Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T13:13:34.084Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Brain morphology in schizotypal personality as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging

from Part VII - Brain imaging

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Adrian Raine
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Todd Lencz
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Sarnoff A. Mednick
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Get access

Summary

Over the past two decades, there have been literally hundreds of studies published in the psychiatric literature on the topic of brain morphology in schizophrenia as assessed by computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (for good overviews, see Gur & Pearlson, 1993; Pearlson & Marsh, 1993; Shelton & Weinberger, 1986). The majority of these reports have employed the strategy of comparing groups of schizophrenics and normal controls in terms of the size of various aspects of brain anatomy. Significant group differences have been demonstrated for many brain regions, most notably, larger ventricular size among the schizophrenics. A host of other studies have explored the relationship between brain morphology and various clinical, neuropsychological, and other neurobiological measures. Although the meaning and implications of these morphological differences have yet to be fully elucidated, there is an emerging sense of confidence within the research community that these neuroimaging findings will provide important clues to the understanding of the etiological and pathophysiological mechanisms underlying schizophrenia.

The primary question that is addressed in this chapter involves the extent to which studies of brain morphology may also serve to provide clues in terms of understanding schizotypal personality. As is evident from this volume, the construct of schizotypy itself remains controversial. Is the distinction between schizotypy and schizophrenia valid? That is, is it really distinct from schizophrenia in terms of its underlying pathophysiology and etiology? Is it merely a milder variant of schizophrenia? Does it share a genetic diathesis with schizophrenia but differ in terms of environmental factors? Is it a different disorder entirely?

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×