Axelrod, R.M. (2006). The Evolution of Cooperation, Basic Books, 241pp.Google Scholar

Bracken, P. (1977). “Unintended Consequences of Strategic Gaming,” Simulation and Gaming, 8, pp. 283–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bracken, P. (1990). “Gaming in Hierarchical Defense Organizations,” in Goldberg, A.C., van Opstal, D., and Barkley, J.H. (eds.), Avoiding the Brink: Theory and Practice in Crisis Management, Brassey’s, 138pp.Google Scholar

Brewer, G.D. and Shubik, M. (1979). The War Game: A Critique of Military Problem Solving, Harvard University Press, 385pp.Google Scholar

Dawes, R.M. (1979). “The Robust Beauty of Improper Linear Models in Decision Making,” American psychologist, 34(7), pp. 571–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawes, R.M. (1980). “Social Dilemmas,” Annual Review of Psychology, 31, pp. 169–193.Google Scholar

Dawes, R.M. (1988). Rational Choice in an Uncertain World, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 346pp.Google Scholar

Dawes, R.M. (2002). “The Ethics of Using or Not Using Statistical Prediction Rules in Psychological Practice and Related Consulting Activities,” Philosophy of Science, 69(S3), S178–S184.Google Scholar

Dawes, R.M., Faust, D., and Meehl, P.E. (1989). “Clinical Versus Actuarial Judgment,” Science, 243, pp. 1668–1674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

DeGroot, M. (1965). Thought and Choice in Chess, Basic Books, 463pp.Google Scholar

Fischhoff, B. (1975). “Hindsight ≠ Foresight: The Effect of Outcome Knowledge on Judgment under Uncertainty,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1, pp. 288–299.Google Scholar

Fischhoff, B. (2010). “Judgment and Decision Making,” WIREs Cognitive Science, 1(5), pp. 724–735.Google Scholar

Fox, C.R. and Birke, R. (2002). “Forecasting Trial Outcomes: Lawyers Assign Higher Probability to Possibilities That Are Described in Greater Detail,” Law and Human Behavior, 26, pp. 159–173.Google Scholar

Goldberg, A.C., van Opstal, D., and Barkley, J.H. (eds.) (1990). Avoiding the Brink: Theory and Practice in Crisis Management, Brassey’s, 138pp.Google Scholar

Gregory, W.L. (2001). “Scenarios and Acceptance of Forecasts,” in Armstrong, J.S. (ed.), Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners, Kluwer, 849pp.Google Scholar

Hastie, R. and Dawes, R.M. (2001). Rational Choice in an Uncertain World, Sage, 372pp.Google Scholar

Hawkins, S.A. and Hastie, R. (1990). “Hindsight: Biased Judgments of Past Events after the Outcome Is Known,” Psychological Bulletin, 107, pp. 311–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henrion, M. and Fischhoff, B. (1986). “Assessing Uncertainty in Physical Constants,” American Journal of Physics, 54(9), pp. 791–798.Google Scholar

Huber, J. and Puto, C. (1983). “Market Boundaries and Product Choice: Illustrating Attraction and Substitution Effects,” Journal of Consumer Research, 10, pp. 31–44.Google Scholar

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (1995). Climate Change 1995. Available at: www.ipcc.ch.Google Scholar

IPCC (2001). Climate Change 2001. Available at: www.ipcc.ch.Google Scholar

IPCC (2007). Climate Change 2007. Available at: www.ipcc.ch.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking Fast and Slow, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 499pp.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, 555pp.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1973). “On the Psychology of Prediction,” Psychological Review, 80, pp. 237–251.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (2000). Choices, Value and Frames, Cambridge University Press, 840pp.Google Scholar

Keysar, B., Hayakawa, S.K., and An, S.G. (2012). “The Foreign Language Effect: Thinking in a Foreign Tongue Reduces Decision Biases,” Psychological Science, 23, pp. 661–668.Google Scholar

Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B., and Phillips, L.D. (1982). “Calibration of Probabilities: The State of the Art to 1980,” in Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (eds.), Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, pp. 306–334.Google Scholar

Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Layman, M., and Combs, B. (1978). “Judged Frequency of Lethal Events,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4(6), pp. 551–578.Google Scholar

Loewenstein, G.F. (1996). “Out of Control: Visceral Influences on Behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(3), 272–292.Google Scholar

Loewenstein, G.F., Weber, E.U., Hsee, C.K., and Welch, E.S. (2001). “Risk as Feelings,” Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), pp. 267–286.Google Scholar

McClintock, C.G. and McNeel, S.P. (1966). “Reward Level and Game Playing Behavior,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 10(1), pp. 98–102.Google Scholar

Manski, C.F. (2013). Public Policy in an Uncertain World: Analysis and Decisions, Harvard University Press, 199pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

March, J.G. and Simon, H.S. (1958). Organizations, Wiley, 262pp.Google Scholar

Morgan, M.G. with Dowlatabadi, H., Henrion, M., Keith, D., Lempert, R., McBride, S., Small, M., and Wilbanks, T. (2009). Best Practice Approaches for Characterizing, Communicating, and Incorporating Scientific Uncertainty in Climate Decision Making, Synthesis and Assessment Product 5.2, report by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research, 89pp.Google Scholar

Morgan, M.G. and Henrion, M. (1990). Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis, Cambridge University Press, 332pp.Google Scholar

Morgan, M.G. and Keith, D.W. (2008). “Improving the Way We Think about Projecting Future Energy Use and Emissions of Carbon Dioxide,” Climatic Change, 90, pp. 198–215.Google Scholar

Moss, R., Edmonds, J.A., Hibbard, K.A. et al. (2010). “The Next Generation of Scenarios for Climate Change Research and Assessment,” Nature, 463, pp. 747–756.Google Scholar

Nakićenović, N. and Swart, R. (2000). Special Report on Emissions Scenarios: A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 599pp. Available at: www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/emission/index.php?idp=0.Google Scholar

Nisbett, R.E. and Wilson, T.D. (1977). “Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes,” Psychological Review, 84, pp. 231–259.Google Scholar

Raiffa, H. (1982). The Art and Science of Negotiation, Harvard University Press, 373pp.Google Scholar

Raiffa, H. with Richardson, J. and Metcalfe, D. (2002). Negotiation Analysis, Harvard University Press, 548pp.Google Scholar

Redelmeier, D.A., Koehler, D.J., Liberman, V., and Tversky, A. (1995). “Probability Judgment in Medicine: Discounting Unspecified Possibilities,” Medical Decision Making, 15, pp. 227–230.Google Scholar

Schelling, T.C. (1978, 2006). Micromotives and Macro Behavior, W.W. Norton and Co., 252pp. in 1978, 270pp. in 2006.Google Scholar

Sjöberg, L. (2006). “Will the Real Meaning of Affect Please Stand up?” Journal of Risk Research, 9(2), pp. 101–108.Google Scholar

Slovic, P., Finucane, M.L., Peters, E., and MacGregor, D.G. (2004). “Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk and Rationality,” Risk Analysis, 24(2), pp. 311–322.Google Scholar

Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., and Lichtenstein, S. (1976). “Cognitive Processes and Societal Risk Taking,” in Carroll, J.S. and Payne, J.W. (eds.), Cognition and Social Behavior, Halsted Press Division of Wiley, pp. 7–36.Google Scholar

Tversky, A. (1972). “Elimination by Aspects: A Theory of Choice,” Psychological Review, 79, pp. 281–299.Google Scholar

Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974). “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,” Science, 185(4157), pp. 1124–1131.Google Scholar

Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1981). “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice,” Science, 211, pp. 453–458.Google Scholar

Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1983). “Extensional versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment,” Psychological Review, 90, pp. 293–315.Google Scholar

van Vuuren, D.P., Edmonds, J., Kainuma, M. et al. (2011). “The Representative Concentration Pathways: An Overview,” Climatic Change, 109, pp. 5–31.Google Scholar

Wardman, J.K. (2006). “Toward a Critical Discourse on Affect and Risk Perception,” Journal of Risk Research, 9(2), pp. 109–124.Google Scholar

Covello, V.T., Sandman, P.M., and Slovic, P. (1988). Risk Communication, Risk Statistics, and Risk Comparisons: A Manual for Plant Managers, Chemical Manufacturers Association, 57pp.Google Scholar

DeKay, M.L., Florig, H.K., Fischbeck, P.S., Morgan, M.G., Morgan, K.M., Fischhoff, B., and Jenni, K.E. (2001). “The Use of Public Risk Ranking in Regulatory Development,” in Fischbeck, P.S. and Farrow, G.S. (eds.), Improving Regulation: Cases in Environment Health and Safety, Resources for the Future, pp. 208–232.Google Scholar

Engineering and Public Policy (1983). “On Judging the Frequency of Lethal Events: A Replication,” Risk Analysis, 3, pp. 11–16.Google Scholar

EPA (1987). Unfinished Business: A Comparative Assessment of Environmental Problems, Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation, 119pp.Google Scholar

EPA (1990). Reducing Risk: Setting Priorities and Strategies for Environmental Protection, Report SAB-EC-90-021 of the EPA Science Advisory Board, 25pp.Google Scholar

EPA (1993). A Guidebook to Comparing Risks and Setting Environmental Priorities, EPA 230 8-93-003, Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation, 226pp.Google Scholar

Fischer, G.W., Morgan, M.G., Fischhoff, B., Nair, I., and Lave, L.B. (1991). “What Risks Are People Concerned about?,” Risk Analysis, 11(2), pp. 303–314.Google Scholar

Fischhoff, B. and Morgan, M.G. (2009). “The Science and Practice of Risk Ranking,” Horizons, 10(3), pp. 40–47.Google Scholar

Fischhoff, B. and Kadvany, J. (2011). Risk: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press, 162pp.Google Scholar

Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., and Combs, B. (1978). “How Safe Is Safe Enough? A Psychometric Study of Attitudes towards Technological Risks and Benefits,” Policy Sciences, 9(2), pp. 127–152.Google Scholar

Florig, H.K., Morgan, M.G., Morgan, K.M., Jenni, K.E., Fischhoff, B., Fischbeck, P.S., and DeKay, M.L. (2001). “A Deliberative Method for Ranking Risks (I): Overview and Test Bed Development,” Risk Analysis, 21(5), pp. 913–921.Google Scholar

Glickman, T.S. and Gough, M. (1990). Readings in Risk, RFF Press – Routledge, 280pp.Google Scholar

Jenni, K.E. (1997). “Attributes for Risk Evaluation,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, 241pp.Google Scholar

Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Layman, M., and Combs, B. (1978). “Judged Frequency of Lethal Events,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4(6), pp. 551–578.Google Scholar

Morgan, K.M., DeKay, M.L., Fischbeck, P.S., Morgan, M.G., and Fischhoff, B. (2001). “A Deliberative Method for Ranking Risks (II): Evaluation of Validity and Agreement among Risk Managers,” Risk Analysis, 21(5), pp. 923–937.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Morgan, M.G., Florig, H.K., DeKay, M., Fischbeck, P., Morgan, K., Jenni, K., and Fischhoff, B. (2000). “Categorizing Risks for Risk Ranking,” Risk Analysis, 20(1), pp. 49–58.Google Scholar

Morgan, M.G., Slovic, P., Nair, I., Geisler, D., MacGregor, D., Fischhoff, B., Lincoln, D., and Florig, H.K. (1985). “Power Line Frequency Electric and Magnetic Fields: A Pilot Study of Risk Perception,” Risk Analysis, 5, pp. 139–150.Google Scholar

Roth, E., Morgan, M.G., Fischhoff, B., Lave, L.B., and Bostrom, A. (1990). “What Do We Know about Making Risk Comparisons?,” Risk Analysis, 10(3), pp. 375–392.Google Scholar

Slovic, P. (1987). “Perception of Risk,” Science, 236(4779), pp. 280–285.Google Scholar

Slovic, P. (2000). The Perception of Risk, Earthscan, 473pp.Google Scholar

Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., and Lichtenstein, S. (1980). “Facts and Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk,” in Schwing, R.S. and Albers, W.A. Jr. (eds.), Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe Is Safe Enough?, Plenum, pp. 181–214.Google Scholar

Starr, C. (1969). “Social Benefits versus Technological Risk,” Science, 165, pp. 1232–1238.Google Scholar

WASH-1400 (1975). Reactor Safety Study: An Assessment of Accident Risks in U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG-75/014, WASH-1400, 207pp.Google Scholar

Willis, H.H. and DeKay, M.L. (2007). “The Roles of Group Membership, Beliefs, and Norms in Ecological Risk Perception,” Risk Analysis, 27, pp. 1365–1380.Google Scholar

Willis, H.H., DeKay, M.L., Morgan, M.G., Florig, H.K., and Fischbeck, P.S. (2004). “Ecological Risk Ranking: Development and Evaluation of a Method for Improving Public Participation in Environmental Decision Making,” Risk Analysis, 24, pp. 363–378.Google Scholar

Willis, H.H., DeKay, M.L., Fischhoff, B., and Morgan, M.G. (2005). “Aggregate, Disaggregate, and Hybrid Analyses of Ecological Risk Perceptions,” Risk Analysis, 25(2), pp. 405–428.Google Scholar

Wilson, R. (1979). “Analyzing the Daily Risks of Life,” Technology Review, 81, pp. 41–46. Reprinted in Glickman, T.S. and Gough, M., Readings in Risk, RFF Press – Routledge, pp. 55–59, 1990.Google Scholar

Wilson, R. and Crouch, E.A.C. (1982). Risk/Benefit Analysis, Ballinger, 219pp.Google Scholar

Atman, C.J. (1990). “Network Structures as a Foundation for Risk Communication: An Investigation of Structure and Format Differences,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, 131pp.Google Scholar

Atman, C.J., Bostrom, A., Fischhoff, B., and Morgan, M.G. (1994). “Designing Risk Communications: Completing and Correcting Mental Models of Hazardous Processes, Part I,” Risk Analysis, 14(5), pp. 779–788. Also reprinted as chapter 18 in in Gerrard, S., Turner, R.K., and Bateman, I. (eds.), Environmental Risk Planning and Management, Edward Elgar Publishers, pp. 251–260, 2001.Google Scholar

Bostrom, A. (1990). “A Mental Models Approach to Exploring Perceptions of Hazardous Processes,” Ph.D. thesis, School of Urban and Public Affairs, Carnegie Mellon University, 279pp.Google Scholar

Bostrom, A., Atman, C.J., Fischhoff, B., and Morgan, M.G. (1994b). “Evaluating Risk Communications: Completing and Correcting Mental Models of Hazardous Processes, Part II,” Risk Analysis, 14(5), pp. 789–798. Also reprinted as chapter 18 in Gerrard, S., Turner, R.K., and Bateman, I. (eds.), Environmental Risk Planning and Management, Edward Elgar Publishers, pp. 261–270, 2001.Google Scholar

Bostrom, A., Fischhoff, B., and Morgan, M.G. (1992). “Characterizing Mental Models of Hazardous Processes: A Methodology and an Application to Radon,” Journal of Social Issues, 48(4), pp. 85–100.Google Scholar

Bostrom, A., Morgan, M.G., Fischhoff, B., and Read, D. (1994a). “What Do People Know about Global Climate Change? Part I: Mental Models,” Risk Analysis, 14(6), pp. 959–970.Google Scholar

Carroll, J.M. and Olson, J.R. (eds.) (1987). Mental Models in Human–Computer Interaction, National Academy Press, 39pp.Google Scholar

Clement, J. (1983). “A Conceptual Model Discussed by Galileo and Used Intuitively by Physics Students,” in Gentner, D. and Stevens, A.L. (eds.), Mental Models, Erlbaum, pp. 325–339.Google Scholar

Covello, V.T., Sandman, P.M., and Slovic, P. (1988). Risk Communication, Risk Statistics, and Risk Comparisons: A Manual for Plant Managers, Chemical Manufacturers Association, 57pp.Google Scholar

Craik, K. (1943). The Nature of Explanation, Cambridge University Press, 123pp.Google Scholar

Desvousges, W.H., Smith, V.K., and Rink, H.H., III (1992). “Communicating Radon Risks Effectively: The Maryland Experience,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, pp. 68–78.Google Scholar

Driver, R. (1983). The Pupil as Scientist, Taylor & Francis, 119pp.Google Scholar

EPA and U.S. DHHS (1986). A Citizen’s Guide to Radon, OPA-86-004, Office of Air and Radiation, 16pp.Google Scholar

Fischhoff, B. (1985). “Managing Risk Perceptions,” Issues in Science and Technology, 2(1), pp. 83–96.Google Scholar

Gentner, D. and Stephens, A.L. (eds.) (1983). Mental Models, Erlbaum, 348pp.Google Scholar

Guston, D.H. (2001). “Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction,” Science, Technology, & Human Values, 26(4), pp. 399–408.Google Scholar

Jasanoff, S. (1989). Talk presented at the Symposium on Managing the Problem of Industrial Hazards: The International Policy Issues, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, February 27.Google Scholar

Jasanoff, S. (ed.) (2004). States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order, Routledge, 317pp.Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird, P. (1983). Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness, Harvard University Press, 513pp.Google Scholar

Kempton, W. (1991). “Lay Perspectives on Global Climate Change,” Global Environmental Change, 1(3), pp. 183–208.Google Scholar

Krug, D., George, B., Hannon, S.A., and Glover, J.A. (1989). “The Effect of Outlines and Headings on Readers’ Recall of Text,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14(2), pp. 111–123.Google Scholar

MacGregor, D.G., Slovic, P., and Morgan, M.G. (1994). “Perception of Risks from Electromagnetic Fields: A Psychometric Evaluation of a Risk-Communication Approach,” Risk Analysis, 14(5), pp. 815–828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Maharik, M. (1991). “Public Perception of the Risks of an Unfamiliar Technology: The Case of Using Nuclear Energy Sources for Space Missions,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, 230pp.Google Scholar

Morgan, M.G., Fischhoff, B., Bostrom, A., and Atman, C.J. (2002). Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach, Cambridge University Press, 351pp.Google Scholar

Morgan, M.G., Fischhoff, B., Bostrom, A., Lave, L., and Atman, C.J. (1992). “Communicating Risk to the Public,” Environmental Science & Technology, 26(11), pp. 2048–2056.Google Scholar

Morgan, M.G., Florig, H.K., Nair, I., Cortes, C., Marsh, K., and Pavlosky, K. (1990b). “Lay Understanding of Power-Frequency Fields,” Bioelectromagnetics, 11, pp. 313–335.Google Scholar

Morgan, M.G. and Lave, L. (1990a). “Ethical Considerations in Risk Communication Practice and Research,” Guest Editorial, Risk Analysis, 10(3), pp. 355–358.Google Scholar

Murphy, G.L. and Wright, J.C. (1984). “Changes in Conceptual Structure with Expertise: Differences between Real-World Experts and Novices,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, pp. 144–155.Google Scholar

Norman, D. (1983). “Some Observations on Mental Models,” in Gentner, D. and Steven, A.L. (eds.), Mental Models, Erlbaum, pp. 7–14.Google Scholar

Nowotny, H., Scott, P., and Gibbons, M. (2006). “Re-thinking Science: Mode 2 in Societal Context,” in Carayannis, E.G. and Campbell, D.F.J. (eds.), Knowledge Creation, Diffusion, and Use in Innovation Networks and Knowledge Clusters: A Comparative Systems Approach across the United States, Europe and Asia, Praeger, pp. 39–51.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, J. and Novick, S. (1982). “Alternative Frameworks, Conceptual Conflict and Accommodation: Toward a Principled Teaching Strategy,” Instructional Science, 11, pp. 183–200.Google Scholar

Oreskes, N. and Conway, E.M. (2010). Merchants of Doubt, Bloomsbury, 355pp.Google Scholar

Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W. et al. (1982). “Accommodation of a Scientific Conception: Towards a Theory of Conceptual Change,” Science Education, 66, pp. 211–227.Google Scholar

Read, D., Bostrom, A., Morgan, M.G., Fischhoff, B., and Smuts, T. (1994). “What Do People Know about Global Climate Change? Part II: Survey Studies of Educated Laypeople,” Risk Analysis, 14(6), pp. 971–982.Google Scholar

Reynolds, T., Bostrom, A., Read, D., and Morgan, M.G. (2010). “Now What Do People Know about Climate Change?,” Risk Analysis, 30(10), pp. 1520–1538.Google Scholar

Roth, E., Morgan, M.G., Fischhoff, B., Lave, L.B., and Bostrom, A. (1990). “What Do We Know about Making Risk Comparisons?,” Risk Analysis, 10(3), pp. 375–392.Google Scholar

Rouse, W.B. and Morris, N.M. (1986). “On Looking into the Black Box: Prospects and Limits in the Search for Mental Models,” Psychological Bulletin, 100, pp. 349–363.Google Scholar

Schauble, L., Glaser, R., Raghavan, K. et al. (1991). “Causal Models and Experimental Strategies in Scientific Reasoning,” Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, pp. 201–238.Google Scholar

Slovic, P., Finucane, M.L., Peters, E., and MacGregor, D.G. (2004). “Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk and Rationality,” Risk Analysis, 24, pp. 311–322.Google Scholar

Thaler, R.H. and Sunstein, C.R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness, Yale University Press, 293pp.Google Scholar

Wildavsky, A. (1981). “Richer Is Safer,” Financial Analysts Journal, 37(2), pp. 19–22.Google Scholar

Adelman, J. (2013). Worldly Philosopher: The Odyssey of Albert O. Hirschman, Princeton University Press, 740pp.Google Scholar

Allison, G.T. (1971). Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, Scott, Foresman and Co., 338pp.; and a later expanded edition with Philip Zelikow (1999), Longman, 416pp.Google Scholar

Allison, G.T. (2012). “The Cuban Missile Crisis at 50: Lessons for U.S. Foreign Policy Today,” Foreign Affairs, Jul./Aug. edition, pp. 11–16.Google Scholar

Altman, S. and Hodgetts, R.M. (1979). Readings in Organizational Behavior, W.B. Saunders and Co., 367pp.Google Scholar

Axtell, R.A., Epstein, J.M., Dean, J.S., Gumerman, G.J., Swedlund, A.C., Harburger, J., Chakravarty, S., Hammond, R., Parker, J., and Parker, M. (2002). “Population Growth and Collapse in a Multiagent Model of the Kayenta Anasazi in Long House Valley,” PNAS, 99, suppl. 3, pp. 7275–7279.Google Scholar

Battiston, S., Farmer, J.D., Flache, A. et al. (2016). “Complexity Theory and Financial Regulation,” Science, 351, pp. 818–819.Google Scholar

Bhagat, R.S. and Steers, R.M. (eds.) (2009). Cambridge Handbook of Culture, Organizations, and Work, Cambridge University Press, 537pp.Google Scholar

Bourrier, M. (2011). “The Legacy of the High Reliability Organization Project,” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 19, pp. 9–13.Google Scholar

Bredhoff, S. (2012). To the Brink: JFK and the Cuban Missile Crisis, The Foundation for the National Archives, 90pp.Google Scholar

Cohen, M.D., March, J.G., and Olsen, J.A. (1976). “Chapter 2: People, Problems, Solutions and the Ambiguity of Relevance,” in March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (eds.), Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations, Universitetsforlaget, pp. 24–37.Google Scholar

Coleman, D.G. (2012). The Fourteenth Day: JFK and the Aftermath of the Cuban Missile Crisis, W.W. Norton & Co., 259pp.Google Scholar

Cyert, R.M. and March, J.G., with contributions by Clarkson, G.P.E. and others (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Prentice-Hall, 332pp.; 2nd ed. (1986), Blackwell, 252pp.Google Scholar

Diamond, J.M. (2012). “Life with the Artificial Anasazi,” Nature, 419, pp. 567–569.Google Scholar

Easterby-Smith, M. and Lyles, M.A. (2011). Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management, 2nd ed., Wiley, 711pp.Google Scholar

Epstein, J.M. (ed.) (2006). Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling, Princeton University Press, 356pp.Google Scholar

Epstein, J.M. and Axtell, R.L. (1996). Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom up, Brookings Institution Press, 208pp.Google Scholar

Gibson, D.E. (2012a). “Decisions at the Brink,” Nature, 487, pp. 27–29.Google Scholar

Gibson, D.E. (2012b). Talk at the Brink: Deliberation and Decision during the Cuban Missile Crisis, Princeton University Press, 218pp.Google Scholar

Hackman, J.R. and Oldham, G.R. (1975). “Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, pp. 159–170.Google Scholar

Hayes, B. (2013). “The Math of Segregation,” American Scientist, 101, pp. 338–341.Google Scholar

Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., and Snyderman, B.B. (1959). The Motivation to Work, Vol. I, Transaction Publishers, 157pp.Google Scholar

Hirschman, A.O. (1970). Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States, Harvard University Press, 176pp.Google Scholar

Janssen, M.A. (2007). “Coordination in Irrigation Systems: An Analysis of the Lansing–Kremer Model of Bali,” Agricultural Systems, 93(1), pp. 170–190.Google Scholar

Janssen, M.A. (2009). “Understanding Artificial Anasazi,” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 12(4), p. 13.Google Scholar

Kingdon, J.W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, Little, Brown and Company, 240pp.Google Scholar

Landsberger, H.A. (1958). Hawthorne Revisited: Management and the Worker, Its Critics, and Developments in Human Relations in Industry, Cornell University, 119pp.Google Scholar

La Porte, T.R. (1996). “High Reliability Organizations: Unlikely, Demanding and at Risk,” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 4(2), pp. 60–71.Google Scholar

La Porte, T.R. and Consolini, P.M. (1991). “Working in Practice But Not in Theory: Theoretical Challenges of High-Reliability Organizations,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 1(1), pp. 19–48.Google Scholar

Leveson, N., Dulac, N., Marais, K., and Carol, J. (2009). “Moving beyond Normal Accidents and High Reliability Organizations: A Systems Approach to Safety in Complex Systems,” Organization Studies, 30(2–3), pp. 227–249.Google Scholar

Locke, E.A. (2009). Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior, 2nd ed., Wiley, 651pp.Google Scholar

March, J.G. (1988). Decisions and Organizations, Basil Blackwell, 458pp.Google Scholar

March, J.G. (1994). A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen, The Free Press, 289pp.Google Scholar

March, J.G. (2007). “The Study of Organizations and Organizing since 1945,” Organization Studies, 28(1), pp. 9–19. Available at: http://oss.sagepub.com/content/28/1/9.Google Scholar

March, J.G. (2008). Explorations in Organizations, Stanford University Press, 464pp.Google Scholar

March, J.G. and Romelaer, P. (1976). “Chapter 12: Position and Presence in the Drift of Decisions,” in March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (eds.), Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations, Universitetsforlaget, pp. 251–276.Google Scholar

March, J.G. and Simon, H.A., with Guetzkow, H. (1958). Organizations, Wiley, 262pp.Google Scholar

March, J.G. and Simon, H.A. (1993). Organizations, 2nd ed., Blackwell, 287pp.Google Scholar

March, J.G. and Sproull, L.S. (1990). “Chapter 5: Technology, Management and Competitive Advantage,” in Goodman, P.S. and Sproull, L.S. (eds.), Technology and Organizations, Jossey-Bass, pp. 144–173.Google Scholar

Mayo, E. (1933). The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization, Macmillan, 194pp.Google Scholar

Monastersky, R. (2015). “And Then There Were None,” Nature, 527, pp. 26–29.Google Scholar

Munton, D. and Welch, D.A. (2012). The Cuban Missile Crisis: A Concise History, Oxford University Press, 123pp.Google Scholar

Olsen, J.P. (1976). “Reorganization as a Garbage Can,” in March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (eds.), Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations, 2nd ed., Universitetsforlaget, pp. 314–337.Google Scholar

Perrow, C. (1984). Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies, Basic Books, 386pp.Google Scholar

Pool, R. (1997). Beyond Engineering: How Society Shapes Technology, Oxford University Press, 358pp.Google Scholar

Raiffa, H. (1982). The Art and Science of Negotiation, Harvard University Press, 373pp.Google Scholar

Raiffa, H. with Richardson, J. and Metcalfe, D. (2002). Negotiation Analysis, Harvard University Press, 548pp.Google Scholar

Rauch, J. “Seeing around Corners,” The Atlantic Monthly, April 2002.Google Scholar

Robbins, S.P. (2003). Organizational Behavior, Prentice Hall, 675pp. (There are multiple editions of this textbook, the most recent versions of which are co-authored by T.A. Judge. I prefer the earlier editions.)Google Scholar

Rochlin, G.I. (1996). “Reliable Organization: Present Research and Future Directions,” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 4(2), pp. 55–59.Google Scholar

Roethlisberger, F.J. and Dickson, W.J., with the assistance of Wright, H.A. (1941). Management and the Worker: An Account of a Research Program Conducted by the Western Electric Company, Hawthorne Works, Chicago, Harvard University Press, 615pp.Google Scholar

Schelling, T.C. (1978, 2006). Micromotives and Macro Behavior, W.W. Norton and Co., 252pp. in 1978, 270pp. in 2006.Google Scholar

Shapira, Z. (ed.) (1997). Organizational Decision Making, Cambridge Series on Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, 397pp.Google Scholar

Simon, H. (1945–1997). Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations, The Free Press, 368pp.Google Scholar

Taylor, F.W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management, W.W. Norton, 144pp.Google Scholar

van Wolferen, K. (1990). The Enigma of Japanese Power, Vintage Books, 504pp.Google Scholar