Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T10:24:17.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Private Speech in the Framework of Referential Communication

from Part II - Language, Communication, Social Cognition, and Awareness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2009

By
Conchi San Martín Martínez ,
Humbert Boada i Calbet  and
Maria Forns i Santacana
Edited by
Adam Winsler ,
Charles Fernyhough  and
Ignacio Montero
Adam Winsler
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
Charles Fernyhough
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Ignacio Montero
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Get access

Summary

There have been numerous research studies dedicated to the analysis of the development of language, but until only a few decades ago those dedicated to communication were relatively scarce. The 1980s witnessed an increase in studies on human communication considered as a social, interactive phenomenon (Dickson, 1981; Noizet, Bélanger, & Bresson, 1985). But social interaction does not account for the entirety of the communicative event. Communicative exchange requires the conjunction of a series of cognitive, linguistic, and social abilities, which are activated to differing degrees in the act of communicating (Shantz, 1983).

Within the vast domain of human communication, our specific interest concerns communicative processes in which cognitive, linguistic, and social abilities are closely related. The linguistic instrument occupies a privileged place, because it allows people to control their own behavior as encoders and decoders of their own messages (Flavell, 1981). Along these lines, an important body of research on public and private communicative functions can be found that starts from the classic studies on egocentric speech related by Piaget (1923/1962) and criticized by Vygotsky (1934/1987). Whereas Piaget did not assign this type of speech any useful function, Vygotsky stressed its importance in the control and progressive planning of behavior through a process of internalization. In this process of internalization, a barely audible or silent speech is produced that complicates a methodological approach. As a result, the taxonomies and procedures employed in order to study it have been both numerous and controversial (Frauenglass & Díaz, 1985; Frawley & Lantolf, 1986).

Type
Chapter
Information
Private Speech, Executive Functioning, and the Development of Verbal Self-Regulation , pp. 121 - 133
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asher, S. R., & Oden, S. L. (1976). Children's failure to communicate: An assessment of comparison and egocentrism explanations. Developmental Psychology, 12, 132–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaudichon, J. (1973). Nature and instrumental function of private speech in problem solving situations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 19, 117–135.Google Scholar
Beaudichon, J. (1999). La communication. Processus, formes et applications. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Beaudichon, J., & Bideaud, J. (1979). De l'utilité des notions d'égocentrisme, de decentration et de prise de rôle dans l'étude du développement. L'Anné Psychologyque, 79, 589–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaudichon, J., & Ducroux, N. (1985). L'approche du contrôle cognitif de la communication chez l'enfant: Quelques données, quelques problèmes. In Bideaud, J. & Richelle, M. (Eds.), Psychologie dévelopmentale, problèmes et réalités (pp. 139–159). Bruxelles, Belgium: Mardaga.Google Scholar
Behrend, D. A., Rosengren, K., & Perlmutter, M. (1989). A new look at children's private speech: The effects of age, task difficulty, and parent presence. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 12, 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berk, L. (1992). Children's private speech: An overview of theory and the status of research. In Díaz, R. M. & Berk, L. (Eds.), Private speech: From social interaction to self-regulation (pp. 17–53). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2005). Consequences of bilingualism for cognitive development. In Kroll, J. F. & Groot, A. M. B. (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 417–432). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bivens, J. A., & Berk, L. E. (1990). A longitudinal study of the development of elementary school children's private speech. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 36, 443–463.Google Scholar
Boada, H. (1986). Comunicación y bilingüismo. In Siguán, M. (Ed.), Estudios de psicolingüística (pp. 147–164). Madrid, Spain: Pirámide.Google Scholar
Boada, H., & Forns, M. (1989). Methodological data for the analysis of referential communication from an ecological perspective (Report UB-DPB-88–13). Unpublished manuscript, Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Boada, H., & Forns, M. (1997). Observational guidelines of communicative exchange: An ecological approach to referential communication. Anuario de Psicología, 75, 7–36.Google Scholar
Boada, H., & Forns, M. (2004a). The cognitive complexity of the referent and self-regulation in children's messages. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 3, 237–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boada, H., & Forns, M. (2004b, August). Private and social language in the messages of monolingual and bilingual children. Poster presented at the 28th International Congress of Psychology (ICP2004), Beijing, China.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1989). Learning a semantic system: What role do cognitive predispositions play? In Rice, M. L. & Schiefelbuch, R. L. (Eds.), The teachability of languages (pp. 133–169). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
Bruner, J., & Hickman, M. E. (1983). La conscience, la parole et la “zone proximale”: Reflexions sur la théorie de Vygotsky. In Bruner, J. (Ed.), Le développement de l'enfant: Savoir faire, savoir dire (pp. 281–292). Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Camaioni, L., & Ercolani, A. P. (1988). The role of comparison activity in the development of referential communication. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 11, 403–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centeno-Cortés, B., & Jiménez, A. (2004). Problem solving tasks in a foreign language: The importance of the L1 in private speech thinking. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 7–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz, R. (1992). Methodological concerns in the study of private speech. In Díaz, R. M. & Berk, L. (Eds.), Private speech: From social interaction to self-regulation (pp. 55–81). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
DiCamilla, F., & Antón, M. (2004). Private speech: A study of language for thought in the collaborative interaction of language learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 36–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, W. P. (1981). Introduction: Toward an interdisciplinary conception of children's communication abilities. In Dickson, W. P. (Ed.), Children's oral communications skills (pp. 1–33). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Duncan, R., & Cheyne, J. A. (2002). Private speech in young adults: Task difficulty, self-regulation, and psychological predication. Cognitive Development, 16, 889–906.Google Scholar
Duncan, R., & Pratt, M. (1997). Microgenetic change in the quality and quantity of preschoolers' private speech. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 20, 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, F. (1981). Timing and context in everyday discourse: Implications for the study of referential and social meaning. In Dickson, W. P. (Ed.), Children's oral communication skills (pp. 241–269). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Flavell, J. H. (1966). Le language privé. Bulletin de Psychologie, 19, 698–701.Google Scholar
Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In Dickson, W. P. (Ed.), Children's oral communication skills (pp. 35–60). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Flavell, J. H., Botkin, P. T., Fry, C. L., Wright, J. W., & Jarvis, P. E. (1968). The development of role-taking and communication skills in children. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Forns, M., & Boada, H. (1997). Estudi longitudinal de la reestructuració del missatge en nens bilingües i monolingües dins d'un programa d'immersió lingüística. Anuario de Psicología, 75, 77–93.Google Scholar
Frauenglass, M. H., & Díaz, R. M. (1985). Self regulatory functions of children's private speech: A critical analysis of recent challenge to Vygotsky's theory. Developmental Psychology, 21, 357–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frawley, W., & Lantolf, J. P. (1986). Private speech and self regulation: A commentary on Frauenglass and Díaz. Developmental Psychology, 22, 706–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuson, K. (1979). The development of self-regulating aspects of speech: A review. In Zivin, G. (Ed.), The development of self-regulation through private speech (pp. 135–217). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Fussell, S. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1989). The effects of intended audience on message production and comprehension: Reference in a common ground framework. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girbau, D. (1996). Private speech and social speech in communication: Terminology and distinctive traits. Journal of Psycholinguistics Research, 25, 507–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girbau, D. (1997). El lenguaje privado y social en la comunicación referencial ecológica infantil. Anuario de Psicología, 75, 59–76.Google Scholar
Girbau, D. (2002). Private and social speech in children's dyadic communication in a naturalistic context. Anuario de Psicología, 33, 339–354.Google Scholar
Girbau, D., & Boada, H. (1996). Private meaning and comparison process in children's referential communication. Journal of Psycholinguistics Research, 25, 383–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girbau, D., & Boada, H. (2004). Accurate referential communication and its relation with private and social speech in a naturalistic context. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 2, 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S., & Krauss, R. M. (1967). What do people say after they have learned how to talk? Studies of the development of referential communication. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 13, 309–316.Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S., Krauss, R. M., & Weisberg, R. (1966). Referential communication in nursery school children: Method and some preliminary findings. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 3, 333–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goudena, P. P. (1992). The problem of abbreviation and internalization of private speech. In Díaz, R. M. & Berk, L. (Eds.), Private speech: From social interaction to self-regulation (pp. 215–224). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Guerrero, M. C. M. (2004). Early stages of L2 inner speech development: What verbal reports suggest. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 90–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohlberg, L., Yaeger, J., & Hjertholm, E. (1968). Private speech: Four studies and a review of theories. Child Development, 39, 691–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauss, R. M., & Glucksberg, S. (1969). The development of communication: Competence as a function of age. Child Development, 40, 255–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre-Pinard, M. (1985). La régulation de l'enfance à l'âge adulte. In Noizet, C., Bélanger, B., & Bresson, F. (Eds.), La communication (pp. 107–136) Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Lloyd, P., Boada, H., & Forns, M. (1992). New directions in referential communication research. British Journal of Development Psychology, 10, 385–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, P., Camaioni, L., & Ercolani, P. (1995). Assessing referential communication skills in the primary preschool years: A comparative study. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13, 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, P., Mann, S., & Peers, I. (1998). The growth of speaker and listener skills from five to eleven years. First Language, 52, 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, M. (1996). Hidden real-time patterns in intra and interindividual behavior: Description and detection. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12, 112–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, M. (2000). Discovering hidden time patterns in behaviour: T-patterns and their detection. Behavior Research Method, Instruments and Computers, 32, 93–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martínez, M., Forns, M., & Boada, H. (1997). Estudio longitudinal de la comunicación referencial en niños de 4 y 8 años. Anuario de Psicología, 75, 37–58.Google Scholar
Montero, I. (2006). Research on private speech and related issues. Some methodological reflections. In Montero, I. (Ed.), Current research trends in private speech: Proceedings of the first international symposium on self-regulatory functions of language (pp. 97–106). Madrid, Spain: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad Autónoma.Google Scholar
Montero, I., & Dios, M. J. (2006). Vygotsky was right. An experimental approach to the relationship between private speech and task performance. Estudios de Psicología, 27, 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noizet, G., Bélanger, D., & Bresson, F. (Eds.). (1985). La communication. Paris: P.U.F.
Piaget, J. (1962). Le langage et la pensée chez l'enfant. Etudes sur la logique de l'enfant. Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé. (Original work published 1923)Google Scholar
Plumert, J. M., Ewert, K., & Spear, S. J. (1995). The early development of children's communication about nested spatial relations. Child Development, 66, 959–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plumert, J. M., Pick, H. L., Marks, R. A., Kintsch, A. S., & Wegesin, D. (1994). Locating objects and communicating about locations: Organizational differences in children's searching and direction-giving. Developmental Psychology, 30, 443–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, J. (1982). L'influence de l'entraînement sur l'acquisititon de la communication chez l'enfant. Paris: Éditions du C.N.R.S.Google Scholar
Ramírez, J. D. (1992). The functional differentiation of social and private speech: A dialogic approach. In Díaz, R. M. & Berk, L. (Eds.), Private speech: From social interaction to self-regulation (pp. 199–214). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Robinson, E. J., & Robinson, W. P. (1981). Ways of reacting to communication failure in relation to the development of the child's understanding about verbal communication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, S., & Cohen, B. D. (1964). Speaker's and listeners' processes in a word-communication task. Science, 145, 1201–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, K. H. (1979). The impact of the natural setting on private speech. In Zivin, G. (Ed.), The development of self-regulation through private speech (pp. 13–49). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Sánchez Medina, J. A. (1999). Pensamiento y lenguaje. Habla egocéntrica y regulación de las acciones. Madrid, Spain: Miño y Dávila Editores.Google Scholar
San Martín, C. (2005). Pensando en voz alta: Lenguaje egocéntrico y autorregulación en una situación comunicativa infantil. Interlingüística, 15, 1253–1260.Google Scholar
San Martín, C. (2006). Is it possible to study private speech in communicative contexts? Self regulatory uses of speech in message formulation during a referential task. In Montero, I. (Ed.), Current research trends in private speech: Proceedings of the first international symposium on self-regulatory functions of language (pp. 137–152). Madrid, Spain: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad Autónoma.Google Scholar
San Martín, C., & Torres, E. (2004). Estudio de la emergencia del habla privada en una situación comunicativa infantil de juego y sus relaciones con el conflicto comunicativo. Anuario de Psicología, 1, 71–86.Google Scholar
Shantz, M. (1983). Communication. In Flavell, J. H. & Markman, E. (Eds.), Cognitive development. Carmichael's manual of child psychology (pp. 841–889). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In Rieber, R. & Carton, A. (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 1. Problems of general psychology (pp. 39–285). New York: Plenum Press. (Original work published 1934)Google Scholar
Werner, H., & Kaplan, B. (1963). Symbol formation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V., & Stone, C. A. (1985). The concept of internalization in Vygotsky's account of the genesis of higher mental functions. In Wertsch, J. V. (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 162–179). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Winsler, A., Carlton, M. P., & Barry, M. J. (2000). Age related changes in preschool children's systematic use of private speech in a natural setting. Journal of Child Language, 27, 665–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winsler, A., León, J. R., Carlton, M. P., & Willson-Quayle, A. (2003). Private speech in preschool children: Developmental stability and change, across-task consistency and relations with classroom behaviour. Journal of Child Language, 30, 583–608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winsler, A., Díaz, R. M., & Montero, I. (1997). The role of private speech in the transition from collaborative to independent task performance in young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12, 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winsler, A., Fernyhough, C., McClaren, E. M., & Way, E. (2005). Private speech coding manual. Retrieved March 8, 2005, from http://classweb.gmu.edu/awinsler/Resources/PsCodingManual.pdf.
Yelland, G. W., Pollard, J., & Mercuri, A. (1993). The metalinguistic benefits of limited contact with a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 423–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zivin, G. (1979). Removing common confusions about egocentric speech, private speech and self regulation. In Zivin, G. (Ed.), The development of self-regulation through private speech (pp. 13–50). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×