Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T20:49:46.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Greener by Design — the technology challenge

Part of: Sustainable Aerospace

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

J. E. Green
J. E. Green*
Affiliation:
Aircraft Research Association, Chairman of the Technology Sub Group
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The effects of aviation on the environment are becoming increasingly important. The world's airlines already have thousands of aircraft serving the passenger and freight markets and the market demand is still increasing. Unless steps are taken to address the problems created by aircraft noise and emissions, the future progress of the air transport industry will be inhibited.

The seriousness of the topic and the factual nature of the Technology Sub Group report are the reasons why this special issue of The Aeronautical Journal is being devoted to “Greener by Design”. Although the report has been carefully read by a number of people outside the Sub Group, it has not been refereed in the normal way (though a number of minor numerical changes have been made to the tables and text of the original report, partly to correct errors and partly for internal consistency). The reports from the other two Sub Groups, covering operations and market-based options, together with the Summary for Policymakers of the Technology Sub Group, will be issued shortly in a single volume but will not necessarily be published in The Aeronautical Journal.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 106 , Issue 1056 , February 2002 , pp. 57 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2002 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Aviation and the Global Atmosphere, Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
2. Arthur, D. Little, Study into the Potential Impact of Changes in Technology on the Development of Air Transport in the UK, DETR/71861/01rep.doc, 2000.Google Scholar
3. Birch, N.T. 2020 Vision: The Prospects for Large Civil Aircraft Propulsion, Aeronaut J, August 2000, 104, (1038), pp 347–352.Google Scholar
4. ICCAIA, ICAO/CAEP/WG3, Summary of Aircraft and Engine Short-to-Medium Term Technology Status for CAEP/5, June 2000.Google Scholar
5. Report of the Forecasting and Economic Analysis Support Group, vol 1: Economic Assessment of Noise Stringency Options, for CAEP/5, January 2001.Google Scholar
6. Shaw, R.J. NASA's Ultra-Efficient Engine Technology (UEET) Program/Aeropropulsion Technology Leadership for the 21st Century, Proceedings of ICAS 2000 Congress, paper 6.10.2, September 2000.Google Scholar
7. Powell, C.A. and Preisser, J.S. NASA Subsonic Jet Transport Noise Reduction Research, Aeronaut J, August 2000, 104, (1038), pp 353–358.Google Scholar
8. Fethney, P. and Jelley, A.H. Airframe Self-Noise Studies on the Lockheed L1011 Tristar Aircraft, RAE Tech Report 80056, May 1980.Google Scholar
9. SOURDINE, PL97-3043, Project funded by the European Commission under the Transport RTD Programme of the 4th Framework Programme, 31 May, 2000 Google Scholar
10. Holbeche, T.A. and Hazell, A.F. An Experimental Study of Wing Shielding of Noise of a Lockheed TriStar Aircraft, RAE Tech Report 82048, April 1982.Google Scholar
11. Influence of Engine Cycle on Emissions, Aeronet Working Paper Nr 2, Results of a workshop held at Munich on 14 September 1999.Google Scholar
12. Kuchemann, D. The Aerodynamic Design of Aircraft, Pergamon, 1978.Google Scholar
13. Torenbeek, E. Cruise Performance and Range Prediction Reconsidered, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 33, (5/6), pp 285–321, 1997.Google Scholar
14. Marec, J-P. Drag reduction: a major task for research, CEAS/DragNet European Drag Reduction Conference 2000, Potsdam, June 2000.Google Scholar
15. Fielding, J.P. Introduction to Aircraft Design, Cambridge University Press, May 1999.Google Scholar
16. Klug, H.G., Bakan, S. and Gayler, V. Cryoplane — quantitative comparison of contribution to anthropogenic greenhouse effect of liquid hydrogen aircraft versus conventional kerosene aircraft, European Geophysical Society, XXI General Assembly, The Hague, The Netherlands, May 1996.Google Scholar
17. Koff, B.L. Spanning the globe with jet propulsion, AIAA-2978, 1991.Google Scholar
18. Plohr, M., Dopelheuer, A. and Lecht, M. The gas turbine heat cycle and its influence on fuel efficiency and emissions, presented at NATO/RTO Air Vehicle Technology Symposium, Ottawa, October 1999.Google Scholar
19. Ruffles, P.C. Innovation in aero engines, December 1996, Aeronaut J, 100, (1000), pp 473–485.Google Scholar
20. Sauvinet, F. Longitudinal active stability: key issues for future large transport aircraft, Proceedings of ICAS 2000 Congress, paper 4.10.1, September 2000 Google Scholar
21. Qin, N., Zhu, Y and Ashill, P.R. CFD Study of Shock Control at Cranfield, Proceedings of ICAS 2000 Congress, paper 2.10.5, September 2000.Google Scholar
22. Jones, B.M. The Streamline Aeroplane, May 1929, Aeronaut J, 33, (357), pp 357–385.Google Scholar
23. Lachmann, G.V. (ed) Boundary Layer and Flow Control, Pergamon Press, 1961.Google Scholar
24. Wong, P.W.C. and Maina, M. Studies of methods and philosophies for designing hybrid laminar flow wings, Proceedings of ICAS 2000 Congress, paper 2.8.2, September 2000.Google Scholar
25. Wilson, R.A.L. and Jones, R.I. Project design studies on aircraft employing natural and assisted laminar flow technologies, SAE Technical Paper 952038, September 1995.Google Scholar
26. Boeing Commercial Airplane Company, Natural laminar flow airfoil analysis and trade studies, NASA Contractor Report 159029, May 1979.Google Scholar
27. Wilson, R.A.L. and Jones, R.I. Operational and certification considerations for subsonic transport aircraft with hybrid laminar flow control, presented at 2nd European Laminar Flow Forum, Bordeaux, 10-12 June 1996.Google Scholar
28. Sawyers, D.M. and Wilson, R.A.L. Assessment of the impact of hybrid laminar flow on a large subsonic aircraft, presented at 2nd European Laminar Flow Forum, Bordeaux, 10-12 June 1996.Google Scholar
29. Peel, C.J. Advances in materials for aerospace, December 1996, Aeronaut J, 100, (1000), pp 487–503.Google Scholar
30. Davies, G.A.O. Aircraft structures, December 1996 Aeronaut J, 100, (1000), pp 523–529.Google Scholar
31. Quist, W.E., Narayanan, G.H. and Wingert, A.L. Aluminium-lithium alloys for aircraft structures — an overview, 2nd Int Conference on Al-Li Alloys, Monterey 1983, Met Soc AIME, 1983.Google Scholar
32. Kumar, A. and Hefner, J.N. Future challenges and opportunities in aerodynamics, August 2000, Aeronaut J, 104, (1038), pp 365–373,Google Scholar
33. Smith, H. College of aeronautics blended wing body development programme, Proceedings of ICAS 2000 Congress, paper 1.1.4, September 2000.Google Scholar
34. Denisov, V.E., Bolsunovsky, A.L., Buzoverya, N.P. and Gurevich, B.I. Recent investigations of the very large passenger blended wing-body aircraft, Proceedings of ICAS 98 Congress, paper 4.10.2, September 1998.Google Scholar
35. Denning, R.M., Allen, J.E. and Armstrong, F.W. Future large aircraft design — the delta with suction, May 1991, Aeronaut J, 101, (1005), pp 187–198.Google Scholar
36. Allen, J.E. Global energy issues affecting aeronautics: a reasoned conjecture, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 1999, 35, (5), pp 413–453.Google Scholar
37. mrett (Midlands Renewable Energy Technology Transfer), Sustainable Aviation Fuel for the Environment (SAFE), study proposal to DTI, December 2000.Google Scholar
38. Whurr, J.A “Compound rotary core turbofan” for the propulsion of subsonic transport aircraft, International Symposium on Novel Aero-propulsion Systems, Institution of Mechanical Engineers, London, 4 September 2000.Google Scholar
39. Dunworth, J.V. Nuclear mobile propulsion with particular reference to aircraft, Proceedings of the Sixth Anglo American Conference, The Royal Aeronautical Society, September 1957.Google Scholar
40. Howard, R.W. Planning for super safety: the fail-safe dimension, November 2000, Aeronaut J, 104, (1041), pp 517–555.Google Scholar
41. Sehra, A.K. Commitment to aviation emissions compatibility, presented at ICAS 2000, September 2000.Google Scholar
42. Boeing Commercial Airplane Company, Press Release, Seattle, 29 March 2001.Google Scholar
43. Lee, D.S. and Sausen, R. New Directions: Assessing the Real Impact of CO2 Emissions Trading by the Aviation Industry, New Directions/Atmospheric Environment 00 (2000) 000-000, Pergamon.Google Scholar