Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T06:08:52.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Normative Aspects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  aN Invalid Date NaN

Edited by
Aaron Segal  and
Samuel Lebens
Aaron Segal
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Samuel Lebens
Affiliation:
University of Haifa, Israel
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Philosophy of Worship
Divine and Human Aspects
 , pp. 117 - 226
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Adams, R. M. 1977. Middle Knowledge and the Problem of Evil. American Philosophical Quarterly, 14(2):109–117.Google Scholar
Dahood, M. 1965. Psalms I (The Anchor Bible, Volume 16). Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, M. 2022. What Is the Best Jewish Account of the Grounds of Worship of God? Journal of Analytic Theology, 10: 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, A. 1974. The Nature of Necessity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Suarez, F. 1859–1879. Opera Omnia. Volume 7. Paris: Vives.Google Scholar
Weiser, A. 1962. Psalms (The Old Testament Library). Philadelphia, PA: The Westminster Press.Google Scholar

References

Adams, M. (1999). Horrendous Evils and The Goodness of God. Ithaca, NY; London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Adams, R. (1985). “Involuntary Sins.” The Philosophical Review, 94(1), 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, R. (1999). Finite and Infinite Goods a Framework for Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alston, W. (1996). “Some (Temporarily) Final Thoughts on Evidential Arguments from Evil,” in The Evidential Argument from Evil, ed. Howard-Snyder, D., Bloomington: Indiana University Press: 311–332.Google Scholar
Arpaly, N. and Schroeder, T. (2013). In Praise of Desire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, D. and Nelkin, D. (2013). “Fairness and the Architecture of Responsibility,” in Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility Volume 1, ed. Shoemaker, D.. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 284–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, R. (2014). “The Connection‐Building Theodicy,” in The Blackwell Companion to the Problem of Evil, eds McBrayer, J. P. and Howard‐Snyder, D.. Oxford: Wiley: 222–235.Google Scholar
Comesaña, J. and Tal, E. (2015). “Evidence of Evidence Is Evidence (trivially).” Analysis, 75(4), 557–559.Google Scholar
D’Arms, J. and Jacobson, D. (2003). “The Significance of Recalcitrant Emotion (or, Anti-Quasijudgmentalism),” in Philosophy and the Emotions. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplementsi, ed. Hatzimoysis, A.. Cambrdige: Cambridge University Press: 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, T. (2016). “Skeptical Theism,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), Edward Zalta, N. (ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/skeptical-theism/.Google Scholar
Feldman, R. (2005). “Respecting the Evidence.” Philosophical Perspectives, 19(1):95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hick, J. (1966). Evil and the God of Love. New York: Harper and Row, revised edition 1978.Google Scholar
Hieronymi, P. (2004). “The Force and Fairness of Blame.” Philosophical Perspectives, 18(1), 115–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, S. (2014). “Epistemic Akrasia.” Noûs, 48(4), 718–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauppinen, A. (2018). “Valuing Anger,” in The Moral Psychology of Anger, ed. Cherry, M. and Flanagan, O.. New York: Roman and Littlefield: 31–47.Google Scholar
Lasonen-Aarnio, M. (2014). “Higher-Order Evidence and the Limits of Defeat.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 88(2), 314–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, J. L. (1955). “Evil and Omnipotence.” Mind, 64, 200–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macnamara, C. (2015). “Blame, Communication and Morally Responsible Agency,” in The Nature of Moral Responsibility, eds. Clarke, R., McKenna, M. and Smith, A.. New York: Oxford University Press: 211–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenna, M. (2012). Conversation and Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppy, G. (2010). “The Evidential Problem of Evil,” in A Companion to Philosophy of Religion: Second Edition, eds McBrayer, J. P. and Howard‐Snyder, D.. Oxford: Wiley: 500–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, D. (2002). “Epistemic Akrasia.” The Monist, 85(3), 381–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Radzik, L. (2011). “On Minding Your Own Business: Differentiating Accountability Relations within the Moral Community.” Social Theory and Practice, 37, 574–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhea, M. C. (2018). The Hiddenness of God. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, W. (1996). “The Evidential Argument from Evil: A Second Look,” in The Evidential Argument from Evil, ed. Howard-Snyder, . Bloomington: Indiana University Press: 262–285.Google Scholar
Rowe, W. (1979). “The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism.” American Philosophical Quarterly, 16, 335–341.Google Scholar
Russell, B. and Wykstra, S. (1988). “The ‘Inductive’ Problem of Evil: A Dialogue.” Philosophical Topics, 16, 133–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, T. (2008). Moral Dimensions: Permissibility, Meaning, Blame. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, D. (2017). “Response-Dependent Responsibility; Or, A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Blame.? Philosophical Review, 126(4), 481–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. (2012). “Moral Blame and Moral Protest,” in Blame: Its Nature and Norms, ed Coates, Justin and Tognazzini, Neal. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. (2015). “Responsibility as Answerability.” Inquiry, 58(2), 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1962/2008). “Freedom and Resentment,” in Free Will and Reactive Attitudes: Perspectives on P.F. Strawson’s “Freedom and resentment”, eds. McKenna, M. and Russell, P.. Burlington, VT; Farnham, England: Ashgate: 19.Google Scholar
Stump, E. (2010). Wandering in Darkness: Narrative and the Problem of Suffering. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tal, E. and Comesaña, J. (2017). “Is Evidence of Evidence Evidence?” Noûs, 51(1), 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tognazzini, N. and Coates, D. J. “Blame,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition), ed. Zalta, E.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/blame/.Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, P. (2006). The Problem of Evil: The Gifford Lectures Delivered in the University of St. Andrews in 2003. Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, R. (2019) “Responsibility and the Limits of Good and Evil.” Philosophical Studies, 176(10), 2705–2727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, R. J. (1994). Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. J. (2010). “Hypocrisy, Moral Address, and the Equal Standing of Persons.” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 38, 307–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, G. (1996). “Two Faces of Responsibility.” Philosophical Topics, 24(2), 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, G. (2014). “Peter Strawson on Responsibility and Sociality,” in Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility, vol. 2: ‘Freedom and Resentment’ at 50, eds. Shoemaker, David and Tognazzini, Neal A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedgwood, R. (2011). “Justified Inference.” Synthese, 189(2), 1–23.Google Scholar
Wiggins, D. (1973). “Towards a Reasonable Libertarianism,” in Essays on Freedom and Action, ed. Honderich, T.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul: 31–62.Google Scholar
Wolf, S. 2012. “Blame, Italian Style.” in Reasons and Recognition: Essays on the Philosophy of T.M. Scanlon (p. Reasons and Recognition: Essays on the Philosophy of T.M. Scanlon). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 332–347.Google Scholar

References

Adams, Robert M. (1999). Finite and Infinite Goods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, David M. (1978). Nominalism & Realism – Universals & Scientific Realism, volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baillie, James and Hagen, Jason. (2008). There Cannot Be Two Omnipotent Beings. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 64(1), 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayne, Tim and Nagasawa, Yujin. (2006). The Grounds of Worship. Religious Studies, 42, 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayne, Tim Bayne and Nagasawa, Yujin. (2007). The Grounds of Worship Again: A Reply to Crowe. Religious Studies, 43, 475–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berto, Francesco and Jago, Mark. (2018). Impossible Worlds. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/impossible-worlds/.Google Scholar
Bradley, Ben. (2006). Two Concepts of Intrinsic Value. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 9(2), 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick. (1986). Brentano and Intrinsic Value. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crisp, Roger. (2000). Review of Jon Kupperman, Value … and What Follows. Philosophy, 75, 458–462.Google Scholar
Danaher, John. (2012). Stumbling on the Threshold: A Reply to Gwiazda on Threshold Obligations. Religious Studies, 48, 469–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Arms, Justin and Jacobson, Daniel. (2000). The Moralistic Fallacy: On the “Appropriateness” of Emotions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 61, 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davison, Scott A. (2012). On the Intrinsic Value of Everything. New York City: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
Davison, Scott A. (2018). God and Intrinsic Value. In Kray, Klaas J., ed. Does God Matter? Essays on the Axiological Consequences of Theism. New York: Routlege, 39–45.Google Scholar
Davison, Scott A. (2019). A Naturalistic Intrinsic Value Theodicy. In Buchak, Lara, Zimmerman, Dean W., and Swenson, Philip, eds., Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion volume 9. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 236–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geach, P. T. (1956). Good and Evil. Analysis 17, 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwiazda, Jeremy. (2011). Worship and Threshold Obligations. Religious Studies, 47, 521–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humberstone, I. L. (1996). Intrinsic/Extrinsic, Synthese, 108(2), 205–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Daniel. (2011). Fitting Attitude Theories of Value. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2011 Edition), Zalta, Edward N., ed. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/fitting-attitude-theories/.Google Scholar
Johnston, Mark. (2019). Why Did the One Not Remain within Itself? In Buchak, Lara, Zimmerman, Dean W., and Swenson, Philip, eds., Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion volume 9. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 106–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonas, Silvia. (2018). Modal Structuralism and Theism. In Ellis, Fiona, ed., New Models of Religious Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 151–171.Google Scholar
Lemos, Noah. (1994.) Intrinsic Value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurin, Anna-Sofia. (2018). Tropes. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Zalta, Edward N., ed., https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/tropes/.Google Scholar
Mele, Alfred R. and Smith, M. P. (1988). The New Paradox of the Stone. Faith and Philosophy, 5(3), 283–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Thomas V. (1984). Duty and Divine Goodness. American Philosophical Quarterly, 21, 261–268.Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. “Owing God Worship.” Chapter 11 in this volume, p.190.Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. (2017). God’s Own Ethics: Norms of Divine Agency and the Argument from Evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. (2018). No Creaturely Intrinsic Value. Philosophia Christi, 20(2), 347–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. (2021). Divine Holiness and Divine Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagasawa, Yujin. (2017). Maximal God: A New Defense of Perfect Being Theism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Jonas. (2015). Doubts about Intrinsic Value. In Hirose, Iwao and Olson, Jonas, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Value Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 44–59.Google Scholar
Orsi, Francesco. (2015). Value Theory. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinowicz, Wlodek and Rönnow-Rasmussen, Toni. (2004). The Strike of the Demon: On Fitting Pro-Attitudes and Value. Ethics, 114, 391–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas. (1998). What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smart, Ninian. (1972). The Concept of Worship. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinburne, Richard. (1981). Faith and Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tännsjö, Törbjorn. (1999). A Concrete View of Intrinsic Value. Journal of Value Inquiry, 33(4), 531–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, J. J. (1997). The Right and the Good. Journal of Philosophy, 94(6), 273–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
William of Ockham. (1978). “Whether It Can be Proved that God Is One” (Quodlibet Septem, translated by P. Linwood Urban), in The Power of God: Readings on Omnipotence and Evil. Eds. P. Urban, Linwood and Walson, D. N.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 75–81.Google Scholar
Williams, Donald C. (1953). On the Elements of Being II. Review of Metaphysics, 7(2), 171–192.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Michael J. (2001). The Nature of Intrinsic Value. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

References

Adams, Robert M. (1985). Involuntary Sins. Philosophical Review 94(1), 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Robert M. (1999). Finite and Infinite Goods. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1999 [c.350–340 BC]). Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Irwin, Terence. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Bayne, Tim, and Nagasawa, Yujin (2006). The Grounds of Worship. Religious Studies 42(3), 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayne, Tim, and Nagasawa, Yujin (2007). The Grounds of Worship Again: A Reply to Crowe. Religious Studies 43(4), 475–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brentano, Franz (1969 [1889]). The Origin of Our Knowledge of Right and Wrong, ed. Kraus, Oskar and Chisholm, Roderick, trans. Chisholm, Roderick and Schneewind, Elizabeth. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Crowe, Benjamin D. (2007). Reasons for Worship: A Response to Bayne and Nagasawa. Religious Studies 43(4), 465–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Arms, Justin, and Jacobson, Daniel (2000). The Moralistic Fallacy: On the “Appropriateness” of Emotion. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61(1), 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2006). The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Glasgow, Joshua (2015). The Expressive Theory of Punishment Defended. Law and Philosophy 34(6), 601–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwiazda, Jeremy (2011). Worship and Threshold Obligations. Religious Studies 47(4), 521–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, Tim (2013). On Prepositional Duties. Ethics 123(2), 264–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedahl, Marcus (2013). The Significance of a Duty’s Direction: Claiming Priority Rather than Prioritizing Claims. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 7(3), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macnamara, Colleen (2011). Holding Others Responsible. Philosophical Studies 152(1), 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmodoro, Anna (2017). Power Mereology: Structural Powers versus Substantial Powers. In Paolini Paoletti, M. and Orilia, F., eds., Philosophical and Scientific Perspectives on Downward Causation. New York: Routledge, 110–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, Simon Cabulea (2015). Directed Duties. Philosophy Compass 10(8), 523–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. (2011). God Beyond Justice. In Bergmann, Michael, Murray, Michael, and Rea, Michael, eds., Divine Evil? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 150–167.Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. (2017). God’s Own Ethics: Norms of Divine Action and the Argument from Evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. (2021). Divine Holiness and Divine Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otto, Rudolf (1923). The Idea of the Holy: An Inquiry into the Non-Rational Factor in the Idea of the Divine and Its Relation to the Rational, trans. Harvey, John W.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek (1984). Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rabinowicz, Wlodek, and Rønnow-Rasmussen, Toni (2004). The Strike of the Demon: On Fitting Pro-Attitudes and Value. Ethics 114(3), 391–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rachels, James (1971). God and Human Attitudes. Religious Studies 7(4), 325–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph (2009). The Authority of Law, 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smart, Ninian (1972). The Concept of Worship. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Michael (1994). The Moral Problem. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore (2019). Atonement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Michael (2004). What Is It to Wrong Someone?: A Puzzle About Justice. In Jay Wallace, R., Scheffler, Samuel, Pettit, Philip, and Smith, Michael, eds., Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 333–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Anscombe, G. E. M. (1981). Modern moral philosophy, in Collected Philosophical Papers, vol. 3. Oxford: Blackwells.Google Scholar
Benatar, D. (2006). What’s God got to do with it? Atheism and religious practice, Ratio 19: 383–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, T. (2009). The Ideologies of Japanese Tea. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Botton, A. (2012). Religion for Atheists. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Frankel, S. and Yaffe, M. D., eds. (2020). Civil Religion in Modern Political Philosophy: Machiavelli to Tocqueville. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujiwara, S. (2019). Practicing belonging? non-religiousness in twenty-first century Japan, Journal of Religion in Japan 8: 123–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon-Lennox, J. (2017). Introduction: Opening the conversation, in Gordon-Lennox, Jeltje, ed., Emerging Ritual in Secular Societies. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
Guttmann, A. (2004). From Ritual to Record: The Nature of Modern Sports. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1889). Adam Smith’s letter to William Strachan, dated 9 November 1776, in Green, T. H. and Grose, T. H., eds., Essays Moral, Political and Literary by David Hume. Vol.I. London: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar
James, W. (1896/1956). The will to believe, in The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Landau, I. (2017). Finding Meaning in an Imperfect World. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebens, S. (2022). Defining religion, in Buchak, Lara and Zimmerman, Dean W., eds., Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion Volume 10. Oxford; online edn, Oxford Academic, 24 March 2022, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192862976.003.0005Google Scholar
LeFebvre, J. R. (2015). Christian wedding ceremonies: ‘nonreligiousness’ in contemporary Japan, Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 42: 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, A. A. (1992). Lines and squares, in When We Were Very Young. London: Puffin Books.Google Scholar
Robinson, S. (2016). Sport, spirituality and religion, in Torres, Cesar R., ed., The Bloomsbury Companion to the Philosophy of Sport. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1918). A free man’s worship, in Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays. Whithorn: Anodos Books.Google Scholar
Schroeder, A. (2008). The Snowball: Warren Buffett and the Business of Life. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Smilansky, S. (1994). The ethical advantages of hard determinism, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54: 355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smilansky, S. (1997). Should I be grateful to you for not harming me? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 42: 585–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smilansky, S. (2000). Free Will and Illusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smilansky, S. (2003). Reactive-contributions and their significance, Public Affairs Quarterly 17: 349–357.Google Scholar
Smilansky, S. (2007). 10 Moral Paradoxes. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smilansky, S. (2021). The idea of moral duties to history, Philosophy 96: 155–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smilansky, S. (draft). The outrageous neglect of gratitude and some reasons behind it.Google Scholar
Smilansky, S. and Räikkä, J. (2020). Black magic and respecting persons – some perplexities, Ratio 33: 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wernick, A. (2000). Auguste Comte and the Religion of Humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wettstin, H. (2012). The Significance of Religious Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodbine, O. X. O. (2016). Black Gods of the Asphalt: Religion, Hip-Hop, and Street Basketball. New York: Columbia University Press. www.religionofsports.com/about/CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Normative Aspects
  • Edited by Aaron Segal, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Samuel Lebens, University of Haifa, Israel
  • Book: The Philosophy of Worship
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009460927.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Normative Aspects
  • Edited by Aaron Segal, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Samuel Lebens, University of Haifa, Israel
  • Book: The Philosophy of Worship
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009460927.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Normative Aspects
  • Edited by Aaron Segal, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Samuel Lebens, University of Haifa, Israel
  • Book: The Philosophy of Worship
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009460927.009
Available formats
×