Book contents
- Sharing Linked Data for Health Research
- Cambridge Bioethics and Law
- Sharing Linked Data for Health Research
- Copyright page
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Context for Decision Making
- 1 Research Using Linked Data
- 2 Individual, Collective, and Public Interests
- 3 Social Licence
- Part II Frameworks for Decision Making
- Part III Practice and Process of Decision Making
- Glossary
- Index
- Cambridge Bioethics and Law
- References
1 - Research Using Linked Data
from Part I - Context for Decision Making
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 June 2022
Book contents
- Sharing Linked Data for Health Research
- Cambridge Bioethics and Law
- Sharing Linked Data for Health Research
- Copyright page
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Context for Decision Making
- 1 Research Using Linked Data
- 2 Individual, Collective, and Public Interests
- 3 Social Licence
- Part II Frameworks for Decision Making
- Part III Practice and Process of Decision Making
- Glossary
- Index
- Cambridge Bioethics and Law
- References
Summary
Chapter one sets the context of linked data for research. It describes the ways in which linked data is being used to improve diagnosis, treatment and healthcare delivery and to understand the drivers of health. The advantages of using linked data for research are discussed. The chapter surveys the kinds of data currently being linked for research and different linkage methods and considers the potential and challenges for future international data linkage.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Sharing Linked Data for Health ResearchToward Better Decision Making, pp. 11 - 27Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Chen, H et al, ‘Living Near Major Roads and the Incidence of Dementia, Parkinson’s Disease, and Multiple Sclerosis: A Population-Based Cohort Study’ (2017) 389(10070) Lancet 718.Google Scholar
Hsieh, J et al, ‘Geographic Variation in the Intended Choice of Adjuvant Treatments for Women Diagnosed with Screen-Detected Breast Cancer in Queensland’ (2015) 15 BMC Public Health 1204.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, K et al, ‘Changes in the Prevalence of Human Papillomavirus Following a National Bivalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Programme in Scotland: A 7-Year Cross-Sectional Study’ (2017) 17(12) Lancet Infectious Diseases 1293.Google Scholar
Mackay, D et al, ‘Impact of Scotland’s Smoke-Free Legislation on Pregnancy Complications: Retrospective Cohort Study’ (2012) 9(3) PLoS Med e1001175.Google Scholar
Mackay, D et al, ‘Impact of Scotland’s Comprehensive, Smoke-Free Legislation on Stroke’ (2013) 8(5) PLoS ONE e62597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mihrshahi, S et al, ‘Vegetarian Diet and All-Cause Mortality: Evidence from a Large Population-Based Australian Cohort the 45 and Up Study’ (2017) 97 Preventive Medicine 1.Google Scholar
Oberlander, T et al, ‘Neonatal Outcomes after Prenatal Exposure to Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Antidepressants and Maternal Depression Using Population-Based Linked Health Data’ (2006) 63(8) Archives of General Psychiatry 898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parsell, C, Petersen, M, and Culhane, D, ‘Cost Offsets of Supportive Housing: Evidence for Social Work’ (2017) 47(5) British Journal of Social Work 1534.Google Scholar