Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:21:30.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Case 100 - Pseudometastases due to red marrow conversion

from Section 16 - Bone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2011

Fergus V. Coakley
Affiliation:
University of California, San Francisco
Get access

Summary

Imaging description

Red bone marrow can become stimulated and metabolically active as a rebound phenomenon after chemotherapy, in response to severe or chronic hemorrhage, or by bone marrow stimulants used in oncology patients (e.g., granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, erythropoietin or interleukin-3) [1–5]. In such settings, bone marrow uptake of 18F-FDG at PET can be markedly increased and simulate diffuse metastatic disease (Figure 100.1).

Importance

An incorrect diagnosis of metastases due to increased FDG uptake at PET by red marrow conversion could lead to unnecessary additional treatment or inappropriate changes in management [4]. Conversely, it is also possible that this appearance could mask true bone metastases [5, 6].

Typical clinical scenario

Increased bone marrow activity at PET has been reported primarily in cancer patients treated with colony stimulating factors.

Differential diagnosis

The main differential consideration for widespread bone marrow uptake of FDG by converted red marrow is diffuse medullary metastases (Figure 100.2). In practice, medullary metastases are usually focal while red marrow conversion is usually diffuse, but this rule is not absolute – medullary metastases are occasionally diffuse [7] and red marrow conversion is occasionally focal [8, 9]. The evolution of these abnormalities over time may allow accurate differentiation. If critical to pending management decisions, biopsy may be required.

Type
Chapter
Information
Pearls and Pitfalls in Abdominal Imaging
Pseudotumors, Variants and Other Difficult Diagnoses
, pp. 356 - 359
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Daldrup-Link, HE, Henning, T, Link, TM. MR imaging of therapy-induced changes of bone marrow. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 743–761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sonet, A, Graux, C, Nollevaux, MC, et al. Unsuspected FDG-PET findings in the follow-up of patients with lymphoma. Ann Hematol 2007; 86: 9–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goerres, GW, Schulthess, GK, Hany, TF. Positron emission tomography and PET CT of the head and neck: FDG uptake in normal anatomy, in benign lesions, and in changes resulting from treatment. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179: 1337–1343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollinger, EF, Alibazoglu, H, Ali, A, Green, A, Lamonica, G. Hematopoietic cytokine-mediated FDG uptake stimulates the appearance of diffuse metastatic disease on whole-body PET imaging. Clin Nucl Med 1998; 23: 93–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorospe, L, Raman, S, Echeveste, J, et al. Whole-body PET/CT: spectrum of physiological variants, artifacts and interpretative pitfalls in cancer patients. Nucl Med Commun 2005; 26: 671–687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chhabra, A, Batra, K, Makler, PT. Obscured bone metastases after administration of hematopoietic factor on FDG-PET. Clin Nucl Med 2006; 31: 328–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanna, SL, Fletcher, BD, Fairclough, DL, Jenkins, JH, Le, AH. Magnetic resonance imaging of disseminated bone marrow disease in patients treated for malignancy. Skeletal Radiol 1991; 20: 79–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bordalo-Rodrigues, M, Galant, C, Lonneux, M, Clause, D, Vande Berg, BC. Focal nodular hyperplasia of the hematopoietic marrow simulating vertebral metastasis on FDG positron emission tomography. Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 669–671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pui, MH, Tan, MH, Kuan, JHY, Pho, RWH. Haematopoietic marrow hyperplasia simulating transarticular skip metastasis in osteosarcoma. Australas Radiol 1995; 39: 303–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×