Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T00:18:28.774Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Basic Science at Risk: Protecting the Independence of Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Katherine S. Squibb Ph.D.
Affiliation:
associate professor, University of Maryland
Wendy Wagner
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Rena Steinzor
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Get access

Summary

There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the latter ignorance.

– Hippocrates (460 – 377 b.c.)

Independence as a Cornerstone of Science

When the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences outlined its recommendations for managing health risks and set up the risk assessment process in 1983, scientific knowledge of the effects of hazardous chemicals on biological systems was established as the cornerstone upon which risk assessment and risk management decisions would be made. The purpose underlying this decision was to ensure that risk management decisions would be based on objective and honest assessments of the true health hazard of chemicals in our environments.

The wisdom of this decision is clear. Independent scientific research provides an unbiased assessment of a problem – in this case, a chemical's ability to cause adverse human and ecological health effects. As the National Research Council recognized, an objective determination of risk is critical to policy-based discussions regarding how much risk society is willing to accept and the subsequent need for regulations and cleanup activities.

Unfortunately, the independence that is at the core of good scientific research is being threatened by current day funding mechanisms for basic toxicology and environmental health research and the regulations that allow companies with financial interests in chemicals to be responsible for generating the scientific data needed for health risk assessments.

Type
Chapter
Information
Rescuing Science from Politics
Regulation and the Distortion of Scientific Research
, pp. 46 - 60
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×