Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:27:06.395Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bringing development into a universal model of reading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2012

S. Hélène Deacon
S. Hélène Deacon*
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Dalhousie University, Life Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada. Helene.deacon@dal.cahttp://langlitlab.psychology.dal.ca/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Reading development is integral to a universal model of reading. Developmental research can tell us which factors drive reading acquisition and which are the product of reading. Like adult research, developmental research needs to be contextualised within the language and writing system and it needs to include key cross-linguistic evaluations. This will create a universal model of reading development.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 5 , October 2012 , pp. 284
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu-Rabia, S. (1997) Verbal and working memory skills of bilingual Hebrew–English speaking children. International Journal of Psycholinguistics 13:25–40.Google Scholar
Burt, J. S. (2006) What is orthographic processing skill and how does it relate to word identification in reading? Journal of Research in Reading 29(4):400–17.Google Scholar
Carlisle, J. (2000) Awareness of the structure and meaning or morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing 12:169–90.Google Scholar
Cunningham, A. E., Perry, K. & Stanovich, K. E. (2001) Converging evidence for the concept of orthographic processing. Reading and Writing 14:549–68.Google Scholar
Deacon, S. H. (in press) Sounds, letters, and meanings: The independent influences of phonological, morphological, and orthographic skills on early word reading accuracy. Journal of Research in Reading. (Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2011.01496.x).Google Scholar
Deacon, S. H., Benere, J. & Castles, A. (2012) Chicken or egg? Untangling the relationship between orthographic processing and reading. Cognition 122:110–17.Google Scholar
Deacon, S. H. & Kirby, J. (2004) Morphological awareness: Just more phonological? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics 25:223–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehri, L. (2005) Learning to read words: Theories, findings and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading 9:167–88.Google Scholar
Garcia, N. P., Abbott, R. D. & Berninger, V. W. (2010) Predicting poor, average, and superior spellers in grades 1 to 6 from phonological, orthographic, and morphological, spelling, or reading composites. Written Language and Literacy 13:61–98.Google Scholar
McBride-Chang, C., Cho, J.-Y., Liu, H., Wagner, R. K., Shu, H., Zhou, A., Cheuk, C. & Muse, A. (2005) Changing models across cultures: Associations of phonological awareness and morphological structure awareness with vocabulary and word recognition in second graders from Beijing, Hong Kong, Korea, and the United States. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 92:140–60.Google Scholar
Roman, A., Kirby, J., Parrila, R., Wade-Woolley, L. & Deacon, S. H. (2009) Towards a comprehensive view of the skills involved in word reading in Grades 4, 6, and 8. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 102:96–113.Google Scholar
Share, D. L. (1995) Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition 55(2):151–218.Google Scholar
Share, D. L. (1999) Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 72(2):95–129.Google Scholar
Share, D. L. (2008a) On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin 134(4):584–615.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. & West, R. F. (1989) Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly 21:360–407.Google Scholar
Tong, X. & McBride-Chang, C. (2010) Developmental models of learning to read Chinese words. Developmental Psychology 46:1662–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, R. K. & Barker, T. A. (1994) The development of orthographic processing ability. In: The varieties of orthographic knowledge: Theoretical and developmental issues, ed. Berninger, V. W., pp. 243–76. Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar