Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- List of abbreviations
- 1 Word: a typological framework
- 2 Typological parameters for the study of clitics, with special reference to Tariana
- 3 The word in Cup'ik
- 4 The word in Eastern/Central Arrernte
- 5 The eclectic morphology of Jarawara, and the status of word
- 6 Towards a notion of ‘word’ in sign languages
- 7 Synchronic and diachronic perspective on ‘word’ in Siouan
- 8 What is a word in Dagbani?
- 9 The word in Georgian
- 10 The word in Modern Greek
- 11 What can we conclude?
- Index of authors
- Index of languages and language families
- Index of subjects
- References
7 - Synchronic and diachronic perspective on ‘word’ in Siouan
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- List of abbreviations
- 1 Word: a typological framework
- 2 Typological parameters for the study of clitics, with special reference to Tariana
- 3 The word in Cup'ik
- 4 The word in Eastern/Central Arrernte
- 5 The eclectic morphology of Jarawara, and the status of word
- 6 Towards a notion of ‘word’ in sign languages
- 7 Synchronic and diachronic perspective on ‘word’ in Siouan
- 8 What is a word in Dagbani?
- 9 The word in Georgian
- 10 The word in Modern Greek
- 11 What can we conclude?
- Index of authors
- Index of languages and language families
- Index of subjects
- References
Summary
Siouan languages were spoken in aboriginal North America in a broad belt stretching from what is now Arkansas northward and westward across the western prairies and eastern great plains to Alberta. In addition there were Siouan languages scattered in the East in what is now Virginia, Alabama and Mississippi. The languages we will be discussing in this chapter are primarily Crow and Hidatsa, of the Missouri River subgroup, and Dakotan (including Dakota and Lakota dialects) and Dhegihan (including Omaha, Ponca, Kansa, Osage and Quapaw) of the Mississippi Valley subgroup. Data from other languages will be introduced as necessary.
Typology
Typologically, Siouan languages are primarily head-marking, active–stative, AOV, SV languages of moderate morphological complexity. Verbs are the most highly inflected category, and they may optionally include numerous and productive instances of noun incorporation. There are also many lexicalised noun–verb compounds. Sapir (1921: 142) characterised Dakota Sioux as ‘complex pure-relational’ in basic type with derivational concepts signalled by agglutinating elements and pure relational (mostly inflectional) concepts somewhat fused. Dakota's overall morphological technique he characterised as ‘agglutinative-fusional’ and degree of synthesis he characterised as ‘synthetic (mildly polysynthetic)’.
Incorporation
Compared with languages like Inuit or Iroquoian we would probably not want to characterise Dakotan, or the rest of Mississippi Valley Siouan, as productively incorporating, but Siouan verbs do incorporate a number of notions that speakers of most European languages would convey with separate words. And these include pronominal, instrumental, locative and directional concepts.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- WordA Cross-linguistic Typology, pp. 180 - 204Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2003
References
- 1
- Cited by