Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T00:37:46.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - An Overview of Urban Planning in Tanzania

From Colonial to Post-colonial Urban Planning Practices

from Part II - Case Studies on Urban Planning in African Countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2023

By
Nestory E. Yamungu ,
Manfred Spocter  and
Ronnie Donaldson
Edited by
Patrick Brandful Cobbinah  and
Eric Gaisie
Patrick Brandful Cobbinah
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Eric Gaisie
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Get access

Summary

Ideological rationalities and urban planning practices are inextricably linked, and urban planning practices draw insight from theoretical propositions. Through a review of relevant literature and documents, the chapter traces ideological changes and their influences on urban planning practices in colonial to post-colonial Tanzania. Colonial urban planning was based on modernist ideological rationalities drawing from layout planning, land use zoning and master planning. Post-colonial planning practices underwent changes in ideological rationalities from master planning to strategic planning. Master planning as modernist planning has always been an expert-led process based on means–ends and dualistic ideas. Strategic planning as post-modernist planning has been based on relations and pluralistic ideas. Non-implementation of master plans and strategic plans have rendered layout plans as the main spatial planning and decision-making tool. Contemporary planning realities are influenced by a multitude of challenges resulting in the emergence of piecemeal planning leading to uncoordinated urban forms, particularly in small towns.

Keywords

ideological rationalitiespiecemeal planning practicesTanzaniaurban planning
Type
Chapter
Information
Reimagining Urban Planning in Africa , pp. 216 - 236
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, E. R. (2000). Rationality revisited: Planning paradigms in a post-postmodernist perspective. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(3), 242–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, A. (1986). Colonial and neocolonial urban planning: Three generations of master plans for Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Utafiti, 8(1), 43–66.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. M. (1987). Master plans for Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania: The shaping of an African city. Habitat International, 11(2), 133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, C. R. (2011). A discussion of poststructuralist and postmodernist positions in the work of Norman Macintosh. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22(2), 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chigara, B., Magwaro-Ndiweni, L., Mudzengerere, F. H., & Ncube, A. B. (2013). An analysis of the effects of piecemeal planning on development of small urban centres in Zimbabwe: Case study of Plumtree. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 15(2), 27–40.Google Scholar
Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Dear, M., & Flusty, S. (1998). Postmodern urbanism. Annals of Association of American Geographers, 88(1), 50–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, R., & Marais, L. (2012). Preface: Small town geographies. In Donaldson, R. & Marais, L. (eds.), Small town geographies: Experiences from South Africa and elsewhere (pp. 9–18). New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Faludi, A. (1985). A decision-centred view of environmental planning. Journal of Landscape Planning, 12(3), 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodchild, B. (1990). Planning and the modern/postmodern debate. Town Planning Review, 61(2), 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunder, M. (2010). Planning as the ideology of (neoliberal) space. Journal of Planning Theory, 9(4), 298–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halla, F. (2002). Preparation and implementation of a general planning scheme in Tanzania: Kahama strategic urban development planning framework. Habitat International, 26(2), 281–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirt, S. A. (2009). Premodern, modern, postmodern? Placing new urbanism into a historical perspective. Journal of Planning History, 8(3), 248–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasala, S. E. (2013). Operationalizing strategic urban development planning: A case of Dar Es Salaam City, Tanzania. PhD dissertation, University of Dar Es Salaam.Google Scholar
Kasala, S. E. (2015). A return to master planning in Dar Es Salaam: A misconception of the theory of paradigm shifts? Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 15(2), 1–8.Google Scholar
Keeble, L. (1964). Principles and practice of town and country planning (3rd ed.). London: The Estates Gazette.Google Scholar
Kerr, R., Robinson, S. K., & Elliot, C. (2016). Modernism, postmodernism, and corporate power: ‘Historicizing the architectural typology of the corporate campus. Journal of Management and Organizational History, 11(2), 123–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kironde, L. (1994). The evolution of the land use structure of Dar Es Salaam 1890–1990: A study in the effects of land policy. PhD dissertation, University of Nairobi.Google Scholar
Lupala, J. M. (2002). Urban types in rapidly urbanizing cities: Analysis of formal and informal settlements in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. PhD dissertation, Royal Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Myers, G. A., & Muhajir, M. A. (2014). The afterlife of the Lanchester Plan: Zanzibar as the garden city of tomorrow. In Bigon, L. & Katz, Y. (eds.), Garden cities and colonial planning: Transnationality and urban ideas in Africa and Palestine (pp. 98–122). Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Namangaya, A. H. (2013). A comparative assessment of the merits of master plans versus strategic urban development plans in guiding land use development: A case of 1979 Dar es Salaam Master Plan and 2000 Dar es Salaam Strategic Plan. Journal of Building and Land Development, Special Issue, 21–37.Google Scholar
Njoh, A. (2007). Planning power: Town planning and social control in colonial Africa. London: UCL Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okpala, D. (2009). Regional overview of the status of urban planning and planning practice in anglophone (sub-Saharan) African countries. Nairobi: UN-Habitat.Google Scholar
Pacione, M. (2009). Urban geography: A global perspective (3rd ed.). London: Taylor & Francis Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rukmana, D. (2010). Urban planning and local wisdom: The shift toward postmodernism and a new urban theory. Paper presented to Yogyakarta International Seminar, Yogyakarta, 27 January.Google Scholar
Ryser, J., & Franchini, T. (2015). International manual of planning practice (6th ed.). The Hague: International Society of City and Regional Planners.Google Scholar
Sandercock, L. (1998). Towards cosmopolis: Planning for multicultural cities. London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Sauve, L. (1999). Environmental education between modernity and postmodernity: Searching for an integrating educational framework. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 4(1), 9–35.Google Scholar
Sawyer, L. (2014). Piecemeal urbanisation at the peripheries of Lagos. African Studies, 73(2), 271–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siu, K. W. M., & Huang, Y. H. (2015). Everyday life under modernist planning: A study of an ever-transforming urban area in Hong Kong. Urban Design International, 20(4), 293–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, J. E. (1970). Dar-es-Salaam: A sketch of a hundred years. Tanzania Notes and Records, 71, 1–18.Google Scholar
Tambila, K. I. (1995). The transition to multiparty democracy in Tanzania: Some history and missed opportunities. Law and Politics in Africa, Asia and Latin America, 28(4), 468–488.Google Scholar
Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2002). The planning polity: Planning, government and the policy process. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
UN-Habitat (2005a). The Sustainable Cities Programme in Tanzania 1992–2003: The SCP Documentation Series (Vol. 1). Nairobi: UN-Habitat.Google Scholar
UN-Habitat (2005b). The Sustainable Cities Programme in Tanzania 1992–2003: The SCP Documentation Series (Vol. 2). Nairobi: UN-Habitat.Google Scholar
UN-Habitat (2005c). The Sustainable Dar es Salaam Project 1992–2003: The SCP Documentation Series (Vol. 3). Nairobi: UN-Habitat.Google Scholar
UN-Habitat (2009). Planning sustainable cities: Global report on human settlements. London: UN-Habitat.Google Scholar
UN-Habitat (2014). The state of African cities 2014: Re-imagining sustainable urban transition. Nairobi: UN-Habitat.Google Scholar
United Republic of Tanzania (1967). The Arusha Declaration: Tanzania’s new revolution, 5 February.Google Scholar
United Republic of Tanzania (2007a). Urban Planning Act No. 8. of 2007. Dodoma: United Republic of Tanzania.Google Scholar
United Republic of Tanzania (2007b). Guidelines for the preparation of general planning schemes and detailed schemes for new areas, urban renewal and regularization. Dar-es-Salaam: Ministry of Lands, Housing and Human Settlement Development.Google Scholar
United Republic of Tanzania (2013). Basic facts and figures on human settlements, 2012: Tanzania mainland. Dar-es-Salaam: Ministry of Finance.Google Scholar
Watson, V. (2003). Conflicting rationalities: Implications for planning theory and ethics. Journal of Planning Theory & Practice, 4(4), 395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, V. (2016). Shifting approaches to planning theory: Global north and south. Journal of Urban Planning, 1(4), 32–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamungu, N. (2019). Street-level bureaucrats and piecemeal planning approaches in the Tanzanian small towns of Mlandizi and Sirari. PhD dissertation, Stellenbosch University.Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×