Bibliography

Nicholas Zair

doi:10.1017/CBO9781107706422.008

Adamesteanu, Dinu and Lejeune, Michel (1971). Il santuario lucano di Macchia di Rossano di Vaglio. Atti dell’Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei. Memorie. Classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche, Series 8, 16, 39–83Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (2003). Bilingualism and the Latin Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (2013). Social Variation and the Latin Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Adiego Lajara, Ignacio-Javier (1992). Protosabelio, osco-umbro, sudpiceno. Barcelona: PPUGoogle Scholar

Allen, W. Sidney (1987). Vox Graeca: The Pronunciation of Classical Greek. Third edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Arena, Renato (1966). Il valore di ii in osco-umbro. Istituto Lombardo. Accademia di Scienze e Lettere. Rendiconti. Classe di lettere e Scienze Morali e Storici 100, 435–72Google Scholar

Arena, Renato (1998). Iscrizioni greche arcaiche di Sicilia e Magna Grecia. Vol. 5: Iscrizioni di Taranto, Locri Epizefiri, Velia e Siracusa. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’OrsoGoogle Scholar

Aurigemma, Salvatore (1940). Opera idraulica medievale apprestata con blocchi architettonici e lastre lapidee scritte d’età romana, in località Villa San Maurizio presso Reggio Emilia. Atti della Reale Accademia d’Italia. Notizie degli Scavi di Antichità Series 7, 18, 255–89Google Scholar

Bader, Françoise (1978). De ‘protéger’ a ‘razzier’ au néolithique indo-européen: phraséologie, étymologies, civilisation. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 73, 101–219Google Scholar

Balles, Irene (1999). Zu den britannischen *i̯o-Stämmen und ihren idg. Quellen. In Zimmer, Stefan, Ködderitzsch, Rolf and Wigger, Arndt (eds.), Akten des zweiten deutschen Keltologen-Symposiums (Bonn, 2.–4. April 1997), 4–22. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer VerlagGoogle Scholar

Bartoněk, Antonín (1975). Greek dialects of ancient Apennine peninsula. In Češka, Josef (ed.), Classica atque Mediaevalia Jaroslao Ludvíkovský Octogenario Oblata, 17–36. Brno: Opera Universitatis Purkynianae Brunensis, Faculta PhilosophiaGoogle Scholar

Benediktsson, Hreinn (1960). The vowel syncope in Oscan-Umbrian. Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap 19, 157–295Google Scholar

Bottini, Angelo and Greco, Emanuele (1974–1975). Tomba a camera dal territorio pestano: alcune considerazioni sulla posizione della donna. Dialoghi di Archeologia 8, 231–74Google Scholar

Buck, Carl Darling (1928). A Grammar of Oscan and Umbrian: With a Collection of Inscriptions and a Glossary. Second edition. Boston: Ginn and CompanyGoogle Scholar

Buck, Carl Darling(1955). The Greek Dialects. Chicago: The University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Campanile, Enrico (1992a). Un fenicio a Roccagloriosa. Studi Etruschi 58, 369–71Google Scholar

Campanile, Enrico (1992b). Note sulla defixio di Marcellina. Studi Etruschi 58, 371–7Google Scholar

Capano, Antonio and Palma, Loretta Del Tutto (1990). L’iscrizione di Muro Lucano. In Tagliente, Marcello (ed.), Italici in Magna Graecia: Lingua, insediamenti e strutture, 105–10. Venosa: Edizioni OsannaGoogle Scholar

Cappelletti, Loredana (2005). Le monete ‘lupine’ dei Lucani. Tyche 20, 11–21Google Scholar

Clackson, James (2002). The writing of χσ and φσ for ξ and ψ. Glotta 78, 22–35Google Scholar

Clackson, James (2007). Indo-European Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Clackson, James (2015). Subgrouping in the Sabellian branch of Indo-European. Transactions of the Philological Society 113, 4–37CrossRef Google Scholar

Clackson, James and Horrocks, Geoffrey (2011). The Blackwell History of the Latin Language. Chichester: Wiley-BlackwellGoogle Scholar

Cohn, Abigail C. (1993). Nasalisation in English: phonology or phonetics. Phonology 10, 43–81CrossRef Google Scholar

Colonna, Giovanni (1984). Un ‘trofeo’ di Novio Fannio, comandante sannita. In Anonymous (ed.), Studi di antichità in onore di Guglielmo Maetzke, 229–41. Rome: Giorgio Bretschneider EditoreGoogle Scholar

Consani, Carlo (1996). Koinai et koiné dans la documentation épigraphique de l’Italie méridonale. In Brixhe, Claude (ed.), La koiné grecque antique. Vol. 2: La concurrence, 113–32. Nancy: A.D.R.A.Google Scholar

Conway, R. S. (1897). The Italic Dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Cornell, T. J. (1990). The conquest of Italy. In Walbank, F. W., Austin, A. E., Frederiksen, M. W. and Ogilvie, R. M. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History. Vol. 7, Part 2: The Rise of Rome to 220 bc, 351–419. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Crawford, Michael H. (1996). Roman Statutes. London: Institute of Classical Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of LondonGoogle Scholar

Crawford, Michael H. (2006). The Oscan inscriptions of Messana. In Ampolo, Carmine (ed.), Guerra e pace in Sicilia e nel Mediterraneo antico (viii–iii sec. a.C.), Vol. 2, 521–5. Pisa: Edizioni della NormaleGoogle Scholar

Crawford, Michael H. (2007). The Mamertini, Alfius and Festus. In Dubouloz, Julien and Pittia, Sylvie (eds.), La Sicile de Cicéron: Lectures des Verrines. Organisé par l’UMR 8585. Centre Gustave Glotz, 274–9. Besançon: Presses universitaires de Franche-ComtéGoogle Scholar

Crawford, Michael H. (2010). Onomastics and the administration of Italia/víteliú? In Catling, R. W. V. and Marchand, F. (eds.), Onomatologos: Studies in Greek Personal Names Presented to Elaine Matthews, 276–9. Oxford: Oxbow BooksGoogle Scholar

Crawford, Michael, Broadhead, W. M., Clackson, J. P. T., Santangelo, F., Thompson, S. and Watmough, M. (2011). Imagines Italicae: A Corpus of Italic Inscriptions. London: Institute of Classical Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of LondonGoogle Scholar

Cristofani, Mauro (1996 [1998]). Sull’origine della scrittura osco-greca. Studi Etruschi 62, 275–9Google Scholar

Cristofori, Alessandro (1998). Appunti sulla colonizzazione italica dell’Africa settentrionale: il caso dei Safidii. In Khanoussi, Mustapha, Ruggeri, Paola and Vismara, Cinzia (eds.), L’Africa Romana: Atti del XII convegno di studio, Olbia 12–15 settembre 1996, 1389–99. Sassari: Editrice Democratica SardaGoogle Scholar

D’Amore, Lucia (2007). Iscrizioni greche d’Italia: Reggio Calabria. Rome: Edizioni QuasarGoogle Scholar

Davis, Stuart (2014). Quantity. In Goldsmith, John A., Riddle, Jason and Yu, Alan C. L. (eds.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 103–40. Second edition. Malden, MA, Oxford and Chichester: Wiley BlackwellGoogle Scholar

de Melo, Wolfgang David Cirilo (2012). Review of Dupraz (2012). Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2012.06.15 (http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2012/2012-06-15.html)Google Scholar

de Simone, Carlo (1976). Messapic damatira/damatura – Balkanic (‘Illyrian’) Δειπάτυρος. Journal of Indo-European Studies 4, 355–66Google Scholar

de Simone, Carlo (2006). Falisco faced ~ latino arcaico vhevhaked: la genuinità della fibula prenestina e problemi connessi. Incontri Linguistici 29, 159–75Google Scholar

de Vaan, Michiel (2008). Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the Other Italic Languages. Leiden and Boston: BrillGoogle Scholar

Del Monaco, Lavinio (2013). Iscrizioni greche d’Italia: Locri. Rome: Edizioni QuasarGoogle Scholar

Del Tutto Palma, Loretta (1989). Epigrafia lucana. Quaderni dell’Istituto di Linguistica dell’Università di Urbino 6, 93–118Google Scholar

Del Tutto Palma, Loretta (1990). Le iscrizioni della Lucania preromana. Padua: UnipressGoogle Scholar

Del Tutto Palma, Loretta (1991). Due ‘voces nihili’: lucano *udo e *numulo. Studi Etruschi 57, 179–86Google Scholar

Del Tutto Palma, Loretta (1996). Grafia e scrittura nella Tavola di Agnone. In Del Tutto Palma, Loretta (ed.), La Tavola di Agnone nel Contesto Italico: Convegno di Studio. Agnone, 13–15 aprile 1994, 413–33. Florence: Leo S. OlschkiGoogle Scholar

Delamarre, Xavier (2003). Dictionnaire de la langue gauloise: Une approche linguistique du vieux-celtique continental. Second edition. Paris: Editions ErranceGoogle Scholar

Delmaire, Roland (ed.) (1994). Carte archeologique de la Gaule 62/1: Le Pas-de-Calais. Paris: Académie des inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, Ministère de la CultureGoogle Scholar

Dexheimer, Dagmar (1998). Oberitalische Grabaltäre: Ein Beitrag zur Sepulkralkunst der römischen Kaiserzeit. Oxford: John and Erica HedgesCrossRef Google Scholar

Domingo, Enrique García (1979). Latinismos en la koiné (en los documentos epigráficos desde el 212 a J.C. hasta el 14 d. J.C.): Gramática y lexicon griego-latino, latino-griego. Burgos: Universidad de Valladolid, Colegio Universitario de BurgosGoogle Scholar

Dupraz, Emmanuel (2012). Sabellian Demonstratives: Forms and Functions. Leiden and Boston: BrillCrossRef Google Scholar

Eichner, Heiner (1993). 1919 oder 1991? Zur Entwicklung der oskisch-umbrischen Studien nebst einer neuen Interpretation des Textes von Fonte Romito (Vetter Nr. 147). In Rix, Helmut (ed.), Oskisch-Umbrisch: Texte und Grammatik. Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft und der Società Italiana di Glottologia vom 25. bis 28. September 1991, 46–95. Wiesbaden: Dr Ludwig ReichertGoogle Scholar

Flobert, Pierre (1990). Le témoignage épigraphique des apices et des I longae sur les quantités vocaliques en latin impérial. In Calboli, Gualtiero (ed.), Latin vulgaire – latin tardif II: Actes du IIème Colloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif (Bologne, 29 août – 2 septembre 1988), 101–10. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer VerlagGoogle Scholar

Foti, Giuseppe and Carratelli, Giovanni Pugliese (1974). Un sepolcro di Hipponion e un nuovo testo orfico. Parola del Passato 29, 91–126Google Scholar

Franchi De Bellis, Annalisa (1981). Le iovile capuane. Florence: Leo S. OlschkiGoogle Scholar

Gabrici, Ettore (1910). Necropoli di età ellenistica a Teano dei Sidicini. Monumenti Antichi 20, 6–151Google Scholar

García Castillero, Carlos (2000). La formación del tema de presente primario osco-umbro. Vitoria: Servicio Editorial Universidad del País VascoGoogle Scholar

Gignac, Francis Thomas (1976–1981). A Grammar of the Greek Papyri of the Roman and Byzantine Periods. 2 vols. Milan: Istituto Editoriale Cisalpino-La GoliardicaGoogle Scholar

Graham, A. J. (1982a). The colonial expansion of Greece. In Boardman, John and Hammond, N. G. L. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History. Vol. 3, Part 3: The Expansion of the Greek World, Eighth to Sixth Centuries bc, 83–162. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Graham, A. J. (1982b). The western Greeks. In Boardman, John and Hammond, N. G. L. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History. Vol. 3, Part 3: The Expansion of the Greek World, Eighth to Sixth Centuries bc, 163–95. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Gualtieri, Maurizio and Poccetti, Paolo (1990). Laminetta di piombo con iscrizione dal complesso A. In Gualtieri, Maurizio and Fracchia, Helena (eds.), Roccagloriosa. Vol. 1: L’abitato: scavo e ricognizione topografica (1976–1986), 137–50. Naples: Publications de centre Jean BérardCrossRef Google Scholar

Gualtieri, Maurizio and Poccetti, Paolo (2001). Frammento di tabula bronzea con iscrizione osca dal pianoro centrale. In Gualtieri, Maurizio and Fracchia, Helena (eds.), Roccagloriosa. Vol. 2: L’oppidum lucano e il territorio, 187–295. Naples: Centre Jean BérardCrossRef Google Scholar

Guzzo, Pier-Giovanni (1981). Su una corazza dalla ‘Magna Grecia’. Museum Helveticum 38, 55–61Google Scholar

Hartmann, Markus (2005). Die frühlateinischen Inschriften und ihre Datierung: Eine linguistisch-archäologisch-paläographische Untersuchung. Bremen: Hempen VerlagGoogle Scholar

Haspels, C. H. G. (1936). Attic Black-figure Lekythoi. Paris: De BoccardGoogle Scholar

Horrocks, Geoffrey (2010). Greek: A History of the Language and its Speakers. Second edition. Malden, MA, Oxford and Chichester: Wiley-BlackwellCrossRef Google Scholar

Ihm, M. (1899). Additamenta ad corporis vol. IX et X. In Ephemeris Epigraphica: Corporis Inscriptionum Latinarum Supplementum, Vol. 8, 1–221. Berlin: George ReimerGoogle Scholar

Immerwahr, Henry R. (1990). Attic Script: A Survey. Oxford: Clarendon PressCrossRef Google Scholar

International Phonetic Association (1999). Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A Guide to the Use of the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Jasanoff, Jay H. (1983a). A rule of final syllables in Slavic. Journal of Indo-European Studies 11, 139–49Google Scholar

Jasanoff, Jay H. (1983b). Reply to Schmalstieg and Kortlandt. Journal of Indo-European Studies 11, 187–90Google Scholar

Jasanoff, Jay H. (2006 [2010]). The origin of the Latin gerund and gerundive: a new proposal. Harvard Ukrainian Studies 28, 195–208Google Scholar

Jasanoff, Jay H. (2014). A note on the Slavic genitive plural. MS (www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~jasanoff/publications.html). Last accessed 1 May 2014Google Scholar

Jeffery, L. H. and Johnston, A. W. (1990). The Local Scripts of Archaic Greece: A Study of the Origin of the Greek Alphabet and its Development from the Eighth to the Fifth Centuries B.C. Second edition. Oxford: Clarendon PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Jiménez Zamudio, Rafael (1986). Estudio de dialecto peligno y su entorno lingüístico. Salamanca: Universidad de León and Universidad de SalamancaGoogle Scholar

Kajanto, Iiro (1965). The Latin Cognomina. Helsinki: KeskuskirjapainoGoogle Scholar

Katz, Joshua T. (2006). The ‘urbi et orbi-rule’ revisited. Journal of Indo-European Studies 34, 319–61Google Scholar

Keaney, Anne Marie (1982). Καποροιννα. Glotta 60, 246Google Scholar

Kortlandt, Frederik (1983). On final syllabes in Slavic. Journal of Indo-European Studies 11, 167–85Google Scholar

Kretschmer, Paul (1894). Die griechischen Vaseninschriften, ihrer Sprache nach untersucht. Gütersloh: BertelsmannGoogle Scholar

Kümmel, Martin Joachim (2013). Zur Endung des Genitivs Plural im Indoiranischen. Indogermanische Forschungen 118, 193–212CrossRef Google Scholar

La Regina, Adriano (2002). La formula onomastica osca in Lucania e nel Bruzzio. Eutopia 2.2, 57–69Google Scholar

Langslow, David (2012). Integration, identity, and language shift: strengths and weaknesses of the ‘linguistic’ evidence. In Roselaar, S. T. (ed.), Processes of Integration and Identity Formation in the Roman Republic, 289–309. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Lazzarini, Maria Letizia (1994). Una nuova defixio greca da Tiriolo. In A.I.O.N. Sezione filologico-letteraria 16 = Cassio, A. C. and Poccetti, P. (eds.), Forme di religiosità e tradizioni sapienziali in Magna Grecia: Atti del convegno Napoli 14–15 dicembre 1993, 163–9. Pisa and Rome: Istituti Editoriali e Poligrafici InternazionaliGoogle Scholar

Lazzarini, Maria Letizia (2004). Lamina plumbea iscritta da Petelia. Mediterraneo Antico 7, 673–80Google Scholar

Lazzarini, Maria Letizia (2009). Interazioni onomastiche nel Bruzio ionico. In Poccetti, Paolo (ed.), L’onomastica dell’Italia antica: Aspetti linguistici, storici, culturali, tipologici e classificatori, 425–31. Rome: École Française de RomeGoogle Scholar

Lazzeroni, Romano (1983). Contatti di lingue e di culture nell’Italia antica. Modelli egemoni e modelli subordinati nelle iscrizioni osche in grafia greca. A.I.O.N. Annali del Dipartimento di Studi del Mondo Classico e del Mediterraneo Antico: Sezione linguistica 5, 171–82Google Scholar

Lazzeroni, Romano (1985). Varianti grafiche e variante fonetiche nelle iscrizioni osche. Una questione di metodo. In Campanile, Enrico (ed.), Lingua e cultura degli Oschi, 47–53. Pisa: Giardini Editori e StampatoriGoogle Scholar

Lejeune, Michel (1970). Phonologie osque et graphie grecque. Revue des Études Anciennes 72, 271–315CrossRef Google Scholar

Lejeune, Michel (1971). Inscriptions de Rossano di Vaglio 1971. Atti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei. Rendiconti. Classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche. Series 8, 26, 663–84Google Scholar

Lejeune, Michel (1972a). Phonologie osque et graphie grecque ii. Revue des Études Anciennes 74, 5–13CrossRef Google Scholar

Lejeune, Michel (1972b). *aisu- ‘dieu’ et la quatrième déclinaison italique. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 67, 129–37Google Scholar

Lejeune, Michel (1972c). Phonétique historique du mycénien et du grec ancien. Paris: KlincksieckGoogle Scholar

Lejeune, Michel (1972d). Inscriptions de Rossano di Vaglio 1972. Atti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei. Rendiconti. Classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche. Series 8, 27, 399–414Google Scholar

Lejeune, Michel (1975). Réflexions sur la phonologie du vocalisme osque. Bullétin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 70, 233–51Google Scholar

Lejeune, Michel (1976). L’anthroponymie osque. Paris: Société d’Édition ‘Les Belles Lettres’Google Scholar

Lejeune, Michel (1985). Notes de linguistique italique xxxvi. Inscription osque a Muro Lucano. Revue des Études Latines 63, 50–55Google Scholar

Lejeune, Michel (1990). Méfitis d’après les dédicaces lucaniennes de Rossano di Vaglio. Louvain-la-neuve: PeetersGoogle Scholar

Lejeune, Michel (1993). Notes osques. In Meiser, Gerhard (ed.), Indogermanica et Italica: Festschrift für Helmut Rix zum 65. Geburtstag, 264–9. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur SprachwissenschaftGoogle Scholar

Leumann, Manu (1977). Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre. Second edition. Munich: C. H. Beck’sche VerlagsbuchhandlungGoogle Scholar

Lindsay, Wallace M. (ed.) (1913). Sexti Pompei Festi: De verborum significatu quae supersunt cum Pauli epitome, thewrewkianis copiis usus. Leipzig: TeubnerGoogle Scholar

Lippolis, E., Garraffo, S. and Nafissi, M. (1995). Culti greci in Occidente: Fonti scritte e documentazione archeologica. Vol. 1: Taranto. Taranto: Istituto per la Storia e l’Archeologia della Magna GreciaGoogle Scholar

Lo Porto, Felice Gino (1980). Medici pitagorici in una defixio greca da Metaponto. La Parola del Passato 35, 282–8Google Scholar

Lomas, Kathryn (2004). Italy during the Roman Republic, 338–31 B.C. In Flower, Harriet I. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic, 199–224. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Luschi, Licia (2006). Mefitis Kaporoinna. In Caiazza, Domenico (ed.), Samnitice Loqui: Studi in onore di Aldo Prosdocimi per il premio ‘I Sanniti’, 259–85. Piedimonte Matese: Libri di arte scienza e cultura della Banca Capasso AntonioGoogle Scholar

Mancini, Marco (2009). Il preterito latino tra continuità e discontinuità: facio, fēcī, fefaked. In Ancillotti, Augusto and Calderini, Alberto (eds.), L’umbro e le altre lingue dell’Italia mediana antica: Atti del I Convegno Internazionale sugli Antichi Umbri. Gubbio, 20–22 settembre 2001, 67–96. Perugia: Edizioni JamaGoogle Scholar

Mancini, Marco (2014). Testi epigrafici e sociolinguistica storica: le ‘defixiones’ sannite. In Giacomelli, Roberto and Bianchi, Adele Robbiati (eds.), Le lingue dell’Italia antico oltre il latino: lasciare parlare i testi. 29 Maggio 2007 (Istituto Lombardo - Accademia di Scienze e Lettere - Incontri di Studio 50), 29–61. Milan: Istituto Lombardo di Scienze e LettereGoogle Scholar

Manganaro, Giacomo (2004). Anagrafe di Leontinoi nel V secolo (a proposito di una tavoletta bronzea dedicatoria di V sec. a.C.). Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 149, 55–68Google Scholar

Maras, Daniele (2012). Scientists declare the Fibula Praenestina and its inscription to be genuine ‘beyond any reasonable doubt’. Etruscan News 14, 1, 20 (http://ancientstudies.fas.nyu.edu/docs/CP/963/EtruscanNewsVol14_2012_winter.pdf). Last accessed 14 January 2013Google Scholar

Marchese, Maria Pia (1974). Lucani. Studi Etruschi 42, 401–28Google Scholar

Martzloff, Vincent (2007). Les syntagmes picéniens povaisis pidaitúpas, me{nt}fistrúí nemúneí, trebegies titúí. Contribution à l’exégèse du cippe paléo-sabellique Te 5 (Penna San Andrea) à la lumière de l’inscription falisque archaïque de Cérès. Revue de philologie, de littérature et d’histoire anciennes 80, 63–104Google Scholar

Martzloff, Vincent (2011). Les marques casuelles dans les documentes paléo-sabelliques et la morphologie du génitif pluriel sud-picénien. In Fruyt, Michèle, Mazoyer, Michel and Pardee, Dennis (eds.), Grammatical Case in the Languages of the Middle East and Europe: Acts of the International Colloquium ‘Variations, Concurrence et Evolution des Cas dans Divers Domaines Linguistiques’, Paris, 2–4 April 2007, 189–215. Chicago: The Oriental Institute of the University of ChicagoGoogle Scholar

Mayser, Edwin and Schmoll, Hans (1970). Grammatik der Griechischen Papyri aus der Ptolemäerzeit: Mit Einschluss der gleichzeitigen Ostraka und der in Ägypten verfassten Inschriften. Vol. 1.1: Einleitung und Lautlehre. Second edition. Berlin: Verlag Walter de GruyterGoogle Scholar

McDonald, Katherine (2012). The testament of Vibius Adiranus. Journal of Roman Studies 102, 40–55CrossRef Google Scholar

McDonald, Katherine (2015). Oscan in Southern Italy: Evaluating Language Contact in a Fragmentary Corpus. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

McDonald, Katherine, Tagliapietra, Livia and Zair, Nicholas (2015). New readings of the multilingual Petelia curse tablet. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 195, 157–64Google Scholar

McDonald, Katherine and Zair, Nicholas (2012 [2013]). Oscan ϝουρουστ and the Roccagloriosa law tablet. Incontri Linguistici 35, 31–48Google Scholar

McLean, Bradley Hudson (2002). An Introduction to Greek Epigraphy of the Hellenistic and Roman Periods from Alexander the Great down to the Reign of Constantine (323 b.c.–a.d. 337). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar

Meiser, Gerhard (1986). Lautgeschichte der umbrischen Sprache. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur SprachwissenschaftGoogle Scholar

Meiser, Gerhard (1987). Pälignisch, Latein und Südpikenisch. Glotta 45, 104–25Google Scholar

Meiser, Gerhard (1993). Das Gerundivum im Spiegel der italischen Onomastik. In Heidermanns, Frank, Rix, Helmut and Seebold, Elmar (eds.), Sprachen und Schriften des antiken Mittelmeerraums: Festschrift für Jürgen Untermann zum 65. Geburtstag, 254–68. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur SprachwissenschaftGoogle Scholar

Meiser, Gerhard (1998). Historische Laut- und Formenlehre der lateinischen Sprache. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche BuchgesellschaftGoogle Scholar

Merlin, Alfred (ed.) (1944). Inscriptions latines de Tunisie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de FranceGoogle Scholar

Miranda, E. (1990–1995). Iscrizioni greche d’Italia: Napoli. 2 vols. Rome: Edizioni QuasarGoogle Scholar

Moretti, Luigi (1984). Epigramma per un atleta di Taranto. In Anonymous (ed.), Alessandria e il mondo ellenistico-romano: Studi in onore di Achille Adriani, 495–7. Rome: ‘L’Erma’ di BretschneiderGoogle Scholar

Mullen, Alex (2012). Introduction. Multiple languages, multiple identities. In Mullen, Alex and James, Patrick (eds.), Multilingualism in the Graeco-Roman Worlds, 1–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Mullen, Alex (2013). Southern Gaul and the Mediterranean: Multilingualism and Multiple Identities in the Iron Age and Roman Periods. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Murano, Francesca (2013). Le tabellae defixionum osche. Pisa and Rome: Fabrizio Serra EditoreGoogle Scholar

Nava, Maria Luisa and Poccetti, Paolo (2001). Il santuario lucano di Rossano di Vaglio. Una nuova dedica osca ad Ercole. Mélanges de l’École Française de Rome. Antiquité 113, 95–122Google Scholar

Nishimura, Kanehiro (2009). The orthographic and phonological interpretation of the Oscan praenomen marahis and related forms. In Yoshida, Kazuhiko and Vine, Brent (eds.), East and West: Papers in Indo-European Studies, 163–79. Bremen: Hempen VerlagGoogle Scholar

Nishimura, Kanehiro (2012). Vowel reduction and deletion in Sabellic: a synchronic and diachronic interface. In Whitehead, Benedicte Nielsen, Olander, Thomas, Olsen, Birgit Anette and Rasmussen, Jens Elmegård (eds.), The Sound of Indo-European: Phonetics, Phonemics and Morphophonemics, 381–98. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum PressGoogle Scholar

Nussbaum, Alan J. (1997). The ‘Saussure effect’ in Latin and Italic. In Lubotsky, Alexander (ed.), Sound Law and Analogy: Papers in Honor of Robert S. P. Beekes on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, 181–203. Amsterdam and Atlanta, GA: RodopiCrossRef Google Scholar

Orioles, Vincenzo (1972). Su alcuni fenomeni di palatalizzazione e di assibilazione nelle lingue dell’Italia antica. Studi Linguistici Salentini 5, 69–100Google Scholar

Penney, John H. W. (1988). The languages of Italy. In Boardman, John, Hammond, N. G. L., Lewis, D. M., and Ostwald, M. (eds.), Cambridge Ancient History. Vol. 4: Persia, Greece and the Western Mediterranean c.525–479 B.C, 720–38. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Penney, John H. W. (2002). Notes on some Sabellic demonstratives. In Hartmann, Ina J. and Willi, Andreas (eds.), Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology and Phonetics 7, 131–42. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Poccetti, Paolo (1980). Nuovi contributi alla topografia della documentazione italica. A.I.O.N. Annali del Dipartimento di Studi del Mondo Classico e del Mediterraneo Antico. Sezione linguistica 2, 77–88Google Scholar

Poccetti, Paolo (1984). Un Brettio a Cuma (nota a Ve 112). Parola del Passato 39, 43–7Google Scholar

Poccetti, Paolo (1985). Nochmals zum oskischen Namen Maras. Beiträge zur Namenforschung 20, 233–44Google Scholar

Poccetti, Paolo (1988). Per un’ identità culturale dei Brettii. Naples: Istituto Universitario Orientale, Dipartimento di Studi del Mondo Classico e del Mediterraneo AnticoGoogle Scholar

Poccetti, Paolo (1993a). Nuova laminetta plumbea osca dal Bruzio. In Crotone e la sua storia tra iv e iii secolo a.C., 213–32. Naples: Università degli Studi di Napoli ‘Federico II’, Dipartimento di Discipline Storiche: Centro di Studi per la Magna GreciaGoogle Scholar

Poccetti, Paolo (ed.) (1993b). Atti della giornata di discussione su ‘la tabella defixionis di Laos’. Napoli, 24 febbraio 1993. A.I.O.N. Annali del Dipartimento di Studi del Mondo Classico e del Mediterraneo Antico: Sezione linguistica 15, 113–90Google Scholar

Poccetti, Paolo (2002). Note sulla declinazione italica dei temi in -u. Incontri Linguistici 25, 47–64Google Scholar

Poccetti, Paolo (2005). Notes de linguistique italique. Nouvelle série 2. En marge de la nouvelle attestation du perfectum falisque faced/facet: le latin de Préneste vhevhaked et la falisque fifiked. Revue des Études Latines 83, 27–35Google Scholar

Poccetti, Paolo (2006a). Notes de linguistique italique. Nouvelle série. 3. L’attestation osque du terme pour ‘consul’ et le traitement de [ns] avec ses reflets latins et romans. Revue des Études Latines 84, 27–36Google Scholar

Poccetti, Paolo (2006b). Sul paradigma del verbo ‘fare’ (< *dheh₁-) nelle lingue dell’Italia antica. In Caiazza, Domenico (ed.), Samnitice loqui: Studi in onore di Aldo Prosdocimi per il premio ‘I Sanniti’, 91–112. Piedimonte Matese: Libri di arte scienza e cultura della Banca Capasso AntonioGoogle Scholar

Poccetti, Paolo (2008). Notes de linguistique italique. Nouvelle série. 5. Une nouvelle inscription osque et le nom de Venus. Revue des Études Latines 86, 24–36Google Scholar

Poccetti, Paolo (2009). Problemi antichi e dati nuovi: coincidenze di teonimi e di antroponimi nell’Italia antica. Una riflessione sulla classe dei ‘teoforici’ a partire da due elementi specifici. In Poccetti, Paolo (ed.), L’onomastica dell’Italia antica: Aspetti linguistici, storici, culturali, tipologici e classificatori, 221–48. Rome: École Française de RomeGoogle Scholar

Poccetti, Paolo (2010). Contacts et échanges technologiques entre Grecs et indigènes en Italie méridionale: langues et écritures au cours du IV^e siècle av. J.-C. In Tréziny, Henry (ed.), Grecs et indigènes de la Catalogne à la Mer Noire: Actes des rencontres du programme européen Ramses² (2006–2008), 659–78. Paris and Aix-en-Provence: Édition Errance and Centre Camille JulianGoogle Scholar

Poccetti, Paolo (2014). Bilingues Bruttaces. Il plurilinguismo di una città della Magna Grecia attraverso i suoi testi: il caso di Petelia. In Giacomelli, Roberto and Bianchi, Adele Robbiati (eds.), Le lingue dell’Italia antico oltre il latino: lasciare parlare i testi, 29 Maggio 2007 (Istituto Lombardo – Accademia di Scienze e Lettere – Incontri di Studio 50), 73–109. Milan: Istituto Lombardo di Scienze e LettereGoogle Scholar

Prag, Jonathan R. W. (2006). Poenus plane est – but who were the ‘Punickes’? Papers of the British School at Rome 74, 1–37CrossRef Google Scholar

Prosdocimi, Aldo L. (2002). Il genitivo singolare dei temi in -o- nelle varietà italiche (osco, sannita, umbro, sudpiceno, etc.). Incontri Linguistici 25, 65–76Google Scholar

Provost, Michel and Mennessier-Jouannet, Christine (eds.) (1994). Carte archeologique de la Gaule 63/1: Clermont-Ferrand. Paris: Académie des inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, Ministère de la CultureGoogle Scholar

Pugliese Carratelli, Giovanni (1983–1984). Dedica a Demeter da Santa Maria d’Anglona. Atti della Società Magna Grecia New Series 24–25, 213–14Google Scholar

Pugliese Carratelli, Giovanni (1992). Gli oggetti in metallo. In Greco, E and Guzzo, Pier Giovanni (eds.), Laos II: La tomba a camera di Marcellina, 17–19. Taranto: Istituto per la Storia e l’Archeologia della Magna GreciaGoogle Scholar

Purcell, Nicholas (1994). South Italy in the fourth century B.C. In Lewis, D. M., Boardman, John, Hornblower, Simon and Ostwald, M. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History. Vol. 6: The Fourth Century bc, 381–403. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Richter, Gisela M. A. (1927). Two theatre vases. The Bulletin of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York 22, 54, 56–8Google Scholar

Rix, Helmut (1976). Die umbrischen Infinitive auf -fi und die urindogermanische Infinitivendung -dhi̯ōi̯. In Davies, Anna Morpurgo and Meid, Wolfgang (eds.), Studies in Greek, Italic, and Indo-European Linguistics Offered to Leonard R. Palmer on the Occasion of his Seventieth Birthday June 5, 1976, 319–31. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur SprachwissenschaftGoogle Scholar

Rix, Helmut (1979). Review of Lejeune (1976). Kratylos 24, 107–16Google Scholar

Rix, Helmut (1986). Die Endung des Akkusativ Plural commune im Oskischen. In Etter, Annemarie (ed.), O-o-pe-ro-si. Festschrift für Ernst Risch zum 75. Geburtstag, 583–97. Berlin and New York: Walter de GruyterGoogle Scholar

Rix, Helmut (1992). Zur Entstehung des lateinischen Perfektparadigmas. In Panagl, Oswald and Krisch, Thomas (eds.), Latein und Indogermanisch: Akten des Kolloquiums der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, Salzburg, 23.–26. September 1986, 221–40. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur SprachwissenschaftGoogle Scholar

Rix, Helmut (1993). Osk. úpsannam – uupsens und Zugehöriges. In Heidermanns, Frank, Rix, Helmut and Seebold, Elmar (eds.), Sprachen und Schriften des antiken Mittelmeerraums: Festschrift für Jürgen Untermann zum 65. Geburtstag, 329–48. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur SprachwissenschaftGoogle Scholar

Rix, Helmut (1996). Variazioni locali in Osco. In Del Tutto Palma, Loretta (ed.), La Tavola di Agnone nel Contesto Italico: Convegno di Studio. Agnone, 13–15 aprile 1994, 243–61. Florence: Leo S. OlschkiGoogle Scholar

Rix, Helmut (1999a). Schwach charakterisierte lateinische Präsensstämme zu Seṭ-Wurzeln mit Vollstufe I. In Eichner, Heiner and Luschützky, Hans Christian (eds.), Compositiones Indogermanicae in Memoriam Jochem Schindler, 515–35. Prague: Enigma CorporationGoogle Scholar

Rix, Helmut (1999b). Oskisch vereiia- à la Mommsen. In Habisreitinger, Jürgen, Plath, Robert and Ziegler, Sabine (eds.), Gering und doch von Herzen: 25 indogermanistische Beiträge. Bernhard Forssman zum 65. Geburtstag, 237–57. Wiesbaden: Reichert VerlagGoogle Scholar

Rix, Helmut (2002). Sabellische Texte: Die Texte des Oskischen, Umbrischen und Südpikenischen. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. WinterGoogle Scholar

Rostowzew, M. (1903). Tesserarum Urbis Romae et Suburbi Plumbearum Sylloge. St Petersburg: L’Académie Impériale des SciencesGoogle Scholar

Rutkowska, Hanna and Rössler, Paul (2012). Orthographic variables. In Hernández-Campoy, Juan Manuel and Conde-Silvestre, Juan Camilo (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, 213–36. Malden, MA, Oxford and Chichester: Wiley-BlackwellGoogle Scholar

Salomies, Olli (1987). Die römischen Vornamen: Studien zur römischen Namengebung. Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum FennicaGoogle Scholar

Salomies, Olli (2008). Les prénoms italiques: un bilan de presque vingt ans après la publication de Vornamen. In Poccetti, Paolo (ed.), Les prénoms de l’Italie antique. Journée d’études Lyon, 26 Janvier 2004, 15–38. Pisa and Rome: Fabrizio Serra EditoreGoogle Scholar

Särstrom, Margit (1940). A Study in the Coinage of the Mamertines. Lund: C. W. K. GleerupGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, Margot (1984). Hermes als Seelengeleiter auf einer apulischen Lutrophoros in Basel. Antike Kunst 27, 34–40Google Scholar

Schrijver, Peter (1991). The Reflexes of the Proto-Indo-European Laryngeals in Latin. Amsterdam and Atlanta, GA: RodopiGoogle Scholar

Schrijver, Peter (2003). Athematic i-presents: the Italic and Celtic evidence. Incontri Linguistici 26, 59–86Google Scholar

Schulze, Wilhelm (1904). Zur Geschichte lateinischer Eigennamen. Berlin: Weidmannsche BuchhandlungGoogle Scholar

Schwyzer, Eduard (1959). Griechische Grammatik: Auf der Grundlage von Karl Brugmanns Griechischer Grammatik. Vol. 1: Allgemeiner Teil: Lautlehre. Wortbildung. Flexion. Third edition. Munich: C. H. BeckGoogle Scholar

Seidl, Christian (1994). Gemeinsabellisch und Vulgärlateinisch: Der Vokalismus. In Dunkel, George E., Meyer, Gisela, Scarlata, Salvatore and Seidl, Christian (eds.), Früh-, Mittel-, Spätindogermanisch: Akten der ix. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 5. bis 9. Oktober 1992 in Zürich, 349–70. Wiesbaden: Dr Ludwig Reichert VerlagGoogle Scholar

Sihler, Andrew (1995). New Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin. New York: Oxford University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Skutsch, Otto (1985). The Annals of Q. Ennius. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Smith, Cecil H (1896). Catalogue of the Greek and Etruscan Vases in the British Museum. Vol. 3: Vases of the Finest Period. London: British MuseumGoogle Scholar

Sogliano, A. (1887). Curti. Notizie degli Scavi di Antichità communicate alla R. Accademia dei Lincei, 560–61Google Scholar

Solin, Heikki and Salomies, Olli (1994). Repertorium nominum gentilium et cognominum Latinorum. Second edition. Hildesheim, Zurich and New York: Olms-WeidmannGoogle Scholar

Stuart-Smith, Jane (2004). Phonetics and Phonology: Sound Change in Italic. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Sturtevant, Edgar H. (1940). The Pronunciation of Greek and Latin. Second edition. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Society of AmericaGoogle Scholar

Threatte, Leslie (1980). The Grammar of Attic Inscriptions. Vol. 1: Phonology. Berlin and New York: Walter de GruyterGoogle Scholar

Thumb, Albert, Kieckers, E. and Scherer, A. (1932–1959). Handbuch der griechischen Dialekte. Heidelberg: C. WinterGoogle Scholar

Tikkanen, Karin (2011). A Sabellian Case Grammar. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag WinterGoogle Scholar

Trendall, A. D. (1967). The Red-Figured Vases of Lucania, Campania and Sicily. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Trendall, A. D. (1987). The Red-Figured Vases of Paestum. Rome: British School at RomeGoogle Scholar

Trendall, A. D. and Cambitoglou, Alexander (1978–1982). The Red-Figured Vases of Apulia. 3 vols. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Trendall, A. D. and Cambitoglou, Alexander (1983). First Supplement to The Red-Figured Vases of Apulia. London: University of LondonGoogle Scholar

Trendall, A. D. and Cambitoglou, Alexander (1991–1992). Second Supplement to The Red-Figured Vases of Apulia. 3 vols. London: University of LondonGoogle Scholar

Untermann, Jürgen (2000). Wörterbuch des Oskisch-Umbrischen. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. WinterGoogle Scholar

Vecchio, Luigi (2003). Le iscrizioni greche di Velia. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der WissenschaftenGoogle Scholar

Vetter, Emil (1953). Handbuch der italischen Dialekte. Vol. 1: Texte mit Erklärung, Glossen, Wörterverzeichnis. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Carl WinterGoogle Scholar

Vine, Brent (1998). Aeolic ὄρπετον and Deverbative *-etó- in Greek and Indo-European. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur SprachwissenschaftGoogle Scholar

von Planta, Robert (1892–1897). Grammatik der oskisch-umbrischen Dialekte. 2 vols. Strasbourg: Verlag von Karl J. TrübnerGoogle Scholar

von Planta, Robert (1893). Eine dritte oskische Bleitafel. Indogermanische Forschungen 2, 435–41Google Scholar

Wachter, Rudolf (1987). Altlateinische Inschriften. Bern, Frankfurt and New York: Peter LangGoogle Scholar

Wachter, Rudolf (2010). Inscriptions. In Bakker, Egbert J. (ed.), A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language, 47–61. Chichester: Wiley-BlackwellCrossRef Google Scholar

Wallace, Rex E. (1985). Volscian sepu/Oscan sipus. Indogermanische Forschungen 90, 123–8Google Scholar

Wallace, Rex E. (1988). Dialectal Latin fundatid, proiecitad, parentatid. Glotta 66, 211–20Google Scholar

Wallace, Rex E. (2007). The Sabellic Languages of Ancient Italy. Munich: LincomGoogle Scholar

Wallace, Rex E. (2008). Zikh Rasna: A Manual of the Etruscan Language and Inscriptions. Ann Arbor and New York: Beech Stave PressGoogle Scholar

Wallace, Rex E. (2011). The Latin alphabet and orthography. In Clackson, James (ed.), A Companion to the Latin Language, 9–28. Malden, MA, Oxford and Chichester: Wiley-BlackwellGoogle Scholar

Walters, H. B. (ed.) (1896). Catalogue of the Greek and Etruscan Vases in the British Museum. Vol. 4: Vases of the Latest Period. London: British MuseumGoogle Scholar

Walters, H. B. (ed.) (1931). Corpus Vasorum Antiquorum: Great Britain Fascicule 8; British Museum (Department of Greek and Latin Antiquities) Fascicule 6. London: British MuseumGoogle Scholar

Weiss, Michael (1998). On some problems of final syllables in South Picene. In Jay Jasanoff, H. Melchert, Craig and Oliver, Lisi (eds.), Mír Curad: Studies in Honor of Calvert Watkins, 703–15. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur SprachwissenschaftGoogle Scholar

Weiss, Michael (2002). Observations on the South Picene inscription TE 1 (S. Omero). In Southern, Mark R. V. (ed.), Indo-European Perspectives, 351–66. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of ManGoogle Scholar

Weiss, Michael (2009). Outline of the Historical and Comparative Grammar of Latin. Ann Arbor and New York: Beech Stave PressGoogle Scholar

Weiss, Michael (2010). Language and Ritual in Sabellic Italy: The Ritual Complex of the Third and Fourth Tabulae Iguvinae. Leiden and Boston: BrillCrossRef Google Scholar

Whatmough, Joshua (1970). The Dialects of Ancient Gaul. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Williams, Nicholas (2011). Middle and Late Cornish. In Ternes, Elmar (ed.), Brythonic Celtic – Britannisches Keltisch: From Medieval British to Modern Breton, 237–357. Bremen: Hempen VerlagGoogle Scholar

Zair, Nicholas (2012a). The Reflexes of the Proto-Indo-European Laryngeals in Celtic. Leiden and Boston: BrillCrossRef Google Scholar

Zair, Nicholas (2012b). Review of Dupraz (2012). Linguist List 23.3105, July 11 (http://linguistlist.org/issues/23/23-3015.html)Google Scholar

Zair, Nicholas (2013). Individualism in ‘Osco-Greek’ orthography. In Wagner, Esther-Miriam, Outhwaite, Ben and Beinhoff, Bettina (eds.), Scribes as Agents of Language Change, 217–26. Berlin: De GruyterGoogle Scholar

Zair, Nicholas (2014a). The future perfect in Oscan and Umbrian, and the ō-perfect in South Picene. Transactions of the Philological Society 112, 367–85CrossRef Google Scholar

Zair, Nicholas (2014b). The treatment(s) of *-u- after a coronal in Oscan: dialect variation and chronology. Indo-European Linguistics 2, 112–25CrossRef Google Scholar

Zimmerman, Jean-Louis (1979). Une cuirasse de Grand Grèce. Museum Helveticum 36, 177–84Google Scholar