Aarts, Bas. 2000. Corpus linguistics, Chomsky and Fuzzy Tree Fragments. In: Mair, Christian and Hundt, Marianne, eds. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. Amsterdam and Atlanta, GA: Rodopi, 5–13.Google Scholar

Aarts, Bas, Denison, David, Keizer, Evelien and Popova, Gergana, eds. 2004. Fuzzy Grammar: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Aarts, Jan. 1991. Intuition-based and observation-based grammars. In: Aijmer, Karin and Altenberg, Bengt, eds. English Corpus Linguistics. London/New York: Longman, 44–62.Google Scholar

Abdulaziz, Mohamed H. 1991. East Africa (Tanzania and Kenya). In: Cheshire, , ed. 1991: 391–401.CrossRef

Aitchison, Jean. 1991. Language Change: Progress or Decay? 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Allen, Cynthia. 1980. Movement and deletion in Old English. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 261–323.Google Scholar

Allison, Paul D. 2008. Convergence failures in logistic regression. In: SAS Institute Inc. 2008. Proceedings of the SAS® Global Forum 2008 Conference. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. www2.sas.com/proceedings/forum2008/360–2008.pdf.Google Scholar

Alston, R. C. 1965. A Bibliography of the English Language from the Invention of Printing to the Year 1800. Vol. I. Leeds: Arnold and Son.Google Scholar

Appleby, Lee L. 1961. A First Luyia Grammar. Nairobi: The East African Literature Bureau.Google Scholar

Ash, John. 1760. Grammatical Institutes: Or, An Easy Introduction to Dr. Lowth's English Grammar, Designed For The Use Of Schools. Worcester. 4th edn. Repr. in facs. by Robin C. Alston (1967): English Linguistics 9. Leeds: The Scholar Press Limited.Google Scholar

Baayen, R. H. 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Variation: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailey, Charles-James N. 1986. Where English cannot put a preposition before a relative or interrogative pronoun. In: Leitner, Gerhard, ed. The English Reference Grammar: Language and Linguistics, Writers and Readers. (Linguistische Arbeiten 172.) Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 156–77.Google Scholar

Ball, Catherine N. 1996. A diachronic study of relative markers in spoken and written English. Language Variation and Change 8: 227–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bard, Ellen Gurman, Robertson, Dan and Sorace, Antonella. 1996. Magnitude Estimation of Linguistic Acceptability. Language 72: 32–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen. 1987. Markedness and salience in second-language acquisition. Language Learning 37: 387–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barlow, Michael and Kemmer, Suzanne, eds. 2000. Usage-based Models of Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Barrett-Keach, Camillia. 1985. The Syntax and Interpretation of the Relative Clause Construction in Swahili. New York/London: Garland Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar

Bates, Elisabeth and MacWhinney, Brian. 1989. Functionalism and the competition model. In: Bates, Elisabeth and MacWhinney, Brian, eds. The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–73.Google Scholar

Bayley, Robert and Preston, Dennis R., eds. 1996. Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Variation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRef

Bengtsson, Per. 1996. Prepositional relatives in English: A diachronic case study of three authors. Unpublished paper. Department of English, Göteborg University.

Bentley, Muriel and Sherwood, Adrian. 1964. English for Modern Africa. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar

Bergh, Gunnar and Seppänen, Aimo. 2000. Preposition stranding with Wh-relatives: A historical survey. English Language and Linguistics 4: 295–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variations across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan and Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Bock, J. Kathryn. 1987. Coordinating words and syntax in speech plans. In: Ellis, Andrew, ed. Progress in the Psychology of Language. London: Lawrence Erlbaum, 337–90.Google Scholar

Bock, J. Kathryn. 1990. Structure in language: Creating form in talk. American Psychologist 45: 1221–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Borsley, Robert D. 2004. An approach to English comparative correlatives. In: Müller, Stefan, ed. Proceedings of the HPSG04 Conference. Stanford, CA CSLI Publications. csli-publications.stanford.edu.Google Scholar

Bortz, Jürgen. 2005. Statistik für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler. 6th edn. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar

Bortz, Jürgen, Lienert, Gustav and Boehnke, Klaus. 1990. Verteilungsfreie Methoden in der Biostatistik. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brauner, Siegmund and Bantu, Joseph K.. 1967. Lehrbuch des Swahili. Leipzig: VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie Leipzig.Google Scholar

Broccias, Christiano. 2006. Cognitive approaches to grammar. In: Kristiansen, Gitte, Achard, Michel, Dirven, René and Ibáñez, Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza, eds. Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 80–115.Google Scholar

Brown, Keith and Miller, Jim. 1991. Syntax: A Linguistic Introduction to Sentence Structure. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bukenya, Austin, Kioko, Angelina and Njeng´ere, David. 2004. Head Start Secondary English: Form 3. Teacher's Book. Nairobi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bukenya, Austin, Kioko, Angelina and Njeng´ere, David. 2005. Head Start Secondary English: Form 4. Teacher's Book. Nairobi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bukenya, Austin, Kioko, Angelina, Njeng´ere, David and Mutei, Virginia. 2003a. Head Start Secondary English: Form 1. Teacher's Book. Nairobi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bukenya, Austin, Kioko, Angelina, Njeng´ere, David and Njue, Jane. 2003b. Head Start Secondary English: Form 2. Teacher's Book. Nairobi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Burchfield, Robert W. 1996. The New Fowler's Modern English Usage. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Bury, Dirk. 2003. Phrase structure and derived heads. Ph.D. thesis, University College London. www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/dirk/PS derivedheads.pdf.

Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 1995. Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10: 425–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2000. The phonology of the lexicon: Evidence from lexical diffusion. In Barlow, and Kemmer, , eds. 2000: 65–85.

Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind's response to repetition. Language 82: 711–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, Joan and Hopper, Paul, eds. 2001. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRef

Cappelle, Bert. 2006. Particle placement and the case for ‘allostructions’. Constructions SV1–7. www.constructions-online.de/articles/specvol1/683/Cappelle_ Particle_Placement.pdf.

Casenhiser, Devin and Goldberg, Adele E.. 2005. Fast mapping between a phrasal form and meaning. Developmental Science 8: 500–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chalker, Sylvia and Weiner, Edmund. 1994. The Oxford Dictionary of English Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cheshire, Jenny, ed. 1991. English around the World: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton and Co.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1961. Some methodological remarks on generative grammar. Word 17: 219–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. (Studies in Generative Grammar 9.) Dordrecht, Holland: Foris Publication.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In: Martin, Roger, Michaels, David and Uriagereka, Juan, eds. 2000. Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 89–155.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In: Kenstowicz, Michael, ed. Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–52.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. Comprehensive Topical English. 2006. KCPE Revision Book with Reminder Notes and Reasoned Answers. 1990–2005. Standard 5–8. Nairobi: High Flyer Services.

Cook, Vivian and Newson, Mark. 1996. Chomsky's Universal Grammar: An Introduction. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Cowart, Wayne. 1997. Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to Sentence Judgements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Crawley, Michael J. 2005. Statistics: An Introduction UsingR. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croft, William and Alan Cruse, D.. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Culicover, Peter W. and Jackendoff, Ray. 2005. Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, William D. and Dubinsky, Stanley. 2003. On extraction from NPs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deane, Paul D. 1992. Grammar in Mind and Brain. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dekeyser, Xavier. 1990. Preposition stranding and relative complementizer deletion: Implicational tendencies in English and other Germanic languages. In: Adamson, Sylvia, Low, Vivian, Vincent, Nigel and Wright, Susan. Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 87–109.Google Scholar

Dekydtspotter, Laurent, Sprouse, Rex A. and Anderson, Bruce. 1998. Interlanguage A-bar dependencies: Binding construals, null prepositions and Universal Grammar. Second Language Research 14: 341–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denison, David. 1985. Why Old English had no prepositional passive. English Studies 3: 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denison, David. 1993. English Historical Syntax. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar

,Department of Education and Science. 1989. English for Ages 5 to 16. (‘The Cox Report’.) London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Diessel, Holger. 2006. Komplexe Konstruktionen im Erstspracherwerb. In: Fischer, and Stefanowitsch, , eds. 2006: 39–54.

Diessel, Holger and Tomasello, Michael. 2000. The development of relative clauses in spontaneous child speech. Cognitive Linguistics 11: 131–51.Google Scholar

Donohew, Grace. 1962. A First Course in Luyia Grammar. Nairobi: East African Literature Bureau.Google Scholar

Downing, Bruce T. 1978. Some universals of relative clause structure. In: Greenberg, Joseph H., ed. Universals of Human Language. Vol. IV: Syntax. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 375–418.Google Scholar

Eckman, Fred. R. 2004. Universals, innateness and explanation in second language acquisition. Studies in Language 28: 682–793.Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick C. 2003. Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In: Doughty, Catherine J. and Long, Michael H., eds. The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 1995. Understanding Second Language Acquisition. 10th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 1998. Second Language Acquisition. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Featherston, Sam. 2004. Bridge verbs and V2 verbs – the same thing in spades?Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 23: 181–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Featherston, Sam. 2005. Magnitude estimation and what it can do for your syntax: Some wh-constraints in German. Lingua 115: 1525–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Field, Andy. 2003. Repeated Measures ANOVA. www.statisticshell.com/repeatedmeasures.pdf.

Field, Andy. 2009. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1977. The case for case reopened. In: Cole, Peter and Sadock, Jerrold M., eds. Syntax and Semantics. Vol. VIII: Grammatical Relations. New York: Academic Press, 59–81.Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1999. Inversion and constructional inheritance. In: Webelhuth, König and Kathol, , eds. 1999: 113–28.

Fillmore, Charles J and Kay, Paul. 1996. Construction Grammar. Unpublished Ms. University of California at Berkeley Department of Linguistics.

Filppula, Markku. 2004. Irish English: Morphology and syntax. In: Kortmann, Burridge, Mesthrie, Schneider and Upton, , eds. 2004: 73–101.

Fischer, Kerstin and Stefanowitsch, Anatol, eds. 2006. Konstruktionsgrammatik: Von der Anwendung zur Theorie. Tübingen: Stauffenberg.

Fischer, Olga. 1992. Syntax. In: Blake, Norman, ed. 1992. The Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. II: 1066–1476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 207–408.Google Scholar

Fischer, Olga, Kemenade, Ans, Koopman, Willem and Wurff, Wim. 2000. The Syntax of Early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fisher, Ann. 1750. A New Grammar: Being the Most Easy Guide to Speaking and Writing the English Language Properly and Correctly. Repr. in facs. by Robin C. Alston (1968): English Linguistics 130. Menston:The Scholar Press Limited.Google Scholar

Fleischer, Jürg. 2002. Preposition stranding in German dialects. In: Sief, Barbiers, Cornips, Leonie and Kleij, Susanne, eds. Syntactic Microvariation. www.meertens.knaw.nl/books/synmic/pdf/fleischer.Google Scholar

Fowler, Henry W. 1926. A Dictionary of Modern English Usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Freeman, Daniel H., Jr. 1987. Applied Categorical Data Analysis. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar

Gathumbi, Agnes, Kimaliro, Eunice, Mugambi, Harriet, Bwonya, Jane, Newman, Julie and Kiio, Ngungui. 2003. New Integrated English: Teacher's Guide 1. Nairobi: The Jomo Kenyatta Foundation.Google Scholar

Gathumbi, Agnes, Kimaliro, Eunice, Mugambi, Harriet, Bwonya, Jane, Newman, Julie and Kiio, Ngungui. 2004a. New Integrated English: Teacher's Guide 2. Nairobi: The Jomo Kenyatta Foundation.Google Scholar

Gathumbi, Agnes, Kimaliro, Eunice, Mugambi, Harriet, Bwonya, Jane, Newman, Julie and Kiio, Ngungui. 2004b. New Integrated English: Teacher's Guide 3. Nairobi: The Jomo Kenyatta Foundation.Google Scholar

Gathumbi, Agnes, Kimaliro, Eunice, Mugambi, Harriet, Bwonya, Jane, Newman, Julie and Kiio, Ngungui. 2005. New Integrated English: Teacher's Guide 4. Nairobi: The Jomo Kenyatta Foundation.Google Scholar

Gelman, Andrew and Hill, Jennifer. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gilquin, Gaëtanelle and Gries, Stefan Th.. 2009. Corpora and experimental methods: A state-of-the-art review. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 5: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginzburg, Jonathan and Sag, Ivan A.. 2000. Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning, and Use of English Interrogatives. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2003. Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 7: 219–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalisation in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Görlach, Manfred. 1994. Einführung ins Frühneuenglische. 2nd edn. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar

Görlach, Manfred. 1999. English in Nineteenth-Century England: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Granger, Sylviane. 1998. The computer learner corpus: A versatile new source of data for SLA research. In: Granger, Sylviane, ed. Learner English on Computer. London: Longman, 3–18.Google Scholar

Gravetter, Frederick J. and Wallnau, Larry B.. 1992. Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences: A First Course for Students of Psychology and Education. 3rd edn. New York et al: West Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Greenbaum, Sidney, ed. 1996. Comparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Grewendorf, Günther. 2002. Minimalistische Syntax. Tübingen/Basle: A. Franke Verlag.Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. 2002. Preposition stranding in English: Predicting speakers' behaviour. In: Samiian, Vida, ed. Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics. Vol. XII. Fresno, CA: Department of Linguistics, California State University, 230–41.Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. 2003. Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics. New York/London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. 2004a. Coll.analysis 3. A Program for R for Windows 2.x. people.freenet.de/Stefan_Th_Gries.

Gries, Stefan Th. 2004b. HCFA 3.2 – A Program for Hierarchical Configural Frequency Analysis for R for Windows. people.freenet.de/Stefan_Th_Gries.

Gries, Stefan Th. 2008. Statistik für Sprachwissenschaftler. (Studienbuch zur Linguistik 13.) Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th., Hampe, Beate and Schönefeld, Doris. 2005. Converging evidence: Bringing together experimental and corpus data on the association of verbs and constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 16: 635–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guy, Gregory R. and Bayley, Robert. 1995. On the choice of relative pronouns in English. American Speech 70: 148–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haberzettl, Stefanie. 2006. Konstruktionen im Zweitspracherwerb. In: Fischer, and Stefanowitsch, , eds. 2006: 55–77.

Halliday, M. A. K. 1988. On the ineffability of grammatical categories. In: Benson, James, Cummings, Michael J. and Greaves, William S., eds. Linguistics in a Systemic Perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 27–51.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Robert. 1994. Sum: Null-prep and piping. Posting on the Linguist List, 28.06.1994. www.umich.edu/~archive/linguistics/linguist.list/volume.5/no.751–800.

Hancock, Ian F. and Angogo, Rachel. 1982. English in East Africa. In: Bailey, Richard W. and Görlach, Manfred. English as a World Language. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Hauser, Marc D., Chomsky, Noam and Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 2002. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?Science 298: 1569–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hawkins, John A. 1994. A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hawkins, John A. 1999. Processing complexity and filler-gap dependencies across grammars. Language 75: 245–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hawkins, John A. 2004. Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hawkins, Roger. 2001. Second Language Syntax: A Generative Introduction. Oxford/Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer B. and Baayen, R. H.. 2005. Shifting paradigms: Gradient structure in morphology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9: 342–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bernd, Heine. 1982. Boni Dialects. (Language and Dialect Atlas of Kenya 10.) Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd and Möhlig, William J. G.. 1980. Geographical and Historical Introduction: Language and Society. (Language and Dialect Atlas of Kenya 1.) Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar

Hoekstra, Jarich. 1995. Preposition stranding and resumptivity in West Germanic. In: Haider, Hubert, Olsen, Susan and Vikner, Sten, eds. Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 95–118.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas. 2003. Preposition stranding vs pied-piping in British English relative clauses: A corpus-based study. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Regensburg.

Hoffmann, Thomas. 2005. Variable vs categorical effects: Preposition pied piping and stranding in British English relative clauses. Journal of English Linguistics 33: 257–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas. 2006. Corpora and introspection as corroborating evidence: The case of preposition placement in English relative clauses. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2: 165–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas. 2007a. ‘Good is good and bad is bad’: But how do we know which one we had?. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 3: 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas. 2007b. ‘I need data which I can rely on’: Corroborating empirical evidence on preposition placement in English relative clauses. In: Featherston, Sam and Sternefeld, Wolfgang, eds. Roots: Linguistics in Search of its Evidential Base. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 161–83.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas. 2008. English relative clauses and Construction Grammar: A topic which preposition placement can shed light on? In: Trousdale, Graeme and Gisborne, Nicolas, eds. Constructional Explanations in English Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 77–112.Google Scholar

Hornstein, Norbert and Weinberg, Amy. 1981. Case theory and preposition stranding. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 55–91.Google Scholar

Hosmer, David W. and Lemeshow, Stanley. 2000. Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd edn. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huddleston, Rodney. 1984. Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huddleston, Rodney. 2002a. The clause: Complements. In: Huddleston, and Pullum, , eds. 2002: 213–321.

Huddleston, Rodney. 2002b. Clause type and illocutionary force. In: Huddleston, and Pullum, , eds. 2002: 851–946.CrossRef

Huddleston, Rodney. 2002c. Non-finite and verbless clauses. In: Huddleston, and Pullum, , eds. 2002: 1171–272.CrossRef

Huddleston, Rodney and Pullum, Geoffrey K., eds. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huddleston, Rodney, Pullum, Geoffrey K. and Peterson, Peter. 2002. Relative constructions and unbound dependencies. In: Huddleston, and Pullum, , eds. 2002: 1031–96.

Hudson, Richard A. 1996. Sociolinguistics. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hudson-Ettle, , Diana, M. and Schmied, Josef. 1999. Manual to accompany the East African Component of the International Corpus of English. Unpublished Ms. Chemnitz University of Technology.

Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johansson, Christine and Geisler, Christer. 1998. Pied piping in spoken English. In: Renouf, Antoinette, ed. Explorations in Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 67–82.Google Scholar

Johnson, Daniel E. 2009a. Getting off the GoldVarb Standard: Introducing Rbrul for Mixed-Effects Variable Rule Analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 3: 359–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, Daniel E. 2009b. RBRUL MANUAL. www.ling.upenn.edu/~johnson4/Rbrul_manual.html.

Johnson, Keith. 2008. Quantitative Methods in Linguistics. Oxford/Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Kanyoro, Musimbi R. A. 1991. The politics of the English language in Kenya and Tanzania. In: Cheshire, , ed. 1991: 402–17.CrossRef

Kao, Rong-Rong. 2001. Where have the prepositions gone? A study of English prepositional verbs and input enhancement in instructed SLA. IRAL 39: 195–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kay, Paul and Fillmore, Charles J.. 1999. Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalisations: The What's X doing Y? construction. Language 75: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keller, Frank, Corley, Martin, Corley, Steffan, Konienczny, Lars and Todirascu, Amalia. 1998. WebExp: A Java toolbox for web-based psychological experiments. Technical Report HCRC/TR-99, Human Communication Research Centre, University of Edinburgh.

Keller, Frank and Alexopoulou, Theodora. 2005. A crosslinguistic, experimental study of resumptive pronouns and that-trace effects. In: Bara, Bruno G., Barsalou, Lawrence and Bucciarelli, Monica, eds. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1120–5. www.cogsci.rpi.edu/CSJarchive/Proceedings/2005/docs/p1120.pdf.Google Scholar

Keller, Frank. 2000. Gradience in Grammar: Experimental and Computational Aspects of Degrees of Grammaticality. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.

Kempen, Gerard and Harbusch, Karin. 2005. The relationship between grammaticality ratings and corpus frequencies: A case study into word order variability in the midfield of German clauses. In: Kepser, and Reis, , eds. 2005. 327–47.CrossRef

Kepser, Stephan and Reis, Marga, eds. 2005. Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical, and Computational Perspectives. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kioko, Angelina Nduku and Muthwii, Margaret Jepkirui. 2004. English variety for the public domain in Kenya: Speaker's attitudes and views. In: Muthwii, Margaret Jepkirui and Kioko, Angelina Nduku, eds. New Language Bearings in Africa: A Fresh Quest. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd., 34–58.Google Scholar

Kjellmer, Göran. 1988. ‘What a night on which to die’: On symmetry in English relative clauses. English Studies 6: 559–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, Elaine C. 2001. (Mis)constructing null prepositions in L2 intergrammars: A commentary and a proposal. Second Language Research 17: 37–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kline, Paul. 1993. The Handbook of Psychological Testing. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kluender, Robert. 1990. A neurophysiological investigation of Wh-Islands. In: Hall, Kiraet al., eds. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 187–204.Google Scholar

König, Ekkehard and Kortmann, Bernd. 1991. On the reanalysis of verbs as prepositions. In: Rauh, Gisa, ed. Approaches to Prepositions. (Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik 358.) Tübingen: Gunter Narr, 109–25.Google Scholar

Kortmann, Bernd, Burridge, Kate, Mesthrie, Rajend, Schneider, Edgar W. and Upton, Clive, eds. 2004. A Handbook of Varieties of English. Vol. II: Morphology and Syntax. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Krifka, Manfred. 1995. Swahili. In: Jacobs, Joachim, Stechow, Arnim, Strenefeld, Wolfgang and Vennemann, Theo, eds. Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Vol. II. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1397–418.Google Scholar

Kubota, Yusuke. 2003. Yet another HPSG-analysis for free relative clauses in German. In: Kim, Jong-Bok and Wechsler, Stephan, eds. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on HPSG. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, 147–67.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New YorkCity. Washington, DC: Centre for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1973. The boundaries of words and their meaning. In: Bailey, Charles-James and Shuy, Roger W., eds. New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 340–73.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1975. Empirical foundations of linguistic theory. In: Austerlitz, Robert P., ed. The Scope of American Linguistics: Papers of the first Golden Anniversary Symposium of the Linguistic Society of America, Held at the University of Massachussets, Amherst on July 24 and 25, 1974. Lisse: Peter de Ridder, 77–133.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2005. Construction Grammars: Cognitive, radical, and less so. In: Ibánez, Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza and Cervel, M. Sandra Pena, eds. Cognitive Linguistics: Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interaction. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 101–59.Google Scholar

Larson, Richard K. 1988. Implicit arguments in situation semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 11: 169–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leaky, Louis S. B. 1959. First Lessons in Kikuyu. Dar es Salaam: Eagle Press.Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey. 1992. Corpus and theories of linguistic performance. In: Svartvik, Jan, ed. Directions in Corpus Linguistics: Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 82, Stockholm, 4–8 August 1991. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 105–22.Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey. 1996. An A-Z of English Grammar and Usage. Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey. 1998. Preface. In: Granger, Sylviane, ed. Learner English on Computer. London: Longman, xiv–xx.Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey. 2007. New resources, or just better old ones? The Holy Grail of representativeness. In: Hundt, Marianne, Nesselhauf, Nadja and Biewer, Carolin, eds. Corpus Linguistics and the Web. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi, 133–49.Google Scholar

Leisi, Ernst. 1985. Das heutige Englisch: Wesenszüge und Probleme. 7th edn. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar

Lieven, Elena, Behrens, Heike, Speares, Jennifer and Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Early syntactic creativity: A usage based approach. Journal of Child Language 30: 333–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lemnitzer, Lothar and Zinsmeister, Heike. 2006. Korpuslinguistik: Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar

Lowth, Robert. 1762. A Short Introduction to English Grammar. 2nd edn. Repr. in facs. by Robin C. Alston (1967): English Linguistics 18. Menston: The Scholar Press Limited.Google Scholar

Lu, Bingfu. 2002. How does language encode performance limitation into its structure. www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~whu/China/chunk.doc.

Mackey, Alison. 2006. Second language acquisition. In: Ralph W. Fasold and Jeff Connor-Linton, eds. An Introduction to Language and Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 433–63.Google Scholar

Maindonald, John and Braun, John. 2003. Data Analysis and Graphics Using R: An Example-based Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mazurkewich, Irene. 1985. Syntactic Markedness and language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 7: 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mbaabu, Ireri. 1996. Language Policy in East Africa: A Dependency Theory Perspective. Nairobi: Educational Research Publications.Google Scholar

McDaniel, Dana and Cowart, Wayne. 1999. Experimental evidence for a Minimalist account of English resumptive pronouns. Cognition 70: 15–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McDaniel, Dana, McKee, Cecile and Bernstein, Judy B.. 1998. How children's relatives solve a problem for Minimalism. Language 74: 308–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McEnery, Tony and Wilson, Andrew. 1996. Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

McKercher, David A. 1996. On the syntax and semantics of English adverbials. M.A. thesis, University of Victoria. individual.utoronto.ca/McKercher-MA-thesis.pdf.

Mesthrie, Rajend. 2004. Black South African English: Morphology and syntax. In: Kortmann, Burridge, Mesthrie, Schneider and Upton, , eds. 2004: 962–73.

Mesthrie, Rajend and Bhatt, Rakesh M.. 2008. World Englishes: The Study of New Linguistic Varieties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, Jim. 2004. Scottish English: Morphology and syntax. In: Kortmann, Burridge, Mesthrie, Schneider and Upton, , eds. 2004: 47–72.

Milroy, Lesley and Gordon, Matthew. 2003. Sociolinguistics: Method and Interpretation. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montgomery, Michael. 1971. Effective English: Teacher's Book 2. London: Evans Brothers.Google Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2004. Gullah: Morphology and syntax. In: Kortmann, Burridge, Mesthrie, Schneider and Upton, , eds. 2004: 356–73.

Müller, Stefan. 1999. An HPSG-Analysis for free relative clauses in German. Grammars 2: 53–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, Stefan. 2006. Resultativkonstruktionen, Partikelverben und syntaktische vs lexikonbasierte Konstruktionen. In: Fischer, and Stefanowitsch, , eds. 2006: 176–202.

Murray, Lindley. 1795. English Grammar: Adapted to the Different Classes of Learners. Repr. in facs. by Robin C. Alston (1968): English Linguistics 106. Menston. The Scholar Press Limited.Google Scholar

Musau, Paul M. 2004. Linguistic human rights in Africa: Challenges and prospects for indigenous languages in Kenya. In: Muthwii, Margaret Jepkirui and Kioko, Angelina Nduku, eds. New Language Bearings in Africa: A Fresh Quest. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd., 59–68.Google Scholar

Mwangi, Serah. 2004. Preposition vanishing in Kenya: A case of syntactic simplification in a variety of East African English. English Today 77: 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, Gerald, Wallis, Sean and Aarts, Bas. 2002. Exploring Natural Language: Working with the British Component of the International Corpus of English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olofsson, Arne. 1981. Relative Junctions in Written American English. Göteborg: ACTA Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar

Omondi, Lucia Ndong'a. 1982. The Major Syntactic Structures of Dholuo. (Language and Dialect Atlas of Kenya Supplement 1.) Berlin: Dietrich Riemer Verlag.Google Scholar

Palmer, Harold E. 1974. The Teaching of Oral English. 2nd edn. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Paolillo, John C. 2002. Analyzing Linguistic Variation: Statistical Models and Methods. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Parkinson, Tom, Philips, Matt and Gourlay, Will. 2006. Lonely Planet: Kenya. 6th edn. London: Lonely Planet Publication Pty Ltd.Google Scholar

Patrick, Peter L. 2004. Jamaican Creole: Morphology and syntax. In: Kortmann, Burridge, Mesthrie, Schneider and Upton, , eds. 2004: 407–38.

Payne, John and Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. Nouns and noun phrases. In: Huddleston, and Pullum, , eds. 2002: 323–524.CrossRef

Penke, Martina and Rosenbach, Anette. 2004. What counts as evidence in linguistics? An introduction. Studies in Language 28: 480–526.Google Scholar

Pesetsky, David. 1998. Some Optimality principles of sentence production. In: Barbosa, Pilaret al., eds. Is the best Good Enough? Optimality and Competition in Syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 337–83.Google Scholar

Philp, A. M. 2001. English grammar in British schools. In: Mesthrie, Rajend, ed. Concise Encyclopedia of Sociolinguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 723–35.Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2001. Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In: Bybee, and Hopper, , eds. 2001: 137–57.CrossRef

Pollard, Carl and Sag, Ivan A.. 1987. Information-based Syntax and Semantics. Vol. I: Fundamentals. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Pollard, Carl and Sag, Ivan A.. 1994. Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 1996. Variationist perspectives on second language acquisition. In: Bayley, and Preston, , eds. 1996: 1–45.CrossRef

Pullum, Geoffrey K. and Scholz, Barbara C.. 2002. Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments. The Linguistic Review 19: 9–50.Google Scholar

Pullum, Geoffrey K. and Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. Prepositions and prepositional phrases. In: Huddleston, and Pullum, , eds. 2002: 597–661.

Quirk, Randolph. 1957. Relative clauses in educated spoken English. English Studies 38: 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey and Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Team, R Development Core. 2008. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. www.R-project.org.Google Scholar

Radford, Andrew. 1981. Transformational Syntax: A Student's Guide to Chomsky's Extended Standard Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Radford, Andrew. 1988. Transformational Grammar: A First Course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Radford, Andrew. 1997. Syntax: A Minimalist Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Radford, Andrew. 2004. Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rand, Eric. 1969. Constructing Sentences. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc.Google Scholar

Rezai, Mohammad Javad. 2006. Preposition stranding and pied piping in second language acquisition. Essex Graduate Student Papers in Language and Linguistics 8. www.sx.ac.uk/linguistics/pgr/egspll/volume8/PDFs/M.%20Javad%20Rezai.pdf.Google Scholar

Robinson, John S., Lawrence, Helen. R. and Tagliamonte, Sali A.. 2001. GOLDVARB 2001: A multivariate analysis application for Windows. www.york.ac.uk/depts/lang/webstuff/goldvarb.

Rosch, Eleanor. 1978. Principles of categorization. In: Rosch, Eleanor and Loyd, Barbara B., eds. Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 27–48.Google Scholar

Ross, John R. 1986. Infinite Syntax!Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar

Rumelhart, David E., McClelland, James L. and the PDP research group. 1986. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Sadighi, F., Parhizgar, M. R. and Saadat, M.. 2004. Preposition pied-piping and preposition stranding constructions in the interlanguage of Iranian EFL learners. Asian EFL Online Journal 6: Article 3. www.asian-efl-journal.com.Google Scholar

Saffran, Jenny R. 2001. The use of predictive dependencies in language learning. Journal of Memory and Language 44: 493–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saffran, Jenny R. 2002. Constraints on statistical language learning. Journal of Memory and Language 47: 172–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sag, Ivan A. 1997. English relative clause constructions. Journal of Linguistics 33: 431–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sag, Ivan A. 2007. Sign-Based Construction Grammar. An informal synopsis. Unpublished Ms. lingo.stanford.edu/sag/papers/theo-syno.pdf.

Sampson, Geoffrey. 2001. Empirical Linguistics. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Schmied, Josef. 1991a. Relative constructions in British and Indian English. Post-doctoral diss., University of Bayreuth.

Schmied, Josef. 1991b. English in Africa: An Introduction. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Schmied, Josef. 1996. Second-language corpora. In Greenbaum, , ed. 1996: 182–96.

Schmied, Josef. 2004a. East African English phonology. In: Kortmann, Bernd, Burridge, Kate, Mesthrie, Rajend, Schneider, Edgar W. and Upton, Clive, eds. A Handbook of Varieties of English. Vol. I: Phonology. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 918–30.Google Scholar

Schmied, Josef. 2004b. East African English (Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania): Morphology and Syntax. In: Kortmann, Burridge, Mesthrie, Schneider and Upton, , eds. 2004: 929–47.

Schneider, Edgar W. 1992. Who(m)? Constraints on the loss of case marking of wh-pronouns in the English of Shakespeare and other poets of the Early Modern English period. In: Rissanen, Matti, Ihalainen, Ossi, Nevalainen, Terttu and Taavitsainen, Irma, eds. History of Englishes: New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics. Berlin/New York: Peter Lang, 437–52.Google Scholar

Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonical English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schütze, Carson T. 1996. The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgements and Linguistic Methodology. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Sigley, Robert J. 1997. Choosing your relatives: Relative clauses in New Zealand English. Ph.D. thesis, Victoria University of Wellington.

Sigley, Robert J. 2003. The importance of interaction effects. Language Variation and Change 15: 227–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skandera, Paul. 2003. Drawing a Map of Africa: Idiom in Kenyan English. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar

Sorace, Antonella and Keller, Frank. 2005. Gradience in linguistic data. Lingua 115: 1497–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stefanowitsch, Anatol and Gries, Stefan Th.. 2005. Covarying collexemes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1: 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steinberg, Danny D. and Sciarini, Natalia V.. 2006. An Introduction to Psycholinguistics. 2nd edn. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Sundby, Bertil, Bjørge, Anne Kari and Haugland, Kari E.. 1991. A Dictionary of English Normative Grammar 1700–1800. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2006. Review of Bod, Rens, Hay, Jennifer, and Jannedy, Stefanie eds. 2003. Probabilistic Linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2: 79–94.Google Scholar

Taylor, John. 1995. Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2006. Eighteenth-century Prescriptivism and the Norms of Correctness. In: Kemenade, Ans and Los, Bettelou, eds. The Handbook of the History of English. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 539–57.Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2006. Konstruktionsgrammatik und Erstspracherwerb. In: Fischer, and Stefanowitsch, , eds. 2006: 19–37.

Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1992. Syntax. In: Hogg, Richard M., ed. The Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. I: The Beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 168–289.Google Scholar

Trotta, Joe. 2000. Wh-clauses in English: Aspects of Theory and Description. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, GA: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 1995. Sociolinguistics: An Introduction to Language and Society. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Tseng, Jesse. 2006. English prepositional passives in HPSG. In: Winter, Shuly, ed. Proceedings of the FG-2006 Conference. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 171–183. csli-publications.stanford.edu.Google Scholar

Ungerer, Friedrich, Meier, Gerhard E. H., Schäfer, Klaus and Lechler, Shirley B.. 1996. A Grammar of Present-Day English. Stuttgart: Klett.Google Scholar

Auwera, Johan. 1985. Relative that – a centennial dispute. Journal of Linguistics 21: 149–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eynden, Nadine. 1996. Aspects of prepositional placement in English. In: Klemola, Juhani, Kytö, Merja and Rissanen, Matti, eds. Speech Past and Present: Studies in English Dialectology in Memory of Ossi Ihalainen. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 426–46.Google Scholar

Eynde, F. 2004. Pied Piping is a local dependency. In: Müller, Stefan, ed. Proceedings of the HPSG04 Conference. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. csli-publications.stanford.edu.Google Scholar

Riemsdijk, Henk. 2000. Free relatives. Syncom: Case 44. faculty.washington.edu/bcitko/LING580/van Riemsdijk_syncom.pdf.

Visser, F. Th. 1963. An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Vol I: Syntactical Units with one Verb. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Vitale, Anthony J. 1981. Swahili Syntax. Dordrecht/NL, Cinnaminson/USA: Foris Publications.Google Scholar

Ward, Gregory, Birner, Betty and Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. Information packaging. In: Huddleston and Pullum, , eds. 2002: 1363–448.CrossRef

Webelhuth, Gert, König, Jean-Pierre and Kathol, Andreas, eds. 1999. Lexical and Constructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation. Stanford, CA: Berkeley Linguistic Society.

Weiner, Edmund S. C. 1983. The Oxford Guide to English Usage. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Weiß, Helmut. 2001. On two types of natural languages: Some consequences for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 27: 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, Lydia. 2003. Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitely, Wilfred H. and Muli, M. G.. 1962. Practical Introduction to Kamba. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wilcock, Graham. 1999. Lexicalization of context. In: Webelhuth, König and Kathol, , eds. 1999: 373–87.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by Gertrude, E. M.Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Woods, Anthony, Fletcher, Paul and Hughes, Arthur. 1986. Statistics in Language Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria. 2004. Preposition stranding in Early Modern English: A corpus-based approach. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference of English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL), University of Vienna, Austria. 23–27 August.

Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria. 2006. Prescriptivism and preposition stranding in eighteenth-century prose. Historical-Socio-Linguistics/Socio-Historical-Linguistics 6. www.let.leidenuni.nl/hsl_shl/preposition%20stranding.htm.

Young, Richard and Bayley, Robert. 1996. VABRUL analysis for second language acquisition research. In: Bayley, and Preston, , eds. 1996: 253–306.