Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. The Science and Politics of Global Climate Change
  • This edition has been replaced by: 9781316832158
  • This book is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core
  • Cited by 8
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
September 2012
Print publication year:
2005
Online ISBN:
9780511790430
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790430
Subjects:
Earth and Environmental Sciences, Politics: General Interest, Climatology and Climate Change, Politics and International Relations
Information

Book description

In this accessible primer, Dessler and Parson combine their expertise in atmospheric science and public policy to help scientists, policy makers, and the public sort through the conflicting claims in the climate-change debate. The authors explain how scientific and policy debates work, summarize present scientific knowledge and uncertainty about climate change, and discuss the available policy options. Along the way, they explain WHY the debate is so confusing. Anyone with an interest in how science is used in policy debates will find this discussion illuminating. The book requires no specialized knowledge, but is accessible to any college-educated general reader who wants to make more sense of the climate change debate. It can also be used as a textbook to explain the details of the climate-change debate, or as a resource for science students or working scientists, to explain how science is used in policy debates.

Reviews

'… there is a real need for a comprehensive book on climate change … The Science and Politics of Global Climate Change is it. It does exactly what the title and subtitle promise, providing insights into the causes and effects of the contributing meteorological phenomena and into why it has been so hard to get consensus among governments … copies should be shipped to anyone who doubts the reality of climate change, starting with presidents in denial.'

Source: New Scientist

'… requires no specialised knowledge, but is accessible to any educated general reader who wants to make more sense of the climate change debate. It also sheds light on how science is used in policy debates.'

Source: The Chemical Engineer

‘Each of the key aspects of global climate change is covered, with up-to-date and well-referenced information throughout. Its impressive breadth and the provision of succinct overviews of source material in the further reading sections of each chapter mean that teachers, lecturers and researchers will all find this book a useful starting point for in-depth study. There are now numerous taught masters courses on 'global change issues', and this book constitutes a must-have addition to their reading lists. … read the book in its entirety - it is well worth it.’

Source: The Times Higher Education Supplement

'This is an excellent way into the subject for the beginner … one of the most lucid and readable introductory accounts of the topic that has been published in some while. As such it should be seen as a 'must-buy' and an essential addition to the library.'

Source: TENews

'This is a book which all scientists and the educated general public should read and reflect upon before it is too late to halt the apparently inevitable progress to Armageddon.'

Source: Chromatographia

'… a useful compendium of the current debates in the science and politics of climate change … succinct and consistent book … it should become a key reading and teaching source in geography and environmental sciences. It can also be valuable to doctoral students and senior researchers interested in learning about climate change science and politics … a book worth having on one's shelf.'

Source: Environmental Sciences

'As more and more extreme weather events around the globe are being associated with climate change, it is sometimes difficult to be able to see the wood for the trees, but this book takes the reader very clearly through the 'maze' of claims and counter-claims. … if only government leaders would read, digest and follow up some of the suggestions in the last chapter, there would be optimism that the problem can be overcome. As always with Cambridge University Press, the book, which is illustrated with diagrams, charts and boxes, is impeccably produced, and is an absolute 'must' for every reader of this journal.'

Source: The International Journal of Meteorology

'Written by an atmospheric scientist and a law professor with extensive public policy experience, the book efffectively tackles the rough-and-tumble intersection of science and policy that has led to confusion and inaction … The scholarly value of [the book] is indisputable. Dessler and Parson independently possess significant authority on both the science and the politics of climate change. Their treatment of the subject illustrates the complexity of the problem with remarkable ease and clarity … the carefully thought-through recommendations make this book critical reading for policymakers … considering action on the issue.'

Maria Ivanova - The College of William and Mary

'… coverage and presentation of climate science and policy [is] commendable … a good candidate for a primer for multidisciplinary classes devoted to climate policy …'

Randall M Wigle - Wilfrid Laurier University

'… both insightful and engaging … the book is also highly readable and well suited to reach a wide audience. That's good, because the gaps in understanding between scientists, policy makers, journalists, and the public remain a major barrier to the adoption of sensible responses to the problem. Dessler and Parson's book will help because it provides us with a sound and thoughtful guide to the climate change debate.'

Source: American Meteorological Society

'The Science and Politics of Global Climate Change: A Guide to the debate by Andrew Dessler and Edward Parson is an excellent attempt at deconstructing the confusion that surrounds the climate-change debate. This reviewer has been waiting some time for a book such as this to appear.…The Science and politics of climate change are brought together quite seamlessly,…Dessler and Parson's book is a must for those who want to move beyond the rhetoric and understand the relationship between climate science policy, and also for those seeking an interdisciplinary outlook on the management of global environmental issues.'

Source: The Times Higher Education Supplement

'This book will be most useful to undergraduates and post-graduates in the fields of environmental science, sustainability and international politics. Each of the key aspects of global climate change is covered, with up-to-date and well referenced information throughout. its impressive breadth and the provision of succinct overviews of source material in the further reading sections of each chapter mean that teachers will all find this book a useful starting point for in-depth study. … as a primer that brings together global climate- change science and politics it succeeds very well indeed.'

Source: The Times Higher Education Supplement

'This important book will be as valuable to informed lay persons, as to policy makers in government, industry and the wider community. While this is a political book, it is also a valid general primer about the science-policy interface. Furthermore, it serves as a model of how to clarify complex problems for lay persons through careful logic, wise choice of supporting literature, consistent definition of technical terms and clear writing.'

Source: Ecoscience

'The Science and Politics of Global Climate Change is a fascinating hybrid of science and policy directed at a broad or nonspecialist audience that may not be well versed in the ongoing climate change controversy. … Overall Dessler and Parson succeed in making both science and policy accessible to a wide readership. As someone working at the interface of science and policy, I could comfortably recommend this book to friends and colleagues. The book - which is well illustrated with easy-to-grasp figures and which has summary tables provided at several key junctures - would also make an excellent resource for a high school or college-level survey course in either environmental studies or public policy.'

Source: EOS, Transactions, American Geophysical Union

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Contents

Contents
References
References
References
Aldy, J. E., Ashton, J., Baron, R., Bodansky, D., Charnovitz, S., Diringer, E., Heller, T., Pershing, J., Shukla, P. R., Tubiana, L., Tudela, F. and Wang, X. (2003). Beyond Kyoto: Advancing the International Effort Against Climate Change. Washington, DC: Pew Center on Global Climate Change, December.
Aspen Institute (2002). U. S. Policy on Climate Change: What's Next? A report of the Aspen Institute Environmental Policy Forum, Frank Loy and Bruce Smart (co-chairs), ed. Riggs, John A.. Aspen, Colorado: Aspen Institute.
Bell, T. L., Chou, M.-., Hou, A. Y. and Lindzen, R. S. (2002). Reply. Bull. Am. Met. Soc., 83, 599.
Bimber, B. (1996). The Politics of Expertise in Congress: the Rise and Fall of the Office of Technology Assessment. Albany: SUNY Press.
Caldeira, K., Jain, A. K. and Hoffert, M. I. (2003). Climate sensitivity uncertainty and the need for energy without CO2 emission. Science, 299, 2052–2054.
Chou, M.-D., Lindzen, R. S. and Hou, A. Y. (2002). Comments on “The Iris hypothesis: a negative or positive cloud feedback?”. J. Climate, 15, 2713–2715.
Christy, J., Spencer, R. W., Norris, W. B., Braswell, W. D. and Parker, D. E. (2003). Error estimates of version 5.0 of MSU-AMSU bulk atmospheric temperatures. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol, 20, 613–629.
Dessler, A. E. (2000). The Chemistry and Physics of Stratospheric Ozone.San Diego: Academic Press.
Fu, Q.et al., (2004). Contribution of stratospheric cooling to satellite-inferred tropospheric temperature trends. Nature, 429, 55–58.
Harrison, H. (2002). Comment on “Does the Earth have an adaptive infrared Iris?”. Bull. Am. Met. Soc., 83, 597.
Hartmann, D. L. & Michelsen, M. L. (2002). No evidence for Iris. Bull. Am. Met. Soc., 83, 249–254.
Hoffert, M. I. (2002). Advanced technology paths to global climate stability: energy for a greenhouse planet. Science, 295, 981–987.
Howse, R. (2002). The Appellate Body Rulings in the Shrimp/Turtle Case: a new legal baseline for the trade and environment debate. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 27 (2), 489–519.
IPCC (1996). Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Houghton, J. T., Filho, L. G. Meira, Callander, B. A., Harris, N., Kattenberg, A. and Maskell, K.. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
IPCC (2000). Emissions Scenarios: Special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Nakicenovic, N. and Swart, R.. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
IPCC (2001a). Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J., Noguer, M., Linden, P. J., Dai, X., Maskell, K., and Johnson, C. A.. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
IPCC (2001b). Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. McCarthy, J. J., Canziani, O. F., Leary, N. A., Dokken, D. J. and White, K. S.. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
IPCC (2001c). Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Metz, B., Davidon, O., Swart, R. and Pan., J.Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
IPCC (2001d). Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report. A Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Watson, R. T. and the Core Writing Team. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jasanoff, S. (1990). The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Karl, T. R. and Trenberth, K. E. (2003). Modern global climate change. Science, 302 (5 December), 1719–1723.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lean, J. and Rind, D. (2001). Sun–climate connections: Earth's response to a variable Sun. Science, 292, 234–236.
Lin, B., Wong, T., Wielicki, B. A. and Hu, Y. (2004). Examination of the decadal tropical mean ERBS nonscanner radiation data for the Iris hypothesis. J. Climate, 17, 1239–1246.
Lindzen, R. S., Chou, M.-D. and Hou, A. Y. (2001). Does the Earth have an adaptive iris?Bull. Am. Met. Soc., 82, 417–432.
Lindzen, R. S., Chou, M.-D. and Hou, A. Y. (2002). Comment on “No evidence for Iris”. Bull. Am. Met. Soc., 83, 1345–1348.
Lomborg, B. (2001). The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World.New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mazur, A. (1973). “Disputes between experts”. Minerva: a review of science, learning, and policy, 11: 2, April 1973, pp. 243–262.
McIntyre, S. and McKitrick, R. (2005). Hockey sticks, principal components, and spurious significance. Geophys. Res. Letts., 32 (3), L03710.
Mears, C. A.et al. (2003). A reanalysis of the MSU channel 2 tropospheric temperature trend. J. Climate, 16, 3650–3664.
Michaels, P. J. (2004). Meltdown: The Predictable Distortion of Global Warming by Scientists, Politicians, and the Media. Washington, D. C.: Cato Institute.
Michaels, P. J. and Balling, R. C. (2000). The Satanic Gases: Clearing the Air About Global Warming.Washington, D. C.: Cato Institute.
Moberg, A., Sonechkin, D. M., Holmgren, K., Datsenko, N. M. and Karlén, W. (2005). Highly variable Northern Hemisphere temperatures reconstructed from low- and high-resolution proxy data. Nature, 433, 613–617.
Monastersky, R. (2003). Storm brews over global warming. Chronicle of Higher Education, 50 (2), A16.
National Commission on Energy Policy (2004). Ending the Energy Stalemate: A Bipartisan Strategy to Meet America's Energy Challenges. December 2004. Available at www.energycommission.org
Oerlemans, J. (2005). Extracting a climate signal from 169 glacier records. SciencExpress, 3 March, 10.1126/science.1107046.
Pacala, S. and Socolow, R. (2004). Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science, 305, 968–972.
Parson, E. A. (2003). Protecting the Ozone Layer: Science and Strategy.New York: Oxford University Press.
Parson, E. A. and Fisher-Vanden, K. (1997). Integrated assessment models of global climate change. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 22, 589–628.
Petit, J. R.et al. (1999). Climate and atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from the Vostok ice core, Antarctica. Nature, 399, 429–436.
Ruckelshaus, W. D. (1985). Risk, science, and democracy. Issues in Science and Technology, 1: 3, Spring, pp. 19–38.
Sandalow, D. B. and Bowles, I. A. (2001). Fundamentals of treaty-making on climate change. Science, 292 (8 June), 1839–1840.
Stewart, R. B. and Wiener, J. B. (2003). Reconstructing Climate Policy: Beyond Kyoto. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
Soon, W. and Baliunas, S. (2003). Proxy climatic and environmental changes of the past 1000 years. Climate Research, 23, 89–110.
Spencer, R. W. and Christy, J. R. (1990). Precise monitoring of global temperature trends from satellites. Science, 247, 1558–1562.
Stommel, H. M. and Stommel, E. (1983). Volcano Weather: the Story of 1816, the Year without a Summer. Newport, RI: Seven Seas Press.
Storch, H., Zorita, E., Jones, J. M., Dimitriev, Y., Gonzalez-Rouco, F. and Tett, S. F. B. (2004). Reconstructing past climate from noisy data. Science, 306 (5296), 679–682.
US National Academy of Sciences (2000). Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources. Reconciling Observations of Global Temperature Change.Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press.
US National Academy of Sciences (2003). Climate Research Committee, Panel on Climate Change Feedbacks. Understanding Climate Change Feedbacks. Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press.
US Global Change Research Program, National Assessment Synthesis Team (2001). Climate Change Impacts on the United States: The Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Victor, D. G. (2004). Climate Change: Debating America's Policy Options. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.
Vinnikov, K. Y. and Grody, N. C. (2004). Global warming trend of mean tropospheric temperatures observed by satellites. Science, 302, 269–272.
Weart, S. R. (2003). The Discovery of Global Warming. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weinberg, A. M. (1972). “Science and trans-science”. Minerva: a review of science, learning, and policy, 10: 2, April 1972, pp. 209–222.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.