Aristotle [1957] Metaphysics, Scriptorum Classicorum Bibliotheca Oxoniensis, Clarendon Press, Oxford, edited by Jaeger, W..Google Scholar

Avron , A. and Zamansky , A. [2011] Non-deterministic semantics for logical systems, Handbook of Philosophical Logic (Gabbay, D. and Guenthner, F., editors), vol. 16, Springer, Dordrecht, 2nd ed., pp. 227–304.Google Scholar

Bacon , A. [2013a] Curry’s paradox and ω-inconsistency, Studia Logica, vol. 101, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar

Bacon , A. [2013b] A new conditional for naive truth theory, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 54, pp. 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bacon , A. [2018] Radical anti-disquotationalism, Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 32, pp. 41–107.Google Scholar

Baker , G. P. and Hacker , P. M. S. [1984] Language, Sense and Nonsense: A Critical Investigation into Modern Theories of Language, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar

Barcan Marcus , R. [1993] Quantification and ontology, Modalities: Philosophical Essays, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 75–87, reprinted with changes from Noûs, vol. 6 (1972), pp. 240–250.Google Scholar

Barwise , J. and Etchemendy , J. [1987] The Liar: An Essay on Truth and Circularity, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar

Beall , J. C. [2009] Spandrels of Truth, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Beall , J. C. and Murzi , J. [2013] Two flavors of Curry’s paradox, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 110, pp. 143–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burge , T. [1984] Semantical paradox, Recent Essays on Truth and the Liar Paradox (Martin, R. L., editor), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 83–117, reprinted with a postscript from The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 76 (1979), pp. 169–198.Google Scholar

Burgess , A. and Burgess , J. [2011] Truth, Princeton Foundations of Contemporary Philosophy, Princeton University Press, Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll , L. [1895] What the tortoise said to Achilles, Mind, vol. 4, pp. 278–280.Google Scholar

Chihara , C. [1979] The semantic paradoxes: A diagnostic investigation, The Philosophical Review, vol. 88, pp. 590–618.Google Scholar

Cobreros , P., Egré , P., Ripley , D., and van Rooij , R. [2013] Reaching transparent truth, Mind, vol. 122, pp. 841–866.Google Scholar

Cook , R. [2014] The Yablo Paradox: An Essay on Circularity, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Curry , H. [1942] The inconsistency of certain formal logics, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 7, pp. 115–117.Google Scholar

Da Ré , B. and Rosenblatt , L. [2018] Contraction, infinitary quantifiers, and omega paradoxes, Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 47, pp. 611–629.Google Scholar

Dummett , M. [1991] The Logical Basis of Metaphysics, Duckworth, London.Google Scholar

Dunn , J. and Belnap , N. [1968] The substitution interpretation of the quantifiers, Noûs, vol. 2, pp. 177–185.Google Scholar

Field , H. [2003a] A revenge-immune solution to the semantic paradoxes, Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 32, pp. 139–177.Google Scholar

Field , H. [2003b] The semantic paradoxes and the paradoxes of vagueness, Liars and Heaps: New Essays on Paradox (Beall, J. C., editor), Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 262–311.Google Scholar

Field , H. [2008] Saving Truth from Paradox, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Field , H. [2014] Naive truth and restricted quantification: Saving truth a whole lot better, The Review of Symbolic Logic, vol. 7, pp. 147–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Field , H. [2016] Indicative conditionals, restricted quantification, and naive truth, The Review of Symbolic Logic, vol. 9, pp. 181–208.Google Scholar

Fine , K. [1975] Vagueness, truth and logic, Synthese, vol. 30, pp. 265–300.Google Scholar

Fine , K. [2005] Prior on the construction of possible worlds and instants, Modality and Tense: Philosophical Papers, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 133–175, reprinted from A. Prior and K. Fine, Worlds, times and selves, Duckworth, London, 1977, pp. 116–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fjellstad , A. [2020] A note on the cut-elimination proof in “Truth without contra(di)ction”, The Review of Symbolic Logic, vol. 13, pp. 882–886.Google Scholar

French , R. [2016] Structural reflexivity and the paradoxes of self-reference, Ergo, vol. 3, pp. 113–131.Google Scholar

Gaifman , H. [1992] Pointers to truth, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 89, pp. 223–261.Google Scholar

Gauker , C. [2006] Against stepping back: A critique of contextualist approaches to the semantic paradoxes, Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 35, pp. 393–422.Google Scholar

Gentzen , G. [1935] Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen. I, Mathematische Zeitschrift, vol. 39, pp. 176–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glanzberg , M. [2004] A contextual-hierarchical approach to truth and the liar paradox, Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 33, pp. 27–88.Google Scholar

Grelling , K. and Nelson , L. [1908] Bemerkungen zu den Paradoxien von Russell und Burali-Forti, Abhandlungen der Fries’schen Schule, vol. neue Folge 2, pp. 301–334.Google Scholar

Grover , D., Camp , J., and Belnap , N. [1975] A prosentential theory of truth, Philosophical Studies, vol. 27, pp. 73–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gupta , A. [1982] Truth and paradox, Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 11, pp. 1–60.Google Scholar

Gupta , A. and Belnap , N. [1993] The Revision Theory of Truth, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Haack , S. [1978] Philosophy of Logics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Halbach , V. [2011] Axiomatic Theories of Truth, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Heck , R. K. [2012] A liar paradox, Thought, vol. 1, pp. 36–40, originally published under the name “Richard G. Heck Jr”.Google Scholar

Herzberger , H. [1970] Paradoxes of grounding in semantics, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 67, pp. 145–167.Google Scholar

Herzberger , H. [1982] Naive semantics and the liar paradox, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 79, pp. 479–497.Google Scholar

Horsten , L. [2011] The Tarskian Turn: Deflationism and Axiomatic Truth, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Horwich , P. [1998] Truth, 2nd ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Hughes , G. E. and Cresswell , M. J. [1989] An Introduction to Modal Logic, Routledge, London, reprint, first published in 1968 by Methuen & Co. and reprinted with corrections in 1972.Google Scholar

Kant , I. [1974] Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Band 1, Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft, vol. 55, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, edited by Weischedel, W..Google Scholar

Kaplan , D. [1989] Demonstratives: An essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals, Themes from Kaplan (Al-mog, J., Perry, J., and Wettstein, H., editors), Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 481–563.Google Scholar

Kleene , S. C. [2009] Introduction to Metamathematics, Ishi Press, New York, first published in 1952, reprint of the 1952 edition with a foreword by M. Beeson.Google Scholar

Kneale , W. and Kneale , M. [1962] The Development of Logic, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Kripke , S. [1976] Is there a problem about substitutional quantification?, Truth and Meaning: Essays in Semantics (Evans, G. and McDowell, J., editors), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 325–419.Google Scholar

Kripke , S. [1984] Outline of a theory of truth, Recent Essays on Truth and the Liar Paradox (Martin, R. L., editor), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 83–117, reprinted with a postscript from The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 72 (1975), pp. 690–716.Google Scholar

Künne , W. [2003] Conceptions of Truth, Clarendon Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lambert , K. [1991] The nature of free logic, Philosophical Applications of Free Logic (Lambert, K., editor), Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar

Mankowitz , P. [2023] The liar without relativism, Erkenntnis, vol. 88, pp. 267–288.Google Scholar

Mcgee , V. [1990] Truth, Vagueness, and Paradox: An Essay on the Logic of Truth, Hackett, Indianapolis.Google Scholar

Mendelson , E. [1987] Introduction to Mathematical Logic. Third Edition, Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, Calif.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murzi , J. and Rossi , L. [2018] Reflection principles and the liar in context, Philosophers’ Imprint, vol. 18, no. 15.Google Scholar

Murzi , J. and Rossi , L. [2020] Generalized revenge, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 98, pp. 153–177.Google Scholar

Nadel , M. [2016] L_{ω 1 ω} and admissible fragments, Model-Theoretic Logics (Barwise, J. and Feferman, S., editors), Perspectives in Logic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 271–316, first edition 1985.Google Scholar

Pagin , P. [2006] ‘Means that’ and the liar, Kvantifikator för en Dag: Essays Dedicated to Dag Westerståhl on His Sixtieth Birthday (Malmgren, H., editor), Philosophical Communications, Web Series, no. 35, Götenburg University, Department of Philosophy, Sweden, pp. 203–230.Google Scholar

Parsons , C. [1983] The liar paradox, Mathematics in Philosophy: Selected Essays, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y., pp. 221–267, reprinted with a postscript from Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 3 (1974), pp. 381–412.Google Scholar

Plantinga , A. [1983] On existentialism, Philosophical Studies, vol. 44, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

Prawitz , D. [1965] Natural Deduction: A Proof-Theoretical Study, Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm.Google Scholar

Prawitz , D. [1973] Towards a foundation of a general proof theory, Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science IV: Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress for Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Bucharest, 1971 (Suppes, P., Henkin, L., Joja, A., and Moisil, Gr., editors), North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 225–250.Google Scholar

Prawitz , D. [1974] On the idea of a general proof theory, Synthese, vol. 27, pp. 63–77.Google Scholar

Priest , G. [1997] Yablo’s paradox, Analysis, vol. 57, pp. 236–242.Google Scholar

Priest , G. [2006] In Contradiction: A Study of the Transconsistent, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prior , A. [1976] Some problems of self-reference in John Buridan, Papers in Logic and Ethics, Duckworth, London, pp. 130–146.Google Scholar

Putnam , H. [1979] On properties, Mathematics, Matter and Method: Philosophical Papers, Volume 1, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, second ed., pp. 305–322, first published in N. Rescher et al., editors, Essays in honor of Carl G. Hempel: A tribute on the occasion of his sixty-fifth birthday, Synthese Library 24, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, 1969, pp. 235–254.Google Scholar

Putnam , H. [1991] The nature of mental states, The Nature of Mind (Rosenthal, D., editor), Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 197–203, first published as “Psychological predicates” in W. Capitan and D. Merrill, editors, Art, mind, and religion, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 1967, pp. 37–48.Google Scholar

Quine , W. V. O. [1960] Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Quine , W. V. O. [1980] Two dogmas of empiricism, From a Logical Point of View: Nine Logico-Philosophical Essays, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, 2nd, revised ed., pp. 20–46, first published, with some differences, in The Philosophical Review, vol. 60 (1951), pp. 20–43.Google Scholar

Quine , W. V. O. [1981] Mathematical Logic, revised ed., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Quine , W. V. O. [1986] Philosophy of Logic, 2nd ed., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Read , S. [2008] The truth-schema and the liar, Unity, Truth and the Liar: The Modern Relevance of Medieval Solutions to the Liar Paradox (Rahman, S., Tulenheimo, T., and Genot, E., editors), Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, vol. 8, Springer, pp. 3–17.Google Scholar

Ripley , D. [2012] Conservatively extending classical logic with transparent truth, Review of Symbolic Logic, vol. 5, pp. 354–378.Google Scholar

Ripley , D. [2013] Paradoxes and failures of cut, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 91, pp. 139–164.Google Scholar

Rumfitt , I. [2014] Truth and meaning, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, vol. 88, pp. 21–55.Google Scholar

Sagi , G. [2017] Contextualism, relativism and the liar, Erkenntnis, vol. 82, pp. 913–928.Google Scholar

Sainsbury , M. [2001] Logical Forms: An Introduction to Philosophical Logic, 2nd ed., Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar

Shoesmith , D. J. and Smiley , T. J. [1978] Multiple-Conclusion Logic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simmons , K. [1993] Universality and the Liar: An Essay on Truth and the Diagonal Argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Simmons , K. [2018] Contextual theories of truth and paradox, The Oxford Handbook of Truth (Glanzberg, M., editor), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 755–786.Google Scholar

Skyrms , B. [1970] Return of the liar: Three-valued logic and the concept of truth, American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 7, pp. 153–161.Google Scholar

Smith , N. [2006] Semantic regularity and the liar paradox, The Monist, vol. 89, pp. 178–202.Google Scholar

Smith , P. [2007] An Introduction to Gödel’s Theorems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Soames , S. [1999] Understanding Truth, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar

Sorensen , R. [2001] Vagueness and Contradiction, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Stephanou , Y. [1994] Some Aspects of Meaning and Justification in Logic, Ph.D. thesis, King’s College London.Google Scholar

Stephanou , Y. [2018] A propositional theory of truth, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 59, pp. 503–545.Google Scholar

Stephanou , Y. [2020a] An argument for existentialism, Acta Analytica, vol. 35, pp. 507–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stephanou , Y. [2020b] Classical logic and the liar, Logic and Logical Philosophy, vol. 29, pp. 35–56.Google Scholar

Stern , J. [2016] Toward Predicate Approaches to Modality, Springer, Cham.Google Scholar

Strawson , P. [1993] On referring, Meaning and Reference (Moore, A., editor), Oxford Readings in Philosophy, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 56–79, reprinted from Mind, vol. 59 (1950), pp. 320–344.Google Scholar

Tappenden , J. [1993a] Analytic truth—it’s worse (or perhaps better) than you thought, Philosophical Topics, vol. 21, pp. 233–261.Google Scholar

Tappenden , J. [1993b] The liar and sorites paradoxes: Toward a unified treatment, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 90, pp. 551–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tarski , A. [1983] The concept of truth in formalized languages, Logic, Semantics, Meta-mathematics, Hackett, Indianapolis, 2nd ed., pp. 152–278, translated by J. H. Woodger and edited by J. Corcoran, first published in Polish in 1933.Google Scholar

Tennant , N. [2015] A new unified account of truth and paradox, Mind, vol. 124, pp. 571–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tennant , N. [2017] Core Logic, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Ungar , A. M. [1992] Normalization, Cut-Elimination and the Theory of Proofs, CSLI Lecture Notes, no. 28, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford.Google Scholar

van Fraassen , B. [1968] Presupposition, implication, and self-reference, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 65, pp. 136–152.Google Scholar

Weir , A. [2004] There are no true contradictions, The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays (Priest, G., Beall, J. C., and Armour-Garb, B., editors), Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 385–417.Google Scholar

Williamson , T. [1992] Vagueness and ignorance, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, vol. 66, pp. 145–162.Google Scholar

Williamson , T. [1998] Indefinite extensibility, Grazer Philosophische Studien, vol. 55, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar

Williamson , T. [1999] Truthmakers and the converse Barcan formula, Dialectica, vol. 53, pp. 253–270.Google Scholar

Yablo , S. [1985] Truth and reflection, Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 14, pp. 297–349.Google Scholar

Yablo , S. [1993] Paradox without self-reference, Analysis, vol. 53, pp. 251–252.Google Scholar

Yablo , S. [2003] New grounds for naive truth theory, Liars and Heaps: New Essays on Paradox (Beall, J. C., editor), Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 312–330.Google Scholar

Zardini , E. [2011] Truth without contra(di)ction, The Review of Symbolic Logic, vol. 4, pp. 498–535.Google Scholar

Zardini , E. [2015] Getting one for two, or the contractors’ bad deal. Towards a unified solution to the semantic paradoxes, Unifying the Philosophy of Truth (Achourioti, T., Galinon, H., Fernández, J. M., and Fujimoto, K., editors), Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, vol. 36, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 461–493.Google Scholar