The Promise and Perils of Private Compliance Programs

Richard M. Locke

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139381840.002

2 - The Promise and Perils of Private Compliance Programs

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2013

Richard M. Locke

Show author details

Richard M. Locke: Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Book contents

Get access

Summary

This chapter analyzes efforts by private firms – and at times, entire industries – to enforce labor standards in global supply chains through corporate self-regulation. In the wake of several well-publicized scandals involving child labor, hazardous working conditions, excessive working hours, and poor wages in the factories that supply major global brands, numerous multinational corporations developed their own “codes of conduct” and “monitoring” schemes aimed at promoting “compliance” with these codes. In fact, given the limited ability (perhaps even willingness) of many developing country governments to enforce their own laws, private compliance is currently the principal way both labor rights nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and global corporations address poor working conditions in global supply chain factories. The underlying assumption of this model of “private voluntary regulation” is that information collected through factory audits will be used both by labor rights NGOs and consumer groups to exert pressure on global brands to reform their sourcing practices as well as by the brands themselves, who rely on this information to police and pressure their suppliers into improving standards in their factories. Should the factories fail to remedy various workplace problems, brands are expected to switch their orders to supposedly more “ethical” producers.

Given their widespread use, we might expect these private compliance programs to be highly effective, but do these initiatives actually lead to better working conditions and enforced labor rights in global supply chains? If so, under what conditions? This chapter addresses these questions by first reviewing the various debates and controversies surrounding private compliance programs, then assessing the underlying assumptions and key features of this model of corporate self-regulation, and finally illustrating how these programs work in practice by analyzing the compliance efforts of two major global corporations – ABC and Hewlett-Packard – both seen as leaders in corporate social responsibility and pioneers in developing corporate codes of conduct and private monitoring schemes.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Promise and Limits of Private Power
Promoting Labor Standards in a Global Economy
, pp. 24 - 45

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139381840.002 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Vogel, David, “Private Global Business Regulation,” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (2008): 261–82CrossRef Google Scholar

Bartley, Tim, “Institutional Emergence in an Era of Globalization: The Rise of Transnational Private Regulation of Labor and Environmental Conditions,” American Journal of Sociology 113, no. 2 (2007): 297–351CrossRef Google Scholar

ILO, Labour Administration and Labour Inspection (Geneva: International Labour Conference, 100th Session, 2011)Google Scholar

Seidman, W., “Monitoring Multinationals: Lessons from the Anti-Apartheid Era,” Politics & Society 31, no. 3 (2003): 381–406CrossRef Google Scholar

Bartley, Timothy, “Corporate Accountability and the Privatization of Labor Standards: Struggles over Codes of Conduct in the Apparel Industry,” Research in Political Sociology 14 (2005): 211–44CrossRef Google Scholar

Esbenshade, Jill L., Monitoring Sweatshops: Workers, Consumers, and the Global Apparel Industry (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Schon, Donald and Rein, Martin, Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies (New York: Basic Books, 1994)Google Scholar

Gereffi, Gary, Humphrey, John, and Sturgeon, Timothy, “The Governance of Global Value Chains,” Review of International Political Economy 12, no. 1 (2005): 78–104CrossRef Google Scholar

Navas-Alemán, Lizbeth and Bazan, Luiza, “Local Implementation of Quality, Labour and Environmental Standards: Opportunities for Upgrading in the Footwear Industry,” SEED Working Paper No. 45 (Geneva: International Labour Organization, 2003)

Oka, Chikako, “Accounting for the Gaps in Labour Standard Compliance: The Role of Reputation-conscious Buyers in the Cambodian Garment Industry,” European Journal of Development Research 22, no. 1 (2010): 59–78CrossRef Google Scholar

Keck, Margaret E. and Sikkink, Kathryn, Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Seidman, Gay, Beyond the Boycott: Labor Rights, Human Rights, and Transnational Activism (New York: American Sociological Association's Rose Series: Russell Sage Foundation Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Shamir, Ronen, “The De-Radicalization of Corporate Social Responsibility,” Critical Sociology 30 (2004): 669–89CrossRef Google Scholar

Elliott, Kimberly Ann and Freeman, Richard B., “White Hats or Don Quixotes? Human Rights Vigilantes in the Global Economy” (Cambridge, MA: National Bureau for Economic Research, 2001)

Can Standards Improve under Globalization? (Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 2003)

Sabel, Charles, “Learning by Monitoring,” in Smelser, Neil (Ed.), The Handbook of Economic Sociology (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994), 137–65Google Scholar

Fung, Archon, O’Rourke, Dara, and Sabel, Charles, Can We Put an End to Sweatshops? A New Democracy Forum on Raising Global Labor Standards (Boston: Beacon Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Becker, Gary S., “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach,” The Journal of Political Economy 76, no. 2 (1968): 169–217CrossRef Google Scholar

Berger, Suzanne, How We Compete: What Companies around the World Are Doing to Make It in Today's Global Economy (New York: Doubleday, 2006)Google Scholar

Humphrey, Gereffi, and Sturgeon, , “The Governance of Global Value Chains.” In Review of International Political Economy 12, no. 1 (2005): 78–104Google Scholar

Kelman, Steven, Regulating America, Regulating Sweden: A Comparative Study of Occupational Safety and Health Policy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981)Google Scholar

Strathern, Marilyn, Audit Cultures (London: Routledge, 2000)CrossRef Google Scholar

Power, Michael, The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997)Google Scholar

Kelman, , Regulating America, Regulating Sweden, A Comparative Study of Occupational Safety and Health Policy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 178–9

Frank, T. A., “Confessions of a Sweatshop Inspector,” Washington Monthly 40, no. 4 (April 2008): 34–7Google Scholar

Silbey, Susan, Huising, Ruthanne, and Coslovsky, Salo Vinocur, “The ‘Sociological Citizen’: Related Interdependence in Law and Organizations,” L’Annee Sociologique, 59, no. 1 (2009): 201–29CrossRef Google Scholar

the special issues edited by Susan Silbey of Regulation and Governance 5, no. 1 (Spring 2011)

Bardach, Eugene and Kagan, Robert A., Going by the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1982)Google Scholar

Eckstein, Harry, “Case Study and Theory in Political Science,” in Eckstein, Harry (Ed.), Regarding Politics: Essays in Political Theory, Stability and Change (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991): 117–76Google Scholar

Armbruster-Sandoval, Ralph, “Globalization and Transnational Labor Organizing: The Honduran Maquiladora Industry and the Kimi Campaign,” Social Science History 27, no. 4 (2003): 551–76Google Scholar

Armbruster-Sandoval, Ralph, Globalization and Cross-Border Labor Solidarity in the Americas: The Anti-Sweatshop Movement and the Struggle for Social Justice (New York: Routledge, 2005)Google Scholar

Frundt, Henry J., “Central American Unions in the Era of Globalization,” Latin American Research Review 37, no. 3 (2002): 7–53Google Scholar

Yu, Xiaomin, “Impact of Corporate Code of Conduct on Labor Standards: A Case Study of Reebok's Athletic Footwear Supplier Factory in China,” Journal of Business Ethics 81 (2008): 513–29CrossRef Google Scholar

Egels-Zandén, Niklas, “Suppliers’ Compliance with MNC's Codes of Conduct: Behind the Scenes at Chinese Toy Suppliers,” Journal of Business Ethics 78 (2007): 45–62CrossRef Google Scholar

Korovkin, Tanya and Sanmiguel-Valderrana, Olga, “Labour Standards, Global Markets, and Non-State Initiatives: Colombia's and Ecuador's Flower Industries in comparative perspective,” Third World Quarterly 28, no. 1 (2007): 117–35CrossRef Google Scholar

Barrientos, Stephanie and Smith, Sally, “Do Workers Benefit from Ethical Trade? Assessing Codes of Labour Practice in Global Production Systems.” Third World Quarterly, 28, no. 4 (2007): 713–29CrossRef Google Scholar

Book contents

2 - The Promise and Perils of Private Compliance Programs

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive