Article contents
Family Memory and Private Archives in the Soviet Twentieth Century*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
Abstract
This article examines two sets of private family archives and the diaries they contain. The authors included items from their own archives throughout their texts. What was their goal in inserting photographs, fragments of letters, official documents, and private papers into these texts? Can this practice shed light on the mechanisms of construction and preservation of family identity as well as on communication within families in the Soviet Union, a perspective that has otherwise remained inaccessible using other sources?
- Type
- Cultural Transformations
- Information
- Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales - English Edition , Volume 68 , Issue 2 , June 2013 , pp. 327 - 355
- Copyright
- Copyright © Les Éditions de l’EHESS 2013
Footnotes
This article is accompanied by photographs available under the heading “Complementary Reading” on the Annales website: http://annales.ehess.fr.
References
1. Pukhal’skaia, Agniia Stefanovna, “Zhizn’ sem’i Abrama Khazanova i Basi Pukhal’skoi” (unpublished manuscript, Moscow, 2006 Google Scholar).
2. On anti-Semitism in the Soviet Union during this period, see Messmer, Matthias, Sowjetischer und postkommunistischer Antisemitismus: Entwicklungen in Russland, der Ukraine und Litauen (Constance: Hartung-Gorre, 1997)Google Scholar; Haumann, Heiko, Geschichte der Ostjuden (Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, 1999 Google Scholar); Y. Gitelman, Zvi, A Century of Ambivalence: The Jews of Russia and the Soviet Union, 1881 to the Present (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2001 Google Scholar); and Slezkine, Yuri, The Jewish Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar).
3. Narsky, Igor, Fotokartochka na pamiat’: Semeinye istorii, fotograficheskie poslaniia i sovetskoe detstvo (Avtobio-istorio-graficheskii roman) (Chelyabinsk: Entsiklopedia, 2008 Google Scholar).
4. Schulze, Winfried, ed., Ego-Dokumente: Annäherung an den Menschen in der Geschichte (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1996), 28. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Personal testimonies play an important role in the study of Soviet daily life, the private sphere, and subjectivity. See: Fitzpatrick, Sheila, Everyday Stalinism: Ordinary Life in Extraordinary Times: Soviet Russia in the 1930s (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999 Google Scholar); Merridale, Catherine, Night of Stone: Death and Memory in Russia (London: Granta, 2000 Google Scholar); and Kozlova, Natalia, Sovetskie liudi: Stseny iz istorii (Moscow: Evropa, 2005)Google Scholar.
6. Hellbeck, Jochen, ed., Tagebuch aus Moskau, 1931-1939 (Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, 1996)Google Scholar.
7. See, for example, Carmen Scheide, Vom Bubikopf zur Dauerwelle, Selbst- und Fremdbilder sowjetischer Nachthexen (2007), http://isem.susu.ac.ru/archen/fliegerinnen_de/ .
8. See Fitzpatrick, , Everyday Stalinism; Fitzpatrick, Tear Off the Masks! Identity and Imposture in Twentieth-Century Russia (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005)Google Scholar. This work has been very popular among Russian scholars working on daily life and identity building. See: Osokina, Elena A., Za fasadom stalinskogo izobiliia: Raspredelenie i rynok v snabzhenii naseleniia v gody industrializatsii, 1928-1941 (Moscow: ROSSPÈN, 1998 Google Scholar); Lebina, Natalia B., Povsednevnaia zhizn’ sovetskogo goroda: Normy i anomalii, 1920-1930 gody (Saint Petersburg: Kikimora/Neva/Letnii sad, 1999 Google Scholar); Kharkhordin, Oleg, Oblichat’ i litsemerit’: Genealogiia rossiiskoi lichnosti (Saint Petersburg: Letnii sad, 2002)Google Scholar; and Narsky, Igor, Zhizn’ v katastrofe: Budni naseleniia Urala v 1917-1922 gg (Moscow: ROSSPÈN, 2001 Google Scholar).
9. Hellbeck, , Tagebuch; Igal Halfin, Intimate Enemies: Demonizing the Bolshevik Opposition, 1918-1928 (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2007 Google Scholar); Véronique Garros et al., eds., Intimacy and Terror: Soviet Diaries of the 1930s (New York: The New Press, 1995); Brigitte Studer and Berthold Unfried, Der stalinistische Parteikader: Identitätsstiftende Praktiken und Diskurse in der Sowjetunion der Dreissiger Jahre (Cologne: Böhlau, 2001); and Irina Paperno, Stories of the Soviet Experience: Memoirs, Diaries, Dreams (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2009).
10. Griesse, Malte, Communiquer, juger et agir sous Staline. La personne prise entre ses liens avec les proches et son rapport au système politico-idéologique (Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2011)Google Scholar.
11. Schütz, Alfred and Luckmann, Thomas, Strukturen der Lebenswelt (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1975; repr. 1994)Google Scholar; Berger, Peter L. and Luckmann, Thomas, Die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit: Eine Theorie der Wissenssoziologie (Frankfurt: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, 1999)Google Scholar.
12. For example, see: Merridale, , Night of Stone; Stefan Guschker, Bilderwelt und Lebenswirklichkeit: eine soziologische Studie über die Rolle privater Fotos für die Sinnhaftigkeit des eigenen Lebens (Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2002), 279–80 Google Scholar.
13. On the role of objects in identity building, see: Lowenthal, David, The Past is a Foreign Country (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985 Google Scholar); Godelier, Maurice, The Enigma of the Gift, trans. Nora Scott (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999)Google Scholar.
14. Flusser, Vilém, Kommunikologie (Frankfurt: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, 1996; repr. 1998), 76–77 Google Scholar.
15. Khar’kova, Vera Afanasievna, “Vospominaniia rossiianki, rodivsheisia v 1922 godu” (unpublished manuscript, Saint Petersburg, 2001)Google Scholar.
16. The purge of the Russian Communist Party, which took place from September to December 1921, was provoked by the fear that the party had been contaminated by “socially alien” elements. It resulted in a steep decline in party membership, which dropped from 732,000 to 410,000 members.
17. Conze, Susanne, “Weder Emanzipation noch Tradition: Stalinistische Frauenpolitik in den vierziger Jahren,” in Stalinismus: Neue Forschungen und Konzepte, ed. Stefan Plaggenborg (Berlin: A. Spitz, 1998), 293–320 Google Scholar.
18. The wave of genealogies of noble families that were published at the time attests to the genealogy boom that occurred in Russian in the 1990s. See, for example, Izvestiia Russkogo genealogicheskogo obshchestva 1 (1994): 45-91, and 6 (1994): 87-108.
19. On evacuation difficulties in the eastern regions, see Manley, Rebecca, To the Tashkent Station: Evacuation and Survival in the Soviet Union at War (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2009)Google Scholar.
20. Pukhal’skaia, “Zhizn’ sem’i,” 445.
21. Ibid., 182.
22. Interview with Vera Afanasievna Khar’kova, May 7, 2009.
23. The NKVD camp at Butovo was a site of mass repression. Between August 1937 and August 1938, more than 20,000 people were shot. See: Bakirov, Ernest A. and Shantsev, Valerii P., eds., Butovskii poligon 1937-1938 gg: Kniga pamiati zhertv politicheskikh repressii (Moscow: Institut eksperimental’noi sotsiologii, 1997-2004), 1-8 Google Scholar; Sclögel, Karl, Terror und Traum: Moskau 1937 (Munich: Carl Hanser, 2008)Google Scholar.
24. For more details on intergenerational conflicts related to the refusal of the elderly to let go of their old things, see Eliutina, Marina E., “Pozhilye liudi i starye veshchi v povsednevnoi zhizni,” Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia 7 (2009): 101–9 Google Scholar.
25. Guschker, Bilderwelt und Lebenswirklichkeit, 279-80.
26. Hellbeck, , Tagebuch; Aleksandra Arkhipova, “Karl Marks i sovetskaia chkolnitsa,” in SSSR: Territoriia liubvi, eds. Borisova et al. (Moscow: Novoe izdatel’stvo, 2008), 188–207 Google Scholar.
27. Khar’kova, Vera Afanasievna, “Biografiia moego muzha Georgiia Georgievicha Pavlova” (unpublished manuscript, Saint Petersburg, 2000)Google Scholar.
28. Pukhal’skaia, “Zhizn’ sem’i,” 369.
29. Khar’kova, “Vospominaniia rossiianki,” 239-40.
30. Ibid., 92.
31. Markowitsch, Hans J. and Welzer, Harald, Das autobiographische Gedächtnis: Hirnorganische Grundlagen und biosoziale Entwicklung (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 2005), 11 Google Scholar.
32. Halbwachs, Maurice, Les cadres sociaux de la mémoire (Paris: PUF, 1935 ; repr. 1952)Google Scholar; Halbwachs, , La mémoire collective (Paris: PUF, 1950 Google Scholar).
33. For example, see: Merridale, , Night of Stone; Langenohl, Andreas, Erinnerung und Modernisierung: Die öffentliche Rekonstruktion politischer Kollektivität am Beispiel des neuen Russlands (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2000)Google Scholar; Narsky, Igor et al., eds., Vek pamiati, pamiat’ veka: Opyt obrashcheniia s proshlym v 20 stoletii (Chelyabinsk: Kamennyi poias, 2004 Google Scholar); and Rolf, Malte, Das sowjetische Massenfest (Hamburg: Hamburger Edition, 2006)Google Scholar.
34. For further information, see: Burke, Peter, “History as Social Memory,” in Memory: History, Culture, and the Mind, ed. Thomas Butler (New York: Blackwell, 1989), 97–113 Google Scholar; Rüsen, Jörn, “Geschichtskultur als Forschungsproblem,” in Historische Orientierung, ed. Jörn Rüsen (Cologne: Böhlau, 1992), 235–45 Google Scholar; Khmelevskaia, Iuliia, “Vvedenie: O memorizatsii istorii i istorizatsii pamiati,” in Narsky et al., Vek pamiati, 7-20 Google Scholar; Hutton, Patrick H., History as an Art of Memory (Hanover/London: University of Vermont/ University Press of New England, 1993 Google Scholar).
35. Guschker, Bilderwelt und Lebenswirklichkeit, 268.
36. Bourdieu, Pierre, Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998), 67 Google Scholar. This passage was translated by Richard Nice.
37. Pukhal’skaia, “Zhizn’ sem’i,” 171.
38. Guschker, Bilderwelt und Lebenswirklichkeit.
39. For example, see: Semenova, Viktoriia and Foteeva, Ekaterina, eds., Sud’by liudei. Rossiia, XX vek. Biografii semei kak ob’’ekt sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniia (Moscow: IS RAN, 1996)Google Scholar.
40. Lowenthal, , The Past, 206 Google Scholar.
41. Godelier, , The Engima of the Gift, 108 Google Scholar.
42. Pomian, Krzysztof, Der Ursprung des Museums: Vom Sammeln (Berlin: K. Wagenbach, 1988; repr. 1993), 50.Google Scholar
43. Suzanne Blazejewski, Bild und Text—Photographie in autobiographischer Literatur: Marguerite Duras’ L’Amant, und Michael Ondaatjes Running in the Family (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2002), 103.Google Scholar
44. For more details on the illusory nature of biographies, see: Bourdieu, “The Biographical Illusion,” trans. Winkin, Yves and Leeds-Hurwitz, Wendy, in Identity: A Reader, eds. Gay, Paul du, Evans, Jessica, and Redman, Peter (London: SAGE Publications, 2001), 297–303 Google Scholar; Blazejewski, , Bild und Text Google Scholar; and Guschker, Bilderwelt und Lebenswirklichkeit.
45. For more details on the role of photographs in family communication, see: Guschker, , Bilderwelt und Lebenswirklichkeit Google Scholar; Hirsch, Marianne, Family Frames: Photography, Narrative, and Postmemory (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
46. For more details on the specificities of “photographic texts,” see Blazejewski, Bild und Text, 58.
47. Barthes, Roland, “L’effet de réel,” Communications 11 (1968): 84–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48. Goff, Jacques Le, Saint Louis Google Scholar, trans. Gollrad, Gareth Evan (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2009 Google Scholar), xxiii.
49. On the characteristics of “naïve” texts, see: Kozlova, Nataliia and Sandomirskaia, Irina, “Ia tak khochu nazvat’ kino.” Naivnoe pis’mo: opyt lingvosotsiologicheskogo chteniia (Moscow: Gnosis, 1996 Google Scholar); Kozlova, Sovetskie liudi.
50. On the Bestuzhev women’s college in Saint Petersburg and on women’s colleges in late imperial Russia in general, see: Ivanov, Anatolii E., Vysshaia shkola v Rossii v kontse 19- nachale 20 v. (Moscow: Akademiia nauk SSSR, 1991 Google Scholar); Nadezhda I. Kozlova, Iz istorii zhenskogo obrazovaniia v Sankt-Peterburge (Saint Petersburg: Petropolis, 1996).
51. Arkhipova, “Karl Marks,” 188-89.
52. A character in Leo Tolstoy’s play The Living Corpse, which was first published posthumously in 1913.
53. Bulgakova, Agniia Ivanovna, “Priezd v Kaliazin. Priezd v Tver” (unpublished manuscript, Tashkent, 1954 Google Scholar), notebook no. 10.
54. On the scope of the repressions directed at Soviets of Polish origin in 1936-1938, see Rotfeld, Adam D. and Torkunov, Anatolii V., eds., Belye piatna-chernye piatna: Slozhnye voprosy v rossiisko-pol’skikh otnosheniiakh (Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2010), 122–25.Google Scholar
55. However, a trip to Yerevan by one of Pukhal’skii’s Polish relatives in the summer of 1968, when Soviet tanks were invading Prague, was vigorously discussed by him and Bulgakova (or Geta, her family nickname): “Matei kept repeating emotionally: ‘It’s an occupation, an occupation.’ Like a Soviet who trusts official reports, Geta replied: ‘It’s international assistance.’ Their conversations often ended in arguments. Naturally, Matei was right.” Pukhal’skaia, “Zhizn’ sem’i,” 140. That she agreed with Matei in text written in the 2000s does not mean that Pukhal’skaia held the same opinion in 1968.
56. Khar’kova, , “Vospominaniia rossiianki,” 239.Google Scholar
57. Ibid.
58. Ibid.
59. On the prohibition of Christmas trees in the context of Soviet antireligious campaigns, see Sal’nikova, Alla, Istoriia elochnoi igrushki (Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2011).Google Scholar
60. Khar’kova, , “Vospominaniia rossiianki,” 117.Google Scholar
61. On Soviet childhood, see: Brine, Jenny et al., eds., Home, School, and Leisure in the Soviet Union, (Boston: Allen & Unwin, 1980 Google Scholar); Valerii V. Bogdanov, Istoriia shkolnykh veshchei (Saint Petersburg: Karo, 2003); Alla Sal’nikova, Rossiiskoe detstvo v 20 veke: Istoriia, teoriia i praktika issledovaniia (Kazan: Kazanskii universitet, 2007); Maria V. Osorina, Sekretnyi mir detei v prostranstve mira vzroslykh (Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2011); and Catriona Kelly, Children’s World: Growing Up in Russia, 1890-1991 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007).
62. Khar’kova, “Vospominaniia rossiianki,” 385.
63. On the formation of Soviet pedagogical norms in the 1930, see: Beyrau, Dietrich, Intelligenz und Dissens: Die russischen Bildungsschichten in der Sowjetunion 1917 bis 1985 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1993), 73–155 Google Scholar; Kelly, Children’s World. In the chapter of her memoirs devoted to the years 1947-1951, Pukhal’skaia provides the following details: “We lived all those years in Tashkent with little information, as news about the country and the world came only from the local radio station and one Russian newspaper, Pravda of the East (Pravda Vostoka). Only in early 1948, when Abram received a Vostok radio set for the hard work he had done in 1947, were we able to listen to the Moscow news (which in fact was scarce and carefully controlled). By changing the set’s frequency, we could get music and concerts from as far away as Brazzaville in the French Congo, which in itself was a miracle. Since then, we have given greater attention to geography in the children’s education. We hung large geographical maps of every part of the world on the walls.” Pukhal’skaia, “Zhizn’ sem’i,” 73.
64. Ibid., 47.
65. Ibid., 144.
66. Basiny detki, 5, 1951-1952, in Pukhal’skaia, “Zhizn’ sem’i.”
67. Khar’kova, “Vospominaniia rossiianki,” 159-60.
68. On the role of “terrifying stories” in overcoming childhood fears, see Osorina, Sekretnyi mir detei, 77-89.
69. Ibid.
70. On the creation of images during the Civil War, see: Narsky, Zhizn’ v katastrofe; Narsky, , “Bürgerkrieg—zur Konstruktion eines Gründungsmythos im frühen Sowjetrussland (Ural 1917-1922),” in Der Krieg in den Gründungsmythen europäischer Nationen und der USA, eds. Buschmann, Nikolaus and Langewiesche, Dieter (Frankfurt and New York: Campus, 2003), 320–30.Google Scholar
71. On the narrow chronological framework of family memory in contemporary Russia, see: Langenohl, , Erinnerung und Modernisierung;Google Scholar Narsky et al., Vek pamiati; and Narsky, Fotokartochka na pamiat’.
72. Khar’kova, “Vospominaniia rossiianki,” 363-64.
73. On the difficulties of identifying the “Soviet” character of Soviet culture, including the culture of manipulating the past, see: Langenohl, Erinnerung und Modernisierung; Narsky, Fotokartochka na pamiat’, 369-77.
74. Khmelevskaia, “Vvedenie,” 8.
75. See Narsky, Fotokartochka na pamiat’.
76. For more details on the conflicts and tensions between generations, see: Bude, Heinz, “Die biographische Relevanz der Generation,” in Generationen in Familie und Gesellschaft, eds. Kohli, Martin and Szidlik, Marc (Opladen: Leske/Budrich, 2000), 19–35 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hirsch, Family Frames; Yurii A. Levada, “Pokoleniia 20 veka: Vozmozhnosti issledovaniia,” in Ottsy i deti. Pokolencheskii analiz sovremennoi Rossii, eds. Yurii A. Levada and Teodor Shanin (Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2005), 32-60.
77. I refer the reader to my previous work: Igor Narsky, “Refleksii o refleksiiakh, ili detskie istorii vzroslogo istorika,” in Detstvo v nauchnykh, obrazovatel’nykh i khudozhestvennykh tekstakh. Opyt prochteniia i interpretatsii, ed. Alla Sal’nikova (Kazan: izdatel’stvo Kazanskogo universiteta, 2010), 55-60; and Narsky, “‘Budushchee-v-proshlom’: Publichnoe prodvizhenie (sovetskikh) semeinykh ‘relikvii’ v optike kul’turno-pokolencheskikh razryvov,” in Puti Rossii. Budushchee kak kultura: prognozy, reprezentatsii, stsenarii, eds. Pugacheva, Marina G. and Vakhshtain, Victor S. (Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2011), 322–38.Google Scholar
78. For an impressive comparative analysis of Russian and German development over the twentieth century, see Eimermakher, Karl et al., eds., Rossiia i Germaniia v 20 veke (Moscow: AIRO-XXI, 2010 Google Scholar), 3 vols.
79. For example, see: Liudmila Shaporina, V., Dnevnik, 2nd ed. (Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2012 Google Scholar), 2 vols.; Konstantin N. Teplukhov, Memuary: 1899-1934 (Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2011).
80. On the daily lives of representatives of prerevolutionary elites in the Soviet Union, see: Vihavainen, Timo, ed., Normy i tsennosti povsednevnoi zhizni: stanovlenie sotsialisticheskogo obraza zhizni, 1920-1930 gody (Saint Petersburg: Neva, 2000 Google Scholar); Chuikina, Sofiia, Dvorianskaia pamiat’: “byvshie” v sovetskom gorode (Leningrad, 1920-e-1930-e gody) (Saint Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Evropeiskogo universiteta, 2006).Google Scholar
81. For example, see Shaporina, Dnevnik, 1:225. Her notes from 1938 are as follows: “Previously, objects were handed down from one generation to another, archives were preserved, and history was created. Now, the present negates the day before, today we shoot yesterday’s leaders, and the entire past is destroyed in the minds of the young. My papa taught me to honor all those little pieces of paper, those notes from the past.”
82. For example, see Maria Ferretti’s important thoughts on workers’ protests against Stalinism during the interwar years, which radically challenge conventional views about the extent of opposition in the USSR in the late twenties and early thirties: Ferretti, Maria, “Iaroslavskii rabochii Vasilii Ivanovich Liulin,” Rossiia XXI 5 (2011): 154–89.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by
Linked content
This is a translation of: Mémoire familiale et archives privées du XXe siècle soviétique