Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T06:23:32.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - What Kind of Problem is the Hermeneutic Circle?

The Situationist Attack on Virtue Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
C. Mantzavinos
Edited by
C. Mantzavinos
C. Mantzavinos
Affiliation:
Witten/Herdecke University Chair of Economics and Philosophy
C. Mantzavinos
Affiliation:
Witten/Herdecke University
Get access

Summary

The hermeneutic circle serves as a standard argument for all those who raise a claim to the autonomy of the human sciences. The proponents of an alternative methodology for the human sciences present the hermeneutic circle either as an ontological problem or as a specific methodological problem in the social sciences and the humanities. One of the most influential defenders of interpretivism in the English-speaking world, Charles Taylor, contends for example (1985: 18):

This is one way of trying to express what has been called the “hermeneutical circle.” What we are trying to establish is a certain reading of text or expressions, and what we appeal to as our grounds for this reading can only be other readings. The circle can also be put in terms of part-whole relations: we are trying to establish a reading for the whole text, and for this we appeal to readings of its partial expressions; and yet because we are dealing with meaning, with making sense, where expressions only make sense or not in relation to others, the readings of partial expressions depend on those of others, and ultimately of the whole.

Our understanding of a society is supposed to be circular in an analogous way: we can only understand, for example, some part of a political process only if we have some understanding of the whole, but we can only understand the whole, if we have already understood the part. In this chapter I would like to check the soundness of this argument.

Type
Chapter
Information
Philosophy of the Social Sciences
Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice
 , pp. 299 - 311
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J. R. 2005. Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications. 6th edn. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google ScholarPubMed
Albert, H. 1994. Kritik der reinen Hermeneutik. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
Ast, G. A. F. 1808. Grundlinien der Grammatik, Hermeneutik und Kritik. Landshut: Jos. Thomann, Buchdrucker und Buchhändler.Google Scholar
Baron, J. 1994. Thinking and Deciding. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, N. and Squire, L. R. 1980. “Preserved learning and retention of pattern-analyzing skill in amnesia: dissociation of knowing how and knowing that,” Science 210: 207–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danks, J. H., Bohn, L., and Fears, R. 1983. “Comprehension Processes in Oral Reading.” In dʹArcais, G. B. Flores and Jarvella, R. J. (eds.) The Process of Language Understanding. Chichester, New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 193–223.Google Scholar
Føllesdal, D., Walløe, L., and Elster, J. 1996. Argumentasjonsteori, språk og vitenskapsfilosofi. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. 1959/1988. “On the Circle of Understanding.” In Connolly, J. M. and Keutner, T. (eds.) Hermeneutics versus Science? Three German Views. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 68–78. Originally published as “Vom Zirkel des Verstehens.” In Pfullingen, G. Neske (ed.) Festschrift für Martin Heidegger zum 70. Geburtstag, pp. 24–35.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. 1960/2003. Truth and Method. 2nd rev. edn, trans. Weinsheimer, J. and Marshall, D. G.. New York: Continuum. Originally published as Wahrheit und Methode. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
Goettner, H. 1973. Logik der Interpretation. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1927/1962. Being and Time trans. Macquarrie, J. and Robinson, E.. New York, NY: Harper & Row. Originally published as Sein und ZeitTübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Just, M. A. and Carpenter, P. A. 1980. “A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension,” Psychological Review 87: 329–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kincaid, H. 1996. Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Little, D. 1991. Varieties of Social Explanation. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Manicas, P. 2006. A Realist Philosophy of Social Science. Explanation and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantzavinos, C. 2005. Naturalistic Hermeneutics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, M. 1994. “Taylor on Interpretation and the Sciences of Man.” In Martin, M. and McIntyre, L. C. (eds.) Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 259–279.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. 1994. The Language Instinct. New York, NY: Perennial Classics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, , Orman, W. 1980. From A Logical Point of View. 2nd rev. edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reale, G. 2000. “Gadamer, ein großer Platoniker des 20. Jahrhunderts.” In Figal, G. (ed.) Begegnungen mit Hans-Georg Gadamer. Stuttgart: Reclam, pp. 92–104.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, F. D. E. 1999. Hermeneutik und Kritik. Frank, M. (ed.). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 7th edn.Google Scholar
Searle, J. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. 2005. “What is an institution?,” Journal of Institutional Economics 1: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. 1979. Models of Thought. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, H. 1983. Reason in Human Affairs. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, H. 1986. “The information processing explanation of gestalt phenomena,” Computers in Human Behavior 2: 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stegmüller, W. 1979/1988. “Walther von der Vogelweide's Lyric of Dream-Love and Quasar 3C 273. Reflections on the So-called ‘Circle of Understanding’ and on the So-called ‘Theory-Ladenness’ of Observations.” In Connolly, J. M. and Keutner, T. (eds.) Hermeneutics versus Science? Three German Views. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 102–152. Originally published as “Walther von der Vogelweides Lied von der Traumliebe und Quasar 3C 273. Betrachtungen zum sogenannten Zirkel des Verstehens und zur sogenannten Theorienbeladenheit der Beobachtungen.” In Rationale Rekonstruktion von Wissenschaft und ihrem Wandel. Stuttgart: Reclam 1979, pp. 27–86.Google Scholar
Stroop, H. R. 1935. “Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions,” Journal of Experimental Psychology 18: 643–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. 1985. “Interpretation and the Sciences of Man.” In Philosophical Papers, vol. 2: Philosophy and the Human Sciences, Cambridge University Press, pp. 15–57.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×