Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: history, ethics and Marxism
- 1 Robert Nozick and Wilt Chamberlain: how patterns preserve liberty
- 2 Justice, freedom, and market transactions
- 3 Self-ownership, world-ownership, and equality
- 4 Are freedom and equality compatible?
- 5 Self-ownership, communism, and equality: against the Marxist technological fix
- 6 Marxism and contemporary political philosophy, or: why Nozick exercises some Marxists more than he does any egalitarian liberals
- 7 Marx and Locke on land and labour
- 8 Exploitation in Marx: what makes it unjust?
- 9 Self-ownership: delineating the concept
- 10 Self-ownership: assessing the thesis
- 11 The future of a disillusion
- Bibliography
- Index of names
- Subject index
5 - Self-ownership, communism, and equality: against the Marxist technological fix
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 August 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: history, ethics and Marxism
- 1 Robert Nozick and Wilt Chamberlain: how patterns preserve liberty
- 2 Justice, freedom, and market transactions
- 3 Self-ownership, world-ownership, and equality
- 4 Are freedom and equality compatible?
- 5 Self-ownership, communism, and equality: against the Marxist technological fix
- 6 Marxism and contemporary political philosophy, or: why Nozick exercises some Marxists more than he does any egalitarian liberals
- 7 Marx and Locke on land and labour
- 8 Exploitation in Marx: what makes it unjust?
- 9 Self-ownership: delineating the concept
- 10 Self-ownership: assessing the thesis
- 11 The future of a disillusion
- Bibliography
- Index of names
- Subject index
Summary
… only then can the narrow horizon of bourgeois right be crossed in its entirety and society inscribe on its banners: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs!
(Karl Marx, Critique of the Gotha Programme)I Self-ownership
1. In this chapter I argue that Marxist reliance on material super-abundance as the solution to social problems is connected with Marxist reluctance to effect an absolute break with certain radical bourgeois values. The ‘Marxist technological fix’ has served as a means of avoiding questions about justice which those who seek to carry the Marxist tradition forward cannot now conscionably ignore.
I shall call the bourgeois thought structure from which, so I claim, Marxism has failed to distinguish itself (sufficiently thoroughly), ‘leftwing libertarianism’. Since the meaning which I assign to that phrase is not the only one it could reasonably be thought to bear, I must explain how I shall use it here.
A libertarian, in the present sense, is one who affirms the principle of self-ownership, which occupies a prominent place in the ideology of capitalism. That principle says, as we have seen, that every person is morally entitled to full private property in his own person and powers.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality , pp. 116 - 143Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1995