Book contents
- Sustaining Early Childhood Learning Gains
- Reviews
- Sustaining Early Childhood Learning Gains
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Program Dosage and Quality
- Part II Continuity from Preschool to Third Grade
- 6 Patterns of Experiences across Head Start and Kindergarten Classrooms That Promote Children’s Development
- 7 Quality and Continuity in Young Children’s Educational Experiences
- 8 The Child–Parent Center Preschool-to-Third-Grade Program
- 9 State Policies That Support Children’s Literacy through Pre-K–Third Grade Education
- Part III School and Family Processes of Impacts over Time
- Part IV Synthesis and Guiding Principles
- Subject Index
- Name Index
- References
9 - State Policies That Support Children’s Literacy through Pre-K–Third Grade Education
from Part II - Continuity from Preschool to Third Grade
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 December 2018
Book contents
- Sustaining Early Childhood Learning Gains
- Reviews
- Sustaining Early Childhood Learning Gains
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Program Dosage and Quality
- Part II Continuity from Preschool to Third Grade
- 6 Patterns of Experiences across Head Start and Kindergarten Classrooms That Promote Children’s Development
- 7 Quality and Continuity in Young Children’s Educational Experiences
- 8 The Child–Parent Center Preschool-to-Third-Grade Program
- 9 State Policies That Support Children’s Literacy through Pre-K–Third Grade Education
- Part III School and Family Processes of Impacts over Time
- Part IV Synthesis and Guiding Principles
- Subject Index
- Name Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Sustaining Early Childhood Learning GainsProgram, School, and Family Influences, pp. 210 - 232Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Allen, L. R. & Kelly, B. B. (Eds.). (2015). Transforming the Workforce for Children Birth through Age 8: A Unifying Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Baker, B. D., Sciarra, D. G. & Farrie, D. (2015 ). Is School Funding Fair? A National Report Card. (4th edn.) Newark, NJ: Education Law Center.Google Scholar
Barnett, W. S., Carolan, M. E., Squires, J. H., Clarke Brown, K. & Horowitz, M. (2015). The State of Preschool 2014: State Preschool Yearbook. New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Education Research.Google Scholar
Barnett, W. S., Jung, K., Youn, M., & Frede, E. C. (2013). Abbott Preschool program longitudinal effects study: Fifth grade follow-up. New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Education Research, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Belway, S., Durán, M. & Spielberg, L. (2013). State Laws on Family Engagement in Education. Alexandria, VA: National PTA.Google Scholar
Bornfreund, L. (2011). Getting in Sync: Revamping Licensing and Preparation for Teachers in Pre-K, Kindergarten and the Early Grades. Washington, DC: New America.Google Scholar
Bornfreund, L., McCann, C., Williams, C. & Guernsey, L. (2014). Beyond Subprime Learning: Accelerating Progress in Early Education. Washington, DC: New America.Google Scholar
Bornfreund, L., Cook, S., Lieberman, A. & Williams, C. (2015, November). Scan of Birth-through-Third Grade Policies with a Focus on Literacy (title). Washington, DC: New America.Google Scholar
Campbell, F. A., Ramey, C. T., Pungello, E. Sparling, J., & Miller-Johnson, S. (2002). Early childhood education: Young adult outcomes from the Abecedarian Project. Applied Developmental Science, 6(1), 42–57.Google Scholar
Cannon, J., Jacknowitz, A. & Painter, G. (2011). The effect of attending full-day kindergarten on English learner students. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30(2), 297–309.Google Scholar
Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N. & Rockoff, J. E. (2013). Measuring the Impacts of Teachers II: Teacher Value-Added and Student Outcomes in Adulthood. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Children’s Defense Fund. (2014, June). The facts about full-day kindergarten. Retrieved from www.childrensdefense.org/library/data/the-facts-about-full-day.pdf.Google Scholar
Children’s Defense Fund. (2013). Full-Day Kindergarten in the States. Retrieved from www.childrensdefense.org/library/data/state-data-repository/full-day-k/full-day-kindergarten-states-2012.html?referrer=https://www.google.com.Google Scholar
Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL). (2014). Identifying K–12 standards for SEL in all 50 states.Google Scholar
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D. & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: a meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432.Google Scholar
Early Childhood Data Collaborative. (2014, February). 2013 State of States’ Early Childhood Data Systems. Washington, DC: ECDC.Google Scholar
Education Commission of the States. (2014). 50-State Comparison: English Language Learners. Retrieved from www.ecs.org/english-language-learners/.Google Scholar
Fernald, A., Marchman, V. A. & Weisleder, A. (2013). SES differences in language processing skill and vocabulary are evident at 18 months. Developmental Science, 16, 234–248.Google Scholar
Graves, B. (2006). PK–3: What Is It and How Do We Know It Works? New York, NY: Foundation for Child Development.Google Scholar
Guernsey, L., Bornfreund, L., McCann, C. & Williams, C. (2014). Subprime Learning: Early Education in America Since the Great Recession. Washington, DC: New America.Google Scholar
Hart, B. & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children. Baltimore, MD: P. H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Hirsch Jr., E. D., Apple, M. W. & Rochester, J. M. (2005). Education Reform and Content: The Long View. Brookings Papers on Education Policy, No. 8 (pp. 175–207). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Jimerson, S. R. (2001). Meta-analysis of grade retention research: Implications for practice in the 21st century. School Psychology Review, 30(3), 420–437.Google Scholar
Kagan, S. L. & Neuman, M. J. (1998, March). Lessons from three decades of transition research The Elementary School Journal, 98(4), 365–379.Google Scholar
Kauerz, K. & Coffman, J. (2013, March). Framework for Planning, Implementing, and Evaluating Pre-K–3rd Grade Approaches. Seattle, WA: College of Education, Univ. of Washington.Google Scholar
Lesaux, N. K. (2010). Turning the Page: Refocusing Massachusetts for Reading Success: Strategies for Improving Children’s Language and Literacy Development, Birth to Age 9. Boston, MA: Strategies for Children.Google Scholar
Lesaux, N. K. (2013). PreK–3rd: Getting Literacy Instruction Right. New York, NY: Foundation for Child Development.Google Scholar
Manship, K., Farber, J., Smith, C., & Drummond, K. (2016). Case studies of schools implementing early elementary strategies: Preschool through third grade alignment and differentiated instruction. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development (Prepared by the American Institutes for Research, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
Mead, S. (2011). PreK–3rd: Principals as Crucial Instructional Leaders. New York, NY: Foundation for Child Development. Retrieved from http://fcd-us.org/sites/default/files/FCD%20PrincipalsBrief7.pdfGoogle Scholar
Meyer, L. A., Gersten, R. M. & Gutkin, J. (1983, November). Direct instruction: a project follow through success story in an inner-city school. The Elementary School Journal, 84(2), 241–252.Google Scholar
Millard, M. (2015). State Funding Mechanisms for English Language Learners. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.Google Scholar
Murnane, R. J. & Steele, J. L. (2007). What is the problem? The challenge of providing effective teachers for all children. The Future of Children, 17(1), 15–43.Google Scholar
NACCRRA (Now Child Care Aware). (2013). We Can Do Better: State Child Care Center Licensing, 2013 Update. Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2014). State Profiles: Early Childhood Teacher Certification.Google Scholar
National Association of Elementary School Principals. (2014). Leading PreK–3 learning Communities: Competencies for Effective Principal Practice. Alexandria, VA.Google Scholar
National Center for Educational Statistics. (2013). A First Look: 2013 Mathematics and Reading: National Assessment of Educational Progress at Grades 4 and 8. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.Google Scholar
National Conference of State Legislatures. (2015, April 24). Funding Pre-K through the school funding formula.Google Scholar
National Council on Teacher Quality. (2014, January). 2013 State Teacher Policy Yearbook: National Summary. Washington, DC: NCTQ.Google Scholar
National Governors Association. (2013). Leading for Early Success: Building School Principals’ Capacity to Lead High-Quality Early Education. Washington, DC: NGA.Google Scholar
Nyhan, P. (2013). i3 grant tests potential reach one country’s oldest PreK–3rd programs. EdCentral blog, New America. www.newamerica.org/education-policy/edcentral.Google Scholar
PreK–12 financing overview. (updated 2015, June 29). New America Atlas website. Retrieved from http://atlas.newamerica.org/school-financeGoogle Scholar
US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. (2010, January). Head Start Impact Study. Final Report. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Reynolds, A. J. (2000). Success in early intervention: The Chicago Child-Parent Centers and youth through age 15. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press (Reprinted 2012).Google Scholar
Reynolds, A. J., Richardson, B. A., Hayakawa, M., Englund, M. M., & Ou, S. (2016a). Multi-site expansion of an early childhood intervention and school readiness. Pediatrics, 138(1). doi: e20154587.Google Scholar
Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., White, B. A., Ou, S., & Robertson, D. L. (2011). Age-26 cost-benefit analysis of the Child-Parent Center education program. Child Development, 82, 782–804.Google Scholar
Reynolds, A. J., Hayakawa, M, Candee, A. J., Englund, M. M. (2016b). CPC P-3 Program Manual: Child-Parent Center Preschool-3rd Grade Program. Minneapolis: Human Capital Research Collaborative, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E. & Van Hemel, S. B. (Eds.) (2008). Early Childhood Assessment: Why, What, and How. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, L. M. (1971). Let us not underestimate the children. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foreman.Google Scholar
Thomas, W. P. & Collier, V. P. (2002). A National Study of School Effectiveness for Language Minority Students’ Long-Term Academic Achievement. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity and Excellence.Google Scholar
Weisberg, D. (2009). The Widget Effect: Our National Failure to Acknowledge and Act on Differences in Teacher Effectiveness. Brooklyn, NY: The New Teacher Project.Google Scholar
Workman, E. (2013, March). Inequalities at the Starting Line: State Kindergarten Policies. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.Google Scholar
Workman, E. (2014, December). Third-Grade Reading Policies. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.Google Scholar
Yoshikawa, H., Weiland, C., Brooks-Gunn, J. et al. (2013, October). Investing in Our Future: The Evidence Base on Preschool Education. New York, NY: Foundation for Child Development.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by