Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T14:22:51.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Hudson on Heads

About Distributional Criteria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2024

Eva Duran Eppler
Affiliation:
Roehampton University, London
Nikolas Gisborne
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Andrew Rosta
Affiliation:
University of Central Lancashire, Preston
Get access

Summary

In this paper dedicated to Hudson, we discuss the criteria used to define the dependency structure and to characterize the syntactic head of every syntactic unit. Hudson was the first one, in the 1980s, to really try to justify his choices of analysis in dependency syntax by using both distributional criteria with and without removal, but he never stated them in black and white. This paper is an attempt to propose distributional criteria for choosing a syntactic head and proving the head status of words that can generally not stand alone, such as determiners, prepositions, or auxiliaries. Three criteria are stated – a Positive and a Negative distributional criterion with removal and a Distributional criterion without removal – as well as a Distributional criterion for the head of a sentence. These criteria are compared to criteria used in Garde (), Hudson (, ), and Mel’čuk (), showing that Mel’čuk circumvented them in practice, while Hudson applied them quite systematically but never really stated them clearly.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1970). Remarks on nominalization. In Jacobs, R. A. and Rosenbaum, P. S. (eds.), Reading in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, MA: Ginn, 184221.Google Scholar
Garde, P. (1977). Ordre linéaire et dépendance syntaxique : Contribution à une typologie. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, 72(1), 126.Google Scholar
Garde, P. (1994). Syntaxe et sémantique chez TesnièreLinguistica34(1), 95–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerdes, K. & Kahane, S. (2013). Defining dependencies (and constituents)Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications258, 125.Google Scholar
Hajičová, E., Hajič, J., Hladká, B., Holub, M., Pajas, P., Řezníčková, V. & Sgall, P. (2001). The current status of the Prague Dependency Treebank. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Text, Speech and Dialogue. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Z. S. (1951). Methods in Structural Linguistics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hockett, Ch. F. (1958). A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: MacMillan Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, R. (1984). Word Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hudson, R. (1987). Zwicky on heads. Journal of linguistics, 23(1), 109–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, R. (2004). Are determiners heads? Functions of Language, 11, 743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, R. (in press). Arguments against the universality of D and determiners. In Armoskaite, S. & Wiltschko, M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Determiners. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1977). X Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. Linguistic Inquiry Monographs. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kahane, S. & Gerdes, K. (2022) Syntaxe théorique et formelle : Modélisation, unités, structures. Berlin: Language Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, I. (1964). Avtomatičeskij sintaksičeskij analiz. Tom I [Automatic syntactic analysis. Volume 1]. Novosibirsk: Izdatel’stvo SO AN SSSR.Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, I. (1988). Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Osborne, T. (2021). NPs, not DPs: The NP vs. DP debate in the context of dependency grammarActa Linguistica Academica, 68(3), 274314.Google Scholar
Osborne, T., Putnam, M. & Gross, T. (2012). Catenae: Introducing a novel unit of syntactic analysisSyntax15(4), 354–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesnière, L. (1959). Éléments de syntaxe structural. Paris: Klincksieck. [Translated by Osborne, T. & Kahane, S. (2015). Elements of Structural Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.]Google Scholar
Zwicky, A. (1985). Heads. Journal of Linguistics, 21(1), 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, A. (1993). Heads, bases and functors. In Corbett, G. G, Fraser, N. M & McGlashan, S. (eds.), Heads in Grammatical Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 292317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×