Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T11:44:32.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Identity Verifi cation and the Social Order

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2015

Peter J. Burke
Affiliation:
University of California, Riverside USA
Jan E. Stets
Affiliation:
University of California, Riverside USA
Edward J. Lawler
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Shane R. Thye
Affiliation:
University of South Carolina
Jeongkoo Yoon
Affiliation:
EWHA Women's University, Seoul
Get access

Summary

Abstract

We outline how identity verification has consequences for the construction and reconstruction of the social order. Identity verification occurs when individuals perceive self-relevant meanings in the situation that match who they are in that situation (their identity). Verification of an identity feels good. This generates solidarity (when facilitated by others) and adherence to norms. Identities are verified by individuals controlling the flow of resources in interaction, and it is this flow that maintains the social structure. Resources either can be ready to be consumed (active resources) such as food for nourishment, or they can have some future use (potential resources) such as education for adaptation. We discuss how identity verification is accomplished by using symbols and signs attached to potential and actual resources in situations. The control of resources helps verify not only one's own identity but also others’ identities. Since the process of identity verification produces positive feelings and stronger social bonds, this should facilitate maintenance of the social order. Identity nonverification will have the reverse effect on the social order, generating negative emotions, conflict, and chaos.

In identity theory, identity verification means changing the world (as we perceive it) to be the way it is supposed to be (according to our identity standards). Our perceptions are the meanings that we control to accomplish this. Perceptually, meanings are conveyed through signs and symbols emanating from the situation. Much of the research and theory within the identity theory framework has focused on symbols, whose arbitrary meanings, learned from the common culture, are shared with others. In this chapter, we emphasize this but also bring more attention to the other source of meaning noted by Mead (1934): signs, whose meaning is not arbitrary but is learned by direct experience in the situation. In this way, we begin to delineate more clearly the connection of identities to the material world and the social structure that surrounds and sustains us. We also point to the role of resource flows including actual and potential resources in verifying people's identities and in maintaining the social structure.

Type
Chapter
Information
Order on the Edge of Chaos
Social Psychology and the Problem of Social Order
, pp. 145 - 164
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burke, Peter J. 2003. “Relationships among Multiple Identities.” Pp. 195–214 in Advances in Identity Theory and Research, edited by Burke, P. J., Owens, T. J, Serpe, R. T, and Thoits, P. A. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Peter J. 2004. “Identities and Social Structure: The 2003 Cooley-Mead Award Address.” Social Psychology Quarterly 67: 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Peter J. 2006. “Identity Change.Social Psychology Quarterly 69: 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Peter J. and Harrod, Michael M.. 2005. “Too Much of a Good Thing?Social Psychology Quarterly 68: 359–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Peter J., and Stets, Jan E.. 1999. “Trust and Commitment through Self-Verification.Social Psychology Quarterly 62: 347–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Peter J., and Stets, Jan E. 2009. Identity Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, Charles S., and Scheier, Michael F. 1998. On the Self-Regulation of Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cast, Alicia D., and Burke, Peter J. 2002. “A Theory of Self-Esteem.Social Forces 80: 1041–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freese, Lee, and Burke, Peter J.. 1994. “Persons, Identities, and Social Interaction.Advances in Group Processes 11: 1–24.Google Scholar
Hitlin, Steven. 2003. “Values as the Core of Personal Identity: Drawing Links between Two Theories of Self.Social Psychology Quarterly. Special Issue: Social identity: Sociological and social psychological perspectives 66: 118–37.Google Scholar
Mead, George H. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Osgood, Charles E., Suci, George J., and Tannenbaum, Percy H.. 1957. The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Powers, William T. 1973. Behavior: The Control of Perception. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Stets, Jan E. 1995a. “Modelling Control in Relationships.Journal of Marriage and the Family 57: 489–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stets, Jan E. 1995b. “Role Identities and Person Identities: Gender Identity, Mastery Identity, and Controlling One's Partner.” Sociological Perspectives 38: 129–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stets, Jan E., and Burke, Peter J.. 1994. “Inconsistent Self-Views in the Control Identity Model.Social Science Research 23: 236–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stets, Jan E., and Burke, Peter J. 2005. “New Directions in Identity Control Theory.Advances in Group Processes 22: 43–64.Google Scholar
Stets, Jan E., and Carter, Michael J.. 2011. “The Moral Self: Applying Identity Theory.Social Psychology Quarterly 74: 192–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stets, Jan E., and Carter, Michael J. 2012. “A Theory of the Self for the Sociology of Morality.American Sociological Review 77: 120–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stets, Jan E., and Cast, Alicia D.. 2007. “Resources and Identity Verification from an Identity Theory Perspective.Sociological Perspectives 50: 517–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stryker, Sheldon. [1980] 2002. Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version. Caldwell, NJ: Blackburn Press.Google Scholar
Swann, William B., Jr. 1987. “Identity Negotiation: Where Two Roads Meet.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53: 1038–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swann, William B., Jr., Pelham, Brett W., and Krull, Douglas S.. 1989. “Agreeable Fancy or Disagreeable Truth? Reconciling Self Enhancement and Self-Verification.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57: 782–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×