Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T09:00:54.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - By the Numbers: Roberta Findlay, Home Video, and the Horror Genre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2023

Peter Alilunas
Affiliation:
University of Oregon
Whitney Strub
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

Roberta Findlay’s association with horror cinema rarely extends beyond Snuff (1976, dir. Michael Findlay): the infamous Manson-inspired exploitation film which, in its promotional ballyhoo, falsely purported to depict the genuine murder of its lead actress. Protests that were sparked in New York City upon the film’s theatrical release, followed by its banning as a “video nasty” in Britain in the early 1980s, has helped transform an otherwise run-of-the-mill exploitation film into an exemplar of boundary-pushing horror cinema.

However, despite the film’s infamy, foregrounding Snuff in academic and popular discourse has come at the expense of sidelining Findlay’s directorial efforts in the horror genre: four films made between 1985 and 1989, The Oracle (1985), Blood Sisters (1987), Lurkers (1987) and Prime Evil (1988), which are yet to be the subject of meaningful analysis.

Findlay’s gender is grounds enough for a scholarly reappraisal of her horror output, given that, as Alison Peirse argues in the introduction to her pathbreaking collection, Women Make Horror: Filmmaking, Feminism, Genre, “there are [sic] a vast number of women filmmakers completely absent from our written horror histories and that by not including the outputs from ‘half the human race,’ our histories are faulty.” The present chapter is, in part, a contribution to Peirse’s revisionist project, but this is not, I should make clear, its sole purpose. Nor is it my intention to champion Findlay’s horror films as offering a “perspective” that challenges patriarchal hegemony, or to claim that they advocate for women or comment on “female experiences.” There remains an assumption, which Peirse challenges, that, “a woman director … will make a woman-centred film” or that woman-directed horror films de facto lend themselves to “feminist” readings. Frankly, it would be disingenuous to fold Findlay’s horror films into this discourse.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Edinburgh University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×