Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:06:53.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 11 - Dichorionic Twin Pregnancy

from Section 1 - Obstetric Aspects of Antenatal Care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2023

Amira El-Messidi
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Alan D. Cameron
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Get access

Summary

A healthy 35-year-old secundigravida with a history of an uncomplicated Cesarean delivery performed four years ago for fetal malpresentation at term is referred by her primary care provider to your general obstetrics clinic at 11+5 weeks’ gestation by menstrual age. The physician provided you with a sonographic dating report confirming a viable intrauterine dichorionic diamniotic twin gestation with a crown–rump length (CRL) of twin A and B at 47 mm and 44 mm, respectively. The patient does not have any obstetric complaints and has been taking routine prenatal vitamins for the past four months. Her social and family histories are unremarkable.

Type
Chapter
Information
OSCEs in Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine
An Evidence-Based Approach
, pp. 141 - 157
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Suggested Readings

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins – Obstetrics, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Multifetal gestations: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies: ACOG Practice Bulletin, No. 231. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137(6):e145e162.Google Scholar
Antonakopoulos, N, Pateisky, P, Liu, B, et al. Selective fetal growth restriction in dichorionic twin pregnancies: diagnosis, natural history, and perinatal outcome. J Clin Med. 2020;9(5):1404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheung, KW, Seto, MTY, Wang, W, et al. Effect of delayed interval delivery of remaining fetus(es) in multiple pregnancies on survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(4):306319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(a) FIGO Working Group on Good Clinical Practice in Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Good clinical practice advice: management of twin pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;144(3):330337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FIGO Working Group on Good Clinical Practice in Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Good clinical practice advice: role of ultrasound in the management of twin pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;144(3):338339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodnight, W, Newman, R. Optimal nutrition for improved twin pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(5):11211134.Google Scholar
Khalil, A, Beune, I, Hecher, K, et al. Consensus definition and essential reporting parameters of selective fetal growth restriction in twin pregnancy: a delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(1):4754. [Correction in Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;56(6):967]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khalil, A, Rodgers, M, Baschat, A, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(2):247263. [Correction in Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;52(1):140]Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Guideline No. 137: twin and triplet pregnancy. September 2019.Google Scholar
Palomaki, GE, Chiu, RWK, Pertile, MD, et al. International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis Position Statement: Cell free (cf)DNA screening for Down syndrome in multiple pregnancies. Prenat Diagn. 2020;41(10):12221232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(a) Audibert, F, Gagnon, A. No. 262 – prenatal screening for and diagnosis of aneuploidy in twin pregnancies. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017;39(9):e347e361.Google Scholar
Brown, R, Gagnon, R, Delisle, MF. No. 373 – cervical insufficiency and cervical cerclage. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019;41(2):233247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morin, L, Lim, K. No. 260 – ultrasound in twin pregnancies. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017;39(10):e398e411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×