Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T06:59:03.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Operational Conservation Remote Sensing

Common Themes, Lessons Learned, and Future Prospects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2018

By
Allison K. Leidner  and
Graeme M. Buchanan
Edited by
Allison K. Leidner  and
Graeme M. Buchanan
Allison K. Leidner
Affiliation:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington DC
Graeme M. Buchanan
Affiliation:
Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB), Edinburgh
Get access

Summary

In this final chapter, we identify and discuss shared themes and lessons learned from the preceding six case study chapters and one organisational perspective chapter. Commonalities were (i) collaboration, (ii) free, open, and accessible data, (iii) spatial and temporal resolution of satellite observations, (iv) types of satellite observations used, (v) building and enabling remote sensing capacity, (vi) customised tool development and visualisations, (vii) integrating in situ and Earth observations, and (viii) a role for serendipity. We then provide our perspective on the future of conservation remote sensing.
Type
Chapter
Information
Satellite Remote Sensing for Conservation Action
Case Studies from Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecosystems
 , pp. 301 - 317
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burgman, M., Jarrad, F., and Main, E. (2015). Decreasing geographic bias in conservation biology. Conservation Biology, 29, 1255–1256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Claverie, M., Masek, J. G., Junchang, J., and Dungan, J. L. (2017). Harmonized Landsat-8 Sentinel-2 (HLS) product user’s guide. Harmonized Landsat–Sentinel-2 (HLS) project. NASA. See https://hls.gsfc.nasa.gov.Google Scholar
CEOS (2017). 2017–2019 work plan: version 1.1.1. See http://ceos.org/document_management/Publications/CEOS_Work-Plans/CEOS_2017-2019-Work-Plan_Jul2017.pdf.Google Scholar
Green, R. E., Buchanan, G.M., and Almond, R. (2011). What do conservation practitioners want from remote sensing? Cambridge Conservation Initiative Report. See www.cambridgeconservation.org/resource/working-papers-and-reports/cci-report-what-do-conservation-practitioners-want-remote.Google Scholar
Lawler, J. J., Aukema, J. E., Grant, J. B., et al. (2006). Conservation science: a 20-year report card in a nutshell. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 4, 473–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paganini, M., Leidner, A. K., Geller, G., Turner, W., and Wegmann, M. (2016). The role of space agencies in remotely sensed essential biodiversity variables. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, 2, 132–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pekel, J-F., Cottam, A., Gorelick, N., and Belward, A. S. (2016). High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes. Nature, 540, 418–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pettorelli, N, Safi, K., and Turner, W. (2014a). Satellite remote sensing, biodiversity research, and conservation of the future. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 69, 20130190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettorelli, N., Laurance, W. F., O’Brien, T. G., et al. (2014b). Satellite remote sensing for applied ecologists: opportunities and challenges. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51, 839–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redford, K. and Taber, A. (2000). Writing the wrongs: developing a safe-fail culture in conservation. Conservation Biology, 14, 1567–1568.Google Scholar
Redford, K.H., Padoch, C., and Sunderland, T. (2013). Fads, funding, and forgetting in three decades of conservation. Conservation Biology, 27, 1523–1739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, R. A., Byler, D., Eastman, J. R., et al. (2015). Ten ways remote sensing can contribute to conservation. Conservation Biology, 29, 350–359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, W., Spector, S., Gardiner, N., et al. (2003). Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, 306–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, W., Rondinini, C., Pettorelli, N., et al. (2015). Free and open-access satellite data are key to biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 182, 173–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×