Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:08:57.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

3 - Optical absorption

P. D. Townsend
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
P. J. Chandler
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
L. Zhang
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Get access

Summary

Analysis methods using absorption, ESR and RBS

Optical methods of studying defects have the advantage that if each defect has characteristic energy levels which lie within the forbidden energy gap, then they show separable optical absorption and luminescence bands. Higher photon energy absorption generally monitors electronic transitions, whereas infra-red absorption records vibrational spectra. Many of the optical transitions which result from the presence of impurities have energies in the visible part of the spectrum and consequently the defects are referred to as colour centres. Examples of colour centres are widespread and include the impurities which give colouration to ruby and sapphire or stained glass. They are the basis for photographic and photochromic materials, and frequently involve a mixture of impurity and intrinsic defects. Whilst analysis of absorption bands may determine defect symmetry and inter-relationships of different colour centres, it is unusual to be able to confirm precise models of defect sites solely from the absorption data. In this respect the processes which involve hyperfine interactions such as Electron Spin Resonance (ESR), Electron Nuclear Double Resonance (ENDOR), Mossbauer spectroscopy or spin precession techniques provide more specific answers if they can be applied. In the ion implantation literature there are frequent presentations of data from Rutherford Back-scattering Spectrometry (RBS) to give the depth distributions of impurities or damage in the target material. In part, RBS appears to be popular for implantation analysis because it requires a high energy ion accelerator, which is normally a feature of an implantation laboratory. The information is useful but, like electron microscopy, it rarely gives precise details of individual defect arrangements.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×