Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of abbreviations
- List of contributors
- 1 A world of indicators: The making of governmental knowledge through quantification
- 2 The flight of the indicator
- 3 Narrating numbers
- 4 By their own account: (Quantitative) Accountability, Numerical Reflexivity and the National Prosecuting Authority in South Africa
- 5 Failure by the numbers? Settlement statistics as indicators of state performance in South African land restitution
- 6 Doing the transparent state: Open government data as performance indicators
- 7 Charting the road to eradication: Health facility data and malaria indicator generation in rural Tanzania
- 8 ‘Nobody is going to die’: An ethnography of hope, indicators and improvizations in HIV treatment programmes in Uganda
- 9 Financial indicators and the global financial crash
- 10 New global visions of microfinance: The construction of markets from indicators
- 11 Spirits of neoliberalism: ‘Competitiveness’ and ‘wellbeing’ indicators as rival orders of worth
- 12 Climate change vulnerability indicators: from noise to signal
- 13 Retroaction: how indicators feed back onto quantified actors
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- References
8 - ‘Nobody is going to die’: An ethnography of hope, indicators and improvizations in HIV treatment programmes in Uganda
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2015
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of abbreviations
- List of contributors
- 1 A world of indicators: The making of governmental knowledge through quantification
- 2 The flight of the indicator
- 3 Narrating numbers
- 4 By their own account: (Quantitative) Accountability, Numerical Reflexivity and the National Prosecuting Authority in South Africa
- 5 Failure by the numbers? Settlement statistics as indicators of state performance in South African land restitution
- 6 Doing the transparent state: Open government data as performance indicators
- 7 Charting the road to eradication: Health facility data and malaria indicator generation in rural Tanzania
- 8 ‘Nobody is going to die’: An ethnography of hope, indicators and improvizations in HIV treatment programmes in Uganda
- 9 Financial indicators and the global financial crash
- 10 New global visions of microfinance: The construction of markets from indicators
- 11 Spirits of neoliberalism: ‘Competitiveness’ and ‘wellbeing’ indicators as rival orders of worth
- 12 Climate change vulnerability indicators: from noise to signal
- 13 Retroaction: how indicators feed back onto quantified actors
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- References
Summary
‘One world, one hope’ Theme of the 11th International AIDS Conference in Vancouver in 1996
Introduction
Uncertainty in HIV treatment
‘AIDS is not over’, warn Michel Sidibé, Peter Piot and Mark Dybul, representatives of the principal organizations of global health, in a commentary published in the Lancet (Sidibé, Piot and Dybul 2012). A lot is contained in their short claim. The authors explain that 8 million people world-wide were receiving antiretroviral medicines by 2011. AIDS-related deaths have been decreasing as a result of the large-scale provision of antiretroviral therapy. Most of these global health achievements were made in sub-Saharan African countries, which bear the brunt of the global burden of disease. Despite this ‘good news’, one of the reasons why these authors refrain from an optimistic view of the future of the AIDS epidemic is that today, still too many HIV positive people lack access to these medicines.
Currently, the most important global framework to articulate such claims to access to antiretroviral therapy is the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) project, which defines a set of targets and indicators to measure progress toward the most important development goals of the twenty-first century. Under this project, ‘universal access to treatment’ is defined as one of the targets to ‘combat HIV/AIDS, Malaria and other diseases’. The official list of indicators promoted by UN organizations posits that universal access to treatment is reached when at least 80 percent of the ‘population with advanced HIV infection [have] access to antiretroviral drugs’. The attribute ‘universal’ refers not to all people with HIV, but only to those who, according to official treatment guidelines, are in an advanced stage of HIV infection and thus need treatment. Even with this definition, 8 million is only half of the target to reach 15 million people with access to antiretroviral therapies by 2015 (see also United Nations 2014: 36). Yet, the global prevalence of HIV is actually much higher, currently estimated to be 34 million, as the authors remind us in their review of these indicators (Sidibé, Piot and Dybul 2012: 2058). However, current funding levels of donor aid are not sufficient to cover the 15 million. Health economic models projecting the long-term costs of antiretroviral therapy demand an annual US$22 billion to run treatment programs world-wide, of which US$12 billion alone would be earmarked for the purchasing of antiretrovirals (e.g. Schwartländer et al. 2011; UNAIDS 2012).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The World of IndicatorsThe Making of Governmental Knowledge through Quantification, pp. 188 - 219Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
- 5
- Cited by