Text: de Budé, Guy, and Martin, Victor. 1927. Eschine: Discours (2 vols.). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Translation: Adams, Charles D. 1919. The speeches of Aeschines. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press/London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar

Text: Page, Denys. 1972. Aeschyli septem quae supersunt tragoediae. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Translation: Sommerstein, Alan H. 2008. Aeschylus (2 vols.). Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Dalmeyda, Georges. 1930. Andocide: Discours. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Text: Wilson, Nigel G. 2007. Aristophanis fabulae (2 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Translation: Henderson, Jeffrey. 1998–2002. Aristophanes (vols. 1–4). Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ross, William D. 1959. Aristotelis ars rhetorica. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

The years of Lyndon Johnson: Master of the senate. 2003. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Radermacher, Ludwig. 1901. Demetrii Phalerei qui dicitur de elocutione libellus. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

Text: Butcher, Samuel H., and Rennie, William. 1903–1931. Demosthenis orationes (3 vols.). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Translations: Murray, A. T. 1936–1939. Demosthenes: Speeches (vols. 4–6). Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Vince, C. A., and Vince, James H.. 1926. Demosthenes II: De corona, De falsa legatione. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press/London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar

Conomis, Nicos C. 1975. Dinarchi orationes cum fragmentis. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

Radermacher, Ludwig, and Usener, Hermann. 1899. Dionysii Halicarnasei quae exstant (vol. v). Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

La page du duc de Savoie [The page of the duke of Savoy]. 1974 (vol. i). Geneva: Famot.Google Scholar

Les mohicans de Paris [Mohicans of Paris]. 1998 (vol. i). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Texts: Diggle, James. 1970. Euripides: Phaethon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Diggle, James. 1981–1994. Euripidis fabulae (3 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Translation: Kovacs, David. 1994–2002. Euripides (6 vols.). Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hude, Karl. 1927.³ Herodoti historiae (2 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tom Brown’s schooldays. 1994. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Jensen, Christian C. 1917. Hyperidis orationes sex cum ceterarum fragmentis. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

Roussel, Pierre. 1960.² Isée: Discours. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Brémond, Émile, and Mathieu, Georges. 1929. Isocrate: Discours (4 vols.). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Russell, Donald A. 1974. Libellus de sublimitate Dionysio Longino fere adscriptus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Conomis, Nicos C. (building on work by Carl Scheibe and Friedrich Blass) 1970. Lycurgi oratio in Leocratem. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

Carey, Christopher. 2007. Lysiae orationes cum fragmentis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sandbach, Francis H. 1990. Menandri reliquiae selectae. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jakoby, Felix. 1904. Das Marmor Parium. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar

Jakoby, Felix. 1929. Die Fragmente der griechischen Historiker (vol. ii, part ii). Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar

Rotstein, Andrea. 2016. Literary History in the Parian Marble. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies. https://chs.harvard.edu/CHS/article/display/6492.andrea-rotstein-literary-history-in-the-parian-marble.Google Scholar

Fowler, Robert L. 2000. Early Greek mythography (vol. i). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Burnet, John. 1910.² Platonis opera (vol. ii). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Slings, Simon R. 2003. Platonis respublica. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Macbeth. 1977. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Text: Lloyd-Jones, Hugh, and Wilson, Nigel G.. 1990. Sophoclis fabulae. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Translations: Jebb, Richard C. 1908.² Sophocles, the plays and fragments. Part V: The Trachiniae. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lloyd-Jones, Hugh. 1994. Sophocles (2 vols.). Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Wimmer, Friedrich. 1862. Theophrasti Eresii opera quae supersunt omnia. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

Text: Jones, Henry S., and Powell, John E.. 1942. Thucydidis historiae (2 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Translations: Dent, J. M. 1910. Thucydides: History of the Peloponnesian War. New York: E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar

Smith, Charles F. 1919. Thucydides (vol. i). London: William Heinemann/New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar

Mynors, R. A. B. 1969. P. Vergili Maronis opera. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Psmith in the city. 1975. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Text: Marchant, Edgar C. 1900–1910. Xenophontis opera omnia (vols. 1, 3, 4). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Translation: Brownson, Charleton L. 1921. Xenophon: Hellenica, books VI and VII; Anabasis, books I-III. London: William Heinemann/New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar

Text: de Budé, Guy, and Martin, Victor. 1927. Eschine: Discours (2 vols.). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Translation: Adams, Charles D. 1919. The speeches of Aeschines. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press/London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar

Text: Page, Denys. 1972. Aeschyli septem quae supersunt tragoediae. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Translation: Sommerstein, Alan H. 2008. Aeschylus (2 vols.). Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Dalmeyda, Georges. 1930. Andocide: Discours. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Text: Wilson, Nigel G. 2007. Aristophanis fabulae (2 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Translation: Henderson, Jeffrey. 1998–2002. Aristophanes (vols. 1–4). Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ross, William D. 1959. Aristotelis ars rhetorica. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

The years of Lyndon Johnson: Master of the senate. 2003. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Radermacher, Ludwig. 1901. Demetrii Phalerei qui dicitur de elocutione libellus. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

Text: Butcher, Samuel H., and Rennie, William. 1903–1931. Demosthenis orationes (3 vols.). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Translations: Murray, A. T. 1936–1939. Demosthenes: Speeches (vols. 4–6). Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Vince, C. A., and Vince, James H.. 1926. Demosthenes II: De corona, De falsa legatione. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press/London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar

Conomis, Nicos C. 1975. Dinarchi orationes cum fragmentis. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

Radermacher, Ludwig, and Usener, Hermann. 1899. Dionysii Halicarnasei quae exstant (vol. v). Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

La page du duc de Savoie [The page of the duke of Savoy]. 1974 (vol. i). Geneva: Famot.Google Scholar

Les mohicans de Paris [Mohicans of Paris]. 1998 (vol. i). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Texts: Diggle, James. 1970. Euripides: Phaethon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Diggle, James. 1981–1994. Euripidis fabulae (3 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Translation: Kovacs, David. 1994–2002. Euripides (6 vols.). Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hude, Karl. 1927.³ Herodoti historiae (2 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tom Brown’s schooldays. 1994. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Jensen, Christian C. 1917. Hyperidis orationes sex cum ceterarum fragmentis. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

Roussel, Pierre. 1960.² Isée: Discours. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Brémond, Émile, and Mathieu, Georges. 1929. Isocrate: Discours (4 vols.). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Russell, Donald A. 1974. Libellus de sublimitate Dionysio Longino fere adscriptus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Conomis, Nicos C. (building on work by Carl Scheibe and Friedrich Blass) 1970. Lycurgi oratio in Leocratem. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

Carey, Christopher. 2007. Lysiae orationes cum fragmentis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sandbach, Francis H. 1990. Menandri reliquiae selectae. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jakoby, Felix. 1904. Das Marmor Parium. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar

Jakoby, Felix. 1929. Die Fragmente der griechischen Historiker (vol. ii, part ii). Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar

Rotstein, Andrea. 2016. Literary History in the Parian Marble. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies. https://chs.harvard.edu/CHS/article/display/6492.andrea-rotstein-literary-history-in-the-parian-marble.Google Scholar

Fowler, Robert L. 2000. Early Greek mythography (vol. i). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Burnet, John. 1910.² Platonis opera (vol. ii). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Slings, Simon R. 2003. Platonis respublica. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Macbeth. 1977. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Text: Lloyd-Jones, Hugh, and Wilson, Nigel G.. 1990. Sophoclis fabulae. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Translations: Jebb, Richard C. 1908.² Sophocles, the plays and fragments. Part V: The Trachiniae. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lloyd-Jones, Hugh. 1994. Sophocles (2 vols.). Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Wimmer, Friedrich. 1862. Theophrasti Eresii opera quae supersunt omnia. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

Text: Jones, Henry S., and Powell, John E.. 1942. Thucydidis historiae (2 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Translations: Dent, J. M. 1910. Thucydides: History of the Peloponnesian War. New York: E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar

Smith, Charles F. 1919. Thucydides (vol. i). London: William Heinemann/New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar

Mynors, R. A. B. 1969. P. Vergili Maronis opera. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Psmith in the city. 1975. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Text: Marchant, Edgar C. 1900–1910. Xenophontis opera omnia (vols. 1, 3, 4). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Translation: Brownson, Charleton L. 1921. Xenophon: Hellenica, books VI and VII; Anabasis, books I-III. London: William Heinemann/New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar

Adema, Suzanne M. 2008. Discourse modes and bases: A study of the use of tenses in Vergil’s Aeneid. PhD dissertation, Free University Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Adema, Suzanne M. 2019. Tenses in Vergil’s Aeneid: Narrative style and structure. Leiden and Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aerts, Simon. 2014. A systemic functional ‘three-dimensional’ approach to aspect in Thucydides’ Histories III. Symbolae Osloenses 88, 2–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahlner, Felix, and Zlatev, Jordan. 2010. Cross-modal iconicity: A cognitive semiotic approach to sound symbolism. Sign Systems Studies 38.1, 298–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allan, Rutger J. 2003. The middle voice in ancient Greek: A study in polysemy. Amsterdam: Gieben.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allan, Rutger J. 2007. Sense and sentence complexity: Sentence structure, sentence connection, and tense-aspect as indicators of narrative mode in Thucydides’ Histories. In Allan, Rutger J. and Buijs, Michel (eds.). The language of literature: Linguistic approaches to classical texts. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 93–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allan, Rutger J. 2009. Towards a typology of the narrative modes in ancient Greek: Text types and narrative structure in Euripidean messenger speeches. In Bakker, Stéphanie J. and Wakker, Gerry C. (eds.). Discourse cohesion in ancient Greek. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 171–204.Google Scholar

Allan, Rutger J. 2011a. The historical present in Thucydides: Capturing the case of αἱρεῖ and λαμβάνει. In Lallot, Jean et al. (eds.). The historical present in Thucydides: Semantics and narrative function. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 37–63.Google Scholar

Allan, Rutger J. 2011b. (one of ‘quatre excercices’) 1. The Archaeology: The case of γίγνεται. 2. Themistocles. In Lallot, Jean et al. (eds.) The historical present in Thucydides: Semantics and narrative function. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 243–51.Google Scholar

Allan, Rutger J. 2013. History as presence: Time, tense and narrative modes in Thucydides. In Tsakmakis, Antonis and Tamiolaki, Mélina (eds.). Thucydides between history and literature. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. 371–90.Google Scholar

Allan, Rutger J. 2014. Changing the topic: Topic positions in ancient Greek word order. Mnemosyne 67.2, 181–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allan, Rutger J. 2017. The imperfect unbound: A cognitive linguistic approach to Greek aspect. In Bentein, Klaas, Janse, Mark and Soltic, Jorie (eds.). Variation and change in ancient Greek tense, aspect and modality. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 100–30.Google Scholar

Allan, Rutger J. 2018. Herodotus and Thucydides: Distance and immersion. In van Gils, Lidewij, de Jong, Irene J. F. and Kroon, Caroline (eds.). Textual strategies in ancient war narrative: Thermopylae, Cannae and beyond. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 131–54.Google Scholar

Allan, Rutger J., de Jong, Irene J. F. and de Jonge, Casper C.. 2017. From enargeia to immersion: The ancient roots of a modern concept. Style 51.1, 34–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ariel, Mira. 2001. Accessibility theory: An overview. In Sanders, Ted, Schilperoord, Joost and Spooren, Wilbert (eds.). Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 29–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asher, Nicholas, and Lascarides, Alex. 2003. Logics of conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Badian, Ernst, and Heskel, Julia. 1987. Aeschines 2.12–18: A study in rhetoric and chronology. Phoenix 41.3, 264–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakker, Egbert J. 1993. Boundaries, topics, and the structure of discourse: An investigation of the ancient Greek particle dé. Studies in Language 17.2, 275–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakker, Egbert J. 1997. Verbal aspect and mimetic description in Thucydides. In Bakker, Egbert J. (ed.). Grammar as interpretation: Greek literature in its linguistic contexts. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 7–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakker, Egbert J. 2006. Contract and design: Thucydides’ writing. In Rengakos, Antonis and Tsakmakis, Antonis (eds.). Brill’s companion to Thucydides. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 109–29.Google Scholar

Bakker, Stéphanie J. 2009. On the curious combination of the particles γάρ and οὖν. In Bakker, Stéphanie J. and Wakker, Gerry C. (eds.). Discourse cohesion in ancient Greek. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bal, Mieke. 2014. Narratology: Introduction to the theory of narrative. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Bary, Corien L. A. 2012. The ancient Greek tragic aorist revisited. Glotta 88, 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Basset, Louis. 2009. The use of the imperfect to express completed states of affairs: The imperfect as a marker of narrative cohesion. In Bakker, Stéphanie J. and Wakker, Gerry C. (eds.). Discourse cohesion in ancient Greek. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 205–19.Google Scholar

Beekes, Robert S. P. (with the assistance of Lucien van Beek). 2010. Etymological dictionary of Greek (2 vols.). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Benveniste, Emile. 1959. Les relations de temps dans le verbe français. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 54, 237–50.Google Scholar

Bergen, Benjamin K. 2012. Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Bergson, Leif. 1953. The omitted augment in the messengers’ speeches of Greek tragedy. Eranos 51, 121–8.Google Scholar

Berman, Ruth A. 1988. On the ability to relate events in narrative. Discourse Processes 11.4, 469–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bertinetto, Pier M., and Delfitto, Denis. 2000. Aspect vs. actionality: Why they should be kept apart. In Dahl, Östen (ed.). Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. 189–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bond, Godfrey W. 1981. Euripides: Heracles. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Bonifazi, Anna, Drummen, Annemieke and de Kreij, Mark. 2016. Particles in ancient Greek discourse: Five volumes exploring particle use across genres. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn3:hul.ebook:CHS_BonifaziA_DrummenA_deKreijM.Particles_in_Ancient_Greek_Discourse.2016.Google Scholar

Bonilla, Carrie L. 2011. The conversational historical present in oral Spanish narratives. Hispania 94.3, 429–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Booth, Wayne C. 1961. The rhetoric of fiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Boter, Gerard J. 2012. The historical present of atelic and durative verbs in Greek tragedy. Philologus 156.2, 207–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bresson, Alain. 2016. The making of the ancient Greek economy. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brinton, Laurel J. 1992. The historical present in Charlotte Brontë’s novels: Some discourse functions. Style 26, 221–44.Google Scholar

Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brisard, Frank. 2002. The English present. In Brisard, Frank (ed.). Grounding: The epistemic footing of deixis and reference. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. 251–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brisard, Frank. 2013. An account of English tense and aspect in Cognitive Grammar. In Jaszczolt, Katarzyna M. and de Saussure, Louis (eds.). Time: Language, cognition and reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 210–35.Google Scholar

Broyd, Samantha J., Demanuele, Charmaine, Debener, Stefan, Helps, Suzannah K., James, Christopher J. and Sonuga-Barke, Edmund J. S.. 2009. Default-mode brain dysfunction in mental disorders: A systematic review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 33.3, 279–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brugmann, Karl. 1904. Die Demonstrativpronomina der indogermanischen Sprachen: Eine bedeutungsgeschichtliche Untersuchung. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

Buckner, Randy L., Andrews-Hanna, Jessica R. and Schacter, Daniel L.. 2008. The brain’s default network: Anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1124.1, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bühler, Karl. 1990. Theory of language: The representational function of language. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [Translation of 1934. Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Gustav Fischer.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buijs, Michel. 2005. Clause combining in ancient Greek narrative discourse: The distribution of subclauses and participial clauses in Xenophon’s Hellenica and Anabasis. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar

Buijs, Michel. 2007. Aspectual differences and narrative technique: Xenophon’s Hellenica and Agesilaus. In Allan, Rutger J. and Buijs, Michel (eds.). The language of literature: Linguistic approaches to classical texts. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 122–53.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere D. and Pagliuca, William. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Caracciolo, Marco. 2012. Notes for a(nother) theory of experientiality. Journal of Literary Theory 6, 141–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caracciolo, Marco. 2014a. The experientiality of narrative: An enactivist approach. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caracciolo, Marco. 2014b. Experientiality. In Hühn, Peter, Meister, Jan C., Pier, John and Schmid, Wolf (eds.). The living handbook of narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University Press. www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/telling-vs-showing.Google Scholar

Carey, Christopher. 1992. Apollodoros: Against Neaira [Demosthenes]. Warminster: Aris and Phillips.Google Scholar

Carruthers, Janice. 2005. Oral narration in modern French: A linguistic analysis of temporal Patterns. Leeds: Legenda.Google Scholar

Carruthers, Janice. 2012. Discourse and text. In Binnick, Robert I. (ed.). The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 306–34.Google Scholar

Casparis, Christian P. 1975. Tense without time: The present tense in narration. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, consciousness and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Chatman, Seymour B. 1978. Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Cienki, Alan, and Müller, Cornelia. 2008. Metaphor, gesture, and thought. In Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. (ed.). The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 483–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clanchy, Michael. 1979. From memory to written record: England 1066–1307. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. 2016. Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological review 123.3, 324–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clark, Herbert H., and Gerrig, Richard J.. 1990. Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66.4, 764–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Classen, Johannes, and Steup, Julius. 1919.⁵ Thukydides. I: Einleitung; Erstes Buch. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar

Collard, Christopher. 1975. Euripides: Supplices (2 vols.). Groningen: Bouma’s Boekhuis.Google Scholar

Cornish, Francis. 2010. Anaphora: Text-based or discourse-dependent? Functionalist vs. formalist accounts. Functions of Language 17.2, 207–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cornish, Francis. 2011. ‘Strict’ anadeixis, discourse deixis and text structuring. Language Sciences 33.5, 753–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crellin, Robert. 2020. The perfect system in Ancient Greek. In Crellin, Robert and Jügel, Thomas (eds.). Perfects in Indo-European languages and beyond. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 435–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cropp, Martin. 2013. Euripides: Electra. Warminster: Aris and Phillips.Google Scholar

Cutrer, L. Michelle. 1994. Time and tense in narratives and everyday language. PhD dissertation, University of California.Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Dancygier, Barbara. 2011. The language of stories: A cognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dancygier, Barbara, Wei-Lun, Lu and Verhagen, Arie (eds.). 2016. Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dancygier, Barbara, and Sweetser, Eve (eds.). 2012. Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dancygier, Barbara, and Vandelanotte, Lieven. 2016. Discourse viewpoint as network. In Dancygier, Barbara et al. (eds.). Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter. 13–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, Malcolm. 1991. Sophocles: Trachiniae. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Declerck, Renaat. 1991. Tense in English: Its structure and use in discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Denniston, John D. 1954.² The Greek particles. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

de Saussure, Louis. 2013. Perspectival interpretations of tenses. In Jaszczolt, Kasia M. and de Saussure, Louis (eds.). Time: Language, cognition, and reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 46–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diessel, Holger. 2006. Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive linguistics 17.4, 463–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diewald, Gabriele. 2011. Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics 49.2, 365–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark, Blasi, Damián E., Lupyan, Gary, Christiansen, Morten H. and Monaghan, Padraic. 2015. Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19.10, 603–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dodds, Eric R. 1960.² Euripides: Bacchae. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dover, Kenneth J. 1968. Aristophanes: Clouds. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Easterling, Pat. 1982. Sophocles: Trachiniae. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Edmunds, Lowell. 1993. Thucydides in the act of writing. In Pretagostini, R. (ed.). Tradizione e innovazione nella cultura greca: Da Omero all’ età ellenistica. Rome: Gruppo Editoriale Internazionale. 831–52.Google Scholar

Elleström, Lars. 2017. Bridging the gap between image and metaphor through cross-modal iconicity: An interdisciplinary model. In Zirker, Angelika et al. (eds.). Dimensions of iconicity. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 167–90.Google Scholar

Emmorey, Karen. 1999. Do signers gesture? In Messing, Lynn and Campbell, Ruth (eds.). Gesture, speech, and sign. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 133–59.Google Scholar

Eriksson, Karl V. 1943. Das Präsens historicum in der nachklassischen griechischen Historiographie. Lund: Ohlsson.Google Scholar

Evans, Vyvyan. 2013. Language and time: A cognitive linguistics approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fanning, Buist M. 1990. Verbal aspect in New Testament Greek. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farnell, Lewis R. 1921. Greek hero cults and ideas of immortality. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles. 1984. Espaces mentaux: Aspects de la construction du sens dans les langues naturelles. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles. 1994. Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural languages. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. [Translation of Fauconnier, 1984.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles, and Turner, Mark. 2002. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles, and Turner, Mark. 2006. Mental spaces. In Geeraerts, Dirk (ed.). Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings. Berlin: de Gruyter. 303–72.Google Scholar

Finglass, Patrick J. 2007. Sophocles: Electra. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Finglass, Patrick J. 2018. Sophocles: Oedipus the king. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, Olga. 2011. Cognitive iconic grounding of reduplication in language. Semblance and signification 10, 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischl, Johannes. 1910. De nuntiis tragicis. Vienna: F. Deutike.Google Scholar

Fleischman, Suzanne. 1986. Evaluation in narrative: The present tense in medieval ‘performed stories’. Yale French Studies 70, 199–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleischman, Suzanne. 1990. Tense and narrativity: From medieval performance to modern fiction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Fludernik, Monika. 1991. The historical present tense yet again: Tense switching and narrative dynamics in oral and quasi-oral storytelling. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 11.3, 365–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fludernik, Monika. 1992. The historical present tense in English literature: An oral pattern and its literary adaptation. Language and Literature 17, 77–107.Google Scholar

Fludernik, Monika. 1996. Towards a ‘natural’ narratology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Fludernik, Monika. 2003. Natural narratology and cognitive parameters. In Herman, David (ed.). Narrative theory and the cognitive sciences. Stanford: CSLI. 243–67.Google Scholar

Fludernik, Monika. 2009. An introduction to narratology. London: Routledge. [Translation of 2006. Einführung in die Erzähltheorie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraenkel, Eduard. 1950. Aeschylus: Agamemnon (3 vols). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Fretheim, Thorstein, and Gundel, Jeanette K. (eds.). 1996. Reference and referent accessibility. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

George, Coulter H. 2011. (one of ‘quatre excercices’) In Lallot, Jean et al. (eds.). The historical present in Thucydides: Semantics and narrative function. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 251–54.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. 2006. Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1991. Isomorphism in the grammatical code: Cognitive and biological considerations. Studies in language 15.1, 85–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gosselin, Laurent. 2000. Présentation et représentation: Les rôles du ‘présent historique’. Travaux de Linguistique 40, 55–72.Google Scholar

Grethlein, Jonas, and Huitink, Luuk. 2017. Homer’s vividness: An enactive approach. Journal of Hellenic Studies 137, 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Cole, Peter and Morgan, Jerry L. (eds.). Syntax and semantics. Volume III: Speech acts. New York: Academic. 41–58.Google Scholar

Grünbaum, Thor. 2007. Action between plot and discourse. Semiotica 165, 295–314.Google Scholar

Gundel, Jeanette K., Hedberg, Nancy and Zacharski, Ron. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69.2, 274–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haiman, John. 1980. The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation. Language 56.3, 515–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamburger, Käte. 1968.² Die Logik der Dichtung. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Verlag.Google Scholar

Hannay, Mike, and Kroon, Caroline H. M.. 2005. Acts and the relationship between discourse and grammar. Functions of language 12.1, 87–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hellawell, Steph J., and Brewin, Chris R.. 2004. A comparison of flashbacks and ordinary autobiographical memories of trauma: Content and language. Behaviour Research and Therapy 42.1, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hengeveld, Kees, and Lachlan Mackenzie, J.. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herman, David. 2007. Cognition, emotion, and consciousness. In Herman, David (ed.). The Cambridge companion to narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 245–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herman, David. 2009. Basic elements of narrative. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hostetter, Autumn B., and Alibali, Martha W.. 2008. Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 15.3, 495–514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Huitink, Luuk. 2019. There was a river on their left-hand side: Xenophon’s Anabasis, reflector narrative and the evolving language of Greek historiography. In Willi, Andreas and Derron, Pascale (eds.). Formes et fonctions des langues littéraires en Grèce ancienne. Vandoeuvres: Fondation Hardt.Google Scholar

Hunt, Arthur S., and Edgar, C. C.. 1932. Select papyri (vol. i). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press/London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar

Iwasaki, Shōichi. 1993. Subjectivity in grammar and discourse. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Janni, Pietro. 1984. La mappa e il periplo. Macerata: ItalyGoogle Scholar

Janssen, Theo A. J. M. 1993. Tenses and demonstratives: Conspecific categories. In Geiger, Richard A. and Rudzka-Ostyn, Brygida (eds.). Conceptualizations and mental processing in language. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter. 741–83.Google Scholar

Janssen, Theo A. J. M. 2002. Deictic principles of pronominals, demonstratives, and tenses. In Brisard, Frank (ed.). Grounding: The epistemic footing of deixis and reference. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. 151–93.Google Scholar

Jacquinod, Bernard. 2011. Πείθω et le présent historique chez Thucydide. In Lallot, Jean et al. (eds.). The historical present in Thucydides: Semantics and narrative function. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 89–114.Google Scholar

Jebb, Richard C. 1908.² Sophocles, the plays and fragments. Part V: The Trachiniae. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jebb, Richard C. 1914.⁵ Sophocles, the plays and fragments. Part I: The Oedipus tyrannus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

de Jong, Irene J. F. 1991. Narrative in drama: The art of the Euripidean messenger-speech. Leiden and Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Jong, Irene J. F. 2007a. Introduction: Narratological theory on time. In de Jong, Irene J. F. (ed.). Time in ancient Greek literature. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Jong, Irene J. F. 2007b. Sophocles Trachiniae 1–48, Euripidean prologues, and their audiences. In Allan, Rutger J. and Buijs, Michel (eds.). The language of literature: Linguistic approaches to classical texts. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 7–28.Google Scholar

Kemmerer, David. 1999. ‘Near’ and ‘far’ in language and perception. Cognition 73.1, 35–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul. 1968. Tense and mood in Indo-European syntax. Foundations of language 4.1, 30–57.Google Scholar

Klauk, Tobias, and Köppe, Tilmann. 2014. Telling vs. showing. In Hühn, Peter, Meister, Jan C., Pier, John and Schmid, Wolf (eds.). The living handbook of narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University. www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/telling-vs-showing.Google Scholar

Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Klum, Arne. 1961. Verbe et adverbe: Étude sur le système verbal indicatif et sur le système de certains adverbes de temps à la lumière des relations verbo-adverbiales dans la prose du français contemporain. PhD dissertation, University of Uppsala.Google Scholar

Kok, Kasper I. 2016. The grammatical potential of co-speech gesture. Functions of Language 23.2, 149–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kok, Kasper I. 2017. The status of gesture in cognitive-functional models of grammar. PhD dissertation, Free University Amsterdam (published by Landelijke Onderzoeksschool Taalkunde).Google Scholar

Koller, Hermann. 1951. Praesens historicum und erzählendes Imperfekt: Beitrag zur Aktionsart der Praesensstammzeiten im Lateinischen und Griechischen. Museum Helveticum 8.1, 63–99.Google Scholar

Kroon, Caroline H. M. 2002. How to write a ghost story? A linguistic view on narrative modes in Pliny Ep. 7.27. In Sawicki, Lea and Shalev, Donna (eds.). Donum grammaticum: Studies in Latin and Celtic linguistics in honour of Hannah Rosén. Leuven: Peeters. 189–200.Google Scholar

Kroon, Caroline H. M. 2017. Textual deixis and the ‘anchoring’ use of the Latin pronoun hic. Mnemosyne 70.4, 585–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kühner, Raphael, and Gerth, Bernhard. 1898.³ Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache. Zweiter Teil: Satzlehre (vol. i). Hannover: Hahnsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar

Kuzmičová, Anezka. 2012a. Fidelity without mimesis: On mental imagery from visual description. In Currie, Gregory, Kot’átko, Petr and Pokorný, Martin (eds). Mimesis: Metaphysics, cognition, pragmatics. London: College Publications. 273–315.Google Scholar

Kuzmičová, Anezka. 2012b. Presence in the reading of literary narrative: A case for motor enactment. Semiotica 189, 23–48.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1972. Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Labov, William, and Waletzky, Joshua. 1967. Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In Helm, June (ed.). Essays on the verbal and visual arts. Seattle: University of Washington Press. 12–44.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Lallot, Jean. 2011. Vue cavalière sur les emplois du PH dans les Histoires de Thucydide. In Lallot, Jean et al. (eds.). The historical present in Thucydides: Semantics and narrative function. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lallot, Jean, Rijksbaron, Albert, Jacquinod, Bernard and Buijs, Michel (eds.). 2011. The historical present in Thucydides: Semantics and narrative function. Leiden and Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lamers, Han, and Rademaker, Adriaan M.. 2007. Talking about myself: A pragmatic approach to the use of aspect forms in Lysias 12.4–19. Classical Quarterly 57.2, 458–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lambert, Frédéric. 2011. Présent historique et subjectivité: Sur quelques exemples de Polybe et de Thucydide. In Lallot, Jean et al. (eds.). The historical present in Thucydides: Semantics and narrative function. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 195–222.Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume II: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2009. Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2011. The English present. Temporal coincidence vs. epistemic immediacy. In Patard, Adeline and Brisard, Frank (eds.). Cognitive approaches to tense, aspect and epistemic modality. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 45–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lanni, Adriaan. 2006. Law and justice in the courts of Classical Athens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lautensach, Otto. 1899. Grammatische Studien zu den griechischen Tragikern und Komikern: Augment und Reduplikation. Hannover: Hahnsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar

Levey, Stephen. 2006. Tense variation in preadolescent narratives. Journal of English Linguistics 34.2, 126–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levinsohn, Stephen H. 2016. Verb forms and grounding in narrative. In Runge, Steven E. and Fresch, Christopher J. (eds.). The Greek verb revisited: A fresh approach for biblical exegesis. Bellingham: Lexham. 163–83.Google Scholar

Levinsohn, Stephen H. 2020. The perfect in context in texts in English, Sistani Balochi and New Testament Greek. In Crellin, Robert and Jügel, Thomas (eds.). Perfects in Indo-European languages and beyond. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 615–33.Google Scholar

Lewis, Michael. 1986. The English verb: An exploration of structure and meaning. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.Google Scholar

Lewis-Williams, David. 2002. The mind in the cave: Consciousness and the origins of art. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar

Liapis, Vayos. 2012. A commentary on the Rhesus attributed to Euripides. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Liddell, Scott K. 2003. Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liddell, Scott K., and Metzger, Melanie. 1998. Gesture in sign language discourse. Journal of pragmatics 30.6, 657–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linhares-Dias, Rui. 2011. How to show things with words: A study on logic, language, and literature trends in linguistics. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Loraux, Nicole. 1986. Thucydide a écrit la guerre du Péloponnèse. Mètis 1.1, 139–61.Google Scholar

Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics: Volume II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

MacDowell, Douglas M. 1978. The law in Classical Athens. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Mandler, Jean M. 1986. On the comprehension of temporal order. Language and Cognitive Processes 1.4, 309–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manne, Sharon. 2002. Language use and post‐traumatic stress symptomatology in parents of pediatric cancer survivors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32.3, 608–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mantini, Dante, Perrucci, Mauro G., Del Gratta, D., Romani, Gian-Luca and Corbetta, M.. 2007. Electrophysiological signatures of resting state networks in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104, 13170–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Martin, Gunther. 2018. Euripides – ‘Ion’: Edition and commentary. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mathewson, David L. 2010. Verbal aspect in the Book of Revelation: The functions of Greek verb tenses in John’s Apocalypse. Leiden and Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matić, Dejan. 2003. Topic, focus, and discourse structure: Ancient Greek word order. Studies in Language 27.3, 573–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKay, Kenneth L. 1974. Further remarks on the ‘historical’ present and other phenomena. Foundations of Language 11.2, 247–51.Google Scholar

McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago press.Google Scholar

McNeill, David. 2005. Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meir, Irit, and Tkachman, Oksana. 2014. Iconicity. In Aronoff, Mark (editor in chief). Oxford Bibliographies: Linguistics. www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199772810/obo-9780199772810-0182.xml.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mellet, Sylvie. 1998. Présent et présentification: Un problème d’aspect. In Vogeleer, Svetlana, Borillo, Andrée, Vetters, Carl and Vuillaume, Marcel (eds.). Temps et discours. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters. 203–13.Google Scholar

Metzger, Melanie. 1995. Constructed dialogue and constructed action in American Sign Language. In Lucas, Ceil (ed.). Sociolinguistics in deaf communities. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. 255–71.Google Scholar

Mortier-Waldschmidt, Odile. 2011. Τρέπειν au présent historique chez Thucydide. In Lallot, Jean et al. (eds.). The historical present in Thucydides: Semantics and narrative function. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 65–88.Google Scholar

Mulkern, Ann E. 1996. The game of the name. In Fretheim, Thorstein and Gundel, Jeanette K. (eds.). 1996. Reference and referent accessibility. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 235–50.Google Scholar

Munson, Rosaria V. 2015. Natural upheavals in Thucydides (and Herodotus). In Clark, Christina, Foster, Edith and Hallett, Judith P. (eds.). Kinesis: The ancient depiction of gesture, motion, and emotion. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2015. 41–59.Google Scholar

Münte, Thomas F., Schiltz, Kolja and Kutas, Marta. 1998. When temporal terms belie conceptual order. Nature 395.6697, 71–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Napoli, Maria. 2006. Aspect and actionality in Homeric Greek: A contrastive analysis. Milan: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar

Nijk, Arjan A. 2013a. A pragmatic account of the use of the historic present in De corona. Mnemosyne 66.3, 365–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nijk, Arjan A. 2013b. The rhetorical function of the perfect in Classical Greek. Philologus 157.2, 237–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nijk, Arjan A. 2016a. Re-experiencing the past. The praesens pro praeterito in non-narrative discourse in tragedy. Philologus 160.2, 217–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nijk, Arjan A. 2016b. How to control the present. A unified account of the nonpast uses of the aorist indicative. Journal of Hellenic Studies 136, 92–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nijk, Arjan A. 2018. Iconiciteit als taalkundig anker. Lampas 51.4, 312–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nijk, Arjan A. 2019. Bridging the gap between the near and the far. Displacement and representation. Cognitive Linguistics 30.2, 327–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nikiforidou, Kiki. 2010. Viewpoint and construction grammar: The case of past + now. Language and Literature 19.3, 265–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nikiforidou, Kiki. 2012. The constructional underpinnings of viewpoint blends. In Dancygier, Barbara and Sweetser, Eve (eds.). Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 177–97.Google Scholar

Norrick, Neal R. 2000. Conversational narrative. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nünning, Ansgar, and Sommer, Roy. 2008. Diegetic and mimetic narrativity: Some further steps towards a narratology of drama. In Pier, John and García Landa, José A. (eds.). Theorizing Narrativity. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter. 331–54.Google Scholar

Oakley, John H., and Sinos, Rebecca H.. 1993. The wedding in Classical Athens. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

O’Kearney, Richard, and Perrott, Kelly. 2006. Trauma narratives in posttraumatic stress disorder: A review. Journal of Traumatic Stress 19.1, 81–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Olson, Douglas S. 2002. Aristophanes: Acharnians. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ooms, Steven, and de Jonge, Casper C.. 2013. The semantics of ἐναγώνιος in Greek literary criticism. Classical Philology 108.2, 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orriens, Sander A. J. 2009. Involving the past in the present: The Classical Greek perfect as a situating cohesion device. In Bakker, Stéphanie J. and Wakker, Gerry C. (eds.). Discourse cohesion in ancient Greek. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 221–39.Google Scholar

Owen, A. S. 1939. Euripides: Ion. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Page, Denys L. 1938. Euripides: Medea. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Park, Lillian, St-Laurent, Marie, McAndrews, Mary P. and Moscovitch, Morris. 2011. The immediacy of recollection: The use of the historical present in narratives of autobiographical episodes by patients with unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuropsychologia 49, 1171–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Parrill, Fey. 2012. Interaction between discourse status and viewpoint in co-speech gesture. In Dancygier, Barbara and Sweetser, Eve (eds.). Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parrill, Fey, Bergen, Benjamin K. and Lichtenstein, Patricia V.. 2013. Grammatical aspect, gesture, and conceptualization: Using co-speech gesture to reveal event representations. Cognitive Linguistics 24.1, 135–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parrill, Fey, and Sweetser, Eve. 2004. What we mean by meaning: Conceptual integration in gesture analysis and transcription. Gesture 4.2, 197–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearson, Alfred C. 1903. The Helena of Euripides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pecher, Diane, and Zwaan, Rolf A. (eds.). 2005. Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perniss, Pamela, Thompson, Robin L. and Vigliocco, Gabriella. 2010. Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology 1, 227. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3153832/.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Perniss, Pamela, and Vigliocco, Gabriella. 2014. The bridge of iconicity: From a world of experience to the experience of language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 369, 1651. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25092668.Google Scholar

Perrino, Sabina. 2007. Cross-Chronotype alignment in Senegalese oral narrative. Language and Communication 27, 227–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pollak, Wolfgang. 1960. Studien zum ‘Verbalaspekt’ im Französischen. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar

Porter, Stanley E. 1989. Verbal aspect in the Greek of the New Testament, with reference to tense and mood. New York: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Purves, Alex C. 2010. Space and time in ancient Greek narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quasthoff, Uta M. 1980. Erzählen in Gesprächen. Linguistische Untersuchungen zu Strukturen und Funktionen am Beispiel einer Kommunikationsform des Alltags. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Quinto-Pozos, David. 2007. Can constructed action be considered obligatory? Lingua 117, 1285–1314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rademaker, Adriaan M., and Buijs, Michel. 2011. A tale of two involuntary encounters: Linguistics and the persuasive function of the historical present in two Thucydidean battle scenes (1.45–51 and 1.56–66). In Lallot, Jean et al. (eds.). The historical present in Thucydides: Semantics and narrative function. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 115–58.Google Scholar

Récanati, François. 1995. Le présent épistolaire: Une perspective cognitive. L’Information grammaticale 66.1, 38–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rijksbaron, Albert. 1991. Grammatical observations on Euripides’ Bacchae. Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar

Rijksbaron, Albert. 2002.³ The syntax and semantics of the verb in Classical Greek. Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar

Rijksbaron, Albert. 2006. On false historic presents in Sophocles (and Euripides). In de Jong, Irene J. F. and Rijksbaron, Albert (eds.). Sophocles and the Greek language: Aspects of diction, syntax and pragmatics. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 127–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rijksbaron, Albert. 2011a. Introduction. In Lallot, Jean et al. (eds.). The historical present in Thucydides: Semantics and narrative function. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 1–18.Google Scholar

Rijksbaron, Albert. 2011b. The profanation of the mysteries and the mutilation of the hermae: Two variations on two themes. In Lallot, Jean et al. (eds.). The historical present in Thucydides: Semantics and narrative function. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 177–94.Google Scholar

Rijksbaron, Albert. 2011c. (one of ‘quatre excercices’) On interpreting γίγνεται in the Archaeology (1.13.4, 1.13.6). In Lallot, Jean et al. (eds.). The historical present in Thucydides: Semantics and narrative function. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 259–61.Google Scholar

Rijksbaron, Albert. 2015. Stative historical presents in Greek tragedy: Are they real? Philologus 159.2, 224–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rimmon-Kenan, Schlomith. 1983. Narrative fiction: Contemporary poetics. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robar, Elizabeth. 2016. The historical present in NT Greek: An exercise in interpreting Matthew. In Runge, Steven E. and Fresch, Christopher J. (eds.). The Greek verb revisited: A fresh approach for biblical exegesis. Bellingham: Lexham. 329–52.Google Scholar

Roisman, Hanna, and Luschnig, Celia A. E.. 2011. Euripides’ Electra: A commentary. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

Romm, James S. 1992. The edges of the earth in ancient thought: Geography, exploration, and fiction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rotstein, Andrea. 2016. Literary History in the Parian Marble. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies. https://chs.harvard.edu/CHS/article/display/6492.andrea-rotstein-literary-history-in-the-parian-marble.Google Scholar

Ruijgh, Cornelis J. 2006. The use of the demonstratives ὅδε, οὗτος and (ἐ)κεῖνος in Sophocles. In de Jong, Irene J. F. and Rijksbaron, Albert (eds.). Sophocles and the Greek language: Aspects of diction, syntax and pragmatics. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 151–61.Google Scholar

Ruipérez, Martín S. 1954. Estructura del sistema de aspectos y tiempos del verbo griego antiguo: Análisis funcional sincrónico. Salamanca: Colegio Trilingũe de la Universidad.Google Scholar

Runge, Steven E. 2010. Discourse grammar of the Greek New Testament: A practical introduction for teaching and exegesis. Peabody: Hendrickson.Google Scholar

Runge, Steven E., and Fresch, Christopher J. (eds.). 2016. The Greek verb revisited: A fresh approach for biblical exegesis. Bellingham: Lexham.Google Scholar

Ryan, Marie-Laure. 2001. Narrative as virtual reality: Immersion and interactivity in literature and electronic media. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Rybarczyk, Magdalena. 2015. Demonstratives and possessives with attitude: An intersubjectively-oriented empirical study. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanders, Ted, Sanders, José and Sweetser, Eve. 2009. Causality, cognition and communication: A mental space analysis of subjectivity in causal connectives. In Sanders, Ted and Sweetser, Eve (eds.). Causal categories in discourse and cognition. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. 19–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schiffrin, Deborah. 1981. Tense Variation in Narrative. Language 57.1, 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schuren, Liesbeth. 2014. Shared storytelling in Euripidean stichomythia. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Schwyzer, Eduard, and Debrunner, Albert. 1950. Griechische Grammatik: Auf der Grundlage von Karl Brugmanns griechischer Grammatik. Band 2: Syntax und syntaktische Stilistik. München: Beck.Google Scholar

Seaford, Richard. 1984. Euripides: Cyclops. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Lawrence. 2010. Embodied cognition. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sicking, Christiaan M. J., and van Ophuijsen, Johannes M.. 1993. Two studies in Attic particle usage. Leiden and Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sicking, Christiaan M. J., and Stork, Peter. 1997. The grammar of the so-called ‘historical present’ in ancient Greek. In Bakker, Egbert J. (ed.). Grammar as interpretation: Greek literature in its linguistic contexts. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 131–68.Google Scholar

Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 1983. Tense and aspect in oral Spanish narrative: Context and meaning. Language 59, 760–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slings, Simon R. 1997. Adversative relators between PUSH and POP. In Rijksbaron, Albert (ed.). New approaches to Greek particles. Amsterdam: Gieben. 101–29.Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan I. 1987. Thinking for speaking. In Aske, Joe, Beery, Natasha, Michaelis, Laura and Filip, Hana (eds.). Papers from the 13th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 435–45.Google Scholar

Smith, Carlota S. 2003. Modes of discourse: The local structure of texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sommerstein, Alan H. 1989. Aeschylus: Eumenides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stanzel, Franz K. 1989.⁴ Theorie des Erzählens. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Steadman, John M. 1917. The origin of the historical present in English. Studies in Philology 14.1, 1–46.Google Scholar

Stieber, Mary C. 2010. Euripides and the language of craft. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Stirling, Lesley. 2012. Tense/aspect shifting in Kala Lagaw Ya oral narratives. Australian Journal of Linguistics 32.1, 157–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sugahara, Takashi, and Hamano, Shoko. 2015. A corpus-based semantic analysis of Japanese mimetic verbs. In Hiraga, Masako K., Herlofsky, William J., Shinohara, Kazuko and Akita, Kimi (eds.). Iconicity: East meets West. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 143–60.Google Scholar

Sweetser, Eve. 2013. Creativity across modalities in viewpoint construction. In Borkent, Mike, Dancygier, Barbara and Hinnell, Jennifer (eds.). Language and the creative mind. Stanford: CSLI. 239–54.Google Scholar

Sweetser, Eve and Fauconnier, Gilles. 1996. Cognitive links and domains: Basic aspects of Mental Space Theory. In Fauconnier, Gilles and Sweetser, Eve (eds.). Spaces, worlds, and grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1–28.Google Scholar

Thoma, Chrystalla A. 2011. The function of the historical present tense: Evidence from modern Greek. Journal of Pragmatics 43.9, 2373–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, Rosalind. 1989. Oral tradition and written record in Classical Athens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Timberlake, Alan. 2007.² Aspect, tense, mood. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.). Language typology and syntactic description. Volume III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 280–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Toolan, Michael J. 1988. Narrative. A critical linguistic introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Tristram, Hildegard L. C. 1983. Tense and time in early Irish narrative. Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft: Vorträge und kleinere Schriften 32, 5–37.Google Scholar

Troscianko, Emily T. 2014a. Kafka’s cognitive realism. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Troscianko, Emily T. 2014b. Reading Kafka enactively. Paragraph 37.1, 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Dijk, Teun A. 1981. Episodes as units of discourse analysis. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.). Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 177–95.Google Scholar

van Ess-Dykema, Carol J. 1984. The historical present in oral Spanish narratives. PhD dissertation, Georgetown University.Google Scholar

van Krieken, Kobie. 2016. Linguistic viewpoint in crime news narratives: Form, function and impact. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen (published by Landelijke Onderzoeksschool Taalkunde).Google Scholar

van Krieken, Kobie, Sanders, José and Hoeken, Hans. 2016. Blended viewpoints, mediated witnesses: A cognitive linguistic approach to news narratives. In Dancygier, Barbara et al. (eds.). Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter. 145–68.Google Scholar

van Krieken, Kobie, Sanders, José and Sweetser, Eve (eds.). 2019. Time and viewpoint in narrative discourse. Special issue of Cognitive linguistics 30.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. Philosophical Review 66.2, 143–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verdenius, W. J. 1980. Notes on the prologue of Euripides’ Bacchae. Mnemosyne 33.1, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

von Fritz, Kurt. 1949. The so-called historical present in early Greek. Word 5.2, 186–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vuillaume, Marcel. 1990. Grammaire temporelle des récits. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar

Vuillaume, Marcel. 2008. Maintenant en contexte narratif non-fictionnel. In Vuillaume, Marcel (ed.). Ici et maintenant. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wårvik, Brita. 2004. What is foregrounded in narrative? Hypotheses for the cognitive basis of foregrounding. In Virtanen, Tuija (ed.). Approaches to cognition through text and discourse. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weinrich, Harald. 1971.² Besprochene und erzählte Welt. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar

West, Martin L. 1971. Early Greek philosophy and the orient. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

West, Martin L. 1997. The east face of Helicon: West Asiatic elements in Greek poetry and myth. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Westbury, Chris, and Moroschan, Gail. 2009. Imageability × phonology interactions during lexical access: Effects of modality, phonological neighbourhood, and phonological processing efficiency. The Mental Lexicon 4.1, 115–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Willi, Andreas. 2017. Towards a grammar of narrative voice: From Homeric pragmatics to Hellenistic stylistics. In Slater, Niall W. (ed.). Voice and voices in antiquity. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 233–59.Google Scholar

Wolfson, Nessa. 1978. A feature of performed narrative: The conversational historical present. Language in society 7.2, 215–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolfson, Nessa. 1982. CHP: The conversational historical present in American English narrative. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolfson, Nessa. 1989. The conversational historical present. Linx 20.1, 135–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wu, Ruey-Jiuan. 2002. Discourse-pragmatic principles for temporal reference in Mandarin Chinese conversation. Studies in Language 26.3, 513–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wu, Suwei. 2018. Multimodality of constructions in Construction Grammars: Transitivity, transitivity alternations, and the dative alternation. PhD dissertation, Free University Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Wyse, William. 1904. The speeches of Isaeus. London: C. J. Clay and Sons.Google Scholar

Young, Rodger C., and Steinmann, Andrew E.. 2012. Correlation of select Classical sources related to the Trojan war with Assyrian and biblical chronologies. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 1.2, 223–48.Google Scholar

Zeman, Sonja. 2013. Vergangenheit als Gegenwart? Zur Diachronie des ‘historischen Präsens’. In Vogel, Petra M. (ed.). Sprachwandel im Neuhochdeutschen. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter. 235–55.Google Scholar

Zirker, Angelika, Bauer, Matthias, Fischer, Olga and Ljungberg, Christian (eds.). 2017. Dimensions of iconicity. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zwaan, Rolf A., and Yaxley, Richard H.. 2003. Spatial iconicity affects semantic relatedness judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 10.4, 954–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed