Trade and Environment at the WTO’ (2004), www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/envir_wto2004_e.pdf, pp. 1–76.Google Scholar

Wouters, Jan, and Raina, Akhil, ‘The European Union and Global Economic Governance: A Leader without a Roadmap?’, in Chaisse, Julien (ed.), Sixty Years of European Integration and Global Power Shifts: Perceptions, Interactions and Lessons (London: Hart Publishing, 2020), pp. 193–216.Google Scholar

Wouters, Jan, Odermatt, Jed, and Ramopoulos, Thomas, ‘Worlds Apart? Comparing the Approaches of the European Court of Justice and the EU Legislature to International Law’, in Cremona, Marise and Thies, Anne (eds.), The European Court of Justice and External Relations Law: Constitutional Challenges (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014), pp. 249–279.Google Scholar

Wouters, Jan, Hoffmeister, Frank, De Baere, Geert, and Ramopoulos, Thomas, The Law of EU External Relations. Cases, Materials, and Commentary on the EU as an International Legal Actor, 3rd ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wu, Bixuan, ‘To Penalize Low Carbon Price or High Carbon Intensity? A Comparison of the EU’s CBAM and the U.S. Clean Competition Act’, International Economic Law and Policy Blog, 1 July 2022, https://ielp.worldtradelaw.net/2022/07/guest-post-to-penalize-low-carbon-price-or-high-carbon-intensity-a-comparison-of-the-eus-cbam-and-th.html.Google Scholar