Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-15T00:36:23.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Improvising within the System

Creating New Teacher Performances in Inner-City Schools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Carrie Lobman
Edited by
R. Keith Sawyer
Carrie Lobman
Affiliation:
Rutgers Graduate School of Education
R. Keith Sawyer
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Get access

Summary

Teachers’ lives are dominated by scripts: the overt scripts of the curriculum, the “hidden” scripts of race, class, language, and culture, and the societal scripts of how teachers and students are supposed to relate to each other. All of these, however, are informed by the meta-script that the primary job of the teacher is to help children acquire knowledge and skills – a deeply embedded cultural model of teaching and learning that has been referred to as instructionism (Papert, 1994), as transmission and acquisition (Rogoff, 1990; Sfard, 1998), or as the banking model (Freire, 1994). Teachers are supposed to find the best techniques for helping children learn more so that they can know more. Reform efforts that aim at addressing the current problems in education generally attempt to make such learning more efficient, equitable, or accountable through smaller classes, culturally relevant pedagogy, and a major focus on testing and assessment. By many accounts (Darling-Hammond, 2007; Kohn, 2004; Kozol, 2005; Meier & Wood, 2004; Sizer, 2004), these efforts are not succeeding.

Type
Chapter
Information
Structure and Improvisation in Creative Teaching , pp. 73 - 93
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker-Sennett, J. & Matusov, E. (1997). School “performances”: Improvisational processes in development and education. In Sawyer, K. (Ed.), Creativity in performance (pp. 197–212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Berger, K. (2009). The developing person through childhood and adolescence. New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
Berk, L. & Winsler, A. (1995). Scaffolding children’s learning: Vygotsky and early childhood learning. Washington DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.Google Scholar
Bodrova, E. & Leong, D. J. (1996). Tools the mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Borko, H. & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 473–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, M. (1985). The zone of proximal development: Where culture and cognition create each other. In Wertsch, J. (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 146–162). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, M. (1998). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, M. (1999). Cultural psychology: Some general principles and a concrete example. In Engeström, Y. & Punamaki, R. L. (Eds.), Perspective on activity theory (pp. 87–106). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, M. & The Distributed Literacy Consortium. (Ed.). (2006). The Fifth Dimension. An after-school program built on diversity. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Comer, J. P. & Gates, H. L. (2004). Leave no child behind: Preparing today’s youth for tomorrow’s world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Daniels, H., Cole, M., & Wertsch, J. (Eds.). (2007). The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Darling-Hammond, L. (2007). Evaluating no child left behind. Retrieved March 27, 2009 from
Davis, J. (2005). Framing education as art: The octopus has a good day. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Egan, K. (1992). Imagination in teaching and learning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Eisner, E. (1998). The kind of schools we need. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Eisner, E. (2005). Re-imagining schools: The selected works of Eliot Eisner. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Farmer, E. (2008). From passive objects to active subjects: Young people, performance and possibility. Journal of the Community Development Society, 39(2), 60–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freire, P. (1994). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum Books.Google Scholar
Fulani, L. & Kurlander, G. (2009). Development gap or achievement gap? Outliers and outsiders reconsider an old problem. New York: All Stars Project.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Goldstein, L. (1999). The relational zone: The role of caring relationships in the construction of the mind. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 647–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, E., Bowman, C. & Mejia, B. (2003). changing the script for youth development: An evaluation of the all stars talent show network and the Joseph A. Forgione development school for youth. New York: Institute for Urban and Minority Education, Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Greene, M. (1988). The dialectics of freedom. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Heath, S. (2000). Making learning work. Afterschool Matters, 1(1), 33–45.Google Scholar
Holzman, L. (1997). Schools for growth: Radical alternatives to current educational models. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Holzman, L. (2000). Performative psychology: An untapped resource for educators. Educational and Child Psychology, 17(3), 86–103.Google Scholar
Holzman, L. (2009). Vygotsky at work and play. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johnstone, K. (1981). Impro: Improvisation and the theater. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Karliner, S. & Holzman, L. (2005). Developing a psychology that builds community and respects diversity. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Convention, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Kohn, A. (2004). NCLB and the effort to privatize public education. In Meier, D. & Kozol, G. (Eds.). (2005), The shame of the nation: The restoration of apartheid schooling in America. New York: Three Rivers Press.Google Scholar
Kozol, J. (2005). The shame of the nation: The restoration of apartheid schooling in America. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
Lobman, C. (2005). Yes and: The uses of improvisation for early childhood teacher development. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 26(3), 305–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobman, C. & Lundquist, M . (2007). Unscripted learning: Using improv activities across the K-8 curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Meier, D. & Wood, G. (2004). Many children left behind: How the no child left behind act is damaging our children and our schools. New York: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Moll, L. (1992). Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nachmanovich, S. (1990). Free play: Improvisation in life and art. New York: Penguin/Putnam.Google Scholar
Newman, F. & Holzman, L. (1993). Lev Vygotsky: Revolutionary scientist. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Newman, F. & Holzman, L. (1996). Unscientific psychology: A cultural-performatory approach to understanding human life. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Newman, F. & Holzman, L. (1997). The end of knowing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Noddings, N. (2005). What does it take to educate the whole child?Educational Leadership, 63(1), 8–13.Google Scholar
Papert, S. (1994). The children’s machine. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. & Gardner, W . (1984). Guidance in cognitive development: An examination of mother-child instruction. In Rogoff, B. and Lave, J. (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 95–116). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sawyer, K. (1997a). Improvisational theater: An ethnotheory of conversational practice. In Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.), Creativity in performance (pp. 171–193). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Sawyer, K. (1997b). Pretend play as improvisation: Conversation in the preschool classroom. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sawyer, K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sizer, T. (2004). Preamble: A reminder for Americans. In Meier, D. & Wood, G. (Eds.), Many children left behind: How the no child left behind act is damaging our children and our schools (pp. xvii–xxii). New York: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Smagorinsky, P. (2007). Vygotsky and the social dynamics of classrooms. English Journal, 97(2), 61–66.Google Scholar
Spolin, V. (1999). Improvisation for the theater (3rd ed.). Chicago: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wertsch, J. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Yinger, R. (1980). A study of teacher planning. The Elementary School Journal, 80, 107–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yinger, R. (1987). By the seat of your pants: An inquiry into improvisation and teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Improvising within the System
  • Edited by R. Keith Sawyer, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: Structure and Improvisation in Creative Teaching
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511997105.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Improvising within the System
  • Edited by R. Keith Sawyer, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: Structure and Improvisation in Creative Teaching
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511997105.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Improvising within the System
  • Edited by R. Keith Sawyer, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: Structure and Improvisation in Creative Teaching
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511997105.005
Available formats
×