Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 98
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
April 2011
Print publication year:
2010
Online ISBN:
9780511762222

Book description

There is long-standing disagreement among systematists about how to divide biodiversity into species. Over twenty different species concepts are used to group organisms, according to criteria as diverse as morphological or molecular similarity, interbreeding and genealogical relationships. This, combined with the implications of evolutionary biology, raises the worry that either there is no single kind of species, or that species are not real. This book surveys the history of thinking about species from Aristotle to modern systematics in order to understand the origin of the problem, and advocates a solution based on the idea of the division of conceptual labor, whereby species concepts function in different ways - theoretically and operationally. It also considers related topics such as individuality and the metaphysics of evolution, and how scientific terms get their meaning. This important addition to the current debate will be essential for philosophers and historians of science, and for biologists.

Reviews

'… an entertaining read and well organized … a launching off point for a new direction in studying the species problem.'

Source: Metascience

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

Bibliography
Agapow, Paul-Michael, Bininda-Edmunds, O. R. P., Crandall, K. A., Gittleman, J. L., Mace, G. M., Marshall, J. C., and Purvis, A. (2004) “The Impact of Species Concept on Biodiversity Studies,” The Quarterly Review of Biology, vol. 79, no. 2, 161–179.
Amundson, Ron, (1998) “Typology Reconsidered: Two Doctrines on the History of Evolutionary Biology,” Biology and Philosophy, 13: 153–177.
Aristotle, , (1995) The Complete Works of Aristotle Vols. I and II, Barnes, J., ed., Princeton University Press.
Ashworth, E. J. (2003) “Language and Logic,” Cambridge Companion to Medieval Philosophy, McGrade, A. S., ed., Cambridge University Press, 73–96.
Balme, D. M. (1987a) “Aristotle's Biology was not Essentialistic,” Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G., eds., Cambridge University Press, 291–312.
(1987b) “Aristotle's Use of Division and Differentiae,” Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G., eds., Cambridge University Press, 69–89.
(1987c) “The Place of Biology in Aristotle's Philosophy,” Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G., eds., Cambridge University Press, 9–20.
Barker, Matthew J. (2007) “The Empirical Inadequacy of Species Cohesion by Gene Flow,” Philosophy of Science, 74: 654–665.
Barnes, Jonathan (1995) “Life and Work,” The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle, Cambridge University Press, 1–26.
Beatty, John (1992) “Speaking of Species: Darwin's Strategy,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, Ereshefsky, M. ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 227–245.
Bird, Alexander (2000) Thomas Kuhn, Princeton University Press.
Bird, Alexander, and Tobin, Emma (2008) “Natural Kinds,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2009 edn.), Zalta, Edward N. ed., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/natural-kinds/
Blackburn, Simon (2002) “Metaphysics,” The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy, Bunnin, N and Tsui-James, E. P., eds., Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 61–89.
Blumenthal, Henry J. (1990) “Neoplatonic Elements in the de Anima Commentaries,” Aristotle Transformed, Sorabji, R., ed., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 305–324.
Blumenthal, Henry J. (1996) Aristotle and Neoplatonism in Late Antiquity: Interpretations of De AnimaIthaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Boler, John F. (1963) “Abailard and the Problem of Universals,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 1 :104–126.
Bolton, Robert (1987) “Definition and Scientific Method in Aristotle's Posterior Analytics and Generation of Animals,” Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G., eds., Cambridge University Press, 120–166.
Boyd, Richard (1999) “Homeostasis, Species, and Higher Taxa,” Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, Wilson, Robert A., ed., Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 141–185.
Brigandt, Ingo (2003) “Species Pluralism Does Not Imply Species Eliminativism,” Philosophy of Science, 70: 1305–1316.
Broberg, Gunnar (1983) “Homo Sapiens: Linnaeus's Classification of Man,” Linnaeus the Man and His Work, Frängsmyr, T., ed., Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 156–194.
Brogaard, Berit (2004) “Species as Individuals,” Biology and Philosophy, 19: 223–243.
Brown, Stephen F. (1999) “Realism versus Nominalism,” The Columbia History of Western Philosophy, New York:Columbia University Press 271–278.
Burian, Richard M. (1985) “On Conceptual Change in Biology: The Case of the Gene,” Evolution at a Crossroads: The New Biology and the New Philosophy of Science,” Depew, D. J. and Weber, B. H., eds., Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 21–42.
Burkhardt, Frederick and Smith, Sydney, eds. (1987) The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. II. Cambridge University Press.
Burkhardt, Frederick and Smith, Sydney, (1990) The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. VI. Cambridge University Press.
Cain, A. J. (1993) Animal Species and Their Evolution, Princeton University Press.
Carnap, Rudolf (1966) An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, Gardner, M., ed., New York:Basic Books.
Claridge, M. F., Dawah, H. A. and Wilson, M. R. (1997) “Practical Approaches to Species Concepts for Living Organisms,” Species: The Units of Biodiversity, Claridge, M. F., Dawah, H. A., Wilson, M. R., eds., London: Chapman and Hall, 1–15.
Cracraft, Joel (1992) “Species Concepts and Speciation Analysis,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, Ereshefsky, M. ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 93–120.
Cracraft, Joel (1997) “Species Concepts in Systematics and Conservation Biology – an Ornithological Viewpoint,” Species: The Units of Biodiversity, Claridge, M. F., Dawah, H.A., Wilson, M. R., eds., London: Chapman and Hall, 325–339.
Cracraft, Joel (2000) “Species Concepts in Theoretical and Applied Biology: A Systematic Debate with Consequences,” Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory, Quentin, Q. D. Wheeler and Meier, R. eds., New York:Columbia University Press, 3–14.
Darwin, Charles (1851) The Complete Works of Charles Darwin Online, University of Cambridge, http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?viewtype=text&itemID=F339.1&keywords=cirripedia&pageseq=1.
Darwin, Charles (1964) On the Origin of Species: A Facsimile of the First Edition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Queiroz, Kevin (1999) “The General Lineage Concept of Species and the Defining Properties of the Species Category,” Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, Wilson, Robert A., ed., Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 49–89.
Queiroz, Kevin (2005) “Ernst Mayr and the Modern Concept of Species,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. CII, suppl. 1, 6600–6607.
Vries, Hugo (1905) Species and Varieties, Their Origin and Mutation, Chicago, IL: Open Court Publishing.
Dennett, Daniel (1995) Darwin's Dangerous Idea, New York:Simon and Schuster.
Devitt, Michael (2008) “Resurrecting Biological Essentialism,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 75, no. 3, 344–382.
Dobzhansky, Theodosius (1937) Genetics and the Origin of Species, New York: Columbia University Press.
Dupré, John (1993) The Disorder of Things: Philosophical Foundations for the Disunity of Science, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dupré, John (1999) “On the Impossibility of a Monistic Account of Species,” Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, Wilson, Robert A., ed., Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 3–19.
Ebbesen, Stan (1990a) “Boethius as an Aristotelian Commentator,” Aristotle Transformed, Sorabji, R., ed., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 373–391.
Ebbeson, Stan (1990b) “Philoponus, Alexander and the Origins of Medieval Logic,” Aristotle Transformed, Sorabji, R., ed., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 445–461.
Ebbeson, Stan (1990c) “Porphyry's Legacy to Logic: A Reconstruction,” Aristotle Transformed, Sorabji, R., ed., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 141–179.
Eldredge, Niles (1995) “Species, Selection, and Paterson's Concept of the Specific-Mate Recognition System,” Speciation and the Recognition Concept, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 464–477.
Eldredge, Niles, and Cracraft, Joel (1980) Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary ProcessNew York: Columbia University Press.
Ereshefsky, Marc (1992) “Species, Higher Taxa, and the Units of Evolution,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, Ereshefsky, M., ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 381–398.
Ereshefsky, Marc (2001) The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of biological Taxonomy, Cambridge University Press.
Eriksson, Gunnar (1983) “Linnaeus the Botanist,” Linnaeus the Man and His WorkFrängsmyr, T., ed., Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 63–109.
Falcon, Andrea (2005) “Commentators on Aristotle,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2005 edn), Zalta, Edward N. ed., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2005/entries/aristotle-commentators/.
Frängsmyr, Tore, ed. (1983) Linnaeus, the Man and His WorkBerkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Frede, Dorothea (2009) “Alexander of Aphrodisias,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2009 edn), Zalta, Edward N. ed., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/alexander-aphrodisias/.
Frege, Gottlob (1990) “On Sense and Nominatum,” reprinted in The Philosophy of Language, Martinich, A.P., ed., Oxford University Press, 190–202.
Ghiselin, Michael, T. (1969) The Triumph of the Darwinian Method, University of Chicago Press.
Ghiselin, Michael T. (1989) “Individuality, History and the Laws of Nature in Biology,” What the Philosophy of Biology Is: Essays Dedicated to David Hull, Ruse, M., ed., Dordrect, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ghiselin, Michael T. (1997) Metaphysics and the Origin of Species, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Gopnik, Alison, and Meltzoff, Andrew N. (1997) Words, Thoughts, and Theories, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
Gotthelf, Allan (1987) “First Principles in Aristotle's Parts of Animals,” Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G., eds., Cambridge University Press, 167–198.
Grene, Marjorie, and Depew, David (2004) The Philosophy of Biology: An Episodic HistoryCambridge University Press.
Griffiths, Paul (1999) “Squaring the Circle, Natural Kinds with Historical Essences,” Species, New Interdisciplinary Essays, Wilson, Robert A., ed., Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 209–228.
Hadot, Pierre (1990) “The Harmony of Plotinus and Aristotle According to Porphyry,” Aristotle Transformed, Sorabji, R., ed., Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 125–140.
Hankinson, R. J. (1994) “Galen and the Logic of Relations,” Aristotle in Late Antiquity, Schrenk, L., ed., Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 57–75.
Hennig, Willi (1977) Phylogenetic Systematics, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Hey, Jody (2001) Genes, Categories and Species: the Evolutionary and Cognitive Causes of the Species Problem, Oxford University Press.
Hull, David L. (1983) Darwin and His Critics, University of Chicago Press.
Hull, David L. (1988) Science as Process: an Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science, University of Chicago Press.
Hull, David L. (1989) The Metaphysics of Evolution, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Hull, David L. (1992a) “The Effect of Essentialism on Taxonomy: Two Thousand Years of Stasis,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of SpeciesEreshefsky, M., ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 199–225.
Hull, David L. (1992b) “A Matter of Individuality,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, Ereshefsky, M., ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 293–316.
Hull, David L. (1997). “The Ideal Species Concept – and Why We Can't Get It,” in Species: the Units of Biodiversity, Claridge, M. F., Dawah, H. A., Wilson, M. R., eds., London: Chapman and Hall, 357–380.
Hull, David L. (1999) “On the Plurality of Species: Questioning the Party Line,” Species: New Interdisciplinary EssaysWilson, Robert A., ed., Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 23–48.
Hull, David L. (2001) Science and Selection: Essays on Biological Evolution and the Philosophy of Science, Cambridge University Press.
Huxley, Julian (1940) The New Systematics, LondonOxford University Press.
Hyman, Arthur and Walsh, James J. (1983) Philosophy in the Middle Ages, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
Jones, W. T. (1969) The Medieval MindSan Diego, CA.: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Kitcher, Philip (1978) “Theories, Theorists and Theoretical Change,” Philosophical Review, 87: 519–547.
Kitcher, Philip (1984) “Against the Monism of the Moment,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 51, no. 4. (December 8), 616–630.
Kitcher, Philip (1992) “Species,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of SpeciesEreshefsky, M., ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 317–341.
Kitcher, Philip (1998) “Explanatory Unification,” Introductory Readings in the Philosophy of ScienceKlemke, E. D., Hollinger, R., Rudge, D. W., eds., Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 278–301.
Kitts, David R. and Kitts, David J. (1979) “Biological Species as Natural Kinds,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 46, no. 4, 613–622.
Klima, Gyula (2003) “Natures: The Problem of Universals,” Cambridge Companion to Medieval Philosophy, McGrade, A. S., ed., Cambridge University Press, 196–207.
Kripke, Saul (1972) Naming and Necessity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kuhn, Thomas (1977) The Essential Tension, The University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, Thomas (1996) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd ednThe University of Chicago Press.
LaPorte, Joseph, (2004) Natural Kinds and Conceptual Change, Cambridge University Press.
Larson, James L. (1968) “The Species Concept of Linnaeus,” Isis, vol. 59, no. 3, 291–299.
Larson, James L. (1971) Reason and Experience: The Representation of Natural Order in the Work of Carl von LinneBerkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Lauden, Larry (1984) Science and Values: The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Lennox, James (1980) “Aristotle on Genera, Species and the More and the Less,” Journal of the History of Biology, 13, 321–346.
Lennox, James (1987a) “Divide and Explain: The Posterior Analytics in Practice,” Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G., eds., Cambridge University Press, 90–119.
(1987b) “Kinds, Forms of Kinds and the More and Less in Aristotle's Biology,” Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, Gotthelf, and Lennox, , eds., Cambridge University Press, 339–359.
(2006) “Aristotle's Biology,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2006 edn), Zalta, Edward N., ed., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2006/entries/aristotle-biology/.
Lewis, David (1983), “Extrinsic Properties,” Philosophical Studies, 44: 197–200.
Lindroth, Sten (1983) “The Two Faces of Linnaeus,” Linnaeus the Man and His Work, Frängsmyr, T., ed., Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1–62.
Linnaeus, Carolus (1964) Systema Naturae, Facsimile of the First EditionEngel-Ledeboer, M. J. S. and Engel, H., eds., Nieuwkoop, Netherlands: B. De Graaf. Publ.
Lovejoy, Arthur O. (1968) “Buffon and the Problem of Species,” Forerunners of Darwin, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 84–113.
Lyell, Charles (1997) Principles of Geology, LondonPenguin Books.
MacLaurin, James and Sterelny, Kim (2008) What is Biodiversity?, University of Chicago Press.
Madigan, Arthur S. J. (1994) “Alexander on Aristotle's Species and Genera as Principles,” Aristotle in Late Antiquity, Schrenk, L., ed., Washington DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 76–91.
Magnello, M. Eileen (1996) “Karl Pearson's Gresham Lectures: W. F. R. Weldon, Speciation and the Origin of Pearsonian Statistics,” British Journal for the History of Science vol. 29, no. 1 (March), 43–63.
Mallet, James (1995) “A Species Definition for the Modern Synthesis,”Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 10, no. 7, 294–299.
Marenbon, John (2005) “Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 edn), Zalta, Edward N., ed., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/boethius/.
Margolis, Eric and Laurence, Stephen (2006) “Concepts,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2007 edn), Zalta, Edward N., ed., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2007/entries/concepts/.
Marrone, Steven P. (2003) “Medieval Philosophy in Context,” Cambridge Companion to Medieval PhilosophyMcGrade, A. S., ed., Cambridge University Press, 10–50.
Mayden, Richard L. (1997) “A Hierarchy of Species Concepts: The Denouement in the Saga of the Species Problem,” Species: The Units of Biodiversity, Claridge, M. F., Dawah, H. A., Wilson, M. R., eds., London: Chapman and Hall, 381–424.
Mayden, Richard L. (1999) “Consilience and a Hierarchy of Species Concepts: Advances Toward Closure on the Species Puzzle,” Journal of Nematology, vol. 31, no. 2, 95–116.
Mayr, Ernst (1942) Systematics and the Origin of Species, New York: Columbia University Press.
Mayr, Ernst (1957a) “Difficulties and Importance of the Biological Species,” The Species Problem, Mayr, , ed. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 371–388.
Mayr, Ernst (1957b) “Species Concepts and Definitions,” The Species ProblemMayr, , ed. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1–22.
Mayr, Ernst (1982) The Growth of Biological Thought, Cambridge, MA, Belknap Press.
Mayr, Ernst (1992) “Species Concepts and Their Application,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, Ereshefsky, M., ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 15–25.
Mayr, Ernst (2000) “The Biological Species Concept,” Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory, Wheeler, Q. D., Quentin and Meier, R., eds., New York: Columbia University Press, 17–29.
Mayr, Ernst and Ashlock, Peter D. (1991) Principles of Systematic Zoology, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Mellor, D. H. (1977) “Natural Kinds,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 28, no. 4, 299–312.
Mellor, D. H. and Oliver, Alex (1997) Properties, Oxford University Press.
Mishler, Brent D. and Brandon, Robert (1987) “Individuality, Pluralism, and the Phylogenetic Species Concept”, Biology and Philosophy, 2: 397–414.
Mishler, Brent D. and Donoghue, Michael (1992) “Species Concepts: A Case for Pluralism,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, Ereshefsky, M., ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 121–137.
Mishler, Brent D., and Theriot, Edward C. (2000) “The Phylogenetic Species Concept (sensu Mishler and Theriot): Monophyly, Apomorphy and the Phylogenetic Species Concept,” Species Concepts and Phylogenetic TheoryWheeler, Q. D., Quentin and Meier, R., eds., New York: Columbia University Press, 44–54.
Mueller, Ian “Aristotle's Doctrine of Abstraction in the Commentators,” Aristotle Transformed, Sorabji, R., ed., Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 463–480.
Murphy, Gregory L., and Medin, Douglas L. (1985) “The Role of Theories in Conceptual Coherence,” Psychological Review, vol. 92, no. 3 (July 1985), 289–316.
,National Research Council Committee on Scientific Issues in the Endangered Species Act (1995) Science and the Endangered Species ActWashington, DC: National Academies Press.
Newton-Smith, W. H. (1994) The Rationality of Science, London: Routledge Press.
Niklas, Karl J. (1997) The Evolutionary Biology of Plants, University of Chicago Press.
Ogilvie, Brian W. (2006) The Science of Describing: Natural History in Renaissance Europe, University of Chicago Press.
Panchen, Alec L. (1992) Classification, Evolution, and the Nature of Biology, Cambridge University Press.
Paterson, Hugh (1992) “The Recognition Concepts of Species,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, Ereshefsky, M., ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 139–158.
Paterson, Hugh (1993) Evolution and the Recognition Concept of Species, Collected Writings of H. E. H. Paterson, McEvey, S. F., ed., Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Peacocke, Christopher (1992) A Study of Concepts, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
Pellegrin, Pierre (1987) “Logical Difference and Biological Difference: The Unity of Aristotle's Thought,” Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G., eds., Cambridge University Press, 313–338.
Peters, F. E. (1967) Greek Philosophical Terms: A Historical Lexicon, New York University Press.
Purvis, O. W. (1997) “The Species Concept in Lichens,” Species: The Units of Biodiversity, Claridge, M. F., Dawah, H.A., Wilson, M. R., eds., London: Chapman and Hall, 109–134.
Putnam, Hilary (1990) “Meaning and Reference,” reprinted in The Philosophy of Language 2nd edn, Martinich, A., ed., New York: Oxford University Press, 308–315.
Quine, W. V. O. (1976) The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1990) “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” reprinted in The Philosophy of Language, 2nd edn, Martinich, A., ed., New York: Oxford University Press, 26–39.
Ray, John (1735) The Wisdom of God Manifested in the Works of Creation 10th edn, London: William Innys and Richard Manby.
Reydon, Thomas A. C. (2003) “Discussion: Species Are Individuals – Or Are They?”, Philosophy of Science, 70: 49–56.
Richards, Janet Radcliffe (2000) Human Nature after Darwin, London: Routledge.
Richards, Richard A. (2002) “Kuhnian Values and Cladistic Parsimony,” Perspectives on Science, vol. 10, no. 1, 1–27.
Richards, Richard A. (2003) “Character Individuation in Phylogenetic Inference,” Philosophy of Science, 70, 264–279.
Richards, Richard A. (2005) “Evolutionary Naturalism and the Logical Structure of Valuation: The Other Side of Error Theory,” Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social, vol. 1, no. 2, 270–294.
Richards, Richard A. (2007a) “Solving the Species Problem: Kitcher and Hull on Sets and Individuals,” Philosophy of Biology, Michael Ruse. ed., Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
Richards, Richard A. (2007b) “The Species Problem: A Philosophical Analysis,” The Encyclopedia of Life Sciences, Chichester: John Wiley.
Richards, Richard A. (2008) “Species and Taxonomy,” Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Biology, Oxford University Press.
Ruse, Michael (1987) “Biological Species: Natural Kinds, Individuals or What?” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 38, no. 2, 225–242.
Ruse, Michael (1992) “Biological Species: Natural Kinds, Individuals, or What?”, The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, Ereshefsky, M., ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 343–361.
Ruse, Michael (1999) The Darwinian Revolution, University of Chicago Press.
Ruse, Michael (1998) Taking Darwin Seriously: A Naturalistic Approach to Philosophy, Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
Sharples, Robert W. (1990) “The School of Alexander?” Aristotle Transformed, Sorabji, R., ed., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 83–111.
Shiel, James (1990) “Boethius' Commentaries on Aristotle,” Aristotle Transformed, Sorabji, R., ed., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 349–372.
Simpson, George Gaylord (1951) “The Species Concept,” Evolution, vol. 5, no. 4, 285–298.
Simpson, George Gaylord (1961) Principles of Animal TaxonomyNew York: Columbia University Press.
Sloan, Philip R. (1976) “The Buffon-Linnaeus Controversy,” Isis, vol. 67, no. 3, 356–375.
Sloan, Philip R. (1979), “Buffon, German Biology, and the Historical Interpretation of Biological Species,” The British Journal for the History of Science, vol. 12, no. 2, 109–153.
Sloan, Philip R. (1985) “From Logical Universals to Historical Individuals,” Histoire du Concept d'Espèce dans les Sciences de la Vie, Paris: Fondation Singer-Polignac.
Sloan, Philip R. (2003) “Reflections on the Species Problem,” The Philosophy of Marjorie Grene, Auxier, R. and Hahn, L. E., eds., Chicago, IL.: Open Court.
Slobodchikoff, C. N. (1976) Concepts of SpeciesStroudsberg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross.
Sneath, P. H. A., and Sokal, Robert R. (1973) Numerical Taxonomy, San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
Soames, Scott (2005) Reference and Description: The Case against Two-Dimensionalism, Princeton University Press.
Sober, Elliott (1980) “Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 47, no. 3, 350–383.
Sober, Elliott (1984) “Sets, Species and Evolution: Comments on Philip Kitcher's ‘Species’,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 51, no. 2, 334–341.
Sober, Elliott (1992) “Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, Ereshefsky, M. ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 247–278.
Sober, Elliott (2000) Philosophy of Biology, 2nd ednBoulder, CO: Westview Press.
Sorabji, Richard (1990) “The Ancient Commentators on Aristotle,” Aristotle Transformed, Sorabji, R., ed., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1–30.
Spade, Paul Vincent (2008) “William of Ockham,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008edn), Zalta, Edward N. ed., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/ockham/.
Stafleu, Frans A. (1971) Linnaeus and the Linnaeans, Utrecht, Netherlands: A. Oosthooek's Uitgeversmaatschappij.
Stamos, David, (2003) The Species Problem, Lanhan, MD: Lexington Books.
Stamos, David, (2007) Darwin and the Nature of Species, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Stauffer, Robert C. (1975) Charles Darwin's Natural Selection, Cambridge University Press.
Stott, Rebecca (2003) Darwin and the BarnacleNew York: W. W. Norton and Company.
Templeton, Alan (1992) “The Meaning of Species and Speciation: A Genetic Perspective,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, Ereshefsky, M., ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 159–183.
Thompson, Augustine (1995) “The Debate on Universals Before Peter Abelard,” The Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 33, no. 3, 409–429.
Valen, Leigh (1992) “Ecological Species, Multispecies, and Oaks,” The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, Ereshefsky, M., ed., Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 69–77.
Wheeler, Quentin D. and Platnick, Norman I. (2000) “The Phylogenetic Species Concept (sensu Wheeler and Platnick),” Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory, Wheeler, Q. D., Quentin and Meier, R. eds., New York: Columbia University Press, 55–69.
Whewell, William (1984) Selected Writings on the History of Science, University of Chicago Press.
Whewell, William (1989) Theory of Scientific MethodButts, R. E., ed., Indianapolis, IN.: Hackett Publishing.
Wiley, E. O. (1981) Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Wiley, E. O., and Mayden, Richard L. (2000) “The Evolutionary Species Concept,” Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory, Wheeler, Q. D., Quentin and Meier, R., eds., New York: Columbia University Press, 70–89.
Williams, Mary B. (1989) “Evolvers are Individuals: Extension of the Species as Individuals Claim,” What the Philosophy of Biology Is: Essays dedicated to David Hull, Ruse, M., ed., Dordrect, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 301–308.
Wilson, Edward O. (2000) Sociobiology: The New Synthesis, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wilson, Leonard G. (1970) Sir Charles Lyell's Scientific Journals on the Species Question, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Wilson, Robert A. (1999) “Realism, Essence, and Kind: Resuscitating Species Essentialism?” Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, Wilson, Robert A., ed., Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 187–207.
Winsor, Mary (2003) “Non-essentialist Methods in Pre-Darwinian Taxonomy,” Biology and Philosophy, 18: 387–400.
Winsor, Mary (2006a) “The Creation of the Essentialism Story: An Exercise in Metahistory,” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 28, 149–174.
Winsor, Mary (2006b) “Linnaeus's Biology was not Essentialist,” Annuals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 93: 2–7.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1968) Philosophical Investigations, New York: MacMillan Publishing Co.
Zimmer, Carl (2008) “What Is a Species,” Scientific American (June), 72–79.
Zirkle, Conway (1959) “Species Before Dawin,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, vol. 103, no. 5, 636–644.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.