Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T20:04:06.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Seismic Impact Engineering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2022

Jeom Kee Paik
Jeom Kee Paik
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

Ship-shaped offshore installations that are operated in shallow water (e.g., at depths of 10 m deep or less) are used for various purposes, such as oil terminals, floating storage and regasification units (FSRUs), power plants and bunkering. These usually remain afloat in operation, with a gap between the seabed and the bottom of the hull. In other situations, such as those for ship-shaped offshore power plant facilities containing nuclear reactors, hull bottoms are touched down onto the seabed by using heavy ballasting materials, such as concrete or sand. However, offshore installations are not fixed to the seabed and move under the effects of environmental actions, but may be moored.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
Design, Construction, Operation, Healthcare and Decommissioning
 , pp. 327 - 346
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bae, D. M. and Zakki, A. (2011). ‘Comparisons of multi material ALE and single material ALE in LS-DYNA for estimation of acceleration response of free-fall lifeboat’. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 48(6): 552–559.Google Scholar
Bai, Y. and Jin, W. L. (2016). Marine Structural Design. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.Google Scholar
Chen, W. F. and Duan, L. (2014). Seismic Design: Bridge Engineering Handbook. Second Edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
Chopra, A. K. (1995). Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering. Prentice Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
FHWA (2004). Evaluation of LS-DYNA Soil Material Model 147. Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.Google Scholar
ISO 19901-2 (2017). Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries: Specific Requirements for Offshore Structures: Part 2: Seismic Design Procedures and Criteria. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.Google Scholar
Jia, J. (2017). Modern Earthquake Engineering: Offshore and Land-Based Structures. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Jia, J. (2018). Soil Dynamics and Foundation Modeling: Offshore and Earthquake Engineering. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Jia, J. and Paik, J. K. (2019). Engineering Dynamics and Vibrations: Recent Developments. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
Marshall, P. and Chang, B. (1996). ‘Structural design considerations’. Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 8107: 781–793.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K. (2018). Ultimate Limit State Analysis and Design of Plated Structures. 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K. (2020). Advanced Structural Safety Studies with Extreme Conditions and Accidents. Springer, Singapore.Google Scholar
Rijken, O. and Leverette, S. (2007). ‘Tension leg platform response to earthquake in Gulf of Mexico’. Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Offshore Polar Engineering Conference, Lisbon, 1–6 July.Google Scholar
Rudan, S., Ćatipović, I., Berg, R., Völkner, S. and Pregeg, P. (2019). ‘Numerical study on the consequences of different’. Ships and Offshore Structures, 14: 387–400.Google Scholar
Song, M., Ma, J. and Huang, Y. (2017). ‘Fluid-structure interaction analysis of ship-ship collisions’. Marine Structures, 55: 121–136.Google Scholar
Tokura, S. (2015). ‘Validation of fluid analysis capabilities in LS-DYNA based on experimental result’. Proceedings of 10th European LS-DYAN Conference, Wurzburg, 15–17 June.Google Scholar
Trentacoste, M. F. (2004). Evaluation of LS-DYNA Soil Material Model 147. US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Seismic Impact Engineering
  • Jeom Kee Paik, University College London
  • Book: Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
  • Online publication: 27 January 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024471.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Seismic Impact Engineering
  • Jeom Kee Paik, University College London
  • Book: Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
  • Online publication: 27 January 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024471.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Seismic Impact Engineering
  • Jeom Kee Paik, University College London
  • Book: Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
  • Online publication: 27 January 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024471.013
Available formats
×