Book contents
- Organization outside Organizations
- Organization outside Organizations
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part 1 Rules, Sanctions, Membership
- Part 2 Organization in and around Markets
- Part 3 Networks and Other Social Relationships
- 9 The Inter-Firm Network as Partial Organization?
- 10 An Organized Network: World Economic Forum and the Partial Organizing of Global Agendas
- 11 Organizing Intimacy
- 12 How Is ‘Organized Crime’ Organized?
- 13 Brotherhood as an Organized Social Relationship
- Part 4 Social Movements and Collective Action
- Part 5 The Partial Organization of Formal Organizations
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
11 - Organizing Intimacy
from Part 3 - Networks and Other Social Relationships
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 July 2019
By
Book contents
- Organization outside Organizations
- Organization outside Organizations
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part 1 Rules, Sanctions, Membership
- Part 2 Organization in and around Markets
- Part 3 Networks and Other Social Relationships
- 9 The Inter-Firm Network as Partial Organization?
- 10 An Organized Network: World Economic Forum and the Partial Organizing of Global Agendas
- 11 Organizing Intimacy
- 12 How Is ‘Organized Crime’ Organized?
- 13 Brotherhood as an Organized Social Relationship
- Part 4 Social Movements and Collective Action
- Part 5 The Partial Organization of Formal Organizations
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
Despite strong emotions and a high density of communication, intimacy does not preclude organization. Intimate relationships can often be recognized as partially organized. In this chapter I examine three intimate relationships – families, kinship, and friendship – in order to investigate how the variation in combinations of organizational elements can be explained by the core component of love in each type of relationship.In examining the appearance of organizational elements in intimate relationships, one can see considerable differences among them, not only in their degree of organization, but also in the elements that are present. There is a connection between the elements that appear in a relationship and the emotional content. But there are also differences within the same type of relationship in how much and in which ways they are organized. An investigation of organizational elements in intimate relationships also provides an awareness of the limits of organization and why intimate relationships remain partially organized.A broadening of the analysis examining connections between states and intimate relationships demonstrates why states can use membership as an organizational element only to a limited extent. States are extremely organized in many respects, yet they are only partially organized.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Organization outside OrganizationsThe Abundance of Partial Organization in Social Life, pp. 235 - 252Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Adeniji, A. (2008) Inte den typ som gifter sig. Feministiska samtal om äktenskapsmotstånd. Göteborg: Makadam förlag.Google Scholar
Ahrne, G. (2014) Samhället mellan oss. Om vänskap, kärlek, relationer och organisationer. Stockholm: Liber.Google Scholar
Almaatouq, A., Radaelli, L., Pentland, A., & Shmueli, E. (2016) Are You Your Friends’ Friend? Poor Perception of Friendship Ties Limits the Ability to Promote Behavioral Change. PLoS ONE 11(3): e0151588. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151588CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Badgett, M. V. L. (2009) When Gay People Get Married: What Happens When Societies Legalize Same-Sex Marriage. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, U. & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995) The Normal Chaos of Love. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Blatterer, H. (2013) Friendship´s Freedom and Gendered Limits. European Journal of Social Theory 16(4): 435–56.Google Scholar
Bommes, M. & Tacke, V. (2005) Luhmann’s Systems Theory and Network Theory. In Seidl, D. & Becker, K. H. (eds.), Niklas Luhmann and Organization Studies. Malmö: Liber. 282–304.Google Scholar
Brunsson, N. (2007) The Consequences of Decision-Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carsten, J. (2000) Introduction: Cultures of Relatedness. In Carsten, J. (ed.), Cultures of Relatedness. New Approaches to the Study of Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1–36.Google Scholar
Chauncey, G. (2004) Why Marriage? The History Shaping Today´s Debate over Gay Equality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Finch, J. (2008) Naming Names: Kinship, Individuality and Personal Names. Sociology 42(4): 709–25.Google Scholar
Friedland, R., Mohr, J. W., Roose, H., & Gardinali, P. (2014) The Institutional Logic of Love: Measuring Intimate Life. Theory and Society 43(3/4): 333–70.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (2012) The Origins of Political Order. From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1992) The Transformation of Intimacy. Sexuality, Love & Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gouldner, A. W. (1959) For Sociology. Renewal and Critique in Sociology Today. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Halleröd, B. & Nyman, C. (2008) Dela rätt är inte lätt. In Grönlund, A. & Halleröd, B. (eds.), Jämställdhetens pris. Umeå: Boréa. 175–93.Google Scholar
Heady, P. & Kohli, M. (2010) Introduction: Towards a Political Economy of Kinship and Welfare. In Heady, P. & Kohli, M. (eds.), Family, Kinship and State in Contemporary Europe. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag. 15–30.Google Scholar
Heater, D. (2004) A Brief History of Citizenship. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
James, P. (2006) Globalism, Nationalism, Tribalism. Bringing Theory Back In. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Jamieson, L. (1999) Intimacy Transformed? A Critical Look at the ‘Pure Relationship’. Sociology 33(3): 477–94.Google Scholar
Layder, D. (2004) Emotion in Social Life. The Lost Heart of Society. London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1986) Love as Passion. The Codification of Intimacy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Mauss, M. (2002) The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1993) Structure in Fives. Designing Effective Organizations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Robertson, F. (1991) Beyond the Family. The Social Organization of Human Reproduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Roman, C. & Peterson, H. (2011) Familjer i tiden. Förhandling, kön och gränslöst arbete. Umeå: Boréa.Google Scholar
Rubin, L. B. (1985) Just Friends. The Role of Friendship in Our Lives. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Schatz, E. (2004) Modern Clan Politics. The Power of ‘Blood’ in Kazakhstan and Beyond. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Scheff, T. (2006) Goffman Unbound. A New Paradigm for Social Science. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Smart, C. (2007) Personal Life. New Directions in Sociological Thinking. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, L. & Pahl, R. (2006) Rethinking Friendship. Hidden Solidarities Today. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Swidler, A. (2001) Talk of Love. How Culture Matters. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, L. (2013) The Character of Friendship. In Calouri, D. (ed.), Thinking about Friendship. Historical and Contemporary Philosophical Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 30–44.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1968) Economy and Society. Volume 1. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weeks, J., Brian, H., & Donovan, C. (2001) Same Sex Intimacies. Families of Choice and Other Life Experiments. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weiner, M. S. (2013) The Rule of the Clan. What an Ancient Form of Social Organization Reveals about the Future of Individualism. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Young, M. & Willmott, P. (1962) Family and Kinship in East London. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Zelizer, V. A. (2005) The Purchase of Intimacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zerubavel, E. (2012) Ancestors and Relatives. Genealogy, Identity, and Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar