Ahmed, A. 2007. Saul Kripke. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Albritton, R. 1959. On Wittgenstein's use of the term ‘criterion’. Journal of Philosophy 56: 845–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersen, H. 2000. Kuhn's account of family resemblance: a solution to the problem of wide open texture. Erkenntnis 52: 313–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Augustine. 1961. Confessions. Translated by Pine-Coffin, R.. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Baker, G. 2004. Wittgenstein's Method: Neglected Aspects. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, G., and Hacker, P.. 1980. Wittgenstein: Understanding and Meaning. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Baker, G., and Hacker, P..1985. Wittgenstein: Rules, Grammar and Necessity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Baker, G., and Hacker, P..2005a. An Analytical Commentary on Wittgenstein's ‘Philosophical Investigations’. (Revised edition of 1980.) Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Baker, G., and Hacker, P..2005b. Wittgenstein: Meaning and Understanding: Essays on the ‘Philosophical Investigations’. (Revised edition of 1980.) Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bambrough, R. 1961. Universals and family resemblances. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 61: 207–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellaimey, J. E. 1990. Family resemblance and the problem of the under-determination of extension. Philosophical Investigations 13: 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bergmann, G. 1967. Logical positivism, language, and the reconstruction of metaphysics. In The Linguistic Turn: Essays in Philosophical Method. Edited by Rorty, R.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992. First published in Rivista Critica di Storia della Filosophia 8 (1953): 453–81.Google Scholar

Bezuidenhout, A. 2002. Truth-conditional pragmatics. Philosophical Perspectives 16: 105–34.Google Scholar

Bloom, P. 2002. How Children Learn the Meaning of Words. 2nd edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bridges, J. Ms. Corralling context-sensitivity.

Campbell, J. 2002. Reference and Consciousness. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carnap, R. 1934. The Unity of Science. Edited and translated by M. Black. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar

Carroll, L. 1988. Through the Looking-Glass. New York: Dial.Google Scholar

Carruthers, P. 1984. Critical study: Baker and Hacker's Wittgenstein. Synthese 58: 451–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cavell, S. 1979. The Claim of Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Child, W. 2006. Memory, expression, and past-tense self-knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73: 54–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Child, W. 2010. Rule and exception in Wittgenstein's philosophy of mind. In Wittgenstein: Mind, Meaning, and Metaphilosophy. Edited by Frascolla, P., Marconi, D. and Voltolini, A.. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Coffa, J. A. 1994. The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Conant, J. 1989. Must we show what we cannot say? In The Senses of Stanley Cavell. Edited by Fleming, R. and Paine, M.. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar

Conant, J. 2000. Elucidation and nonsense in Frege and early Wittgenstein. In The New Wittgenstein. Edited by Crary, A. and Read, R.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Crary, A. 2000a. Introduction. In The New Wittgenstein. Edited by Crary, A. and Read, R.. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crary, A. 2000b. Wittgenstein's philosophy in relation to political thought. In The New Wittgenstein. Edited by Crary, A. and Read, R.. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crary, A., and Read, R. (eds.). 2000. The New Wittgenstein. London: Routledge.CrossRef

Davidson, D. 1963. Actions, reasons, and causes. Journal of Philosophy 60: 685–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diamond, C. 1991. Throwing away the ladder: how to read the Tractatus. In The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press. First published in Philosophy 63 (1988): 5–27.Google Scholar

Diamond, C. 2000. Ethics, imagination and the method of Wittgenstein's Tractatus. In The New Wittgenstein. Edited by Crary, A. and Read, R.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Diamond, C. 2001. How long is the standard metre in Paris? In Wittgenstein in America. Edited by McCarthy, T. and Stidd, S.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Dolev, Y. 2007. Mission impossible and Wittgenstein's standard metre. Philosophical Investigations 30: 127–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dummett, M. 1978a. The justification of deduction. In Truth and Other Enigmas. London: Duckworth. First published in Proceedings of the British Academy 59 (1975): 201–32.Google Scholar

Dummett, M. 1978b. Wittgenstein's philosophy of mathematics. In Truth and Other Enigmas. London: Duckworth. First published in Philosophical Review 68 (1959): 324–48.Google Scholar

Dummett, M. 1991a. Frege: Philosophy of Mathematics. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Dummett, M. 1991b. More about thoughts. In Frege and Other Philosophers. Oxford: Clarendon Press. First published in Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 30 (1988): 1–19.Google Scholar

Dummett, M. 1991c. An unsuccessful dig. In Frege and Other Philosophers. Oxford: Clarendon Press. First published in Philosophical Quarterly 34 (1984): 379–401.Google Scholar

Dummett, M. 1993a. The Seas of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Dummett, M. 1993b. What is a theory of meaning? (I). In The Seas of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press. First published in Mind and Language. Edited by S. Guttenplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1974.Google Scholar

Dummett, M. 1993c. What is a theory of meaning? (II). In The Seas of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press. First published in Truth and Meaning. Edited by Evans, G. and McDowell, J.. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1976.Google Scholar

Dummett, M. 1993d. Wittgenstein on necessity: some reflections. In The Seas of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press. First published in Reading Putnam. Edited by Clark, P. and Hale, B.. Oxford: Blackwell 1991.Google Scholar

Dummett, M. 2007. Reply to Marco Santambrogio. In The Philosophy of Michael Dummett. Edited by Auxier, R. and Hahn, E.. La Salle and Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar

Evans, G. 1982. The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Floyd, J. 1998. The uncaptive eye: solipsism in the Tractatus. In Loneliness. Edited by Rouner, L.. Notre Dame: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Religion.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. 1998. Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fodor, J. 2003. Hume Variations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. 2008. LOT 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fogelin, R. 1976. Wittgenstein. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fogelin, R. 1987. Wittgenstein. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Forster, M. 2004. Wittgenstein on the Arbitrariness of Grammar. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Fowler, A. 1982. Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Frege, G. 1979. Posthumous Writings. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Geach, P. T. 1957. Mental Acts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gert, H. 2002. The standard meter by any name is still a meter long. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65: 50–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giaquinto, M. 2007. Visual Thinking in Mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginet, C. 1992. The dispositionalist solution to Wittgenstein's problem about understanding a rule. In The Wittgenstein Legacy. Edited by French, P., Uehling, T. and Wettstein, H.. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Glock, H.-J. 1990. Philosophical Investigations: principles of interpretation. In Wittgenstein – Towards a Re-evaluation. Edited by Haller, R. and Brandl, J.. Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.Google Scholar

Glock, H.-J. 1996. A Wittgenstein Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glock, H.-J. 1997. Philosophy, thought and language. In Thought and Language. Edited by Preston, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Glock, H.-J. 2001. The development of Wittgenstein's philosophy. In Wittgenstein: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Glock, H.-J. 2003. Quine and Davidson on Language, Thought and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glock, H.-J. 2006. Concepts: representations or abilities? In Content, Consciousness, and Perception. Edited by Di Nucci, E. and McHugh, C.. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar

Glock, H.-J. 2008. What is Analytic Philosophy?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glock, H.-J. 2009. Concepts: where subjectivism goes wrong. Philosophy 84: 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldfarb, W. 1983. I want you to bring me a slab: remarks on the opening sections of the Philosophical Investigations. Synthese 56: 265–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldfarb, W. 1992. Wittgenstein on understanding. In The Wittgenstein Legacy. Edited by French, P., Uehling, T. and Wettstein, H.. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Goldfarb, W. 1997. Metaphysics and nonsense. Journal of Philosophical Research 22: 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grice, H. P., and Strawson, P. F.. 1956. In defense of a dogma. Philosophical Review 65: 141–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hacker, P. 1986. Insight and Illusion. 2nd edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. 1987. Languages, minds and brains. In Mindwaves. Edited by Blakemore, C. and Greenfield, S.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. 1993a. Wittgenstein: Meaning and Mind. Part I – Essays. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. 1993b. Wittgenstein: Meaning and Mind. Part II – Exegesis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. 1996a: Wittgenstein: Mind and Will. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. 1996b. Wittgenstein's Place in Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. 2000a. Wittgenstein: Mind and Will. Part I – Essays. (Slightly revised edition of 1996a.) Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. 2000b. Wittgenstein: Mind and Will. Part II – Exegesis. (Slightly revised edition of 1996a.) Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Haller, R. 1988. Questions on Wittgenstein. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Hallett, G. 1977. A Companion to Wittgenstein's ‘Philosophical Investigations’. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Hanna, R. 1993. Direct reference, direct perception, and the cognitive theory of demonstratives. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 74: 96–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanna, R. 2006a. Rationality and the ethics of logic. Journal of Philosophy 103: 67–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanna, R. 2006b. Rationality and Logic. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hare, R. M. 1972. The Language of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hilmy, S. 1987. The Later Wittgenstein: The Emergence of a New Philosophical Method. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hintikka, J. 1996. Ludwig Wittgenstein: Half-Truths and One-and-a-Half Truths. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hintikka, J. and Hintikka, M.. 1986. Investigating Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hobson, P. 2002. The Cradle of Thought. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Horwich, P. 2004. Wittgenstein's metaphilosophical development. In Wittgenstein's Lasting Significance. Edited by Kolbel, M. and Weiss, B.. London: Routledge. Reprinted in his From a Deflationary Point of View. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2004.Google Scholar

Horwich, P. Forthcoming 1. The nature of paradox. In Truth–Meaning–Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Horwich, P. Forthcoming 2. Williamson's philosophy of philosophy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Horwich, P. Forthcoming 3. Wittgenstein's Metaphilosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hylton, P. 1997. Functions, operations, and sense in Wittgenstein's Tractatus. In Early Analytic Philosophy. Edited by Tait, W.. La Salle, IL: Open Court Press.Google Scholar

Jacquette, D. 1998. Wittgenstein's Thought in Transition. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar

James, W. [1890] 1983. The Principles of Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kaplan, D. 1989. Demonstratives. Themes from Kaplan. Edited by Almog, J.et al. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kenny, A. 1975. Will, Freedom and Power. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Kenny, A. 1984. The Legacy of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Kenny, A. 1989. The Metaphysics of Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Kenny, A. 2006. Wittgenstein. Revised 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kienzler, W. 1997. Wittgensteins Wende zu seiner Spätphilosophie 1930–1932. Eine historische und systematische Darstellung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Kienzler, W. 2001. About the dividing line between early and late Wittgenstein. In From the Tractatus to the Investigations and Other Essays. Edited by Oliveri, G.. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Kripke, S. 1980. Naming and Necessity. 2nd edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kripke, S. 1982. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Künne, W. 2005. Properties in abundance. In Universals, Concepts and Qualities. Edited by Chakrabarti, A. and Strawson, P. F.. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Leiter, B. 2004. Introduction. In The Future for Philosophy. Edited by Leiter, B.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lewis, D. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Locke, J. [1689] 1975. Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Luntley, M. 2008a. Conceptual development and the paradox of learning. Journal of Philosophy of Education 42: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luntley, M. 2008b. Training and learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory 40: 695–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luntley, M. 2009. On the teaching and learning of words. In Wittgenstein's Enduring Arguments. Edited by Levy, D. and Zamuner, E.. London and Boston: Routledge.Google Scholar

Malcolm, N. 1995. Kripke and the standard meter. In Wittgensteinian Themes: Essays 1978–1989. Edited by Wright, G. H.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Maury, A. 1994. Sources of the remarks in Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations. Synthese 98: 349–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDowell, J. 1984. Wittgenstein on following a rule. Synthese 58: 325–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDowell, J. 1994. Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

McDowell, J. 1998a. Intentionality and interiority in Wittgenstein. In Mind, Value and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

McDowell, J. 1998b. One strand in the private language argument. In Mind, Value and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

McGinn, M. 1997. Wittgenstein and the ‘Philosophical Investigations’. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

McGuinness, B. F. 2002. Approaches to Wittgenstein. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Medina, J. 2002. The Unity of Wittgenstein's Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Minar, E. 1995. Feeling at home in language. Synthese 102: 413–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Minar, E. 1998. Wittgenstein on the metaphysics of the self: the dialectic of solipsism in Philosophical Investigations. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79: 329–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mulhall, S. 2007. Wittgenstein's Private Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Peacocke, C. 1984. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language by Saul A. Kripke. Philosophical Review 93: 263–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peacocke, C. 1992. A Study of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Pears, D. 1986. Ludwig Wittgenstein. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 2nd edition with a new preface by the author.Google Scholar

Pears, D. 1987. The False Prison vol. I. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pears, D. 1988. The False Prison vol. II. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pears, D. 2006. Paradox and Platitude in Wittgenstein's Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perry, J. 1979. The problem of the essential indexical. Noûs 13: 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pettit, P. 2004. Existentialism, quietism, and the role of philosophy. In The Future for Philosophy. Edited by Leiter, Brian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pichler, A. 1994. Untersuchungen zu Wittgensteins Nachlass (Investigating Wittgenstein's Nachlass). Working Papers from the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen 8. http://wab.aksis.uib.no/wp-no8.pdf 2.4 on revision of TS 208 in MSS 111–114.

Pichler, A. 2004. Wittgensteins Philosophische Untersuchungen: Vom Buch zum Album (Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations: From Book to Album). Studien zur Österreichischen Philosophie 36. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Pollock, G. 2004. Wittgenstein on the standard metre. Philosophical Investigations 27: 148–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pompa, L. 1967. Family resemblance. Philosophical Quarterly 17: 63–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pompa, L. 1968. Family resemblance: a reply. Philosophical Quarterly 18: 347–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Price, H. H. 1953. Thinking and Experience. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar

Ramsey, F. P. 1966. Critical notice of the Tractatus. In Essays on Wittgenstein's Tractatus. Edited by Beard, R. and Copi, I.. London: Routledge. First published in Mind 32 (1923): 465–78.Google Scholar

Recanati, F. 2005. Literalism and contextualism: some varieties. In Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth. Edited by Preyer, G. and Peter, G.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ricketts, T. 1996. Pictures, logic, and the limits of sense in Wittgenstein's Tractatus. In The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein. Edited by Sluga, H. and Stern, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rosch, E. and Mervis, C.. 1975. Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7: 573–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rothaupt, J. 1996. Farbthemen in Wittgensteins Gesamtnachlass. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1912. The Problems of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1966. On the nature of truth and falsehood. [1910]. Reprinted in Philosophical Essays. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1985. The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. [1918]. Reprint, edited by Pears, D.. Chicago: Open Court Publishing.Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1988. Logical atomism. [1924]. Reprinted in vol. IX of Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell. Edited by Frohmann, B. and Slater, J.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ryle, G. 1949. The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson and Co.Google Scholar

Schulte, J. 1992. Wittgenstein: An Introduction. Translated by Brenner, W. and Holley, J.. Albany: State University of New York Press. First published in 1989 as Wittgenstein: Eine Einführung. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar

Schulte, J. 1998. Review of Wolfgang Kienzler, Wittgensteins Wende zu seiner Spätphilosophie 1930–1932. European Journal of Philosophy 6: 379–85.Google Scholar

Schulte, J. 2002. Wittgenstein's method. In Wittgenstein and the Future of Philosophy: A Reassessment after 50 Years. Edited by Haller, R. and Puhl, Klaus. Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.Google Scholar

Schulte, J. 2005. What is a work by Wittgenstein? In Wittgenstein: The Philosopher and His Works. Edited by Pichler, A., and Säätelä, S.. Frankfurt am Main: Ontos Verlag.Google Scholar

Schulte, J. Forthcoming. Concepts and concept-formation. In Wittgenstein after His Nachlass. Edited by Venturinha, N.. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Sellars, W. 1962. Philosophy and the scientific image of man. In Frontiers of Science and Philosophy. Edited by Colodny, R.. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Simon, M. A. 1969. When is a resemblance a family resemblance?Mind 78: 408–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sluga, H. 1983. Subjectivity in the Tractatus. Synthese 56: 123–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sluga, H. 1996. Whose house is that? Wittgenstein on the self. In The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein. Edited by Sluga, H. and Stern, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, E. and Medin, D.. 1981. Concepts and Categories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Soames, S. 2003. Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century. Vol. II. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Stern, D. 1991. The ‘middle Wittgenstein’. Synthese 87: 203–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stern, D. 1995. Wittgenstein on Mind and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stern, D. 1996. The availability of Wittgenstein's philosophy. In The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein. Edited by Sluga, H. and Stern, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stern, D. 2004. Wittgenstein's ‘Philosophical Investigations’: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stern, D. 2005. How many Wittgensteins? In Wittgenstein: The Philosopher and His Works. Edited by Pichler, A. and Säätelä, S.. Frankfurt am Main: Ontos Verlag.Google Scholar

Stern, D. 2007. The uses of Wittgenstein's beetle: Philosophical Investigations 293 and its interpreters. In Wittgenstein and His Interpreters. Edited by Kahane, G., Kanterian, E. and Kuusela, O.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Stern, D. Forthcoming 1. Private language. In The Oxford Wittgenstein Handbook. Edited by McGinn, Marie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stern, D. Forthcoming 2. Tracing the development of Wittgenstein's writing on private language. In Wittgenstein after His Nachlass. Edited by Venturinha, N.. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Strawson, P. 1959. Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stroud, B. 2000a. Mind, meaning, and practice. In Meaning, Understanding, and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stroud, B. 2000b. Reasonable claims: Cavell and the tradition. In Understanding Human Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stroud, B. 2000c. Wittgenstein on meaning, understanding, and community. In Meaning, Understanding, and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sullivan, P. M. 1994. Problems for a construction of meaning and intention. Mind 103: 147–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Travis, C. 1989. The Uses of Sense: Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Travis, C. 2006: Thought's Footing: A Theme in Wittgenstein's ‘Philosophical Investigations’. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tugendhat, E. 1982. Traditional and Analytic Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Savigny, E. 1994. Wittgenstein's ‘Philosophische Untersuchungen’: Ein Kommentar für Leser (Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations: A Commentary for Readers). 2nd edition. 2 vols. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar

Wright, G. H., 1982. Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Weitz, M. 1956. The role of theory in aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 15: 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, M. 1999. Wittgenstein, Mind and Meaning. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williamson, T. 2004. Past the linguistic turn. In The Future for Philosophy. Edited by Leiter, B.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Williamson, T. 2008. Must do better. In The Philosophy of Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wisdom, J. 1952. Ludwig Wittgenstein, 1934–1937. Mind 61: 258–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Witherspoon, E. 2000. Conceptions of nonsense in Carnap and Wittgenstein. In The New Wittgenstein. Edited by Crary, A. and Read, R.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Wright, C. 2001a. On making up one's mind: Wittgenstein on intention. In Rails to Infinity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. First published in Logic, Philosophy of Science and Epistemology. Edited by P. Weingartner and G. Schurz. Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky 1987.Google Scholar

Wright, C. 2001b. Wittgenstein's later philosophy of mind: sensation, privacy and intention. In Rails to Infinity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. First published in Meaning Scepticism, ed. Klaus Puhl. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter and Co.Google Scholar