Lewis, G, ed. Saving mothers’ lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–2008. The Eighth Report of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG 2011;118 Suppl. 1;1–203. [As of February 2022, this report had been cited 1,857 times in the general literature and in 457 academic papers.]Google Scholar

Lewis, G, Drife, J. Why Mothers Die 1997–99: the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. London: RCOG Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Lewis, G, Drife, J, Botting, B et al. Why Mothers Die: report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom 1994–1996. London: TSO, 1998.Google Scholar

Paintin, D. Commentary: effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1990;97(11):967–73.Google Scholar

Weindling, AM. The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH): a review of the history of Confidential Enquiries. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2003;88:1034–7.CrossRef Google Scholar

Barry, CN. Home versus hospital confinement. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 1980;30(211):102–7.Google Scholar

Editorial. Current practice in obstetrics. British Medical Journal 1964;1(5383): 580.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jeffcoate, TNA. Prolonged labour. Lancet 1961;278(7193):61–7.Google Scholar

MacLennan, HR. The management of labour in contracted pelvis. British Medical Journal 1954;2(4892):837–40.Google Scholar

Miller, D. Common obstetrical injuries and their sequelae. British Medical Journal 1936;2(3939):4–6.Google Scholar

O’Driscoll, K, Jackson, RJA, Gallagher, JT. Prevention of prolonged labour. British Medical Journal 1969;2(5655):477–80.Google Scholar

Sheehan, HL. Shock in obstetrics. Lancet 1948;251(6488):1–7.Google Scholar

Wood, LAC. Obstetric retrospect. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 1981;31(223):80–90.Google Scholar

Buddeberg, BS, Aveling, W. Puerperal sepsis in the 21st century: progress, new challenges and the situation worldwide. Postgraduate Medical Journal 2015;91(1080):572–8.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Colebrook, L. Prevention of puerperal sepsis: a call to action. British Medical Journal 1936;1:1257–9. [Colebrook had long campaigned for better aseptic practice in childbirth. This heartfelt paper appeared in the BMJ two weeks after his historic Lancet report on prontosil.]Google Scholar

Colebrook, L, Kenny, M. Treatment of human puerperal infections, and of experimental infections in mice, with prontosil. Lancet 1936;227(5884):1279–81.CrossRef Google Scholar

Duka, T. Childbed fever, its causes and prevention: a life’s history. Lancet 1886;128(3283 and 3284): 206–8 and 246–8. [These articles about Ignaz Semmelweis were written by Theodor Duka, who restored his reputation.]Google Scholar

Loudon, I. The tragedy of childbed fever. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. [This is the definitive history of puerperal sepsis.]Google Scholar

Lowis, GW, Minagar, A. Alexander Gordon of Aberdeen and the contagiousness of puerperal fever. Journal of Medical Biography 2002;10:150–4.Google Scholar

Noble, WC. Coli: great healer of men. The biography of Dr Leonard Colebrook FRS. London: Heinemann, 1974.Google Scholar

Obstetrical Society of London. Discussion on puerperal fever. Lancet 1875;105(2698):685–92.Google Scholar

Black, MD. Blood transfusion in obstetrics. British Medical Journal 1937;1(3082):903–6. (and correspondence in British Medical Journal 1937;1(3084):1043–4).CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hendry, J, Baird, D. Treatment of placenta praevia. Transactions of Edinburgh Obstetrical Society 1937;57:25–44.Google Scholar PubMed

Liang, DYS. The emergency obstetric service, Bellshill Maternity Hospital 1933–1961. BJOG 1963;70(1):83–93.Google Scholar

Lloyd, HN et al. Discussion on [the] emergency obstetrical service (the flying squad): its use and abuse. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 1949;42:1–10.Google Scholar

Mavrides, E, Allard, S, Chandraharan, E, et al. on behalf of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Prevention and management of postpartum haemorrhage. (Green-Top Guideline No. 52.) BJOG 2016;124:e106–e149.Google Scholar

Pavord, S, Rayment, R, Madan, B et al. on behalf of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Management of inherited bleeding disorders in pregnancy. (Green-Top Guideline No. 71: Joint with UKHCDO.) BJOG 2017;124:e193–e263.Google Scholar

Thomson, AJ, Ramsay, JE, on behalf of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Antepartum haemorrhage (Green-Top Guideline No. 63). London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2011.Google Scholar

WHO recommendations for prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage. www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/9789241548502/en Google Scholar

Eclampsia Trial Collaborative Group. Which anticonvulsant for women with eclampsia? Evidence from the Collaborative Eclampsia Trial. Lancet 1995;345:1455–63.Google Scholar

Magpie Trial Collaborative Group. Do women with pre-eclampsia, and their babies, benefit from magnesium sulphate? The Magpie Trial: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2002;359:1877–90.Google Scholar

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management. NICE Guideline 133, 2019. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng133 Google Scholar

WHO recommendations for prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/9789241548335/en Google Scholar

Abortion and maternal deaths. British Medical Journal 1976;2(6027):70.Google Scholar

Anonymous. The statistics of 100 cases of abortion. Lancet 1902;159:1125–6.Google Scholar

Anonymous. Should abortion be legalised? Lancet 1932;219:627.Google Scholar

Anonymous. A charge of illegal abortion: Rex v. Bourne. Lancet 1938;232:220–6.Google Scholar

Baird, D. A fifth freedom? British Medical Journal 1965;2(5471):1411–18.Google Scholar

Davis, A. 2,665 cases of abortion: a clinical survey. British Medical Journal 1950;2(4671): 123–30.Google Scholar

Diggory, PLC. Some experiences of therapeutic abortion. Lancet 1969;293:873–5.Google Scholar

Drife, J. Historical perspective on induced abortion through the ages and its links with maternal mortality. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2010;24:431–41.Google Scholar

General Medical Council. Deputation on the Midwives Bill. British Medical Journal 1895;1(1796):1244–7.Google Scholar

Malleson, J. Criminal abortion: a suggestion for lessening its incidence. Lancet 1939;233:366–7.Google Scholar

On the frequency of criminal abortion. Provincial Medical Journal 1843;2:471–2.Google Scholar

Rowlands, S (ed.). Abortion care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Thomson, AT. Lectures on medical jurisprudence now in the course of delivery at the University of London: Lecture XVII: on abortion. Lancet 1837;27:625–30.Google Scholar

Asher, R. Talking sense. London: Pitman, 1972.Google Scholar

Atlee, HB. Evidence in favour of a more active puerperium: a study of 500 cases. Canadian Medical Association Journal 1935;33(2):144–50.Google Scholar

Bryant, EC. Early ambulation in the practice of obstetrics. Canadian Medical Association Journal 1947;57(3):257–9.Google Scholar PubMed

Drife, J. Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in obese women. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2015;29(3):365–76.Google Scholar

Editorial. Early discharge of maternity patients. British Medical Journal 1964;2(5401):70–1.Google Scholar

Hampton, JR. The end of clinical freedom. British Medical Journal 1983;287(6401):1237–8.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and the puerperium. Third edition. (Green-Top Guideline No. 37a). London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2015.Google Scholar

Salzman, KD. The nature and some hazards of obstetrics in general practice. British Medical Journal 1955;2(4930):15–19.Google Scholar

Thomas, J, Paranjothy, S, RCOG Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. London: RCOG Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Thornton, P, Douglas, J. Coagulation in pregnancy. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2010;24(3):339–52.Google Scholar

Carapetis, JR. Rheumatic heart disease in developing countries. New England Journal of Medicine 2007;357(5):439–41.Google Scholar

Drife, JO. Breast cancer, pregnancy, and the pill. British Medical Journal 1981;283:778–9.Google Scholar

Head, CEG, Thorne, SA. Congenital heart disease in pregnancy. Postgraduate Medical Journal 2005;81:292–8.Google Scholar

Nelson-Piercy, C. Handbook of obstetric medicine. Sixth edition. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis, 2021.Google Scholar

Powrie, RO, Greene, MF, Camann, W, eds. De Swiet’s medical disorders in obstetric practice. Fifth edition. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.Google Scholar

Schaufelberger, M. Cardiomyopathy in pregnancy. Heart 2019;105:1543–51.Google Scholar

Soma-Pillay, P, Nelson-Piercy, C, Toppanen, H, Mebazaa, A. Physiological changes in pregnancy. Cardiovascular Journal of Africa 2016;27(2):89–94.Google Scholar

Yarris, JP, Hunter, AJ. Roy Hertz MD (1909–2002): the cure of choriocarcinoma and its impact on the development of chemotherapy for cancer. Gynecologic Oncology 2003;89:193–8.CrossRef Google Scholar

Yentis, SM, Steet, PJ, Plaat, F. Eisenmenger’s syndrome in pregnancy: maternal and fetal mortality in the 1990s. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1998;105(8):921–2.Google Scholar

Sykes, WS. Essays on the first hundred years of anaesthesia. Volume 2. 1982. Edinburgh: E&S Livingstone.Google Scholar

Grieff, JMC, Tordoff, SG, Griffiths, R et al. Acid aspiration prophylaxis in 202 obstetric anaesthetic units in the UK. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1994;3:137–42.Google Scholar

Interim report of Departmental Committee on Maternal Mortality & Morbidity. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1930.Google Scholar

Thomas, J, Paranjothy, S. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit: The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. London: RCOG Press; 2001.Google Scholar

Cantwell, R. Perinatal mental health service development across the UK: many achievements, growing challenges. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine. (2022): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2022.1 CrossRef Google Scholar

Howard, LM, Molyneaux, E, Dennis, C-L, Rachat, T, Stein, A, Milgrom, J. Non-psychotic mental disorders in the perinatal period. Lancet 2014;384 :1775–88.Google Scholar

Jones, I, Chandra, PS, Dazzan, P, Howard, LM. Bipolar disorder, affective psychosis, and schizophrenia in pregnancy and the post-partum period. Lancet 2014;384:1789–99.Google Scholar

Khalifeh, H, Hunt, IM, Appleby, L, Howard, LM. Suicide in perinatal and non-perinatal women in contact with psychiatric services: 15 year findings from a UK national inquiry. Lancet Psychiatry 2016;3:233–42.Google Scholar

Oates, M. The development of an integrated community service for severe postnatal mental illness. In Motherhood and Mental Illness 2: causes and consequences, ed. Kumar, S and Brockington, IF, pp. 133–58. London: Wright, 1988.Google Scholar

Prettyman, RJ and Friedman, T. Care of women with puerperal psychiatric disorders in England and Wales. British Medical Journal 1991;302:1345–6.Google Scholar

Department of Health. Inequalities in Health: report of an independent enquiry chaired by Sir Donald Acheson. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1998.Google Scholar

Department of Health and Social Security. Inequalities in Health: report of a research working group chaired by Sir Douglas Black. London: Department of Health and Social Security, 1980.Google Scholar

Godber, G. The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal Deaths: A limited study of clinical results. In: A Question of Quality? Roads to assurance in medical care. Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, ed. McLachan, G, pp. 23–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Gray, A M. Inequalities in Health. The Black Report: a summary and comment. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7118327 Google Scholar

Lewis, G, ed. Saving Mothers’ Lives: the seventh report of the Confidential Enquires into Maternal Deaths in the UK. CEMACH. December 2007. www.cmace.org.uk Google Scholar

Lewis, G, ed. Saving Mothers’ Lives: the eighth report of the UK Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths. Centre for Maternal and Child Health Enquiries. March 2011. Published as BJOG 2011;118Suppl1: 1–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02847.x Google Scholar

Marmot, M. Health equity in England: the Marmot review ten years on. BMJ 2020;368:m693.Google Scholar

Marmot, M, Allen, J, Boyce, T, Goldblatt, P, Morrison, J. Health equity in England: the Marmot review 10 years on. London: Institute of Health Equity, 2020. www.instituteofhealthequity.org/the-marmot-review-10-years-on Google Scholar

Oliver, A. Reflections on the development of health inequalities policy in the United Kingdom. Working Papers 11/2008. LSE Health. London: School of Economics and Political Science, 2008.Google Scholar

Oxley, WH, Phillips, MH, Young, J. Maternal mortality in Rochdale. British Medical Journal 1935;1(3867):304–7.Google Scholar

Socialist Health Association. The Black Report. 1980. www.sochealth.co.uk/national-health-service/public-health-and-wellbeing/poverty-and-inequality/the-black-report-1980 Google Scholar

https://healthtalk.org/conditions-threaten-womens-lives-childbirth-pregnancy/overview. This is a website with women describing their near-miss experiences.Google Scholar

Hinton, L, Locock, L, Knight, M. Experiences of the quality of care of women with near-miss maternal morbidities in the UK. BJOG. 2014 Sep;121 Suppl 4 (Suppl4): 20–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12800. PMID: 25236629; PMCID: PMC4312976.Google Scholar

Knight, M, Acosta, C, Brocklehurst, P et al. Beyond maternal death: improving the quality of maternal care through national studies of ‘near-miss’ maternal morbidity. Southampton: NIHR Journals Library, 2016. PMID: 27386616.Google Scholar

Knight, M, Bunch, K, Vousden, N et al. A national cohort study and confidential enquiry to investigate ethnic disparities in maternal mortality. EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Dec. 13;43:101237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101237. PMID: 34977514; PMCID: PMC8683666.Google Scholar

Knight, M, Lindquist, A. The UK Obstetric Surveillance System: impact on patient safety. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Aug;27(4):621–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.03.002. Epub 2013 Mar 30. PMID: 23548471.Google Scholar

www.thelancet.com/series/maternal-health-2016 Google Scholar

Marshall, O, Blaylock, R, Murphy, C, Sanders, J. Risk messages relating to fertility and pregnancy: a media content analysis. Wellcome Open Res. 2021 May 14;6:114. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16744.1. PMID: 34286102; PMCID: PMC8276184.Google Scholar

Borchert, M, Bacci, A, Baltag, V, Hodorogea, S, Drife, J. Improving maternal and perinatal health care in the Central Asian Republics. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2010;110:97–100.Google Scholar

Fathalla, M. Human rights aspects of safe motherhood. Best Practice and Clinical Research in Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2006;20(3):409–19.Google Scholar

Fathalla, M. Reproductive rights and reproductive wrongs. Current Women’s Health Reports 2001;1(3):169–70.Google Scholar

Lewis, G. Reviewing maternal deaths to make pregnancy safer. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2008;22(3):447–63.Google Scholar

Lewis, G. Saving mothers’ lives: the continuing benefits for maternal health from the United Kingdom (UK) Confidential Enquires into Maternal Deaths. Seminars in Perinatology 2012;36(1):19–26.Google Scholar

Lewis, G. The cultural environment behind successful maternal death and morbidity reviews. BJOG 2014;121 Special issue 4 (International Reviews: Quality of Care):24–31.Google Scholar

Rosenfield, A, Maine, D. Maternal mortality, a neglected tragedy: where is the M in MCH? Lancet 1985;326(8446):83–5.Google Scholar

Say, L, Chou, D, Gemill, A et al. Global causes of maternal deaths: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Global Health 2014;2:e323–e233.Google Scholar

Thaddeus, S, Maine, D. Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Social Science and Medicine 1994;38(8):1091–110.Google Scholar

World Health Organization. Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2019.Google Scholar

World Health Organization, Lewis, G. Beyond the Numbers: reviewing maternal deaths and complications to make pregnancy safer. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004.Google Scholar

For those interested in more details of the South African experience with CEMDs, the articles by Moodley and colleagues (2014) and Moodley and colleagues (2018) give more details. In an attempt to make the Saving Mothers reports more accessible, a number of the chapters from the seventh Saving Mothers Report 2017–2019 related to conditions were published in the Obstetrics and Gynaecology Forum (https://journals.co.za/toc/medog/30/4).Google Scholar

There also some other spin-offs from a CEMD which are often not recognised, but very important. The system set-up allows for rapid recognition of complications which are rare but in a large enquiry become apparent, for example the article by Fawcus and colleagues (2016) highlighted the problem of deaths due to bleeding at or after caesarean delivery, which led to an immediate response. The system also can be used to rapidly report on new diseases such as COVID-19. Here the CEMD was able to produce quarterly reports to the ministerial committee working on COVID-19 and highlight for the committee the higher mortality of COVID-19 in pregnancy, putting pregnant women in the high-risk category and stressing their need for vaccination.Google Scholar

Finally, a CEMD is an integral part of the audit cycle. Poor-quality emergency care was identified early as a problem in maternal deaths by the CEMD in South Africa. Thus permission was obtained from Professor Nyncke van den Broek and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists to adapt their ‘Life Saving Skills’ course to South African circumstances. The adapted course, ‘Essential Steps in Managing Obstetric Emergencies’, was tested in South Africa. Twelve of the worst-performing districts were identified using the CEMD. In partnership with the Liverpool School Tropical Medicine and their volunteers, the adapted course was scaled up in these 12 districts such that at least 80% of all healthcare professionals dealing with pregnant women were trained in emergency obstetric care. The impact was assessed using the CEMD of the 12 districts and the control group of the remaining 40 districts. It showed a 39.5% overall drop in mortality, mainly due to reduction in deaths due to complications of HIV infection, but also a 17.5% reduction in direct maternal deaths, mainly those due to obstetric haemorrhage and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (Pattinson et al. 2019). This is a good illustration of the audit cycle and the part a CEMD plays in it.Google Scholar

Fawcus, S, Pattinson, RC, Moodley, J et al. Maternal deaths from bleeding associated with caesarean delivery: a national emergency (a review). SAMJ: South African Medical Journal 2016 May;106(5):472–6.Google Scholar

Moodley, J, Fawcus, F, Pattinson, R. Improvements in maternal mortality in South Africa. South African Medical Journal 2018 Mar 2;108(4):s4–s8.Google Scholar

Moodley, J, Pattinson, RC, Fawcus, S, Schoon, MG, Moran, N, Shweni, PM. The confidential enquiry into maternal deaths in South Africa: a case study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2014;121(s4):53–60.Google Scholar

Pattinson, RC, Bergh, AM, Ameh, C et al. Reducing maternal deaths by skills-and-drills training in managing obstetric emergencies: a before-and-after observational study. South African Medical Journal 2019 Mar 29;109(4):241–5.Google Scholar

Pattinson, RC, Fawcus, S, Gebhardt, GS, Soma-Pillay, P, Niit, R, Moodley, J. The impact of COVID-19 on use of maternal and reproductive health services and maternal and perinatal mortality. South African Health Review 2021: 106–19.Google Scholar

Chatterjee, A, Paily, VP. Achieving Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5 in India. BJOG 2011;118Suppl 2:47–59.Google Scholar

Paily, VP, Ambujam, K, Rajasekharan, V, Nair, VR, Thomas, B. Confidential review of maternal deaths in Kerala: a country case study. BJOG 2014;121Suppl 4:61–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13000 Google Scholar

Paily, VP, Ambujam, K, Thomas, B et al., eds. Why Mothers Die: Kerala 2010–2020: observations and recommendations. Thrissur: Kerala Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2021.Google Scholar

Paily, VP, Ambujam, K, Thomas, B, Sekharan, PK, Nair, VR. Measures to reduce maternal mortality: Kerala experience. In press.Google Scholar

CMQCC Improving Health Care Response to Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy Toolkit, Version 2.0. www.cmqcc.org/resources-tool-kits/toolkits/HDP^[6]Google Scholar

CMQCC Improving Health Care Response to Obstetric Hemorrhage Toolkit, Version 2.0. www.cmqcc.org/resources-tool-kits/toolkits/ob-hemorrhage-toolkit^[5]Google Scholar

Main, EK, Cape, V, Abreo, A et al. Reduction of severe maternal morbidity from hemorrhage using a state perinatal quality collaborative. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(3):298.e1–298.e11.^[9]Google Scholar

Main, EK, Dhurjati, R, Cape, V et al. Improving maternal safety at scale with the mentor model of collaborative improvement. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018;44(5):250–9.^[7]Google Scholar

Main, EK, Goffman, D, Scavone, BM et al. National partnership for maternal safety: consensus bundle on obstetric hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(1):15562.^[10]Google Scholar

Main, EK, McCain, CL, Morton, CH, Holtby, S, Lawton, ES. Pregnancy-related mortality in California: causes, characteristics and improvement opportunities. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Apr;125(4):938–47.^[1]Google Scholar

Morton, CH, Seacrist, MJ, Van Otterloo, LR, Main, EK. Quality improvement opportunities identified through case review of pregnancy-related deaths from preeclampsia/eclampsia. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2019 48:275–87.^[3]Google Scholar

Morton, CH, Van Otterloo, LR, Seacrist, MJ, Main, EK. Translating maternal mortality review into quality improvement opportunities in response to pregnancy-related deaths in California. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2019 48:252–62.^[2]Google Scholar

Rosenstein, MG, Chang, S-C, Sakowski, C et al. Hospital quality improvement interventions, statewide policy initiatives and rates of nulliparous term singleton vertex caesarean deliveries in California. JAMA 2021;325(16):1631–9.^[8]Google Scholar

Seacrist, MJ, Van Otterloo, LR, Morton, CH, Main, EK. Quality improvement opportunities identified through case review of pregnancy-related deaths from obstetric hemorrhage. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2019 48:288–99.^[4]Google Scholar