Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T10:34:55.559Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Literal and Metaphorical Silences in Rhetoric: Examples from the Celebration of the 1974 Revolution in the Portuguese Parliament

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2019

By
Michael Billig  and
Cristina Marinho
Edited by
Amy Jo Murray  and
Kevin Durrheim
Amy Jo Murray
Affiliation:
University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Kevin Durrheim
Affiliation:
University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Get access

Summary

This chapter examines significant silences in a specific situation: namely, the Portuguese parliament’s annual commemoration of the April 1974 revolution that overthrew the Salazarist dictatorship. By concentrating on a formal occasion of epideictic rhetoric, it is possible to examine rhetorical silences in detail. The analysis makes two crucial distinctions: the differences between literal and metaphorical silences and the differences between absences produced by speakers and those produced by audiences. The analysis concentrates on absences in the ways that the right-wing parties participate in the ceremony. The right-wing parties, especially the CDS-PP, are ambivalent about the 1974 revolution and its symbol of the red carnation. However, this ambivalence cannot be expressed directly in the ceremony but is revealed in absences – whether it be speakers avoiding giving unqualified praise of the revolution or unmitigated criticism of Salazarism, or the audience withholding applause at specific moments, or audience and speakers not wearing the symbolic carnation. The absences, which need not be literal silences, can be subtly managed. One example shows how a CDS-PP speaker rhetorically creates a space for right wingers to applaud the mention of the postrevolutionary defeat of the far left, while not rhetorically creating an analogous space for applauding the revolution itself.

Keywords

literal and metaphorical silencesepideictic rhetoricPortuguese revolution
Type
Chapter
Information
Qualitative Studies of Silence
The Unsaid as Social Action
 , pp. 21 - 37
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, J. M. (1984). Our masters’ voices. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (1991 ).Ideology and opinions. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (1995). Banal nationalism, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (1996). Arguing and thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (2005). Laughter and ridicule. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Billig, M., & Marinho, C. (2014). Manipulating information and manipulating people: Examples from the 2004 Portuguese parliamentary celebration of the April Revolution. Critical Discourse Studies, 11(2), 158–174.Google Scholar
Billig, M., & Marinho, C. (2017). The politics and rhetoric of commemoration. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Bull, P. (2006). Invited and uninvited applause in political speeches. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46(3), 563–578.Google Scholar
Condit, C. M. (1985). The functions of epideictic: The Boston Massacre orations as exemplar. Communication Quarterly, 33(4), 284–299.Google Scholar
Heritage, J., & Greatbatch, D. (1986). Generating applause: A study of rhetoric and response at party political conferences. American Journal of Sociology, 92(1), 110–157.Google Scholar
Ilie, C. (2010a). Strategic uses of parliamentary forms of address: The case of the U.K. Parliament and the Swedish Riksdag. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(4), 885–911.Google Scholar
Ilie, C. (Ed.) (2010b). European parliaments under scrutiny. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Krebs, R. R., & Jackson, P. T. (2007). Twisting tongues and twisting arms: The power of political rhetoric. European Journal of International Relations, 13(1), 35–66.Google Scholar
Marinho, C. (2012). Celebrating the April Revolution in the Portuguese parliament: Discursive habits, constructing the past and rhetorical manipulation, PhD dissertation, Loughborough University, Loughborough.Google Scholar
Marinho, C., & Billig, M. (2013). The CDS-PP and the Portuguese Parliament’s annual celebration of the 1974 Revolution: Ambivalence and avoidance in the construction of the fascist past. In Wodak, R. & Richardson, J. E. (Eds.), Analyzing fascist discourse (pp. 146–162). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pernot, L. (2005). Rhetoric in antiquity. Washington DC: Catholic University Press.Google Scholar
Pernot, L. (2015a). Epideictic rhetoric. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Pernot, L. (2015b). Greek ‘figured speech’ on imperial Rome. Advances in the History of Rhetoric, 18(2), 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric. London: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Rezola, M. I. (2007). 25 de Abril. Lisbon: A Esfera dos Livros.Google Scholar
Rezola, M.I. (2010). The Portuguese transition to democracy. In Herr, R. & Pinto, A. C. (Eds.), The Portuguese Republic at one hundred (pp. 83–99). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sheard, C. M. (1995). The public value of epideictic rhetoric. College English, 58(7), 765–794.Google Scholar
Vivian, B. (2006). Neoliberal epideictic: Rhetorical form and commemorative politics on September 11, 2002. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 92(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. (2011). Suppression of the Nazi past, coded languages and discourses of silences: Applying the discourse-historical approach to postwar anti-Semitism in Austria. In Steinmetz, W. (Ed.), Political languages in the age of extremes (pp. 351–379). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wodak, R., & de Cillia, R. (2007). Commemorating the past: The discursive construction of official narratives about the ‘Rebirth of the Second Austrian Republic’. Discourse & Communication, 1(3), 337–363.Google Scholar
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In Wodak, R. & Meyers, M. (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 1–33). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Zerubavel, E. (2006). The elephant in the room: Silence and denial in everyday life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×