Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T22:50:48.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter Six - Trait-mediated effects, density dependence and the dynamic stability of ecological systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

Robert D. Holt
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Florida
Michael Barfield
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Florida
Takayuki Ohgushi
Affiliation:
Kyoto University, Japan
Oswald Schmitz
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Robert D. Holt
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

Introduction

One of the most basic things that can be said about the ecology of a species is that the traits of its members (in a given environmental setting) influence that species’ demographic rates – births, deaths and movements – as well as transitions such as changes in body size or condition. When species interact, their demographic rates interlock, so changes in the abundance or traits of one species affect the vital rates of the others (and vice versa, sometimes). A message elaborated throughout this volume is that due to the fundamental connection between traits and demography, the traits of interacting individuals, and in particular plasticity in those traits, can have ramifying influences for many different issues in ecology and evolutionary biology, including in particular the percolation of indirect interactions through complex communities (e.g., Krivan and Schmitz 2004; Ohgushi 2005; Abrams 2010; Utsumi et al. 2010).

A perennial issue in population ecology is understanding how density dependence influences the abundance and distribution of species. Here we argue that an explicit concern with density dependence is – or should be – of central interest as well in articulating the ecological impact of trait-mediated indirect effects (TMIEs). We start with general comments on how the traits involved in indirect interactions can also influence density dependence. We provide a brief overview of prior literature that touches on density dependence in the context of trait-mediated interactions and present a simple theoretical model to illustrate how trait-mediated effects can influence density dependence. The term ‘stability’ in ecology encompasses several distinct concepts, such as the return of a population or community to a reference state following disturbance, or the persistence of ecological systems over time (Grimm and Wissel 1997). Understanding the causes of stability for essentially all these meanings requires one to gauge how density dependence operates over both short and long timescales, via both direct and indirect mechanisms.

Type
Chapter
Information
Trait-Mediated Indirect Interactions
Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives
, pp. 89 - 106
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, P. A. 1984 Functional responses of optimal foragersAmerican Naturalist 120 382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, P. A. 1993 Indirect effects arising from optimal foragingKawanabe, H.Cohen, J. E.Iwasaki, K.Mutualism and Community OrganizationOxfordOxford University Press255Google Scholar
Abrams, P. A. 1995 Implications of dynamically variable traits for identifying, classifying, and measuring direct and indirect effects in ecological communitiesAmerican Naturalist 146 112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, P. A. 2007 Defining and measuring the impact of dynamic traits on interspecific interactionsEcology 88 2555CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abrams, P. A. 2009 Determining the functional form of density dependence: deductive approaches for consumer–resource systems having a single resourceAmerican Naturalist 174 321Google ScholarPubMed
Abrams, P. A. 2010 Implications of flexible foraging for interspecific interactions: lessons from simple modelsFunctional Ecology 24 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, P. A.Holt, R. D. 2002 The impact of consumer–resource cycles on the coexistence of competing consumersTheoretical Population Biology 62 281CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abrams, P. A.Kawecki, T. J. 1999 Adaptive host preference and the dynamics of host–parasitoid interactionsTheoretical Population Biology 56 307CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abrams, P. A.Vos, M. 2003 Adaptation, density dependence, and the abundances of trophic levelsEvolutionary Ecology Research 5 1113Google Scholar
Armstrong, R. A.McGehee, R. 1976 Coexistence of two competitors on one resourceJournal of Theoretical Biology 56 499CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bagchi, R.Swinfield, T.Gallery, R. E. 2010 Testing the Janzen-Connell mechanism: pathogens cause overcompensating density dependence in a tropical treeEcology Letters 13 1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckerman, A. P. 2005 The shape of things eaten: the functional response of herbivores foraging adaptivelyOikos 110 591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beddington, J. R. 1975 Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effects on searching efficiencyJournal of Animal Ecology 44 331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berec, L.Eisner, J.Krivan, V. 2010 Adaptive foraging does not always lead to more complex food websJournal of Theoretical Biology 266 211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brashares, J. S.Werner, J. R.Sinclair, A. R. E. 2010 Social ‘meltdown’ in the demise of an island endemic: Allee effects and the Vancouver Island marmotJournal of Animal Ecology 79 965CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Briggs, C. J.Hoopes, M. F. 2004 Stabilizing effects in spatial parasitoid-host and predator–prey models: a reviewTheoretical Population Biology 65 299CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, J. S.Kotler, B. P. 2007 Foraging and the ecology of fearStephens, D. W.Brown, J. S.Ydenberg, R. C.Foraging: Behavior and EcologyChicago, ILUniversity of Chicago Press437Google Scholar
Cortez, M. H.Ellner, S. P. 2010 Understanding rapid evolution in predator–prey interactions using the theory of fast-slow dynamical systemsAmerican Naturalist 176 E109CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Courchamp, F.Berec, L.Gascoigne, J. 2009 Allee Effects in Ecology and ConservationOxfordOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Creel, S.Christianson, D.Liley, S.Winnie, Jr, J. A. 2007 Predation risk affects reproductive physiology and demography of elkScience 315 960CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dambacher, J. M.Ramos-Jiliberto, R. 2007 Understanding and predicting effects of modified interactions through a qualitative analysis of community structureQuarterly Review of Biology 82 227CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeAngelis, D. L.Goldstein, R. A.Neill, R. V. 1975 A model for trophic interactionEcology 56 881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denno, R. F.Kaplan, I. 2007 Plant-mediated interactions in herbivorous insects: mechanisms, symmetry, and challenging the paradigms of competition pastOhgushi, T.Craig, T. P.Price, P. W.Ecological Communities: Plant Mediation in Indirect Interaction WebsCambridgeCambridge University Press19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenton, A.Rands, S. A. 2006 The impact of parasite manipulation and predator foraging behavior on predator–prey communitiesEcology 87 2832CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fryxell, J. M.Lundberg, P. 1998 Individual Behavior and Community DynamicsLondonChapman and HallCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaillard, J. M.Festa-Bianchet, M.Yoccoz, N. G.Loison, A.Toigo, C. 2000 Temporal variation in fitness components and population dynamics of large herbivoresAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31 367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garay-Narváez, L.Ramos-Jiliberto, R. 2009 Induced defenses within food webs: the role of community trade-offs, delayed responses, and defense specificityEcological Complexity 6 383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gause, G. F.Smaragdova, N. P.Witt, A. A. 1936 Further studies of interaction between predators and preyJournal of Animal Ecology 5 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, V.Wissel, C. 1997 Babel, or the ecological stability discussions: an inventory and analysis of terminology and a guide for avoiding confusionOecologia 109 323CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawlena, D.Schmitz, O. J. 2010 Physiological stress as a fundamental mechanism linking predation to ecosystem functioningAmerican Naturalist 176 537CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hosack, G. R.Li, H. W.Rossignol, P. A. 2009 Sensitivity of system stability to model structureEcological Modelling 220 1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, R. D. 1977 Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communitiesTheoretical Population Biology 12 197CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holt, R. D. 1985 Density-independent mortality, non-linear competitive interactions, and species coexistenceJournal of Theoretical Biology 116 479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horak, P.Tummeleht, L.Talvik, H. 2006 Predator threat, copulation effort and immunity in male rats ()Journal of Zoology 268 9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huisman, J.Weissing, F. J. 1999 Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaosNature 402 407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ives, A. R.Dobson, A. P. 1987 Antipredator behavior and the population dynamics of simple predator–prey systemsAmerican Naturalist 130 431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimbrell, T.Holt, R. D. 2004 On the interplay of predator switching and prey evasion in determining the stability of predator–prey dynamicsIsrael Journal of Zoology 50 187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondoh, M. 2003 Foraging adaptation and the relationship between food-web complexity and stabilityScience 299 1388CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kopp, M.Gabriel, W. 2006 The dynamic effects of an inducible defense in the Nicholson–Bailey modelTheoretical Population Biology 70 43CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kratina, P.Vos, M.Bateman, A.Anholt, B. R. 2009 Functional responses modified by predator densityOecologia 159 425CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krivan, V. 1997 Dynamical consequences of host-feeding on parasitoid-host dynamicsBulletin of Mathematical Biology 59 809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krivan, V. 1998 Effects of optimal antipredator behavior of prey on predator–prey dynamics: the role of refugesTheoretical Population Biology 53 131CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krivan, V. 2007 The Lotka–Volterra predator–prey model with foraging-predation risk trade-offsAmerican Naturalist 170 771Google ScholarPubMed
Krivan, V.Schmitz, O. J. 2004 Trait and density mediated indirect interactions in simple food websOikos 107 239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levins, R. 1975 Evolution in communities near equilibriumCody, M.Diamond, J. M.Ecology and Evolution of CommunitiesCambridge, MAHarvard University Press16Google Scholar
Lochmiller, R. L.Deerenberg, C. 2000 Trade-offs in evolutionary immunology: just what is the cost of immunityOikos 88 87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logofet, D. O. 1993 Matrices and Graphs: Stability Problems in Mathematical EcologyBoca Raton, FLCRC PressGoogle Scholar
Loeuille, N. 2010 Consequences of adaptive foraging in diverse communitiesFunctional Ecology 24 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, R. M. 1974 Stability and Complexity in Model EcosystemsPrinceton, NJPrinceton University PressGoogle Scholar
Montaño-Moctezuma, G.Li, H. W.Rossignol, P. A. 2007 Alternative community structures in a kelp-urchin community: a qualitative modeling approachEcological Modelling 205 343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mougi, A.Kishida, O. 2009 Reciprocal phenotypic plasticity can lead to stable predator–prey interactionJournal of Animal Ecology 78 1172CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murdoch, W. W.Oaten, A. 1975 Predation and population stabilityAdvances in Ecological Research 9 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowicki, P.Bonelli, S.Barbero, F.Balletto, E. 2009 Relative importance of density-dependent regulation and environmental stochasticity for butterfly population dynamicsOecologia 161 227CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohgushi, T. 2005 Indirect interaction webs: herbivore-induced effects through trait change in plantsAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36 81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puccia, C. J.Levins, R. 1985 Qualitative Modeling of Complex Systems: An Introduction to Loop Analysis and Time AveragingCambridge, MAHarvard University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramos-Jiliberto, Garay-Narváez, L. 2007 Qualitative effects of inducible defenses in trophic chainsEcological Complexity 4 58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinaldi, S.Gragnani, A.De Monte, S. 2004 Remarks on antipredator behavior and food chain dynamicsTheoretical Population Biology 66 277CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenzweig, M. L. 1974 Aspects of biological exploitationQuarterly Review of Biology 52 371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roughgarden, J. 1971 Density-dependent natural selectionEcology 52 453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roughgarden, J.Feldman, M. W. 1975 Species packing and predation pressureEcology 56 489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffer, M. 2009 Critical Transitions in Nature and SocietyPrinceton, NJPrinceton University PressGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, O. J. 1992 Exploitation in model food chains with mechanistic consumer–resource dynamicsTheoretical Population Biology 41 161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, O. J. 2010 Resolving Ecological ComplexityPrinceton, NJPrinceton University PressGoogle Scholar
Schoener, T. W. 1973 Population growth regulated by intraspecific competition for energy or time: some simple representationsTheoretical Population Biology 4 56CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheriff, M. J.Krebs, C. J.Boonstra, R. 2009 The sensitive hare: sublethal effects of predator stress on reproduction in snowshoe haresJournal of Animal Ecology 78 1249CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinclair, A. R. E. 2003 Mammal population regulation, keystone processes, and ecosystem dynamicsPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 348 1729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skalski, G. T.Gilliam, J. F. 2001 Functional responses with predator interference: viable alternatives to the Holling type II modelEcology 82 3083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbani, P.Ramos-Jiliberto, R. 2010 Adaptive prey behavior and the dynamics of intraguild predationEcological Modelling 221 2628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Utsumi, S.Ando, Y.Miki, T. 2010 Linkages among trait-mediated indirect effects: a new framework for the indirect interaction webPopulation Ecology 52 485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baalen, M.Krivan, V.Rijn, P. C. J.Sabelis, M. W. 2001 Alternative food, switching predators, and the persistence of predator–prey systemsAmerican Naturalist 157 512Google ScholarPubMed
Wissinger, S. A.Whiteman, H. H.Denoe, M.Mumford, M. L.Aubee, C. B. 2010 Consumptive and nonconsumptive effects of cannibalism in fluctuating age-structured populationsEcology 91 549CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ziebarth, N. L.Abbott, K. C.Ives, A. R. 2010 Weak population regulation in ecological time seriesEcology Letters 13 21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×