Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T10:30:40.749Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - At the crossroads of trust and distrust: skepticism and ambivalence toward business

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

Robert Bies
Affiliation:
Georgetown University
Jared D. Harris
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Brian Moriarty
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Andrew C. Wicks
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Get access

Summary

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

the situation

Current analyses of public trust in business do not capture the new relationships and realities facing business in the twenty-first century.

key questions

What do high levels of distrust in business really mean? Is there a “new normal” with respect to trust and distrust in business? Should business leaders and policy makers be concerned about levels of trust in business? Are business accountability strategies and analytic tools effective for building public trust in business?

new knwowledge

Trust and distrust are not ends of the same continuum; rather, trust and distrust are two distinct phenomena, and both can exist simultaneously with respect to the public’s attitudes toward business. The simultaneous coexistence of trust and distrust creates the condition of ambivalence toward business. Trust tends to be a fairly stable phenomenon, but distrust also appears to be a resilient phenomenon, defining a new business landscape in which it does not fade away but is always present, if not always salient.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Axelrod, R. (1984), The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Barber, R. (1983), The Logic and Limits of Trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Barnard, C. I. (1938), The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bies, R. J. (2010, April), ‘Leading change in the era of bad news: Dealing with anger, distrust, and revenge in the workplace.’ Paper presented at the ProSci Global Conference, Las Vegas, NV.
Bies, R. J. and Moag, J. S. (1986), ‘Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness.’ In Lewicki, R. J., Sheppard, B. H., and Bazerman, M. H. (eds.), Research on Negotiation in Organizations. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 43–55.Google Scholar
Bies, R. J. and Tripp, T. M. (1996), ‘Beyond distrust: getting even and the need for revenge.’ In Kramer, R., and Tyler, T. R. (eds.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 246–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bies, R. J., Tripp, T. M., and Kramer, R. M. (1997), ‘At the breaking point: cognitive and social dynamics of revenge in organizations.’ In Giacalone, R. A. and Greenberg, J. (eds.), Anti-social Behavior in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 18–36.Google Scholar
Boothman, R. C. (2006), ‘Medical justice: making the system work better for patients and doctors.’ Testimony before the United States Senate, Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, June 22.
Bowen, D. E. and Johnston, R. (1999), ‘Internal service recovery: developing a new construct.’ International Journal of Service Industry Management, 10, 118–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, R. (1962), Silent Spring. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Deutsch, M. (1962), ‘Cooperation and trust: some theoretical notes.’ Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 275–320). Lincoln, NE: Nebraska University Press.Google Scholar
Dickens, C. (1859/1997), A Tale of Two Cities. New York: Signet Classics.Google Scholar
Edelman Trust Barometer (2009), .
Edelman Trust Barometer (2010), .
Edelman Trust Barometer (2011), .
Edelman Trust Barometer (2012), .
Feldheim, M.A., & Wang, X. (2004), ‘Ethics and public trust: results from national survey.’ Public Integrity, 6, 63–75.Google Scholar
Gambetta, D. (1988), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hardin, R. (2004), ‘Distrust: manifestations and management.’ In Hardin, R. (ed.), Distrust. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, vol. VIII, 3–33.Google Scholar
Holmes, E. (2011, December 9), ‘Tweeting without fear: how three companies have built their twitter strategies.’ Wall Street Journal, B1.
Janis, I. L. (1989), Crucial Decisions: Leadership in Policymaking and Crisis Management. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Jos, P. H. and Tompkins, M. E. (2004), ‘The accountability paradox in an age of reinvention: the perennial problem of preserving character and judgment.’ Administration & Society, 36, 255–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, R. M. (2002), ‘When paranoia makes sense.’ Harvard Business Review, 80(7), 62–69.Google ScholarPubMed
Kramer, R. M. (2009), ‘Rethinking trust.’ Harvard Business Review, 87(6), 69–77.Google ScholarPubMed
Kramer, R. M. and Pittinsky, T. L. (eds.) (2012), Restoring Trust in Organizations and Leaders: Enduring Challenges and Emerging Answers. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leventhal, G. S. (1980). ‘What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationship.’ In Gergen, K., Greenberg, M., and Willis, R. (eds.), Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research. New York: Plenum Press, 27–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewicki, R. J., McAllister, D. J., and Bies, R. J. (1998), ‘Trust and distrust: new relationships and realities.’ Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 438–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1979), Trust and Power. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
Matthews, D. (2011), ‘Accountability and democracy.’ In Public Agenda and Kettering Foundation, Don’t Count Us Out (3–5) (at: ).
Michel, S., Bowen, D., and Johnston, R. (2009), ‘Why service recovery fails: tensions among customer, employee, and process perspectives.’ Journal of Service Management, 20, 253–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nader, R. (1965), Unsafe at Any Speed: The Designed-in Dangers of the American Automobile. New York: Grossman.Google Scholar
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., and Zeithaml, V. A. (1991), ‘Understanding customer expectations of service.’ Sloan Management Review, 32(3), 39–48.Google Scholar
Public Agenda and Kettering Foundation (2011), Don’t Count Us Out: How an Overreliance on Accountability Could Undermine the Public’s Confidence in Schools, Business, Government, and More (at ).
Santayana, G. (1905), Life of Reason. New York: C. Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Shultz, G. (1993), Triumph and turmoil: My years as Secretary of State. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Sievers, B. (2003), ‘Against all reason: Trusting in trust.’ Organizational & Social Dynamics, 3, 19–39.Google Scholar
Sitkin, S. B. and Bies, R. J. (1993), ‘The legalistic organization: Definitions, dimensions and dilemmas.’ Organization Science, 4, 343–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sitkin, S. B. and Bies, R. J. (eds.) (1994), The Legalistic Organization. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Sitkin, S. B. and Roth, N. L. (1993), ‘Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust.’ Organization Science, 26, 367–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibaut, J. W. and Walker, L. (1975), Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Tripp, T. M. and Bies, R. J. (2009), Getting even: The Truth about Workplace Revenge – And How to Stop It. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R. and Lind, E. A. (1992), ‘A relational model of authority in groups.’ In Zanna, M. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press, vol. XXV, 115–192.Google Scholar
Williamson, O.E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Worchel, P. (1979). ‘Trust and distrust.’ In Austin, W. G. and Worchel, S. (eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 174–187.Google Scholar
Zucker, L.G. (1986). ‘Production of trust: institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920.’ In Staw, B. M. and Cummings, L. L. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, vol. VIII, 53–111.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×