Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:58:56.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Alterity, Authority, and Ancestors

Exploring Monkey Images in Moche Iconography of North Coast Peru

from Part I - The Americas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2022

By
Aleksa K. Alaica
Edited by
Bernardo Urbani ,
Dionisios Youlatos  and
Andrzej T. Antczak
Bernardo Urbani
Affiliation:
Venezuelan Institute for Scientific Research
Dionisios Youlatos
Affiliation:
Aristotle University, Thessaloniki
Andrzej T. Antczak
Affiliation:
Universiteit Leiden
Get access

Summary

Nonhuman primates in the Andes region of South America have been excavated in burial contexts and are commonly depicted in ceramic art. Monkey images in Moche iconography are well-known but few systematic analyses have been conducted to approximate their role and meaning in sociopolitical and ritual activities. This chapter investigates variation in nonhuman primate depictions from the Moche culture to determine the elite use of monkey images for their symbolic value and ritual significance in the arid desert north coast region of present-day Peru. By examining their shared features, their association with key Amazonian plant species and their use in legitimizing authority, I contextualize Moche monkey depictions as key agents of alterity because of their nonlocal origin. I argue that the association of nonhuman primates with headdresses, serving vessels, and funerary rituals indicate that monkeys were perceived as nonlocal affines in Moche society that wielded considerable power in political and ceremonial practices. In Moche iconography, monkeys were not simply aesthetic additives but formed part of a selected group of nonhuman beings with social agency that derived from their nonlocal, Amazonian origin and their relationship to potent ritual substances. Monkeys, resembling their human relatives, were recognized to have ancestral roles that legitimized authority for elites involved in ceremonial activities related to sacrifice, fertility, and renewal.

Keywords:

Monkeys, Amazon, Interregional interaction, Desert coast, Ritual, ulluchu; ishpingo

Type
Chapter
Information
World Archaeoprimatology
Interconnections of Humans and Nonhuman Primates in the Past
 , pp. 132 - 152
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alaica, A. K. (2018). Partial and complete deposits and depictions: Social Zooarchaeology, iconography and the role of animals in Late Moche Peru. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 20, 864–872.Google Scholar
Alva, I. (2013). Ventarrón y Collud. Origen y Auge de la Civilización en la Costa Norte del Perú. Lima: Ministerio de Cultural del Perú, Proyecto Especial Naylamp Lambayeque.Google Scholar
Bawden, G. (1996). The Moche. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Benson, E. P. (1985). The Moche moon. In Peter Kvietok, D., & Sandweiss, D. H., eds., Recent Studies in Andean Prehistory and Protohistory. Ithaca: Latin American Studies Program, Cornell University, 105–144.Google Scholar
Benson, E. P. (1997). Birds and Beasts of Ancient Latin America. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Benson, E. P. (2012). The Worlds of the Moche on the North Coast of Peru. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bergeson, D. (1996). The positional behavior and prehensile tail use of Alouatta palliata, Ateles geoffroyi, and Cebus capucinus. Unpublished PhD thesis, Washington University.Google Scholar
Barrera Vásquez, A. (1991). Diccionario Maya, 2nd ed. Mexico City: Editorial Porrúa.Google Scholar
Billman, B. R. (2002). Irrigation and the origins of the Southern Moche state on the north coast of Peru. Latin American Antiquity, 13(4), 371–400.Google Scholar
Bourget, S. (1994). Los Sacerdotes a la Sombra del Cerro Blanco y del Arco Bicéfalo. In Revista del Museo de Arqueología, Antropología e Historia No. 5, Trujillo: Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, 81–125.Google Scholar
Bourget, S. (2001a). Rituals of sacrifice: Its practice at Huaca de la Luna and its representations. In Pillsbury, J.,ed., Moche Art and Archaeology in Ancient Peru. New York: Yale University Press, 89–110.Google Scholar
Bourget, S. (2001b). Children and ancestors: Ritual practices at the Moche Site of Huaca de la Luna, North Coast of Peru. In Benson, P., & Cook, A. G., eds., Ritual Sacrifice in Ancient Peru. Austin: University of Texas Press, 93–118.Google Scholar
Bourget, S. (2006). Sex, Death and Sacrifice in Moche Religion and Visual Culture. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bryant, J. E., Holmes, E. C., & Barrett, A. D. T. (2007). Out of Africa. A molecular perspective on the introduction of yellow fever virus into the Americas. PLoS Pathogens, 3(5), 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, R. L. (1992). Chavin and the Origins of Andean Civilization. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Bussmann, R. W., & Sharon, D. (2006). Traditional medicinal plant use in Northern Peru: Tracking two thousand years of healing culture. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 2(47), 1–18.Google Scholar
Bussmann, R. W., & Sharon, D. (2009). Naming a phantom — the quest to find the identity of the Ulluchu, an unidentified ceremonial Plant of the Moche culture in Northern Peru. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 5(8), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cant, J. (1986). Locomotion and feeding postures of spider and howling monkey: Field study and evolutionary interpretation. Folia Primatologica, 46, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpio Perla, M., & Delibes Mateos, R. (2004). La Cámara Funeraria M-U1242 del Área 34. Castillo Butters, L. J., ed., Programa Arqueológico San José de Moro, Temporada de 2004. Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católico del Perú, 126–139.Google Scholar
Castillo, L. J. (2001). The Last of the Mochicas: A view from the Jequetepeque Valley. In Moche Art and Archaeology in Ancient Peru, Pillsbury, J., ed., New Haven: Yale University Press, 307–328.Google Scholar
Castillo, L. J. (2010). Moche politics in the Jequetepeque Valley: A case for political opportunism. In Quilter, J., & Castillo, L. J., eds., New Perspectives on Moche Political Organization. Washington DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research and Collection, 83–109.Google Scholar
Castillo, L. J., & Homquist, U. (2000). Mujeres y Poder en la Sociedad Mochica Tardia. In Henriquez, N., ed., El Hechizo de las Imágenes: Estatus Social, Género y Etnicidad en la Historia Peruana. Lima: Fondo Editorial de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 13–34.Google Scholar
Castillo, L. J., & Quilter, J. (2010). An overview of past and current theories and research on Moche political organization. In Quilter, J., & Castillo, L. J., eds., New Perspectives on Moche Political Organization. Washington DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research and Collection, 1–16.Google Scholar
Cordy-Collins, A. (2001). Blood and the moon priestesses: Spondylus shell in Moche ceremony. In Benson, E. P., & Cook, A. G., eds., Ritual Sacrifice in Ancient Peru. Austin: University of Texas Press, 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMarrais, E., & Robb, J. (2013). Art makes society: An introductory visual essay. World Art, 3(1), 3–22.Google Scholar
DeMarrais, E., Castillo, L. J., & Earle, T. (1996). Ideology, materialization, and power strategies. Current Anthropology, 37(1), 15–31.Google Scholar
Donnan, C. B. (1978). Moche Art of Peru: Pre-Columbian Symbolic Communication. Los Angeles: Museum of Cultural History, University of California.Google Scholar
Donnan, C. B. (1992). Ceramics of Ancient Peru. Los Angeles: Fowler Museum of Cultural History, University of California.Google Scholar
Donnan, C. B. (2007). Moche Tombs at Dos Cabezas. Los Angeles: UCLA, Cotsen Institute of Archaeology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnan, C. B., & McClelland, D. (1979). The Burial Theme in Moche Iconography. Studies in Pre-Columbian Art and Archaeology No. 21. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.Google Scholar
Eeckhout, P. (2006). Semillas Sadradas: El Ishpingo (Nectandra sp.) en Pachacamac, Costa Central del Perú. In Olivera, D. E., & Yacobaccio, H. D., Change in the Andes: Origins of Social Complexity, Pastoralism and Agriculture. Oxford: BAR Publishing, 201–210.Google Scholar
Eeckhout, P. (2013). Change and permanency on the coast of Ancient Peru: The religious site of Pachacamac. Archaeology of Religious Change, 45(1), 137–160.Google Scholar
Eeckhout, P., & Owens, L. S. (eds). (2015). Funerary Practices and Models in the Ancient Andes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galindo, P., & Srihongse, S. (1967). Evidence of recent jungle yellow-fever activity in Eastern Panama. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 36, 151–161.Google Scholar
Gamboa, J. (2020). Un Personaje Elusivo: Los Mono en el Estilo Cerámico Casma de la Costa Norcentral de Perú (ca. 800–1350 DC). Chungara Revista de Anthropología Chilena, 52, 285–303.Google Scholar
Garve, R., Garve, M., Türp, J. C., & Meyer, C. G. (2017). Labrets in Africa and Amazonia: Medical implications and cultural determinants. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 22(2), 232–240.Google Scholar
Gebo, D. (1992). Locomotor and positional behavior in Alouatta palliata and Cebus capucinus. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 26, 277–290.Google ScholarPubMed
Goepfert, N. (2008). Ofrendas y sacrificio de animals in la cultura Mochica: El ejemplo de la Plataforma Uhle, Complejo Arqueológico Huacas del Sol y de la Luna. In Arqueológia Mochica: Nuevos Enfoques. Actas del Primer Congreso Internacional de Jóvenes Investigadores de la Cultura Mochica, Lima, 4-5 de Agosto de 2004. Lima: Institut Français d’Études Anides-Fondo Editorial de la Pontificia Universidad Católico del Perú, 231–244.Google Scholar
Goepfert, N. (2011). Frayer la route d’un monde inversé. Sacrifice et offrandes animals dans la culture Mochica (100-800 apr. J.-C.), côte nord du Pérou. Paris Monographs in American Archaeology 28. Oxford: BAR Publishing.Google Scholar
Goepfert, N. (2012). New zooarchaeological and funerary perspectives on Mochica culture (A.D.100–800), Peru. Journal of Field Archaeology, 37(2), 102–120.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (2003). The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
Helms, M. (1998). Access to Origins: Affines, Ancestors and Aristocrats. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Hill, E. (2016). Images of ancestors: Identifying the revered dead in Moche iconography. In Hill, E., & Hageman, J. B., eds., The Archaeology of Ancestors: Death, Memory, and Veneration. Gainesville: University of Florida Press, 189–212.Google Scholar
Janson, C., & Boinski, S. (1992). Morphological and behavioral adaptations for foraging in generalist primates: The case of cebines. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 88, 483–498.Google Scholar
Karadimas, D. (2016). Monkeys, wasps and gods: Graphic perspectives on middle horizon and later Pre-Hispanic painted funerary textiles from the Peruvian Coast. Nuevo Mundo Mundos Nuevos. Available at: https://journals.openedition.org/nuevomundo/69281 (Accessed July 1, 2020)Google Scholar
Kaulicke, P. (2020). Early social complexity in Northern Peru and its Amazonian connections. In Pearce, A. J., Beresford-Jones, D. G., & Heggarty, P., eds., London: UCL Press, 103–114.Google Scholar
Langdon, S. (1990). From Monkey to man: The evolution of a geometric sculptural type. American Journal of Archaeology, 94(3), 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macri, M. J., & Looper, M. G. (2003). The New Catalog of Maya Hieroglyphs. Volume 1. The Classic Period Inscriptions. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Masseti, M. (2015). The early 8th century AD zoomorphic iconography of the wall decorations in Qasr al-Amra Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Anthropozoologica, 50(2), 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauricio, A. C., & Castro, J. (2007). Informe Técnico de las Excavaciones en el Área 42 de San José de Moro-Temporada de 2007. In Castillo, L. J., ed., Programa Arqueológico San José de Moro, Informe de Investigaciones Temporada de 2007. Lima: Pontificia Universidad de Católica del Perú, 102–161.Google Scholar
Millaire, J.-F. (2010). Primary state formation in the Virú Valley, north coast of Peru. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(14), 6186–6191.Google Scholar
Montoya, M. (2004). Estudio Fitoquímico y Bioquímico de Semillas Prehispánicas de Nectandra sp. ECIPERU: Encuentro Científico Internacional, 1(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
Morphy, H. (1989). Introduction. In Morphy, H., ed., Animals into Art. London: Unwin Hyman, 1–20.Google Scholar
Munn, N. (1966). Visual categories: An approach to the study of representational systems. American Anthropologist, 68, 936–950.Google Scholar
Pareja, M. N. (2017). Monkey and ape iconography in Minoan Art. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Temple University.Google Scholar
Pareja, M. N., McKinney, T., Mayhew, J. A., Setchell, J. M., Nash, S. D., & Heaton, R. (2020). A new identification of the monkeys depicted in a Bronze Age Wall Painting from Akrotiri, Thera. Primates, 61, 159–168.Google Scholar
Prieto, G., & Cuiscanqui, S. (2007). Informe Técnico de la Excavaciones en el Área 35-Temporada 2007. In Castillo Butters, L. J., ed., Programa Arqueológico San José de Moro, Informe de Investigaciones Temporada de 2007, Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católico del Perú, 36–79.Google Scholar
Quilter, J. (1997). The narrative approach to Moche iconography. Latin American Antiquity, 8(2), 113–133.Google Scholar
Reitz, E. (2003). Resource use through time at Paloma, Peru. Bulletin of Florida Museum of Natural History, 440, 65–80.Google Scholar
Reynel, C., Pennington, R. T., & Särkinen, T. (2013). Cómo Se Formó la Diversidad Ecológica del Perú. Lima: Jesús Bellido.Google Scholar
Rice, P. M., & South, K. E. (2015). Revisiting monkeys on pots: A contextual consideration of primate imagery on classic lowland Maya Pottery. Ancient Mesoamerica, 26, 275–294.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. (2008). The stranger-king or, elementary forms of the politics of life. Indonesia and the Malay World, 36(105), 177–199.Google Scholar
Saunders, N. J. (1994). Predators of culture: Jaguar symbolism and Mesoamerican elites. World Archaeology, 26, 104–117.Google Scholar
Scher, S. (2012). Markers of masculinity: Phallic representation in Moche art. Boletín Instituto Frances de Estudios Andinos, 41(2), 169–196.Google Scholar
Shady, R., & Leyva, C. (eds.). (2003). La Ciudad Sagrada de Caral-Supe. Lima: Instituto Nacional de Cultura.Google Scholar
Stross, B. (2008). K’u: The divine monkey. Journal of Mesoamerican Languages and Linguistics, 1, 1–34.Google Scholar
Swenson, E. (2007). Adaptive strategies or ideological innovations? Interpreting sociopolitical developments in the Jequetepeque Valley of Peru during the Late Moche Period. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 26, 253–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swenson, E. (2008). San Ildefonso and the “Popularization” of Moche Ideology in the Jequetepeque Valley. In Castillo Butters, L. J., Bernier, H., Lockard, G., & Yong, J. R., eds., Arqueologia mochica: Nuevos Enfoques. Lima: Fondo Editorial Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 411–431.Google Scholar
Swenson, E. (2018). Sacrificial landscapes and the anatomy of Moche biopolitics: (AD200–800). In Jennings, J., & Swenson, E., eds., Powerful Places in the Ancient Andes. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 247–286.Google Scholar
Swenson, E., & Seoane, F. (2019). Proyecto de Investigación Arqueológica Jatanca-Huaca Colorada-Tecapa Valle de Jequetepeque-Temporada 2018. Lima: Ministry of Culture.Google Scholar
Topic, J. R., & Lange Topic, T. (1983). Coast-highland relations in Northern Peru: Some observations on routes, networks, and scales of interaction. In Leventhal, R. & Kolata, A., eds., Civilization in the Ancient Americas. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico, 237–259.Google Scholar
Toyne, J. M. (2015). The body sacrificed. Journal of Religion and Violence, 3(1), 137–172.Google Scholar
Trever, L. S. (2019). A Moche riddle in clay: Object knowledge and art work in ancient Peru. The Art Bulletin, 101(4), 18–38.Google Scholar
Uceda, S. (2001). Investigations at Huaca de la Luna, Moche Valley: An example of Moche religious architecture. In Pillsbury, J., ed., Moche Art and Archaeology in Ancient Peru. Washington, DC: Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, and National Gallery of Art, 47–67.Google Scholar
Uceda, S. (2010). Theocracy and secularism: Relationships between the temple and urban nucleus and political change at the Huacas de Moche. In Quilter, J., & Castillo, L. J., eds., New Perspectives on Moche Political Organization. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, 132–158.Google Scholar
Uceda, S., Morales, R., & Mujica, E. (2016). Huaca de la Luna. Templos y dioses Moche. Lima: Fundación Backus & World Monument Fund.Google Scholar
Urbani, B. (2005). The targeted monkey: A re-evaluation of predation on New World primates. Journal of Anthropological Sciences, 83, 89–109.Google Scholar
Van Buren, M. (1996). Rethinking the vertical archipelago: Ethnicity, exchange, and history in the south-central Andes. American Anthropologist, 98(2), 338–351.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, E. B. (1998). Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 4(3), 469–488.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, E. B. (2004). Exchanging perspectives: The transformation of objects into subjects in Amerindian ontologies. Common Knowledge, 10(3), 463–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wassén, S. H. (1987). “Ulluchu” in Moche iconography and blood ceremonies: The search for identification. Årstryck, 1985 /1986, 59–85.Google Scholar
Wołoszyn, J. Z., & Piwowar, K. (2015). Sodomites, Siamese twins, and scholars: Same-sex relationships in Moche art. American Anthropologist, 117(2), 285–301.Google Scholar
Zedeño, M. N. (2009). Animating by association: Index objects and relational taxonomies. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 19(3), 407–417.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×