Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:23:17.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - The Purpose of Primate Cognitive Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2022

By
Bennett L. Schwartz  and
Michael J. Beran
Edited by
Bennett L. Schwartz  and
Michael J. Beran
Bennett L. Schwartz
Affiliation:
Florida International University
Michael J. Beran
Affiliation:
Georgia State University
Get access

Summary

What is the purpose of studies of primate cognition, and how should one best study primate cognition? This book answers those questions, and it highlights some of the most recent and compelling evidence regarding the cognitive abilities of primate species. This book describes the goals of studying primate cognition (historically, and in the present), and how such studies teach us about the minds of our closest living relatives, as well as about our own minds. Primate cognitive studies illustrate important aspects of the origins of human cognition, and they provide a measure of connectedness between humans and other primates. Topics range across nearly all those typically seen in a book of human cognition: perception, representation, categorization, memory, decision-making, communication and language, numerical cognition, metacognition, and theory of mind, among others. This book also describes the varied setting in which primates can be studied, and the range of experimental and observational approaches that are typically used. Some authors address questions about the ethics of working with nonhuman primates, as well as the concerns that have emerged about replication and reproducibility of results that are reported in primate cognitive research.

Keywords

primatescognitionevolutioncomparative psychologyethology
Type
Chapter
Information
Primate Cognitive Studies , pp. 1 - 11
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addis, D. R., Knapp, K., Roberts, R. P., & Schacter, D. L. (2012). Routes to the past: Neural substrates of direct and generative autobiographical memory retrieval. NeuroImage, 59, 2908–2922.Google Scholar
Altarriba, J., & Robinson, C. J. (2018). The psycholinguistics of bilingualism. In Altarriba, J. & Heredia, R. R. (Eds.), An introduction to bilingualism: Principles and processes (2nd ed.) (pp. 69–92). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Balda, R. P., Olson, D. J., Kamil, A. C., & Nims, P. J. (1995). Performance of four seed-caching corvid species in operant tests of nonspatial and spatial memory. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 109, 173–181.Google Scholar
Barrett, H. C., & Kurzban, R. (2006). Modularity in cognition: Framing the debate. Psychological Review, 113, 628–647.Google Scholar
Beach, F. A. (1950). The snark was a boojum. American Psychologist, 5, 115–124.Google Scholar
Beran, M. J. (2017). Quantitative cognition. In Call, J. (Ed.), APA handbook of comparative psychology, vol 2. (pp. 553–578). APA Press.Google Scholar
Beran, M. J. (2018). Replication and pre-registration in comparative psychology. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 31. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/59f4z2ndGoogle Scholar
Beran, M. J., Parrish, A. E., Perdue, B. M., & Washburn, D. A. (2014). Comparative cognition: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 27, 3–30.Google Scholar
Beran, M. J., & Smith, J. D. (2011). Information seeking by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Cognition, 120, 90–105.Google Scholar
Beran, M. J., Smith, J. D., & Perdue, B. M. (2013). Language-trained chimpanzees name what they have seen, but look first at what they have not seen. Psychological Science, 24, 660–666.Google Scholar
Bitterman, M. E. (1960). Toward a comparative psychology of learning. American Psychologist, 15, 704–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boesch, C., Bombjakova, D., Boyette, A., & Meier, A. (2017). Technical intelligence and culture: Nut cracking in humans and chimpanzees. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 163, 339–355.Google Scholar
Burns-Cusato, M., Cudato, B., & Glueck, A. C. (2013). Barbados green monkeys (Chlorocebus sabaeus) recognize ancestral alarm calls after 350 years of isolation. Behavioural Processes, 100, 197–199.Google Scholar
Call, J. (2010). Do apes know that they could be wrong? Animal Cognition, 13, 689–700.Google Scholar
Call, J., & Carpenter, M. (2001). Do apes and children know what they have seen? Animal Cognition, 3, 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, Z., Ravaux, L., de Waal, F. B. M., & Zuberbühler, K. (2016). Bonobos (Pan paniscus) vocally protest against violations of social expectations. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 130, 44–54.Google Scholar
Clayton, N. S., & Dickinson, A. (1999). Memory for the contents of caches by scrub jays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 25, 82–91.Google Scholar
Dewsbury, D. A. (1984). Comparative psychology in the twentieth century. Hutchinson Ross Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Farrar, B. G., Altschul, D. M., Fischer, J., van der Mescht, J., Placi, S., Troisi, C. A., Vernouillet, A., Clayton, N. S., & Ostojic, L. (2020). Trialling meta-research in comparative cognition: Claims and statistical inference in animal physical cognition. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 7, 419–444.Google Scholar
Farrar, B., G., Boeckle, M., & Clayton, N. S. (2020). Replications in comparative cognition: What should we expect and how can we improve? Animal Behavior and Cognition, 7, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrigno, S., Kornell, N., & Cantlon, J. F. (2017). A metacognitive illusion in monkeys. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284, 20171541.Google Scholar
Fitch, W. T. (2009). The biology and evolution of language: “Deep homology” and the evolution of innovation. In Gazzaniga, M. S. (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences IV (pp. 873–883). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fragaszy, D., Pickering, T., Liu, Q., Izar, P., Ottoni, E., & Visalberghi, E. (2010). Bearded capuchin monkeys’ and a human’s efficiency at cracking palm nuts with stone tools: Field experiments. Animal Behaviour, 79, 231–332.Google Scholar
Goodall, J. (1971). In the shadow of man. Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Hampton, R. (2019). Parallel overinterpretation of behavior of apes and corvids. Learning and Behavior, 47, 105–106.Google Scholar
Heimbauer, L. A., Beran, M. J., & Owren, M. J. (2018). A chimpanzee’s (Pan troglodytes) perception of variations in speech: Identification of familiar words when whispered and when spoken by a variety of talkers. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 31, 1–16.Google Scholar
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (2005). Brain and visual perception: The story of a 25-year collaboration. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Humphrey, N. K., & Weiskrantz, L. (1967). Vision in monkeys after removal of the striate cortex. Nature, 215, 595–507.Google Scholar
Jacobs, G. H. (1977). Visual capacities of the owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus) – I. Spectral sensitivity and color vision. Vision Research, 17, 811–820.Google Scholar
Kano, F., Call, J., & Krupenye, C. (2020). Primates pass dynamically social anticipatory-looking false belief tests. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24, 777–778.Google Scholar
Kornell, N., Son, L. K., & Terrace, H. S. (2007). Transfer of metacognitive skills and hint seeking in monkeys. Psychological Science, 18, 64–71.Google Scholar
Livingstone, M. S., & Hubel, D. H. (1984). Anatomy and physiology of a color system in the primate visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 4, 309–356.Google Scholar
ManyPrimates, Altschul, D. M., Beran, M. J., Bohn, M., Call, J., DeTroy, S., Duguid, S. J., Egelkamp, C. L., Fichtel, C., Fischer, J., Flessert, M., Hanus, D., Haun, D. B. M., Haux, L. M., Hernandez-Aguilar, R. A., Herrmann, E., Hopper, L. M., Joly, M., Kano, F., … Watzek, J. (2019). Establishing an infrastructure for collaboration in primate cognition research. PLoS ONE, 14, e0223675.Google Scholar
Parrish, A. E., Beran, M. J., & Agrillo, C. (2019). Linear numerosity illusions in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella), rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta), and humans (Homo sapiens). Animal Cognition, 22, 883–895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Platt, M. L., Brannon, E. M., Briese, T. L., & French, J. A. (1996). Differences in feeding ecology predict differences in performance between golden lion tamarins (Leontopithecus rosalia) and Wied’s marmosets (Callithrix kuhli) on spatial and visual memory tasks. Animal Learning and Behavior, 24, 384–393.Google Scholar
Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S. (1986). Ape language: From conditioned response to symbol. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. L. (2019). Using natural ecology to predict higher cognition in human and non-human primates. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 6, 344–354.Google Scholar
Shettleworth, S. J. (2009). The evolution of comparative cognition: Is the snark still a boojum? Behavioural Processes, 80, 210–217.Google Scholar
Smith, J. D., Beran, M. J., Couchman, J. J., Coutinho, M. V. C., & Boomer, J. (2009). The curious incident of the capuchins. Comparative Cognition and Behavior Reviews, 4, 47–50.Google Scholar
Stevens, J. R. (2017). Replicability and reproducibility in comparative psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 862.Google Scholar
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2016). Human cooperation shows the distinctive signatures of adaptations to small-scale social life. Behavioral Brain Science, 39, e54.Google Scholar
Tulving, E. (2002). Episodic memory: From mind to brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 1–25.Google Scholar
Wasserman, E. A. (1997). The science of animal cognition: Past, present, and future. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 123–135.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×