Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:55:38.499Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Bad apples, bad barrels and bad cellars: a “boundaries” perspective on professional misconduct

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2016

Daniel Muzio
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle
James Faulconbridge
Affiliation:
Lancaster University Management School, UK
Claudia Gabbioneta
Affiliation:
Newcastle University Business School, UK
Royston Greenwood
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Canada
Donald Palmer
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Kristin Smith-Crowe
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Royston Greenwood
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Get access

Summary

Parmalat – formerly one of the largest dairy companies in the world – went bankrupt on December 24, 2003, leaving behind a “hole” of 14 billion euros, a sum almost twice the company's 2002 sales turnover. Subsequent investigations revealed that the company's financial accounts had consistently and deliberately been falsified for each of the thirteen years that Parmalat was listed on the Milan Stock Exchange. During those years, professionals – who are supposed to act as gatekeepers (Coffee 2005, 2006) – did not (or, in some cases, decided not to) see what was going on. Deloitte – which was auditing the company's group accounts – did not raise any concerns until October 2003 when they issued a disclaimer on the company's accounts, as they could not determine the amount of a fund held by a subsidiary. Standard and Poor's constantly rated the company at the investment grade and even improved its outlook only a few months before the company defaulted. Securities analysts, similarly, remained positive on Parmalat's shares until the company was already on the verge of bankruptcy; only a few days before the fraud was detected, fifty-seven of sixty-six of their equity research reports recommended buying or holding the company's shares.

Enron's story, one of the biggest scandals in American history, is not much different, although it took place in the supposedly more developed US stock market. As in the Parmalat story, professionals did not effectively perform their ascribed roles. Arthur Andersen, the company's auditors, consistently approved Enron's accounts without raising any concerns and failed to inform “the company's audit committee about both the accounting policies in use at Enron and the unusual transactions the company had conducted” (Batson Report 2003: 40–41). Management consultancies such as McKinsey, which advised Enron, endorsed its strategic repositioning and praised its “asset light” strategy (Kipping, Kirkpatrick, and Muzio 2006). Not until four days before bankruptcy was declared on December 2, 2001, did rating agencies lower their ratings of the company to below the mark of a safe investment. As late as October in the same year, fifteen securities analysts rated Enron a “buy” and twelve of them recommended it as a “strong buy.”

Type
Chapter
Information
Organizational Wrongdoing
Key Perspectives and New Directions
, pp. 141 - 175
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, A. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. University of Chicago Press.
Abbott, A. 1995. “Boundaries of social work or social work of boundaries?Social Service Review 69: 545–562.Google Scholar
Abbott, A. 2005. “Linked ecologies: States and universities as environments for professions,” Sociological Theory 23: 245–274.Google Scholar
Abbott, L., Parker, S., and Peters, J. 2004. “Audit committee characteristics and restatements,” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 23(1): 69–87.Google Scholar
Ackroyd, S. and Muzio, D. 2007. “The reconstructed professional firm explaining change in English legal practices,” Organization Studies 48: 1–19.Google Scholar
Albrecht, G. L. and Levy, J. A. 1982. “The professionalization of osteopathy: Adaptation in the medical marketplace,” Research in the Sociology of Health Care 2: 161–206.Google Scholar
Anderson-Gough, F., Grey, C., and Robson, K. 1999. “Making up accountants: the organisational and professional socialisation of trainee chartered accounts,” in Roslender, R. (ed.), Accounting and Business Research, 29: 259–260. Aldershot: Gower Ashgate.
Anderson-Gough, F., Grey, C., and Robson, K. 2000. “In the name of the client: The service ethic in two international accounting firms,” Human Relations 53: 1151–1174.Google Scholar
Arnold, P. J. 2005. “Disciplining domestic regulation: The World Trade Organization and the market for professional services,” Accounting, Organizations and Society 30: 299–330.Google Scholar
Arnold, P. J. and Sikka, P. 2001. “Globalization and the state–profession relationship: The case the Bank of Credit and Commerce International,” Accounting, Organizations and Society 26: 475–499.Google Scholar
Barber, B. 1963. “Some problems in the sociology of the professions,” Daedalus 92: 669–688.Google Scholar
Barber, B. M., Lehavy, R., and Trueman, B. 2007. “Comparing the stock recommendation performance of investment banks and independent research firms,” Journal of Financial Economics 85: 490–517.Google Scholar
Batson Report. 2003. The final report of Neal Batson, Court-appointed examiner, in re: ENRON CORP., et al., debtors. United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York.
Begun, J. W. and Lippincott, R. C. 1987. “The origins and resolution of interoccupational conflict,” Work and Occupations 14: 368–386.Google Scholar
Blouin, J., Grein, B., and Roundtree, B. 2007. “An analysis of forced auditor change: The case of former Arthur Andersen clients,” The Accounting Review 82: 621–650.Google Scholar
Braun, R. L. 2000. “The effect of time pressure on auditor attention to qualitative aspects of misstatements indicative of potential fraudulent financial reporting,” Accounting, Organizations and Society 25: 243–259.Google Scholar
Brint, S. G. 1994. In an Age of Experts: The Changing Role of Professionals in Politics and Public Life. Princeton University Press.
Briscoe, F. and Von Nordenflycht, A. 2014. “Which path to power? Workplace networks and the relative effectiveness of inheritance and rainmaking strategies for professional partners,” Journal of Professions and Organization 1(1): 33–48.Google Scholar
Brock, D., Powell, M., and Hinings, C. R. 1999. Restructuring the Professional Organization: Accounting, Healthcare and Law. London and New York: Routledge.
Broom, G. and Bandel, C. 2014. “Swiss banks send U.S. client data before cascade of accords,” Bloomberg Business, July 31.
Broschak, J. 2015. “Client Relationships in Professional Service Firms,” in Empson, L., Muzio, D., Broschak, J., and Hinings, B. (eds.), The Handbook of Professional Services Firms: 304–326. Oxford University Press.
Burger, E. S., Mayer, D., and Bowal, P. 2007. “KPMG and abusive tax shelters: Key ethical implications for legal and accounting professionals,” Journal of Legal Profession 31: 43–74.Google Scholar
Burrage, M., Jaraush, K., and Siegrist, H. 1990. “An actor based framework for the study of professionalism,” in Burrage, M. and Torstendahl, R. (eds.), The Professions in Theory and History: 202–226. London: Rutledge.
Burrage, M. and Torstendahl, R. 1990. Professions in Theory and History. London: Sage.
Cameron, C. 2002. “Hired guns and smoking guns: McCabe v British American Tobacco Australia Ltd,” University of New South Wales Law Journal 25: 768–773.Google Scholar
Caramanis, C. V. 2002. “The interplay between professional groups, the state and supranational agents: Pax Americana in the age of ‘globalisation,’” Accounting, Organizations and Society 27: 379–408.Google Scholar
Carr-Saunders, A. M., and Wilson, P. A. 1933. The Professions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
CFA. 2013. Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct.
Coffee, J. C. 2005. “A Theory of Corporate Scandals: Why the U.S. and Europe Differ.” Columbia Law and Economics Working Paper No. 274.
Coffee, J. C. 2006. Gatekeepers: The Professions and Corporate Governance. Oxford University Press.
Cooper, D., Hinings, C. R., Greenwood, R., and Brown, J. L. 1996. “Sedimentation and transformation in organizational change: The case of Canadian law firms,” Organization Studies 17: 623–647.Google Scholar
Cooper, D., Lowe, A., Puxty, A., Robson, K., and Willmott, H. 1988. Regulating the UK Accountancy Profession: Episodes in the Relation Between the Profession and the State. Paper presented at the Economic and Social Research Council Conference on Corporatism at the Policy Studies Institute, London, January.
Cooper, D. L. and Robson, K. 2006. “Accounting, professions and regulation: Locating the sites of professionalization,” Accounting, Organizations and Society 31: 415–444.Google Scholar
Court of Milan. 2008. I Section Criminal Law. Sentence. N. 10465/04 R.G. n.r. N. 12473/04 + 7436/08 +9538/05 R.G. Trib.
Covaleski, M. A., Dirsmith, M. L., Heian, J. B., and Samuel, S. 1998. “The calculated and the avowed: Techniques of discipline and struggles over identity in Big Six public accounting firms,” Administrative Science Quarterly 43: 293–327.Google Scholar
Crotty, J. 2009. “Structural causes of the global financial crisis: A critical assessment of the ‘new financial architecture,’” Cambridge Journal of Economics 33: 563–580.Google Scholar
Crump, R. 2013. “FRC warns auditors over ethical failings,” Accountancy Age. May 29.
Cullinan, C. 2004. “Enron as a symptom of audit process breakdown: Can the Sarbanes-Oxley Act cure the disease?,” Critical Perspectives in Accounting 15: 853–864.Google Scholar
Daly, M. C. and Silver, C. 2006. “Flattening the world of legal services: The ethical and liability minefields of offshoring legal and law-related services,” Georgetown Journal of International Law 38: 401–447.Google Scholar
DeFond, M. L. and Francis, J. R. 2005. “Audit research after Sarbanes-Oxley,” Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 25: 5–30.Google Scholar
Dinovitzer, R., Gunz, H., and Gunz, S. 2014. “Unpacking client capture: Evidence from corporate law firms,” Journal of Professions and Organization 1: 99–117.Google Scholar
Dinovitzer, R., Gunz, H., and Gunz, S. 2015. “Professional ethics: Origins, applications and developments,” in Empson, L., Muzio, D., Broschak, J., and Hinings, B. (eds.), The Handbook of Professional Services Firms: 113–134. Oxford University Press.
Dowell, K. 2012. “Russell Jones & Walker acquired by listed Aussie firm Slater & Gordon,” The Lawyer. Available from: www.thelawyer.com/analysis/the-lawyer-management/abs-news-and-analysis/russell-jones-and-walker-acquired-by-listed-aussie-firm-slater-and-gordon/1011140.article [Acessed: January 30, 2012].
Dugar, A. and Nathan, S. 1995. “The effect of investment banking relationships on financial analysts’ earnings forecasts and investment recommendations,” Contemporary Accounting Research 12: 131–160.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. 1957. Professional Ethics and Civic Morals. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Empson, L. and Chapman, C. 2006. “Partnership versus corporation: Implications of alternative forms of governance in professional service firms,” Research in the Sociology of Organizations 24: 139–170.Google Scholar
Empson, L., Muzio, D., Broschak, J., and Hinings, B. 2015. “Introduction,” in Empson, L., Muzio, D., Broschak, J., and Hinings, B. (eds.), The Handbook of Professional Services Firms: 1–22. Oxford University Press.
Etherington, L. and Lee, R. 2007. “Ethical codes and cultural context: Ensuring legal ethics in the global law firm,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 14: 95–118.Google Scholar
Faulconbridge, J. R. and Muzio, D. 2007. “Re-inserting the professional in the study of PSFs,” Global Networks 7: 249–270.Google Scholar
Faulconbridge, J. R. and Muzio, D. 2008. “Organizational professionalism in globalizing law firms,” Work, Employment & Society 22: 7–25.Google Scholar
Faulconbridge, J. R. and Muzio, D. 2009. “The financialization of large law firms: Situated discourses and practices of organization,” The Journal of Economic Geography 9: 641–661.Google Scholar
Faulconbridge, J. R. and Muzio, D. 2012. “The rescaling of the professions: towards a transnational sociology of the professions,” International Sociology 27: 109–125.Google Scholar
Flood, J. 2011. “The re-landscaping of the legal profession: Large law firms and professional re-regulation,” Current Sociology 59: 507–529.Google Scholar
Forbes Report. 2003. Final report of Neal Batson, court-appointed examiner. Chapter 11, Case No. 01–16034 (AJG). Jointly Administered.
Fortney, S. and Gordon, T. 2013. “Adopting law firm management system to survive and thrive: A study of the Australian approach to management-based regulation,” University of St. Thomas Law Journal 10: 152.Google Scholar
Freidson, E. 1970. Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. New York: Dodd, Mead & Co.
Freidson, E. 1984. “The changing nature of professional control,” Annual Review of Sociology 10: 1–20.Google Scholar
Freidson, E. 1994. Professionalism Reborn: Theory, Prophecy, and Policy. University of Chicago Press.
Freidson, E. 2001. Professionalism: The Third Logic. University of Chicago Press.
Gabbioneta, C., Greenwood, R., Mazzola, P., and Minoja, M. 2013. “The influence of the institutional context on corporate illegality,” Accounting, Organizations and Society 38: 484–504.Google Scholar
Gabbioneta, C., Prakash, R., and Greenwood, R. 2014. “Sustained corporate corruption and processes of institutional ascription within professional networks,” Journal of Professions and Organization 1: 16–32.Google Scholar
Gannagé-Stewart, H. 2014. “Slater & Gordon completes Pannone takeover.” The Lawyer. Available from: www.thelawyer.com/analysis/the-lawyer-management/merger-watch/slater-and-gordon-completes-pannone-takeover/3016466.article [Accessed: February 17, 2015].
Grey, C. 1998. “On being a professional in a Big Six firm,” Accounting, Organizations and Society 23: 569–587.Google Scholar
Grey, C. 2003. “The real world of Enron's auditors,” Organization 10: 572–576.Google Scholar
Goode, W. J. 1957. “Community within a community: The professions,” American Sociological Review 22: 194–200.Google Scholar
Goode, W. J. 1960. “The profession: reports and opinion,” American Sociological Review 25: 902–965.Google Scholar
Goode, W. J. 1969. “The theoretical limits of professionalization,” in Etzioni, A. (ed.), The Semi-Professions and Their Organization: 266–313. New York: Free Press.
Greenwood, E. 1957. “Attributes of a profession,” Social Work 2: 45–55.Google Scholar
Greenwood, R. 2007. “Your ethics,” in Empson, L. (ed.), Managing the Modern Law Firm: 186–195. Oxford University Press.
Greenwood, R. and Empson, L. 2003. “The professional partnership: Relic or exemplary form of governance?,” Organization Studies 24: 909–933.Google Scholar
Greenwood, R. and Hinings, C. R. 1993. “Understanding strategic change: The contribution of archetypes,” Academy of Management Journal 36: 1052–1081.Google Scholar
Greenwood, R., Hinings, C. R., and Brown, J. 1990. “‘P2-form’ strategic management: Corporate practices in professional partnerships,” Academy of Management Journal 33: 725–755.Google Scholar
Greenwood, R. and Suddaby, R. 2006. “Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms,” Academy of Management Journal 49: 27–48.Google Scholar
Gunz, H. P. and Gunz, S. P. 2008. “Client capture and the professional service firm,” American Business Law Journal 45: 685–721.Google Scholar
Halpern, S. A. 1992. “Dynamics of professional control: Internal coalitions and crossprofessional boundaries,” American Journal of Sociology 97: 994–1021.Google Scholar
Harrington, B. 2015. “Going global: professionals and the micro-foundations of institutional change,” Journal of Professions and Organization 2(2): 103–121.Google Scholar
Hayward, M. L. A. and Boeker, W. 1998. “Power and conflicts of interest in professional firms: Evidence from investment banking,” Administrative Science Quarterly 43: 1–22.Google Scholar
Heinz, J. P. 1982. “The power of lawyers,” Georgia Law Review 17: 891–911.Google Scholar
Johnson, T. J. 1972. Professions and Power. London: Macmillan.
Kershaw, D. and Moorhead, R. 2013. “Consequential responsibility for client wrongs: Lehman Brothers and the regulation of the legal profession,” The Modern Law Review 76: 26–61.Google Scholar
Kipping, M., Kirkpatrick, I., and Muzio, G. D. 2006. “Overly controlled or out of control? Management consultants and the new corporate professionalism,” in John., C. (ed.), Production Values: Futures for Professionalism: 153–168. DEMOS: London.
Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., and Treviño, L. K. 2010. “Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work,” Journal ofApplied Psychology 95: 1–31.Google Scholar
Klimentchenko, D. A. 2009. “Myth of auditor independence,” University of Illinois Law Review: 1275–1299.
Krause, E. A. 1996. Death of the Guilds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Kronus, C. L. 1976. “The evolution of occupational power an historical study of task boundaries between physicians and pharmacists,” Work and Occupations 3: 3–37.Google Scholar
Larson, M. S. 1977. The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. The University of California Press.
Leicht, K. T. and Fennell, M. L. 1997. “The changing organizational context of professional work,” Annual Review of Sociology 23: 215–231.Google Scholar
Leicht, K. and Fennell, M. 2001. Professional Work: A Sociological Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
Le Mire, S. 2007. “The case study: James Hardie and its implications for the teaching of ethics,” in Naylor, B. and Hyams, R. (eds.), Innovation in Clinical Legal Education: Educating Lawyers for the Future: 237–241. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Levitt, A. 2000. Renewing the Covenant with Investors. New York University. Centre for Law and Business. May 10th, 2000.
Lin, H. W. and McNichols, M. F. 1998. “Underwriting relationships, analysts’ earnings forecasts and investment recommendations,” Journal of Accounting and Economics 25: 101–127.Google Scholar
Lipartito, K. J. and Miranti, P. J. 1998. “Professions and organizations in twentieth-century America,” Social Science Quarterly 79: 301–320.Google Scholar
MacDonald, K. M. 1995. The Sociology of the Professions. London: Sage.
Macey, J. R. and Sale, H. A. 2003. “Observations on the role of commodification, independence, and governance in the accounting industry,” Villanova Law Review 48: 1167–1187.Google Scholar
Maister, D. H. 1993. Managing the Professional Service Firm. New York: The Free Press.
Malhotra, N., Morris, T., and Hinings, C. B. 2006. “Variation in organizational form among professional service organizations,” Research in the Sociology of Organizations 24: 171–202.Google Scholar
Manning, J. 2015. “Gateley IPO: demand high as firm raises £30 m from first legal IPO,” The Lawyer. Available from: www.thelawyer.com/gateley-ipo-demand-high-as-firm-raises-30m-from-first-legal-ipo/3035946.article [Acessed: June 8, 2015].
Markle, T. 2014. “A call to partners with outside capital. The non-lawyer investment approach must be updated,” Arizona State Law Journal 45: 1251.Google Scholar
McKenna, C. D. 2006. The World's Newest Profession: Management Consulting in the Twentieth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Michaely, R. and Womack, K. L. 1999. “Conflict of interest and the credibility of underwriter analyst recommendations,” Review of Financial Studies 12: 653–86.Google Scholar
Millerson, G. 1964. The Qualifying Associations: A Study in Professionalization. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Mitchell, A. and Sikka, P. 2011. The Pin-stripe Mafia: How Accounting Firms Destroy Societies. Basildon, UK: Association for Accountancy & Business Affairs.
Mitchell, A., Sikka, P., Christensen, J., Morris, P., and Filling, P. 2002. No Accounting for Tax Havens. Basildon, UK: Association for Accountancy & Business Affairs.
Muzio, D., Brock, D. M., and Suddaby, R. 2013. “Professions and institutional change: Towards an institutionalist sociology of the professions,” Journal of Management Studies 50: 699–721.Google Scholar
Myers, J., Myers, L., and Omer, T. 2003. “Exploring the term of the auditor-client relationship and the quality of earnings,” The Accounting Review 78(3): 779–799.Google Scholar
Nagel, M. T. 2007. “Double deontology and the CCBE: Harmonizing the double trouble in Europe,” Washington University Global Studies Law Review 6: 455–481.Google Scholar
Nicolson, D. and Webb, J. S. 1999. Professional Legal Ethics: Critical Interrogations. Oxford University Press.
Novack, J. 2012. “Latest U.S.-Swiss deal makes clear: No hiding cash in big Swiss banks,” Forbes, June 21.
O'Brien, P. C., McNichols, M. F., and Hsiou-Wei, L. 2005. “Analyst impartiality and investment banking relationships,” Journal of Accounting Research 43: 623–650.Google Scholar
Pache, A. and Santos, F. 2010. “When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands,” Academy of Management Review 35: 455–476.Google Scholar
Palan, R., Murphy, R., and Chavagneux, C. 2010. Tax Havens: How Globalization Really Works. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Palmer, D. 2012. Normal Organizational Wrongdoing: A Critical Analysis of Theories of Misconduct in and by Organizations. Oxford University Press.
Parker, C. E. 2004. “Law firms incorporated: How incorporation could and should make firms more ethically responsible,” University of Queensland Law Journal 25: 347.Google Scholar
Parker, C. E., Evans, A. H., Haller, L. R., Le Mire, S., and Mortensen, R. G. 2008. “The ethical infrastructure of legal practice in large law firms: Values, policy and behaviour,” The University of New South Wales Law Journal 31: 158–188.Google Scholar
Parker, C. E., Gordon, T., and Mark, S. 2010. “Regulating law firms ethics management: An empirical assessment of an innovation in regulation of the legal profession in New South Wales,” Journal of Law and Society 37: 466–500.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. 1954. Professional and Social Structure. In Essays in Sociological Theory. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Partnoy, F. 2009. Legal Studies Research Paper Series Research Paper No. 09–014 Rethinking Regulation of Credit Rating Agencies: An Institutional Investor Perspective.
Paterson, I., Fink, M., and Ongus, A. 2003. “Economic impact of regulation in the field of liberal professions in different Member States,” Research Report Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna – Study for the European Commission, DG Competition – Available from www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CC8QFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fec.europa.eu%2Fcompetition%2Fsectors%2Fprofessional_services%2Fstudies%2Fexecutive_en.pdf&ei=7oDWU9chiNjsBqyngIAP&usg=AFQjCNHHYE3m9ubt7lKuzX6IGYq5nKpIxg&bvm=bv.71778758,d.ZGU [Acessed July 28, 2014].
Public Prosecutor Parma. 2010. Notice of termination of preliminary investigations, art. 415/bis, Italy's Code of Criminal procedure (CPP).
Rayne, R. 2014. “Do U.S. firms need external equity investments to remain competitive?,” Texas International Law Journal 49: 559.Google Scholar
Reynolds, M. A. 2000. “Professionalism, ethical codes and the internal auditor: A moral argument,” Journal of Business Ethics 2492: 115–124.Google Scholar
Ribstein, L. E. 2003. “Bubble laws,” Houston Law Review 40: 77–97.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. 1994. “Fictitious capital, fictitious spaces: The geography of offshore financial flows,” in Corbridge, S., Thrift, N., and Martin, R. (eds.), Money, Power and Space: 91–115. Oxford: Blackwell.
Rosen, R. 2002. “‘We're all consultants now’: How change in client organizational strategies influences change in the organization of corporate legal services,” Arizona Law Review 22: 637–684.Google Scholar
Sako, M. 2015. “Outsourcing and offshoring of professional services,” in Muzio, L., Muzio, D., Broschak, J., and Hinings, B. (eds.), The Handbook of Professional Services Firms: 327–347. Oxford University Press.
Santoro, M. A. and Strauss, R. J. 2013. Wall Street Values. Business Ethics and the Global Financial Crisis. Cambridge University Press.
SEC, Securities and Exchange Commission. 2000. Final rule: Revision of the Commission's auditor independence requirements, November 21, 2000.
Senate Governmental Affairs Committee. 2002. Rating the raters: Enron and the credit rating agencies. Hearing before the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee, 107th Cong., S. Hrg. 107–471 (March 20, 2002) at 65–66, 122.
Sharma, A. 1997. “Professional as agent: Knowledge asymmetry in agency exchange,” Academy of Management Review 22: 758–98.Google Scholar
Shaw, G. B. 2004. The Doctor's Dilemma. Sioux Falls: NuVisions Publications.
Sikka, P. 2009. “Financial crisis and the silence of the auditors,” Accounting, Organizations and Society 34: 868–873.Google Scholar
Sikka, P. and Hampton, M. P. 2005. “The role of accountancy firms in tax avoidance: Some evidence and issues,” Accounting Forum 29: 325–343.Google Scholar
Sikka, P. and Willmott, H. 1995. “‘The power of “independence’: Defending and extending the jurisdiction of accounting in the United Kingdom,” Accounting, Organizations and Society 20: 547–581.Google Scholar
Slater & Gordon. 2007. “Prospectus”. Available from www.slatergordon.com.au/docs/prospectus/Prospectus.pdf [Accessed: April 23, 2008].
Smets, M., Morris, T., and Greenwood, R. 2012. “From practice to field: A multilevel model of practice-driven institutional change,” Academy of Management Journal 55: 877–904.Google Scholar
Suddaby, R., Cooper, D. J., and Greenwood, R. 2007. “Transnational regulation of professional services: Governance dynamics of field level organizational change,” Accounting Organizations and Society 32: 333–362.Google Scholar
Suddaby, R., and Muzio, D. 2015. “Theoretical perspective on the professions,” in Empson, L., Muzio, D., Broschack, J., and Hinings, B. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Professional Services Firms: 25–47. Oxford University Press.
Suddaby, R. and Viale, T. 2011. “Professionals and field-level change: Institutional work and the professional project,” Current Sociology 59: 423–41.Google Scholar
Sturdy, A. 1997. “The consultancy process – an insecure business?,” Journal of Management Studies 34: 389–413.Google Scholar
Terry, L. S. 2001. “‘GATS’ Applicability to transnational lawyering and its potential impact on US state regulation of lawyers,” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 34: 989–1096.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2014. The dozy watchdogs. December 13: 24–26.
The Lawyer. 2015. Making history: Irwin Mitchell appoints brokers as it eyes 2015 float. Available from: www.thelawyer.com/news/lawyer-news-daily/making-history-irwin-mitchell-appoints-brokers-as-it-eyes-2015-float/3030662.article [Acessed: January 22, 2015].
The New York Times. 2001. Enron tries to dismiss finance doubts. October 24.
The New York Times. 2012. The spreading scourge of corporate corruption. October 7.
Thornton, P., Jones, C., and Kury, K. 2005. “Institutional logics and institutional change: Transformation in accounting, architecture, and publishing,” in Jones, C. and Thornton, P. (eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations: 125–170. London: JAI.
Urry, J. 2014. Offshoring. London: Polity Press.
von Nordenflycht, A. 2014. “Does the emergence of publicly traded professional service firms undermine the theory of the professional partnership? A cross-industry historical analysis.” Journal of Professions and Organization 1(2): 137–160.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. M., Boyer O'Leary, M., Metiu, A., and Jett, Q. R. 2008. “Perceived proximity in virtual work: Explaining the paradox of far-but-close,” Organization Studies 29: 979–1002.Google Scholar
Wójcik, D. 2013. “Where governance fails: Advanced business services and the offshore world,” Progress in Human Geography 37: 330.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×