Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T04:56:55.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Conclusion

Presence and the Art of Improvisational Teaching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Lisa Barker  and
Hilda Borko
Edited by
R. Keith Sawyer
Lisa Barker
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Hilda Borko
Affiliation:
Stanford University
R. Keith Sawyer
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Get access

Summary

In the introductory chapter of this volume (see Chapter 1), Keith Sawyer states that the goal for this book is “to present a new theory of professional pedagogical practice” (p. 13). At the core of this new theory is the premise that “balancing structure and improvisation is the essence of the art of teaching” (p. 2). The phrase “the art of teaching” suggests that teaching – like any interactive craft that includes collaboration or live performance (e.g., “the art of conversation”) – entails two inter-related facets of expertise: mastery of a body of fundamental principles or methods governing the craft (i.e., “structure”) and mastery of skills in conducting human activity (i.e., “improvisation”). The educational scholars represented in this book share this conception of teaching; they view teaching as an improvisational activity, and they contend that “what makes good teachers great” is disciplined improvisation. Each chapter either explicitly or implicitly address the question: How can the principles of artistic improvisation in theater, music, and dance be adapted for interactive educational contexts – from student learning in public school classrooms to teacher learning at the university level? In this chapter, we discuss this body of work through the lens of two additional guiding questions:

  1. What does this multi-layered “theory of professional pedagogical practice” look like, and how does this theory contribute to our understanding of teaching, learning, and curriculum development?

  2. What do this theory and these applied principles mean for teacher education?

Type
Chapter
Information
Structure and Improvisation in Creative Teaching , pp. 279 - 298
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cazden, C. B. (1986). Classroom discourse. In Wittrock, M. C. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (pp. 432–463). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Christensen, C. R. (1991). The discussion teacher in action: Questioning, listening, and response. In Christensen, C. R., Garvin, D. A., & Sweet, A. (Eds.), Education for Judgment: The Artistry of Discussion Leadership (pp. 153–172). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience & education. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
Eisner, E. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Graff, G. (2003). Clueless in Academe: How schooling obscures the life of the mind. New Haven, CT: Yale.Google Scholar
Greene, M. (1973). Teacher as stranger. Buena Vista, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. W. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100.Google Scholar
Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15, 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, P. & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 184–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, K. (1979). Impro: Improvisation and the theatre. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
King, M. L., Jr. (1997). “Letter from Birmingham Jail.” In Gates, H. L., Jr. and McKay, N. Y. (Eds.), The Norton Anthology of African American Literature (pp. 1854–1866). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Labaree, D. F. (2000). On the nature of teaching and teacher education: Difficult practices that look easy. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 228–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meijer, P. C., Korthagen, F. A. J., & Vasalos, A. (2009). Supporting presence in teacher education: The connection between the personal and professional aspects of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nystrand, M. & Gamoran, A. (1997). The big picture: Language and Learning in hundreds of English lessons. In Nystrand, M., Gamoran, A., Kachur, R., & Prendergast, C. (Eds.), Opening Dialogue: Understanding the Dynamics of Language and Learning in the English Classroom (pp. 30–74). New York: Teachers College.Google Scholar
O’Connor, M.C. & Michaels, S. (1996). Shifting participant frameworks: Orchestrating thinking practices in group discussion. In Hicks, D. (Ed.), Discourse, Learning, and Schooling (pp. 63–103). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, P. J. (1998). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Palmer, P. J. (2003). Teaching with heart and soul: Reflections on spirituality in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 376–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodgers, C. R. & Raider-Roth, M. B. (2006). Presence in teaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 12(3), 265–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rud, A. G., Jr. (1995). Learning in comfort: Developing an ethos of hospitality in education. In Garrison, J. W. & Rud, A. G. Jr. (Eds.), The Educational Conversation: Closing the Gap (pp. 119–128). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Ryan Madson, P. (2005). Improv wisdom. New York: Bell Tower.Google Scholar
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Schwab, J. J. (1978). The practical: Translation into curriculum. In Westbury, I. and Wilkoff, N. J. (Eds.), Science Curriculum and Liberal Education: Selected Essays of Joseph J. Schwab (pp. 259–286). Orlando, FL: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spolin, V. (1963). Improvisation for the theater. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Conclusion
  • Edited by R. Keith Sawyer, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: Structure and Improvisation in Creative Teaching
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511997105.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Conclusion
  • Edited by R. Keith Sawyer, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: Structure and Improvisation in Creative Teaching
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511997105.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Conclusion
  • Edited by R. Keith Sawyer, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: Structure and Improvisation in Creative Teaching
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511997105.014
Available formats
×