Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T02:21:30.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An even more universal model of reading: Various effects of orthography on dyslexias

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2012

Naama Friedmann  and
Aviah Gvion
Naama Friedmann
Affiliation:
Language and Brain Lab, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel. naamafr@post.tau.ac.ilhttp://www.tau.ac.il/~naamafr/ Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
Aviah Gvion
Affiliation:
Language and Brain Lab, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel. naamafr@post.tau.ac.ilhttp://www.tau.ac.il/~naamafr/ Department of Communications Sciences and Disorders, Ono Academic College, Kiryat Ono 55000, Israel. aviah.g@ono.ac.il Reuth Medical Center, Tel Aviv 67728, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The properties of a specific orthography dictate the way people read it. We bring considerations from dyslexia to suggest that the claim can be extended further. First, the effect of orthographic neighborhood density can be extended beyond letter-position encoding and beyond the orthographic lexicon. Second, Hebrew and Arabic differ with respect to letter forms, and hence, in letter-position encoding.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 5 , October 2012 , pp. 285 - 286
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Coltheart, M. (2006) Acquired dyslexias and the computational modelling of reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology 23:96–109.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T. & Besner, D. (1977) Access to the internal lexicon. In: Attention and performance VI, ed. Dornic, S., pp. 535–55. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R. & Ziegler, J. (2001) DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review 108:204–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, C. J. & Coltheart, M. (2002) Paying attention to reading errors in acquired dyslexia. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6: 359–61.Google Scholar
Ellis, A. W. & Young, A. W. (1988/1996) Human cognitive neuropsychology. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Friedmann, N., Biran, M. & Gvion, A. (2012) Patterns of visual dyslexia. Journal of Neuropsychology 6:1–30.Google Scholar
Friedmann, N. & Gvion, A. (2005) Letter form as a constraint for errors in neglect dyslexia and letter position dyslexia. Behavioural Neurology 16:145–58.Google Scholar
Friedmann, N. & Haddad-Hanna, M. (in press a) Letter position dyslexia in Arabic: From form to position. Behavioural Neurology 25. doi: 10.3233/BEN-2012-119004.Google Scholar
Friedmann, N. & Haddad-Hanna, M. (in press b) Types of developmental dyslexia in Arabic. In: Arabic literacy: Theoretical insights and practical challenges. Language and Literacy Series, ed. Saiegh-Haddad, E & Joshi, M.. Springer.Google Scholar
Friedmann, N. & Lukov, L. (2008) Developmental surface dyslexias. Cortex 44(9):1146–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, J. C. (1984) Toward a rational taxonomy of the acquired dyslexias. In: Dyslexia: A global issue, ed. Malatesha, R. N. & Whitaker, H. A., pp. 211–32. Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Vallar, G., Burani, C. & Arduino, L. S. (2010) Neglect dyslexia: A review of the neuropsychological literature. Experimental Brain Research 206: 219–35.Google Scholar