Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T17:17:58.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Self-development, individuation, and culture: A psychoanalytic search

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

By
Güler Okman Fişek
Edited by
Sevda Bekman  and
Ayhan Aksu-Koç
Foreword by
M. Brewster Smith
Sevda Bekman
Affiliation:
Bogaziçi University, Istanbul
Ayhan Aksu-Koç
Affiliation:
Bogaziçi University, Istanbul
Get access

Summary

Çiğdem is a valued colleague and friend. More importantly, she is an older sister and guide, especially in our joint attempts to help further the development of psychology in Turkey over the years. A sense of responsibility and obligation, to which we refer as “being girl scouts”, has led to adventures in many contexts, even to the extent of being summoned by the police during the early days of the 1980 coup. Beyond that relationship, I have gained knowledge and courage from Çiğdem's seminal ideas in pursuing my own interest in the interface of culture, family, and the self.

This chapter attempts to explore the topic of early self-development, especially with regards to the process of individuation from a comparative psychoanalytic perspective. Among the many points regarding the construal of self that Çiğdem Kağıtçıbaşı makes in her recent articles, one speaks directly to the topic of this chapter. Evaluating the general approach of cross-cultural psychology to different construals of self, she writes that, “this approach falls short of addressing questions regarding how these different types of selves emerge” (2005: 410). Stating that these questions require a developmental perspective she goes on to discuss the issue in the context of family and socio-cultural development.

Kağıtçıbaşı's constructs of “separate-relational” selves (1996a, 1996b) find echoes in constructs such as “independent-interdependent” (Markus and Kitayama 1991), “individualistic-collectivistic” (Triandis et al. 1988), “idiocentric-sociocentric” (Shweder and Bourne 1984), and so forth. These are social psychological or anthropological terms, from disciplines that have traditionally paid the most attention to culture.

Type
Chapter
Information
Perspectives on Human Development, Family, and Culture , pp. 194 - 206
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beebe, B. and Lachmann, F. M., Infant Research and Adult Treatment (Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Benjamin, J., Shadow of the Other (New York: Routledge, 1998).Google Scholar
Blatt, S. J. and Blass, R. B., “Relatedness and self-definition: Two primary dimensions in personality development, psychopathology, and psychotherapy,” in Barron, J. W., Eagle, M. N., and Wolitsky, D. L. (eds.), Interface of Psychoanalysis and Psychology (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1992), pp. 399–428.Google Scholar
Bowlby, B., Attachment and Loss. Volume 1 (New York: Basic Books, 1969).Google Scholar
Edelman, G. M., Wider than the Sky (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Fişek, G. O., “Cultural context: migration and health risks: A multilevel analysis,” in Marschalck, P. and Wiedl, K. H. (eds.), Migration und Krankheit, IMIS Schriften 10 (Osnabrück: Univeristy of Osnabrück Publications, 2001, pp. 113–22.Google Scholar
Fişek, G. O., “Bende bir ben var ailemden içeri [There is an I in me inside of my family],” invited address presented at the XII National Congress of Psychology, Ankara, Turkey, 2002.
Fişek, G. O., “The traditional self and family in flux: Opportunities and risks engendered by change,” invited conference in seminar on “Self and family in flux” at the Transcultural Center, Stockholm, Sweden, 2003.
Fişek, G. O. and Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., “Multiculturalism and psychotherapy: The Turkish case,” in Pedersen, P. (ed.), Multiculturalism as a Fourth Force (Philadelphia, PA: Taylor and Francis, 1999), pp. 75–92.Google Scholar
Fonagy, P. and Target, M., Psychoanalytic Theories (London: Whurr Publishers, 2003).Google Scholar
Ghent, E., “Foreword,” in Skolnick, N. J. and Warshaw, S. C. (eds.), Relational Perspectives in Psychoanalysis(Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, 1992), pp. xi–xxix.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. and Mitchell, S. A., Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Guisinger, S. and Blatt, S. J., “Individuality and relatedness,” American Psychologist, 49 (1994), 104–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare-Mustin, R. T. and Marecek, J., “The meaning of difference,” American Psychologist, 43 (1988), 455–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, E., The Self and the Object World (New York: International Universities Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., “The autonomous-relational self: A new synthesis,” European Psychologist, 1 (1996a), 180–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., Family and Human Development across Cultures (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1996b).Google Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., “Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family,” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20 (2005), 1–20.Google Scholar
Kohut, H., The Restoration of the Self (New York: International Universities Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Landrine, H., “Clinical implications of cultural difference: The referential versus indexical self,” Clinical Psychology Review, 12 (1992), 401–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahler, M. S., Pine, F., and Bergman, A., The Psychological Birth of the Human Infant (New York: Basic Books, 1975).Google Scholar
Markus, H. R. and Kitayama, S., “Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation,” Psychological Review, 98 (1991), 224–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modell, A. H., The Private Self (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Roland, A., In Search of Self in India and Japan (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Roland, A., Cultural Pluralism and Psychoanalysis (New York: Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P., Alcalay, L., Allensworth, M., Allik, J., Ault, L., Austers, I. et al., “Patterns and universals of adult romantic attachment across 62 cultural regions: Are models of self and of other pancultural constructs?,” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35 (2004), 367–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schore, A. N., Affect Regulation and the Origin of the Self: The Neurobiology of Emotional Development (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1994).Google Scholar
Shweder, R. A. and Bourne, E. J., “Does the concept of the person vary cross-culturally?,” in Shweder, R. A. and LeVine, R. A. (eds.), Culture Theory: Essays on Mind, Self and Emotion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984), pp. 158–99.Google Scholar
Stern, D. N., The Interpersonal World of the Infant (New York: Basic Books, 1985).Google Scholar
Stern, D. N., The Motherhood Constellation: A Unifying View of Parent–infant Psychotherapy (New York: Basic Books, 1995).Google Scholar
Sullivan, H. S., “The illusion of personal individuality,” Psychiatry, 13 (1950/1964), 317–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sümer, N. and Güngör, D., “Psychometric evaluation of adult attachment measures on Turkish samples and a cross-cultural comparison,” Turkish Journal of Psychology, 14 (1999), 71–106.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., and Villareal, M. J., “Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self–ingroup relationships,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (1988), 323–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×