Resilience Engineering for Power and Communications Systems Networked Infrastructure in Extreme Events
Book contents
- Resilience Engineering for Power and Communications Systems
- Resilience Engineering for Power and Communications Systems
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Fundamental Supporting Concepts
- 3 Resilience Models and Metrics
- 4 Dependencies and Interdependencies and Their Effect on Resilience
- 5 Disaster Forensics of Infrastructure Systems
- 6 Electric Power Grid Resilience
- 7 Resilience of Information and Communication Networks
- 8 Integrated Electric Power and Communications Infrastructure Resilience
- 9 Infrastructure Systems Planning for Improved Resilience
- Index
- References
5 - Disaster Forensics of Infrastructure Systems
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 January 2024
Book contents
- Resilience Engineering for Power and Communications Systems
- Resilience Engineering for Power and Communications Systems
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Fundamental Supporting Concepts
- 3 Resilience Models and Metrics
- 4 Dependencies and Interdependencies and Their Effect on Resilience
- 5 Disaster Forensics of Infrastructure Systems
- 6 Electric Power Grid Resilience
- 7 Resilience of Information and Communication Networks
- 8 Integrated Electric Power and Communications Infrastructure Resilience
- 9 Infrastructure Systems Planning for Improved Resilience
- Index
- References
Summary
As was introduced in Chapter 1, adaptation is a fundamental attribute of resilient systems. Adaptation could occur by identifying changes in the physical and social environment with the potential to affect a community system operation or by reacting after a disruptive event happens. Part of a positive reaction in the latter of these adaptation mechanisms involves learning about which factors contributed to improving resilience and which factors caused a lower resilience. This chapter focuses on an important tool that is part of such a learning process for improved resilience: disaster forensics. Disaster forensics are based on a postdisaster investigation, in which field investigations and postevent data collection are important components. Hence, the first part of this chapter will focus on explaining the steps and procedures involved with a disaster forensic investigation, including a description of how to perform field investigations. This chapter then describes power grids’ and information and communication networks’ performance in recent natural disasters based on lessons obtained during past forensic investigations.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Resilience Engineering for Power and Communications SystemsNetworked Infrastructure in Extreme Events, pp. 195 - 275Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Bell, S., Reliability, Crime and Circumstance: Investigating the History of Forensic Science, Praeger Publishers, West Port, CT, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilstone, W. J., Savage, K. A., and Clark, L. A., Forensic Science: An Encyclopedia of History, Methods, and Techniques, ABC-CLIO Inc., Santa Barbara, CA, 2006.Google Scholar
Houck, M. M. and Siegel, J. A., Fundamentals of Forensic Science, Edition 2, Elsevier, Burlington, MA, 2010.Google Scholar
Specter, M. M., “National Academy of Forensic Engineers.” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 145–149, Aug. 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S., “Forensic engineering: Reduction of risk and improving technology (for all things great and small).” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1019–1037, Sept. 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiff, A. J., Guide to Post-Earthquake Investigation of Lifelines. American Society of Civil Engineering, Technical Council of Lifeline Earthquake Engineering (TCLEE) Monograph 11, July 1997.Google Scholar
Kent, K., Chevalier, S., Grance, T., and Dang, H., Guide to Integrating Forensic Techniques into Incident Response, NIST Special Publication 800–86, August 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruse, W. G. II and Heiser, J. G., Computer Forensics: Incident Response Essentials, Addison-Wesley, Crawfordsville, IN, 2010.Google Scholar
Dien, Y., Llory, M., and Montmayeul, R., “Organisational accidents investigation methodology and lessons learned.” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 111, nos. 1–3, pp. 147–153, July 2004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Transportation Safety Board, “Aviation Investigation Manual: Major Team Investigation.” Nov. 2002. www.ntsb.gov/investigations/process/pages/default.aspx, last accessed August 13, 2019.Google Scholar
Peisert, S., Bishop, M., Karin, S., and Marzullo, K., “Toward Models for Forensic Analysis,” in Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensic Engineering (SADFE’07), Bell Harbor, WA, 14 pages, Apr. 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O.-Smith, A., Alcántara-Ayala, I., Burton, I., and Lavell, A., “Forensic Investigations of Disasters (FORIN): A Conceptual Framework and Guide to Research,” Integrated Research on Disaster Risk and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, 2016.Google Scholar
Kwasinski, A., “US Gulf Coast Telecommunications Power Infrastructure Evolution since Hurricane Katrina,” in Proceedings of the International Telecommunication Energy Special Conference, 2009, Vienna, Austria, May 10–13, 6 pages, 2009.Google Scholar
Kwasinski, A., “Effects of Hurricanes Isaac and Sandy on Data and Communications Power Infrastructure,” in Proceedings of the IEEE INTELEC 2013, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Kwasinski, A., “Effects of Notable Natural Disasters from 2005 to 2011 on Telecommunications Infrastructure: Lessons from On-Site Damage Assessments,” in Proceedings of the INTELEC 2011, Amsterdam, Netherlands, October 9–13, 9 pages, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwasinski, A., “Effects of Notable Natural Disasters of 2017 on Information and Communication Networks Infrastructure,” in Proceedings of the IEEE INTELEC 2018, Turin, Italy, Oct. 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwasinski, A., “Telecom Power Planning for Natural Disasters: Technology Implications and Alternatives to US Federal Communications Commission’s ‘Katrina Order’ in View of the Effects of 2008 Atlantic Hurricane Season,” in Proceedings of the INTELEC 2009, Incheon, South Korea, October 18–22, 6 pages, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwasinski, A., “Field Technical Surveys: An Essential Tool for Improving Critical Infrastructure and Lifeline Systems Resiliency to Disasters,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 2014 Global Humanitarian Technology Conference, San Jose, CA, pp. 78–85, Oct. 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FCC Independent Panel Reviewing the Impact of Hurricane Katrina on Communications Networks. “Report and Recommendations to the Federal Communications Commission.” June 12, 2006.Google Scholar
“STS-107 Entry Timeline,” www.netcore.us/1/cta/sts107re-entrytext.htm, last accessed September 9, 2011.Google Scholar
Kwasinski, A., “Lessons from the 1st Workshop about Preparing Information and Communication Technologies Systems for an Extreme Event,” in Proceedings of the IEEE INTELEC 2014, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 1–8, Oct. 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwasinski, A., “Telecommunications Outside Plant Power Infrastructure: Past Performance and Technological Alternatives for Improved Resilience to Hurricanes,” in Proceedings of the INTELEC 2009, Incheon, South Korea, October 18–22, 6 pages, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishnamurthy, V., Kwasinski, A., and Dueñas-Osorio, L., “Comparison of power and telecommunications interdependencies between the 2011 Tohoku and 2010 Maule earthquakes.” ASCE Journal of Infrastructure Systems, vol. 22, no. 3, Mar. 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dueñas-Osorio, L. and Kwasinski, A., “Quantification of lifeline system interdependencies after the 27 February 2010 Mw 8.8 offshore Maule, Chile earthquake.” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 28, no. S1, pp. S581–S603, June 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwasinski, A., Andrade, F., Castro-Sitiriche, M., and O’Neill-Carrillo, E., “Hurricane Maria effects on Puerto Rico electric power infrastructure.” IEEE Power and Energy Technology Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 85–94, Feb. 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, G. W. Jr., “Fortieth Annual Report on the Electric Property of the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority,” Puerto Rico Energy Bureau report No. CEPR-AP-2015–0001, June 2013.Google Scholar
Kwasinski, A., Eidinger, J., Tang, A., and Tudo-Bornarel, C., “Performance of electric power systems in the 2010–2011 Christchurch New Zealand earthquake sequence.” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 205–230, Feb. 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwasinski, A., Weaver, W. W., Chapman, P. L., and Krein, P. T., “Telecommunications power plant damage assessment for Hurricane Katrina – site survey and follow-up results.” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 277–287, Sept. 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwasinski, A., “Field Damage Assessments as a Design Tool for Information and Communications Technology Systems That Are Resilient to Natural Disasters,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Applied Sciences in Biomedical and Communication Technologies (ISABEL), Barcelona, Spain, 6 pages, Oct. 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OpenStreetMap, “Copyright and license,” www.openstreetmap.org/copyright, last accessed August 13, 2019.Google Scholar
Tang, A. K. (editor), Tohoku, Japan, Earthquake and Tsunami of 2011: Lifeline Performance, American Society of Civil Engineers, Technical Council of Lifeline Earthquake Engineering Monograph TCLEE no. 42, 2017.Google Scholar
Howell, W., “Workforce Issues Hurricanes Gustav and Ike,” in Proceedings of the National Hurricane Conference, Austin, TX, Apr. 2009.Google Scholar
Kwasinski, A., “Lessons from Field Damage Assessments about Communication Networks Power Supply and Infrastructure Performance during Natural Disasters with a focus on Hurricane Sandy,” FCC Proceeding Docket number 11–60 “In the matter of reliability and continuity of Communications Networks, Including Broadband technologies effects on Broadband Communications Networks of Damage or Failure of Network equipment or severe overload.” Feb. 2013.Google Scholar
Kwasinski, A., “Effects of Hurricane Maria on Renewable Energy Systems in Puerto Rico,” in Proceedings of the 7th International IEEE Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA 2018), Paris, France, Oct. 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Japan Times, “Awaji Island wind turbine topples over as typhoon cuts through western Japan,” August 24, 2018. www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2018/08/24/national/awaji-island-wind-turbine-topples-powerful-typhoon-passes-western-japan/#.XVM8C0d7n3, last accessed August 13, 2019.Google Scholar
Kappernman, J. G. and Albertson, V. D., “Bracing for the geomagnetic storms.” IEEE Spectrum, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 27–33, Mar. 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, R. M., Assante, M. J., and Conway, T., “Analysis of the Cyber Attack on the Ukrainian Power Grid,” report from Electricity-Information Sharing and Analysis Center and SANS Industrial Control Systems, March 18, 2016.Google Scholar
US Department of Homeland Security, “NCCIC/ICS-CERT Incident Alert. Cyber-Attack against Ukrainian Critical Infrastructure,” National Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center IR-ALERT-H-16–043-01AP, March 7, 2016.Google Scholar
Buldyrev, S. V., Parshani, R, Paul, G et al., “Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks.” Nature, vol. 464, pp. 1025–1028, Apr. 2010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwasinski, A., “Numerical Evaluation of Communication Networks Resilience with a Focus on Power Supply Performance during Natural Disasters,” in Proceedings of INTELEC 2015, Osaka, Japan, pp. 1–7, Oct. 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, A, Kwasinski, A., Eidinger, J., Foster, C., and Anderson, P., “Telecommunication systems performance: Christchurch earthquakes.” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 231–252, Feb. 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar