Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2015
Introduction
Does the original position accommodate feminist considered convictions? What I mean by this is: does the original position allow us to identify as unjust the arrangements that feminist considered convictions highlight? An answer to this question will be of interest to those wondering about the feminist content of Rawlsian liberalism. The question may also be understood as a step in exploring the possibility of a feminist liberalism that is contractualist.
To answer this question, we need a list of feminist considered convictions, which I provide below. I show that much of what the feminist considered convictions identify as injustice is recognized as such by the original position; but much of it is not. I show also that the original position underwrites necessary effective coercive remedies for some of the injustices it recognizes, but not for all of them. So, I argue, we must say that some injustices recognized by the original position may endure in a Rawlsian well-ordered society. I then explore a feminist use of the original position associated with the work of Susan Okin that captures more of what feminists identify as injustice; but, I argue, this approach fails to fully accommodate feminist considered convictions about dependency. I ask whether an initial situation could be designed that accommodates feminist considered convictions about dependency and is also part of a liberal view.
The chapter follows the process of reflective equilibrium, which Rawls tells us goes on “indefinitely” (PL, p. 97). I begin by pointing out a discrepancy between a set of considered convictions on the one hand and Rawls's favored interpretation of the initial situation, the original position, on the other. In the face of this discrepancy one might opt to modify the feminist considered convictions; I show how the original position facilitates such modification. Alternatively, one might opt to modify the original position; I explore some modifications that feminists have suggested. If feminist liberalism is basically contractualist, the truth of the feminist considered convictions may not be assumed but must be established, perhaps through a process of reflective equilibrium. This chapter presents some first steps in that process.
Feminist considered convictions
The list of feminist considered convictions I offer here is culled from the family of social movements and doctrines that is feminism.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.