Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:46:19.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - The role of trust in international cooperation in crisis areas: a comparison of German and US-American NGO partnership strategies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
L. Ripley Smith  and
Ulrike Schwegler
Edited by
Mark N. K. Saunders ,
Denise Skinner ,
Graham Dietz ,
Nicole Gillespie  and
Roy J. Lewicki
L. Ripley Smith
Affiliation:
Bethel University
Ulrike Schwegler
Affiliation:
Institute for Applied Trust Research
Mark N. K. Saunders
Affiliation:
University of Surrey
Denise Skinner
Affiliation:
Coventry University
Graham Dietz
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Nicole Gillespie
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Roy J. Lewicki
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Get access

Summary

Summary

International and intra-national crises often require international cooperation for resolution. Cooperation is increasingly a function of international partnerships among various levels of societal, non-governmental organizations (NGOs). The present study examines partnership strategies within and between international development and humanitarian agencies based in Germany and the United States. Using in-depth interviews and content analytic methods, the study looks at the trust-development criteria and processes across multiple levels of international organizational cooperation. Culture-specific preferences in trust-building processes are identified which can enable actors to build and maintain trust within and between international development and humanitarian agencies, but can also generate potential barriers. The study extends standard trust-building models to include affective and progressive trust formation processes. Findings on cultural differences in partnership-building strategies and trust development are presented as well as recommendations for improving best practice in strategic NGO alliances.

Introduction

The last two decades have produced some of the most significant humanitarian crises in history. The natural disaster and conflict centres include Haiti, Southeast Asia, Pakistan, Sudan, Rwanda, the Balkans, West Africa, Afghanistan, Columbia, Iraq, Sri Lanka, East Timor and the United States. As crises tax the capacity of the United Nations and other international governmental organizations (IGOs), non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are asked to play an increasingly significant role in disaster relief, rehabilitation and development (Helton, 2002). Unfortunately, the response of the international community in providing food, shelter and medical care in the midst of these crises is often disjointed and inefficient (Bebbington and Farrington, 1993; Loescher and Helton, 2002) In part, the explanation for this less than optimal response lies in the complexity of the task to which these organizations apply themselves.

Type
Chapter
Information
Organizational Trust
A Cultural Perspective
 , pp. 281 - 310
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bachmann, R. 2001. ‘Trust, power and control in trans-organizational relations’. Organization Studies, 22, 337–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbanti, O. 2003. ‘Global partnerships and development’. Conflict Research Consortium, University of Colorado.
Bebbington, A. and Farrington, J. 1993. ‘Governments, NGOs and agricultural development: perspectives on changing inter-organizational relationships’. Journal of Development Studies, 29, 199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bijlsma-Frankema, K. and Woolthuis, R. Klein (eds.) 2005. Trust Under Pressure. Empirical Investigations of Trust and Trust Building in Uncertain Circumstances. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Blomqvist, K. 2005. ‘Trust in a dynamic environment: fast trust as a threshold condition for asymmetric technology partnership formation in the ICT sector’. In Bijlsma- Frankena, K. and Woolthuis, R. Klein (eds.) Trust Under Pressure.
Bouckaert, G., Peters, G. and Verhoest, K. 2006. ‘Coordination strategies in seven OECD countries from 1980 to 2005: Comparative findings’. EGPA Study Group: Coordination of Public Sector Organizations in the Era of Marketization and Joined-up Government. Milan, Italy.Google Scholar
Cameron, K. and Quinn, R. 1999. Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Chao, G. T. and Moon, H. 2005. ‘The cultural mosaic: a metatheory for understanding the complexity of culture’. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1128–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, J. and Möllering, G. 2003. ‘Contextual confidence and active trust development in the Chinese business environment’. Organization Science, 14, 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doney, P. M., Cannon, J. P. and Mullen, M. R. 1998. ‘Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust’. Academy of Management Review, 23, 601–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, M. and Fowler, A. 2002. ‘Introduction: changing challenges for NGDO management’. In Edwards, M. and Fowler, A. (eds.) NGO Management. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. and Hulme, D. 2002. ‘Making a difference: scaling-up the developmental impact of NGOs – concepts and experiences’. In Edwards, M. and Fowler, A. (eds.) NGO Management. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Fisher, J. 2003. ‘Local and global: international governance and civil society’. Journal of International Affairs, 57, 19–40.Google Scholar
Fowler, A. 2002a. ‘NGO futures – beyond aid: NGDO values and the fourth position’. In Edwards, M. and Fowler, A. (eds.) NGO Management. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Fowler, A. 2002b. ‘Beyond partnership: getting real about NGO relationships in the aid system’. In Edwards, M. and Fowler, A. (eds.) NGO Management. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Gambetta, D. 1998. Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Helton, A. C. 2002. ‘Rescuing the refugees’. Foreign Affairs, 81, 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. 1983. ‘The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories’. Journal of International Business Studies, 14, 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. 1984. Culture's Consequences. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Koh, H. H. 2000. ‘U.S. State Department report on human rights practices’. US State Department.
Krasner, S. D. 1983. ‘Structural causes and regime consequences: regimes as intervening variables’. In Krasner, S. D. (ed.) International Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kühlmann, T. M. 2005. ‘Formation of trust in German–Mexican business relations’. In Bijlsma-Frankema, K. and Woolthuis, R. Klein (eds.) Trust Under Pressure.
Lewicki, R. J. and Bunker, B. B. 1996. ‘Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships’. In Kramer, R. M and Tyler, T. R. (eds.) Trust in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. D. and Weigert, A. J. 1985a. ‘Social atomism, holism, and trust’. The Sociological Quarterly, 26, 455–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. D. and Weigert, A. J. 1985b. ‘Trust as a social reality’. Social Forces, 63, 967–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipschutz, R. D. 1989. ‘Bargaining among nations: culture, history, and perception in regime formation’. Workshop on Managing the Global Commons: Decision Making and Conflict Resolution in Response to Climate Change. Knoxville, Tennessee.Google Scholar
Loescher, G. and Helton, A. C. 2002. ‘War on Iraq: an impending refugee crisis?’ Council On Foreign Relations.
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H. and Schoorman, F. D. 1995. ‘An integrative model of organizational trust’. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, D. J. 1995. ‘Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations’. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24–59.Google Scholar
McEvily, B., Perrone, V. and Zaheer, A. 2003. ‘Trust as an organizing principle’. Organization Science, 14(1), 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKnight, D. H. and Chervany, N. L. 2001. ‘Trust and distrust definitions: one bite at a time’. In Falcone, R., Singh, M. and Tan, Y.-H. (eds.) Trust in Cyber-societies. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L. and Chervany, N. L. 1998. ‘Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships’. Academy of Management Review, 23, 473–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacanowsky, M. and O'Donnell-Trujillo, N. 1983. ‘Organizational communication as cultural performance’. Communication Monographs, 50, 127–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plante, C. S. and Bendell, J. 1998. ‘The art of collaboration: lessons from emerging environmental business-NGO partnerships in Asia’. Greener Management International, 24, 91–115.Google Scholar
Ring, P. S. and Ven, A. H. 1994. ‘Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships’. Academy of Management Review, 19, 90–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, D., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S. and Camerer, C. 1998. ‘Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust’. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweer, M. K. W. and Thies, B. 2003. Vertrauen als Organisationsprinzip: Perspektiven für komplexe soziale Systeme. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
Schwegler, U. 2006. ‘Trust building processes within German–Indonesian cooperation’. 22nd EGOS colloquium: Trust within and across boundaries: Conceptual challenges and empirical insights. Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar
Schwegler, U. 2008. Vertrauen zwischen Fremden: Die Genese von Vertrauen am Beispiel deutsch-indonesischer Kooperationen. Frankfurt am Main: IKO-Verlag.Google Scholar
Shreve, C. 2006. ‘Non-governmental organizations research guide’. Perkins Library, Duke University.
Smith, L. R. 2005. ‘The structural context of intercultural personhood: identity re-formation’. International Journal of Communication, 15, 89–112.Google Scholar
Spangler, B. 2003. ‘Coalition building’. Conflict Research Consortium, University of Colorado.
Teegen, H., Doh, J. and Vachani, S. 2004. ‘The importance of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in global governance and value creation: an international business research agenda’. Journal of International Business Studies, 35, 463–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ting-Toomey, S. 1994. The Challenge of Facework: Cross-cultural and Interpersonal Issues. New York: State University of New York – Albany Press.Google Scholar
Ting-Toomey, S. 2005. ‘The matrix of face: an updated face-negotiation theory’. In Gudykunst, W. B. (ed.) Theorizing about Intercultural Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ting-Toomey, S. and Oetzel, J. G. 2003. ‘Cross-cultural face concerns and conflict styles: current status and future directions’. In Gudykunst, W. B. (ed.) Cross-cultural and Intercultural Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C. 1972. The Analysis of Subjective Culture. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Weber, R. P. 1985. Basic Content Analysis. Beverley Hills and London: Sage.Google Scholar
Williams, M. 2003. ‘Global civil society: expectations, capacities and the accountability of international NGOs’. 21st Century Trust.
Zucker, L. G. 1986. ‘Production of trust: institutional sources of economic structures, 1840–1920’. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 8, 35–111.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×