Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T17:27:53.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Interrogative constructions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2013

Peter Siemund
Affiliation:
Universität Hamburg
Get access

Summary

We can distinguish four major clause types in English: declaratives, interrogatives, imperatives, and exclamatives. We identify them primarily on the basis of their word order, as I will show below. The focus of this chapter lies on interrogatives, but it will be useful to introduce some background information on clause types and their associated functions. This will be done in Section 12.1. Interrogatives in varieties of English primarily differ from the corresponding standard specimens in terms of word order, both in main and embedded interrogative clauses. We will investigate these differences in Section 12.2. A cross-linguistic comparison of interrogatives that places standard and vernacular constructions of English in this domain into a larger picture will round off this chapter (Section 12.3).

Overview

Interrogative clauses as a grammatical phenomenon belong to the system of sentence types. We understand sentence types as the systematic pairing of the formal properties of a clause with some illocutionary function (see König and Siemund 2007). Let us first of all try to make clear what this means.

Illocutionary force and sentence types

In uttering a sentence, speakers can perform various communicative acts, such as making a statement, asking a question, issuing a command, or expressing surprise about an unexpected state of affairs. They may also want to apologise, promise something, or accuse or criticise somebody. There is scarcely a limit to the set of imaginable communicative acts, and speakers are likely to find extremely nuanced ways to express them.

Type
Chapter
Information
Varieties of English
A Typological Approach
, pp. 237 - 257
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Davydova, Julia, Hilbert, Michaela, Pietsch, Lukas, and Siemund, Peter. 2011. Comparing varieties of English: Problems and perspectives. In Peter Siemund (ed.), Linguistic Universals and Language Variation, 291–323. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2011a. Polar questions. In Dryer, Matthew S and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, chapter 116A. Available online at . Accessed 22 December 2011.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2011b. Position of interrogative phrases in content questions. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, chapter 93A. Available online at . Accessed 22 December 2011.Google Scholar
Filppula, Markku. 1999. A Grammar of Irish English: Language in Hibernian Style. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R. 1940. Tunica. New York: Augustin.Google Scholar
Hagège, Claude. 2008. Towards a typology of interrogative verbs. Linguistic Typology 12(1). 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henry, Alison. 1995. Belfast English and Standard English: Dialect Variation and Parameter Setting (Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hinds, John. 1984. Japanese. In Chisholm, William S., Milic, Louis T., and Greppin, John A.C. (eds.), Interrogativity: A Colloquium on the Grammar, Typology and Pragmatics of Questions in Seven Diverse Languages, 145–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard and Siemund, Peter. 2007. Speech act distinctions in grammar. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, volume I: Clause Structue, 276–324. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard and Siemund, Peter. 2012. Satztyp und Typologie. In Meibauer, Jörg, Steinbach, Markus, and Altmann, Hans (eds.), Satztypen des Deutschen. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. and Thompson, Sandra A.. 1984. Mandarin. In Chisholm, William S, Milic, Louis T., and Greppin, John A.C (eds.), Interrogativity: A Colloquium on the Grammar, Typology and Pragmatics of Questions in Seven Diverse Languages, 47–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan. 2009. Content interrogatives in a sample of 50 languages. Lingua 119(8). 1131–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend and Bhatt, Rakesh M. 2008. World Englishes: The Study of New Linguistic Varieties. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michael. 1992. A Grammar of Lango. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siemund, Peter. 2001. Interrogative constructions. In Haspelmath, Martin, König, Ekkehard, Oesterreicher, Wulf, and Raible, Wolfgang (eds.), Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook, volume II, 1010–27. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter and Hannah, Jean. 2008. International English: A Guide to the Varieties of Standard English. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 1994. Speech act classification, language typology and cognition. In Tsohatzidis, Savas L. (ed.), Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives, 460–77. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Filppula, Markku. 2000. Inversion in embedded questions in some regional varieties of English. In Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo, Denison, David, Hogg, Richard M., and McCully, Chris B. (eds.), Generative Theory and Corpus Studies: A Dialogue from 10 ICEHL, 439–53. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hilbert, Michaela. 2008. Interrogative inversion in non-standard varieties of English. In Siemund, Peter and Kintana, Noemi (eds.), Language Contact and Contact Languages, 261–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilbert, Michaela. 2011. Interrogative inversion as a learner phenomenon in English contact varieties: A case of Angloversals? In Mukherjee, Joybrato and Hundt, Marianne (eds.), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap, 126–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney. 1994. The contrast between interrogatives and questions. Journal of Linguistics 30. 411–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. and Zwicky, Arnold M.. 1985. Speech act distinctions in syntax. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, volume I: Clause Structure, 155–96. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sand, Andrea and Kolbe, Daniela. 2010. Embedded inversion worldwide. Linguaculture 2(1). 25–42.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×