Book contents
- Relationship Maintenance
- Advances in Personal Relationships
- Relationship Maintenance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Tables
- Figures
- Contributors
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Theories of Relationship Maintenance
- Part III Processes of Relationship Maintenance
- 7 Communication and Relationship Maintenance
- 8 Attributions, Forgiveness, and Gratitude as Relationship Maintenance Processes
- 9 Social Networks and Relationship Maintenance
- 10 Dyadic Coping as Relationship Maintenance
- 11 Conflict Management and Problem Solving as Relationship Maintenance
- 12 Sex as Relationship Maintenance
- 13 Accuracy and Bias in Relationship Maintenance
- Part IV The Social Context of Relationship Maintenance
- Part V Conclusion
- Index
- References
10 - Dyadic Coping as Relationship Maintenance
from Part III - Processes of Relationship Maintenance
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 December 2019
Book contents
- Relationship Maintenance
- Advances in Personal Relationships
- Relationship Maintenance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Tables
- Figures
- Contributors
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Theories of Relationship Maintenance
- Part III Processes of Relationship Maintenance
- 7 Communication and Relationship Maintenance
- 8 Attributions, Forgiveness, and Gratitude as Relationship Maintenance Processes
- 9 Social Networks and Relationship Maintenance
- 10 Dyadic Coping as Relationship Maintenance
- 11 Conflict Management and Problem Solving as Relationship Maintenance
- 12 Sex as Relationship Maintenance
- 13 Accuracy and Bias in Relationship Maintenance
- Part IV The Social Context of Relationship Maintenance
- Part V Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
Perhaps not surprisingly, romantic couples experience stress. Stress can originate both within the relationship, such as differing viewpoints between partners, or outside the relationship, such as learning about a poor performance review at work or having an argument with a friend. Irrespective of the origin of the stress, romantic partners are able to combat its negative effects by recognizing stress as an interdependent experience, one that is shared between partners, and engaging in positive dyadic coping. Conceptualized by Bodenmann’s systemic transactional model, positive dyadic coping is defined as supportive behaviors that help to downregulate partners’ negative experiences of stress and include providing emotional or problem-focused support. The purpose of this chapter is to present compelling evidence to conceptualize positive dyadic coping as a relationship maintenance strategy, one that helps preserve the relationship during times of distress and contributes to relationship satisfaction and longevity.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Relationship MaintenanceTheory, Process, and Context, pp. 178 - 193Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
American Psychological Association. (2015). Stress in America [Data file]. Retrieved from www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2015/snapshot.aspxGoogle Scholar
American Psychological Association (2016). Stress in America [Data file]. Retrieved from www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2016/coping-with-change.pdfGoogle Scholar
Badr, H., & Acitelli, L. K. (2017). Re-thinking dyadic coping in the context of chronic illness. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 44–48. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.001Google Scholar
Baker, J. P., & Berenbaum, H. (2007). Emotional approach and problem-focused coping: A comparison of potentially adaptive strategies. Cognition and Emotion, 21(1), 95–118. doi:10.1080/02699930600562276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J. P., & Berenbaum, H. (2011). Dyadic moderators of the effectiveness of problem-focused and emotional-approach coping interventions. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 35, 550–559. doi:10.1007/s10608-011-9386-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497Google Scholar
Beach, S. R. H., Katz, J., Kim, S., & Brody, G. H. (2003). Prospective effects of marital satisfaction on depressive symptoms in established marriages: A dyadic model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 355–371. doi:10.1177/0265407503020003005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenmann, G. (1995). A systemic-transactional conceptualization of stress and coping in couples. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 54, 34–49.Google Scholar
Bodenmann, G. (1997). Dyadic coping – a systemic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. European Review of Applied Psychology, 47, 137–140.Google Scholar
Bodenmann, G. (2000). Stress und Coping bei Paaren [Stress and coping in couples]. Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Bodenmann, G. (2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In Revenson, T. A., Kayser, K., & Bodenmann, G. (2005) Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Bodenmann, G., Bradbury, T. N., & Pihet, S. (2009). Relative contributions of treatment-related changes in communication skills and dyadic coping skills to the longitudinal course of marriage in the framework of marital distress prevention. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 50, 1–21. doi:10.1080/10502550802365391Google Scholar
Bodenmann, G., & Cina, A. (2006). Stress and coping among stable-satisfied, stable-distressed, and separated/divorced Swiss couples: A 5-year prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 44, 71–89. doi:10.1300/J087v44n01_04Google Scholar
Bodenmann, G., Ledermann, T., & Bradbury, T. N. (2007). Stress, sex, and satisfaction in marriage. Personal Relationships, 14, 551–569.Google Scholar
Bodenmann, G., Meuwly, N., & Kayser, K. (2011). Two conceptualizations of dyadic coping and their potential for predicting relationship quality and individual well-being: A comparison. European Psychologist, 16(4), 255–266. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000068Google Scholar
Bodenmann, G., Pihet, S., & Kayser, K. (2006). The relationship between dyadic coping and marital quality: A 2-year longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 485–493. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.20.3.485Google Scholar
Bodenmann, G., & Shantinath, S. D. (2004). The Couples Coping Enhancement Training (CCET): A new approach to prevention of marital distress based upon stress and coping. Family Relations, 53, 477–484.Google Scholar
Coan, J. A., & Sbarra, D. A. (2015). Social baseline theory: The social regulation of risk and effort. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 87–91. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.12.021Google Scholar
Cutrona, C., Bodenmann, G., Randall, A. K., Clavel, F., & Johnson, M. (in press). Stress, dyadic coping, and social support: Moving toward integration. In Vangelisti, A. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 341–352). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dindia, K. (2000). Relational maintenance. In Hendrick, C. & Hendrick, S. S. (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 287–299). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Donato, S., Parise, M., Iafrate, R., Bertoni, A., Finkenauer, C., & Bodenmann, G. (2015). Dyadic coping responses and partners’ perceptions for couple satisfaction: An actor-partner interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32(5), 580–600. doi:10.1177/0265407514541071Google Scholar
Drosdzol, A., & Skrzypulec, V. (2009). Evaluation of marital and sexual interactions of Polish infertile couples. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6, 3335–3346. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01355.xGoogle Scholar
Falconier, M. K., Jackson, J. B., Hilpert, P., & Bodenmann, G. (2015a). Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 28–46. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.07.002Google Scholar
Falconier, M. K., Nussbeck, F., & Bodenmann, G. (2013). Immigration stress and relationship satisfaction in Latino couples: The role of dyadic coping. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 320(8), 813–843. doi:10.1521/jscp.2013.32.8.813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconier, M. K., Nussbeck, F., Bodenmann, G., Schneider, H., & Bradbury, T. (2015b). Stress from daily hassles in couples: Its effects on intradyadic stress, relationship satisfaction, and physical and psychological well-being. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 41(2), 221–235. doi:10.111/jmft.12073Google Scholar
Falconier, M. K., Randall, A. K., & Bodenmann, G. (Eds.). (2016). Couples coping with stress: A cross-cultural perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Feeney, J. A., & Karantzas, G. C. (2017) Couple conflict: Insights from an attachment perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 60–64. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.017Google Scholar
Fincham, F. D., & May, R. W. (2017). Infidelity in romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 70–74. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.008Google Scholar
Folkman, S. (2009). Commentary on the special section “Theory-based approaches to stress and coping”: Questions, answers, issues, and next steps in stress and coping research. European Psychologist, 14(1), 72–77.Google Scholar
Gamarel, K. E., Reisner, S. L., Laurenceau, J. P., Nemoto, T., & Operario, D. (2014). Gender minority stress, mental health, and relationship quality: A dyadic investigation of transgender women and their cisgender male partners. Journal of Family Psychology, 28(4), 437–447. doi:10.1037/a0037171Google Scholar
García-López, C., Sarriá, E., Pozo, P., & Recio, P. (2016). Supportive dyadic coping and psychological adaptation in couples parenting children with autism spectrum disorder: The role of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(11), 3434–3477. doi:10.1007/s10803-016-2883-5Google Scholar
Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 221–233. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.2.221Google Scholar
Herzberg, P. Y. (2013). Coping in relationships: The interplay between individual and dyadic coping and their effects on relationship satisfaction. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 26(2), 136–153. doi:10.1080/10615806.2012.655726Google Scholar
Hilpert, P., Randall, A. K., Sorokowski, P., Atkins, D. C., Sorokowska, A., Ahmadi, K., … Yoo, G. (2016). The associations of dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction vary between and within nations: A 35-nation study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, article 1106, 1–16. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01106Google Scholar
Johnson, M. D., Anderson, J. R., Walker, A., Wilcox, A., Lewis, V. L., & Robbins, D. C. (2013). Common dyadic coping is indirectly related to dietary and exercise adherence via patient and partner diabetes efficacy. Journal of Family Psychology, 27, 722–730. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0034006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, M. D., Galambos, N. L., Finn, C., Neyer, F. J., & Home, R. M. (2017). Pathways between self-esteem and depression in couples. Developmental Psychology, 53(4), 787–799. doi:10.1037/dev0000276Google Scholar
Klaric, M., Franciskovic, T., Stevanovic, A., Petrov, B., Jonovska, S., & Nemcic Moro, I. (2011). Marital quality and relationship satisfaction in war veterans and their wives in Bosnia and Herzegovina. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 2, 8077. doi:10.3402/ejpt.v2i0.8077Google Scholar
Landis, M., Peter-Wight, M., Martin, M., & Bodenmann, G. (2013). Dyadic coping and marital satisfaction of older spouses in long-term marriage. GeroPsych, 26(1), 39–47. doi:10.1024/1662–9647/a000077Google Scholar
Lavner, J. A., & Bradbury, T. N. (2010). Patterns of change in marital satisfaction over the newlywed years. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 1171–1187. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00757.xGoogle Scholar
Lavner, J. A., & Bradbury, T. N. (2012). Why do even satisfied newlyweds eventually go on to divorce? Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 1–10. doi:10.1037/a0025966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Levesque, C., Lafontaine, M., Caron, A., Flesch, J. L., & Bjornson, S. (2014). Dyadic empathy, dyadic coping, and relationship satisfaction: A dyadic model. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 10(1), 118–134. doi:10.5964/ejop.v10i1.697Google Scholar
Merz, C. A., Meuwly, N., Randall, A. K., & Bodenmann, G. (2014). Engaging in dyadic coping: Buffering the impact of everyday stress on prospective relationship satisfaction. Family Science, 5, 30–37. doi:10.1080/19424620.2014.927385Google Scholar
Messerschmitt, S. (2017). Coping with stress association with anticipated stigma: The role of dyadic coping in married, undergraduate students (Unpublished master thesis). Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.Google Scholar
Meuwly, N., Feinstein, B. A., Davila, J., Nuñez, D. G., & Bodenmann, G. (2013). Relationship quality among Swiss women in opposite-sex versus same-sex romantic relationships. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 72, 229–233.Google Scholar
Milek, A., Randall, A. K., Nussbeck, F. W., Breitenstein, C. J., & Bodenmann, G. (2017). Deleterious effects of stress on time spent with one’s partner and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Couple and Relationship Therapy, 16, 210–231.Google Scholar
Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2004). How does context affect intimate relationships? Linking external stress and cognitive processes within marriage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 134–148. doi:10.1177/0146167203255984Google Scholar
Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2017). Acknowledging the elephant in the room: How stressful environmental contexts shape relationship dynamics. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 107–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.013Google Scholar
Nussbeck, F. W., & Jackson, J. B. (2016). Measuring dyadic coping across cultures. In Falconier, M. K., Randall, A. K., & Bodenmann, G. (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: A cross-cultural perspective (pp. 36–53). New York, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ogolsky, B. G., & Bowers, J. R. (2013). A meta-analytic review of relationship maintenance and its correlates. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(3), 343–367. doi:10.1177/0265407512463338Google Scholar
Ogolsky, B. G., Monk, J. K., Rice, T. M., Theisen, J. C., & Maniotes, C. R. (2017). Relationship maintenance: A review of research on romantic relationships. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 9, 275–306. doi:10.1111/jftr.12205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otis, M. D., Riggle, E. D. B., & Rostosky, S. S. (2006). Impact of mental health on perceptions of relationship satisfaction and quality among female same-sex couples. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 10(1–2), 267–283. doi:10.1300/J155v10n01_14Google Scholar
Papp, L. M., & Witt, N. L. (2010). Romantic partners’ individual coping strategies and dyadic coping: Implications for relationship functioning. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(5), 551–559. doi:10.1037/a0020836Google Scholar
Proulx, C. M., Helms, H. M., & Buehler, C. (2007). Marital quality and personal well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(3), 576–593. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00393.xGoogle Scholar
Randall, A. K., & Bodenmann, G. (2009). The role of stress on close relationships and marital satisfaction. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 105–115. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2008.10.004Google Scholar
Randall, A. K., & Bodenmann, G. (2017). Stress and its associations with relationship satisfaction. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 96–106. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.010Google Scholar
Randall, A. K., Hilpert, P., Jimenez-Arista, L. E., Walsh, K. J., & Bodenmann, G. (2016). Dyadic coping in the U.S.: Psychometric properties and validity for use of the English version of the Dyadic Coping Inventory. Current Psychology, 35, 570–582. doi:10.1007/s12144-015-9323-0Google Scholar
Randall, A. K., & Schoebi, D. (Eds.). (2018). Interpersonal emotion dynamics in personal relationships. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
Randall, A. K., Tao, C., Totenhagen, C. J., Walsh, K. J., & Cooper, A. (2017). Associations between sexual orientation discrimination and depression among same-sex couples: Moderating effects of dyadic coping. Journal of Couple and Relationship Therapy, 4, 325–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, A. K., Totenhagen, C. J., Walsh, K. J., Adams, C., & Tao, C. (2017). Coping with workplace minority stress: Associations between dyadic coping and anxiety among women in same-sex relationships. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 21(1), 70–87. doi:10.1080/10894160.2016.1142353Google Scholar
Regan, T. W., Lambert, S. D., Kelly, B., Falconier, M., Kissane, D., & Levesque, J. V. (2015). Couples coping with cancer: Exploration of theoretical frameworks from dyadic studies. Psycho-Oncology, 24(12), 1605–1617. doi:10.1002/pon.3854CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Regan, T. W., Lambert, S. D., Kelly, B., McElduff, P., Girgis, A., Kayser, K., & Turner, J. (2014). Cross-sectional relationships between dyadic coping and anxiety, depression, and relationship satisfaction for patients with prostate cancer and their spouses. Patient Education and Counseling, 96, 120–127. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2014.04.010Google Scholar
Revenson, T. A., Kayser, K., & Bodenmann, G. (Eds.) (2005). Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Ruffieux, M., Nussbeck, F. W., & Bodenmann, G. (2014). Long-term prediction of relationship satisfaction and stability by stress, coping, communication, and well-being. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 55, 485–501. doi:10.1080/10502556.2014.931767Google Scholar
Rusu, P. P., Hilpert, P., Beach, S. R., Turliuc, M. N., & Bodenmann, G. (2015). Dyadic coping mediates the association of sanctification with marital satisfaction and well-being. Journal of Family Psychology, 29(6), 843. doi:10.1037/fam0000108Google Scholar
Schaer, M., Bodenmann, G., & Klink, T. (2008). Balancing work and relationship: Couples coping enhancement training (CCET) in the workplace. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57, 71–89. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00355.xGoogle Scholar
Seider, B. H., Hirschberger, G., Nelson, K. L., & Levenson, R. W. (2009). We can work it out: Age differences in relational pronouns, physiology, and behavior in marital conflict. Psychology and Aging, 24, 604–613. doi:10.1037/a0016950CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Totenhagen, C. J., Randall, A. K., Cooper, A., Tao, C., & Walsh, K. J. (2017). Stress spill-over in same-sex couples: Concurrent and lagged daily effects. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 31, 236–256.Google Scholar
Totenhagen, C. J., Serido, J., Curran, M. A., & Butler, E. A. (2012). Daily hassles and uplifts: A diary study on understanding relationship quality. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 719–728. doi:10.1037/a0029628Google Scholar
Vedes, A., Bodenmann, G., Nussbeck, F., Randall, A. K., & Lind, W. (2013, June). The role of we-ness in mediating the associations between dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction. Poster presented at the Sixth International Meeting of Stress and Dyadic Coping – Couples coping with Cancer-Related Stress: Translating Research into Practice. University of Louisville, KY.Google Scholar
Weaver, K. M. (2014). An investigation of gay male, lesbian, and transgender dyadic coping in romantic relationships (Doctoral dissertation, available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. UMI No. 3632070).Google Scholar
Wunderer, E., & Schneewind, K. A. (2008). The relationship between marital standards, dyadic coping, and marital satisfaction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 462–476. doi:10.1002/ejsp.405Google Scholar
Xu, F., & Hiew, D. N. (2016). Dyadic coping in Chinese couples. In Falconier, M. K., Randall, A. K., & Bodenmann, G. (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: A cross-cultural perspective (pp. 218–235). New York, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 7
- Cited by